Thread Number: 11873
Looked at washers today (long)
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 210910   5/19/2007 at 19:56 (6,158 days old) by washabear (Maryland)        

I had a Saturday morning with nothing to do, so I decided to go look at some washers. I went to four stores: Home Depot, Lowes, Sears, and Boscov’s. Interesting to say the least.

At Home Depot, the first stop, a man asked me if I needed help. I said I was just looking, but with each machine I examined, he flew up at me and started explaining details. I wanted to turn to him and say “Which part of ‘I’m just looking’ do you not understand?” But I did not. Eventually, I left, essentially being chased out by this overzealous salesperson. The same thing happened at Sears, but no matter.

What I saw: Each of the stores had several of the Whirlpool-made Maytag top loaders, but they were all labeled differently: the Sears models were labeled Dependable Care; the Home Depot models were labeled Legacy Series; and the Lowes models didn’t have a label at all. To me, they all looked the same, so what’s up with that? I liked them the first time I saw them, but this time, I’m not so sure. They seem sturdy but generic. The thing I like best about them is how easily the softener dispenser cup lifts out for cleaning—to my knowledge, much easier than any other current Whirlpool machine’s. Very slick. Boscov’s had other Maytags going for as low as $399. They felt very cheesy and had plastic tubs. I guess they were the last of the pre-Whirlpool models? Boscov’s also had lots of Frigidaire top loaders at very low prices. Nice looking machines but very jerky, ratchety knobs.

All the stores had the Whirlpool standard top loaders, but they seemed kind of blah to me. Lowes had the new Amanas, but their control panels were exactly the same as my 6-year-old Whirlpool’s. Nothing like going forward!

The GE top loaders were in attendance everywhere. I must admit that the upper range models looked and felt better than many of the others—but I’m probably just swayed by that easily defeatable magnetic switch!

Actually, among the traditional top loaders, I think I liked the Kenmores the best. They seemed very sturdy; the white porcelain tubs were very nice; and I was even able to pull up on the triple action agitator, just as described here. Cool! That said, the control knobs seemed somewhat flimsy—surely they can do better than that.

About stainless steel tubs: I thought that the Whirlpool Cabrio/Kenmore Oasis/Maytag Bravos had the nicest tubs. The seams were very smooth and almost undetectable. Of course, those washers are very expensive and seem to have a lot of complaints about performance and reliability, so I probably would not consider them for now.

As for front loaders, Boscov’s was the only store that had the Frigidaire 2940. That one seemed very nice, although I thought the door was kind of flimsy. Some of the other stores had lower model Frigidaires that had essentially the same feel. The Affinity machines looked good and were reasonably priced. Actually, the GE front loaders looked very nice, too, maybe nicer than the Frigidaires—but they are made in China. I just walked right past anything called Samsung. I found the Bosch and Whirlpool front loaders plug-ugly, not to mention inordinately expensive. There was a Maytag Epic that was priced lower than the Whirlpools: $999. It seemed OK but still too expensive for me. Most of the LG machines were very expensive, also, but I did see a plain white model that looked good. It was $799 at Home Depot, looked very nice, and had a lot of features for the price. I hear so many horror stories about LG, though, that I would be afraid to consider it.

So there you have it: one person’s washer shopping on a Saturday morning with nothing else to do. These are just my impressions from seeing the machines in the stores. Any insights into particular models are welcome.

Thanks.













Post# 210942 , Reply# 1   5/19/2007 at 21:46 (6,158 days old) by westyslantfront ()        

When I am asked what machine to buy, I suggest top load
Whirlpool/Kenmore/Whirltag. No need to spend extra for the water stingy front loaders. If people think they are saving in water bills, those machines use more electricity,cost more to purchase, and do not last long. It is false economy.


Ross


Post# 210943 , Reply# 2   5/19/2007 at 21:51 (6,158 days old) by neptunebob (Pittsburgh, PA)        
Guess what, So does Suze Orman!

neptunebob's profile picture
Just saw her show and the part about "Can I Afford It?" and she just told a single mother to spend half as much money on a top loader - after all, Suze even said she has one.

Still, I like at least having a front loader in the extended family, to keep me out of creepy coin laundries when dealing with bulky items.


Post# 211194 , Reply# 3   5/20/2007 at 17:15 (6,157 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago)        
GE TLs

johnb300m's profile picture
I actually HATE the GE top load machines. Go in and grab their agitators and swing them around. You'll feel how jerky and unrefined the tub movement is with lots of metallic scraping noises.
Awful, I wonder what's inside that's making those noises? Probably something that would fail.

I think the WP made Maytag stainless TL machines i think have horrible stainless tubs. Ugly snagging seams everywhere. Horrible. Their capacity also looks less than our 23 year old LA511. Maytag Corp. stainless tubs were MUCH better and luxurious.

My aunts have a first generation Neptune. It had a few initial warranty repairs, but so far so good. They like it.

I don't think I could ever bring myself to buy a new, modern washer. I don't think I could get any machine newer than 1995.


Post# 211203 , Reply# 4   5/20/2007 at 18:10 (6,157 days old) by jons1077 (Vancouver, Washington, USA)        
older is better

jons1077's profile picture
I have to agree with Johnb300m. As much as I like being able to wash my comforter and rugs in my front load He4t, I will never again buy one. When I move into my house in a year that basement will only have vintage models in it and I plan on keeping them in working order and using them for everyday use. Even the vintage compact Kenmore washer I just got washes so much better than any new machine I've seen or dealt with. When we remodel the kitchen I hope to find nice vintage appliances for that too. Things were just made better back then. Just my opinion though.

Jon


Post# 211214 , Reply# 5   5/20/2007 at 18:57 (6,157 days old) by exploder3211 ()        

I don't like newer either, but if i had the money id get either an Affinity, Fisher and Pykel or Cabrio with Agitator. But scince i am poor, i had to settle for something else for a while.

Post# 211238 , Reply# 6   5/20/2007 at 20:13 (6,157 days old) by westyslantfront ()        

I have a set of Norgetags with large capacity tubs and I am going to keep them as long as they work. I noticed too many seams on the Whirltag stainless steel tubs. As for Whirltags, I would stick with porcelain tub.


Ross



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy