Thread Number: 25424
BD Kenmore
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 391712   11/8/2009 at 20:31 (5,254 days old) by supersurgilator (Indiana)        

Look at this, I had no idea a BD could spin at these speeds LOL.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO supersurgilator's LINK on eBay





Post# 391713 , Reply# 1   11/8/2009 at 20:37 (5,254 days old) by pulsator (Saint Joseph, MI)        

pulsator's profile picture
Indeed I'm pretty sure that those speeds are accurate... for the motor! The wash tub doesn't spin that fast but the motor does! Those are very common motor speeds!

Post# 391714 , Reply# 2   11/8/2009 at 20:37 (5,254 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
FUNNY - that's actually a 1977 Kenmore 70 series. Looks very low mileage (the top isn't porcelain and hasn't yet rusted).

The rpm quote must have come from the tech facts sticker on the left and the seller confused motor speeds.


Post# 391790 , Reply# 3   11/9/2009 at 07:58 (5,253 days old) by rll70sman (Hastings, Minnesota)        

Wow! That machine looks like it just came off the showroom floor. I'd like to see a tub shot and find out what specific features are on it.

Post# 391793 , Reply# 4   11/9/2009 at 08:03 (5,253 days old) by gyrafoam (Wytheville, VA)        

Well, since it indicates the "power source" is gas, that might explain the speed-o-light spin.

Post# 391795 , Reply# 5   11/9/2009 at 08:06 (5,253 days old) by ingliscanada ()        

Only a Frigidaire Unimatic spins that fast.

Post# 391803 , Reply# 6   11/9/2009 at 08:41 (5,253 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
You have my full attention

mickeyd's profile picture
The BD portables get up to near 1000 rpms, 900 something, or maybe just 900 ;-> but pretty fast nonetheless. Always wondered why full-size models were never engineered to spin as fast as the portables. I know about the 110 volt matching portable dry issues, but still.....

The never-ending wonders and surprises of WP/KM.

We'll get an answer, unless we already have it with Stevie's gas.


Post# 391834 , Reply# 7   11/9/2009 at 11:41 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Mickeyd -

The belt drive full-size machines are anchored and otherwise fully supported by the cabinets. Unlike the later BD portables and all DD machines where the cabinet is purely cosmetic, the cabinet in a full-size machine provides all the support for the baseplate. This IS the platform for the entire operational machine with the exception of the timer.

Spin speeds on the BDs are often a subject of jokes here on AW.org, but they could not be raised dramatically and still keep the cabinets "stuck" on the floor. Too much spin speed in them, and centrifical force would send them across the floor diagonally like a loose rocket.

Case in point - one time back when I was in High School, our cat (probably deliberately, he loved to do that) lodged one of his toys of choice under our 1974 large cap. machine. The forlorn look on his face got my immediate attention and I set out to get the item for him. Instead of getting the yard-stick out which we usually did, I layed down on the floor, tilted the washer back on its back feet, figuring I'd just reach in a get the toy, no problem, right?

W R O N G !!!!! The machine was in final spin at the time, with a full load. Taking the cabinet off the front feet caused the weight of the machine obviously to settle on the back two. As soon as I lifted it, the washer IMMEDIATELY shifted to the left, about 45 or more degrees, in a violent and instantaneous rush that I was completely un-prepared for. The right front foot and cabinet corner smacked me in the head (explains a lot since then), and the machine swung around and pressed itself again the wall-mounted laundry sink and nearly ripped it from the wall before I got myself outta there. The sound of the machine's two back feet scuffing across the vinyl floor (like this deep thunka-thunka-thunka) I remember clearly, it echoed throughout the cabinet. The machine even moved the dryer on it's short trip. This was all during a perfectly balanced, quiet load. I didn't even notice the machine was spinning. So, needless to say, I understand why extraction speeds were never changed much.

I believe the standard tubs spin at about 525 rpm, and some or most large tubs at 505 or so. What they had going for them is basket diameter, which provides for good centrifical force vs. narrower tubs that spin a bit faster.

Gordon


Post# 391838 , Reply# 8   11/9/2009 at 11:53 (5,253 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
" smacked me in the head (explains a lot since then),&

mickeyd's profile picture
Oh Gordon, your brain is a well-known marvel, you brainiac.

What a great story. See if you can figure out the dating issue in Darren's post.

More later. Sorry, my sister Lynn just arrived.


Post# 391874 , Reply# 9   11/9/2009 at 13:56 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Rob -

I have an identical model to this machine. The ebay machine does look like new and has me perplexed - it either spent a lot of time in a western dry climate area or hasn't been used much. The reason I say this is because the 27741 model (which is a 1977 seventy-series) came with a painted top, BUT had a porcelain lid. There were MANY of these around here in the mid-90s and nearly all of them had nasty rust around the lid well area which eventually became visible above the lid. These models were very sought after in good used condition back at that time so whenever I'd find one (rust buckets we'd sometimes call them), I'd grab it and either re-paint the top (a pain) or swap a porcelain top from a donor when one was available.

