| Thread Number: 15271 Maytag and Fisher & Paykel |
Post# 257323-1/2/2008-19:46 ||| liberator1509 (Bristol) |
|
Do any of the US pollsters know the future of Maytag commercial washers - now that the Newton Maytag plant has been shut, will they continue in production? The Neptune and Atlanta machines once marketed here for the domestic market (and a very up-market market at that - they retailed at the equivalent of over $2000 a shot) appear to have been discontinued - though the UK website still shows them. I wonder if they will be replaced with products from the new Whirl-tag line, or will they market machines from the commerical line for domestic use? Otherwise our Maytag choice in the UK is re-branded Askos...which it has to be said are very nice - just have a preference for TLs.
|
Post# 257377-1/3/2008-05:22 ||| dj-gabriele (Bologna (ITALY)) |
|
I've seen the specification, I always wondered how American machines compared to European ones in terms of energy efficency and cleaning ability (measured with EU standars) and I was happy to see that front loading ones were just as good as the Old World's ones but I was shocked to see that top loading (American laundry line as they called it) got energy class F and cleaning class G... that's the worst possible! I can't believe my eyes!
|
Post# 257380-1/3/2008-06:09 ||| johnb300m (Orland Park, IL) |
|
EW DW
so what are Maytag's EU dishwashers like?
|
Post# 257381-1/3/2008-06:19 ||| foraloysius (Groningen, the Netherlands) |
|
The Maytag dishwashers sold in the UK are rebadged Asko's.
|
Post# 257387-1/3/2008-07:52 ||| liberator1509 (Bristol) |
|
energy labelling
The Atlanta was labelled at A for energy, G for efficiency, and C for spin drying, the Neptune B, A, B. While the G is the lowest possible, it is very important to remember that the EU labelling system isn't very straight-forward, and the distance between A and G is not particularly clear. US top-loaders get G efficiency ratings because they use so much water - A rated machines need to use about 10 ltires per kg or less. Both the Atlanta and Neptune machines spin at 1000rom, so I have no idea why they should have different spin ratings. I don't think the EU spin rating is particularly clear - it appears to relate to RPM rather than extraction, surely a precentage of water removed (expressed as that) would be much clearer, as drum size and cycle time influence the result as much as RPM?
|
Post# 257392-1/3/2008-08:40 ||| rapunzel (Cairns, Queensland - staying in Sydney for the next six months) |
|
A while ago I posted a link in another thread regarding cleaning and efficiency comparisons of top and front loaders. The thread was in this section, posted by vivalavatrice and titled 'more water.'
|
Post# 257401-1/3/2008-09:49 ||| PeterH770 (I'm naked under all my clothes) |
|
The Neptune and the orbital transmission toploader are discontinued with the closing of the Newton plant last October. I haven't heard if WP will put the Maytag name and a coin slide on their DD toploaders. I have basically been ignoring them in this market.
|
Post# 257402-1/3/2008-09:56 ||| dj-gabriele (Bologna (ITALY)) |
|
to David:
|
Post# 257498-1/3/2008-18:58 ||| rapunzel (Cairns, Queensland - staying in Sydney for the next six months) |
|
The thread was in this section, posted by vivalavatrice and titled 'more water.'
It can be found right here in the 'Deluxe' forum. All you have to do is scroll down.
|
Post# 257506-1/3/2008-19:09 ||| rapunzel (Cairns, Queensland - staying in Sydney for the next six months) |
|
There you go dj-gabriele
I am a generous and loving soul. Now all you have to do is click on the thread.
|
Post# 257594-1/4/2008-05:33 ||| dj-gabriele (Bologna (ITALY)) |
|
How lovely :) Thank you :D |