The features of this machine were weird. Again, the model is 27741, whereas a better model was the 27701. Usually, machines get better with Kenmore as the stock/model number gets higher, so a '741 should be a more feature-filled model than the '701, but in this case it wasn't. I think the '741 was devised to be a price-point competitive model or was featured in some sort of promotion, etc. In addition to not having a porcelain top, I do not believe it has an off-balance buzzer (I'll have to check). It has only 3 water levels whereas most 70-series back then had four or more, and only three temps, where most had five. It has a Penta-Vane agitator with no dispensers.

The reason I know this for near certainty is I have an identical machine that was recently reactivated after 18 years of storage. I will gladly get you some interior shots, etc. if you care to see them. This machine pre-dates the "energy saver" notations that were included with the 1979 and 1980 models, this machine having a warm rinse with the hot wash option, whereas the later 79/80 models with three temps all had cold rinses.

Check out pic # 25 of the Aberdeen Farm. Behind the Turq. Lady K dryer is a Harvest Gold/Golden Wheat sibling of this washer, with a painted non-porcelain lid. You can see what looks like the beginnings of rust in the back corners on both sides of the lid well. Those dang painted panels used to really frustrate me because they were often the only reason the owner got rid of the machine.

Gordon


Post# 391965 , Reply# 10   11/9/2009 at 19:05 (5,253 days old) by rll70sman (Hastings, Minnesota)        

Gordon, go ahead and post some pics if you wish. I've always wondered what the Penta-Vane agitator looked like. Most people I knew who had belt-driven Kenmores either had the Roto-Swirl or the Dual-Action agitators. I always thought it unusual that some models had spray rinses and the unbalanced load switch and some didn't. And it seemed like many Kenmore and Whirlpool machines of that era rusted terribly around the base instead of the lid.

My grandma's 1981 24-inch Kenmore didn't have spray rinses or an unbalanced load switch, but its "woo-woo" sound was higher pitched. It did have a Dual-Action agitator and no bleach or fabric softener dispensers. The cycles were Cotton/Sturdy, Permanent Press, Knit/Delicate, and Prewash. The water levels were high, medium, and low and the water temperatures were hot/cold, warm/cold, and cold/cold. As a kid I remember that machine getting off balance a time or two and it ripping the linoleum in several places in grandma's laundry room. It was a basic machine but sure did a good job of washing clothes. Sadly, something went haywire with it several years ago where it filled, agitated, drained, and spun for the wash portion of the cycle but wouldn't agitate for the rinse portion. However, it drained and spun after the rinse as normal.


Post# 392005 , Reply# 11   11/9/2009 at 21:16 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Rob -

I'll get you some pics in a minute here.

24-inch machines for some reason did not have spray rinses, at least in the early 80s. I have not been exposed to many of these, but I remember having a 1982 24-inch plastic-top machine and I noticed it didn't spray and thought something was wrong with it. The timers are the same with the full-size machines, so they are obviously wired this way on purpose.

I think the higher pitch of the woo-woo was due to the size of the cabinet and sound wave geometry. Nothing mechanical is different with that era of machine vs. the 29-inch. I will say that most often, 24-inch and 29-inch standard cap models often seemed to have GE split phase motors, whereas the 29-inch large cap machines had Emerson capacitor start motors. The motors may have had a little bit of difference in sound. I have a 1973 standard machine with a GE motor and it sounds noticeably higher pitched than the Emerson powered machine right next to it in my garage.

As to the off-balance buzzer - I will look at the catalogs, but I didn't notice if any of the 24-inch units had the kick-out relay or not. Most 70-series and better 29-inch models did with only few exceptions.

Your Grandmother's machine was a pretty nice one actually. Most 24-inch models were lower end units, not all, but most. Having a DA in a 24-inch model was very rare, and if it had the black metal panel, a pre-wash and a 2-speed motor, it was a dandy machine. I remember only one 80-series 24-inch model from the '79 model year, otherwise a 70-series (which is what hers sounds like) was king of the roost most of the time in 24-inch models between 1976 and 1983 (other than 1979). Incidentally, the 1979 Kenmore model year had more models than any I can think of in the belt-drive era.

Pics to follow.

Gordon


Post# 392010 , Reply# 12   11/9/2009 at 21:25 (5,253 days old) by yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
Doesn't $100.00 seem a little high for this machines age and low features, otherwise in nice shape........

Post# 392020 , Reply# 13   11/9/2009 at 21:59 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Rob -

Here are some pics that you asked for, brand new....if they were on film, it wouldn't even be dry yet.

This machine is affectionately known around here as "Moppy". I have owned this washer since fall 1990, but it wasn't in running shape until the winter of 2009.

When I got it, the machine was 13 years old, being made in the 41st week of 1977. For such a short life, it had been rode hard and put up wet as they say. The top was rusted so badly it was peeling inches onto the top surfaces and completely under the lid. The lid was fine since it was porcelain coated. Inside, the basket was scraped nearly clean of porcelain, at least the lower half, and it WREAKED of stinky feet - I mean W R E A K E D. It was AWFUL.

My washer buddy/mentor, had just started our deal that I negotiated with Sears to haul-off their haul-aways, and I had told him that I wanted ANY black panel machine that he didn't want first. What that usually meant for me was the Avocado machines, the Coppertone ones, his costly to repair cast-offs, and the "earthy" ones like Moppy. Back then people were almost lined up for these. He laughed when he offered me this machine, asking me if I wanted to modify my request (I thought seriously about that).

This machine sat in my garage for several months until the next spring/summer and humid warm days caused me to rid myself of the stench and I put the washer in the warehouse at work. It had a broken belt, and with the top so bad and the basket so worn, I couldn't justify robbing parts from what was usually nicer parts donors, so I began to use this one as a donor. I used a few parts as needed but always made notes to keep an eye out while scavenging at used appliance stores.

When I started to dig into my storage trailer of machines, I decided to face this machine and see what it was all about. What I found was astonishing - it had been used for all or most of it's life to wash mop heads. Literally a football sized handful of mop strings were stuck under the agitator. There was so much build-up of lint around the side of the tub where the self-cleaning lint filter mounts that a hole had rusted on the SIDE of the tub (never saw that before!!!). AND, not only was the basket void of smooth porcelain, but the outer tub was too, and it looked literally like a pepperoni pizza.

I dug into this machine in the dead of winter last year, and the stench had largely gone away after all these years. I had managed to save a couple replacement baskets and an outer tub. The machine already had a newish replacement pump, and I installed a new belt. I also got a replacement top from a 1985 Kenmore 80 series machine (that's why there is a blank bleach dispenser hole on the left - beggars can't be choosers as the original top was well beyond restoration).

The users of this machine must have used some intense "detergents" in this machine to dissolve porcelain in the outer tub. Most of the smell from the machine came from the gross build-up of redeposited detergent on the tub ring, which was at least 2/3 of an inch thick. The rest of the smell was harbored in the rusty top.

When it all came back together, the machine was surprisingly 'greatful' for my work. Some machines I would swear fight me, others just seem to work with me. It is remarkably quiet, it does a great job, and I've had fun with the agitator as I've never seen a Penta-Swirl in action under a lot of conditions other than those that I had repaired/serviced with light test loads, etc. I have come to believe however that the Penta-Vane, which was the lower end agitator, is the better of the two overall in daily life's laundry. I really didn't want to keep this machine, but due to it's history, here it is and here it will probably remain. This is the exact same model as the one on ebay.

Gordon


Post# 392022 , Reply# 14   11/9/2009 at 22:01 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Another shot

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Looking in a bit....

Post# 392026 , Reply# 15   11/9/2009 at 22:03 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Say ahhh....

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Here's a Penta-Swirl for you Rob....

FYI - the replacement basket in this machine is from an upper line or nearly TOL machine. The 70 series and lower machines usually had blue speckled tubs. I like the beige speckles....


Post# 392029 , Reply# 16   11/9/2009 at 22:07 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Moppy enjoying water for the first time in over 18 years

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Fun fun - I enjoyed 'water test day' this year when I tested four machines at once.

Post# 392033 , Reply# 17   11/9/2009 at 22:08 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Hi level

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
I like the fact that this machine has seen little enough use that the water level pressure switch hasn't become inaccurate, so it still fills to the proper factory "Hi" level.

Post# 392036 , Reply# 18   11/9/2009 at 22:13 (5,253 days old) by redcarpetdrew (Fairfield, CA)        
Boy, Ya gotta sickness...

redcarpetdrew's profile picture
I think you have those bd washers down better than anyone at Sears or Whirlpool for that matter. I gotta ask. How much of that is in your noggin and how much is on paper? More than ever, I'm glad that junk pile rescue is going to YOU!

RCD


Post# 392042 , Reply# 19   11/9/2009 at 22:23 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
OK, I'm done now, LOL.....

Post# 392044 , Reply# 20   11/9/2009 at 22:24 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
It's all in my head Andy, are you saying I should get this crap documented? :-) Not sure I could punish anyone like that....

Post# 392048 , Reply# 21   11/9/2009 at 22:28 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
But THANKS for the kind words Andy I appreciate that coming from you, and most importantly, THANKS to Robert - I have had more fun sharing my washer hobby in the last two years than ever in my life. My Mom, who started all this in me when I was two years old just grins now and smiles approvingly instead of her former puzzled smirks....

Post# 392062 , Reply# 22   11/9/2009 at 23:25 (5,253 days old) by rll70sman (Hastings, Minnesota)        

Thanks so much, Gordon, for taking the time to explain and post these pics. Actually, now that I've seen a close-up of the Penta-Vane, it does look familiar. Grandma's machine had the exact same cycles as yours, equipped with a two-speed motor along with the black panel and woodgrain top. What's ever so interesting about your model is the fact that the hot wash is paired with a warm rinse. I've never seen that before with three water temperature selections. Usually they're all cold rinses.

Even as a kid with a card table chair set against the washer, I always thought it had all the functions and options to make it a versatile machine. I'm glad that you were able to give your washer a second life despite its horrible smell. I hate to see all these older models sitting at the dump, waiting for the crusher. I often wonder how many could be reconditioned instead of pitched....


Post# 392071 , Reply# 23   11/9/2009 at 23:51 (5,253 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Rob -

I love that feature with the hot wash/warm rinse. I don't use warm rinses, but if I feel there's a bit too much suds which could cause a wasteful second rinse, I will use the warm setting to get extra water through the spray rinses. It may not do much, but it makes me feel better.

About the machines you see sitting waiting for the crusher.... Yes, sadly, many could have years of life left if they were treated to some repairs or general care. But, some are just "done" as well. I've seen both.

It had one beautiful Coppertone 1977 80 series machine that must have been loved by its owner, but used A LOT at the same time. It put on a good show when it was looked at, but upon closer examination, it yielded one of the most worn out, pieces of crusher fodder I've ever worked on. My mistake was to start investing parts in it before I had fully evaluated it. It had a belt that had separated into three or four separate belts. I have no idea how the machine ran that way. The pump almost fell apart in my hand as the impeller was loose in the shaft and broken inside. The tub was leaking too. So, a belt, pump and tub re-seal and we're all set, right? No. While I was testing it I found a half-dozen bad dead spots in the timer. $70-some bucks for a new timer....Once that was in and running, I was testing the machine enjoying the woo-woos when all of a sudden the motor started making a rubbing sound, which quickly turned into a grinding, then a rubbing/grinding sound, which got louder and louder, and BANG---SLAM and only a hum remained. The armature had broken mid-cycle and the motor was totalled. It apparently rebelled against a new, properly adjusted belt. I had a used motor fortunately.

So, once that machine left my hands it had a new timer, a new pump, a new belt, re-sealed centerpost, a re-sealed tub, and a "new" motor. Was it worth it? Well I remember it fondly 17 years later.... I do know it lasted in service until a few years ago when the motor again died. Who knows after that.


Post# 392077 , Reply# 24   11/10/2009 at 00:33 (5,253 days old) by lebron (Minnesota)        

lebron's profile picture
Awesome machine! I like belt-drive Kenmores. What made these black panel center dial machines so popular back in the day?

Post# 392155 , Reply# 25   11/10/2009 at 09:10 (5,252 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Jed -

I think they were just different than what else was offered at the time. People liked the black panels with gold and chrome. Black and gold are very common themes in elegant decorating, even in many neighborhood entrance signs, etc. here in the South. I think they also liked that with the common panels, a buyer could match the perfect washer with their favorite model dryer and still have a matched set.

Whatever the attraction, they were made for over 11 years, then the DDs continued the theme until the mid-90s.

Gordon


Post# 392169 , Reply# 26   11/10/2009 at 11:08 (5,252 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
The Gordon Book of Kenmore

mickeyd's profile picture
The part about the belt devolving into 4! belts and still working, and the part about how some machines cooperate and work with you reminds me of the fact that many of us here anthropomorphize (make people out of) our machines the way we do our pets. When we find machines in such comically broken states, yet still alive and working, it reminds me of our aging bodies. The cat hiding stuff has me wondering. PBS's "Nature" says cats have no neo-cortex, while dogs have one that is about 4% the size of ours--the thinking part of the brain. Then how the heck are cats so smart. PBS better do some more homework.

So funny how you gave the machine a heart transplant--pump, etc.--and she rejected it and died, preferring the one with loose, free-standing valves (ventricles, impellers, etc.) Happens to people too. Independence and strong wills.

About the warm spray rinses. I'm right with you man , and you can hear the difference and see the greater volume of water expelled through the hose during warm sprays, especially you if click the temp back and forth between/during sprays.
The DD's using the 30 second horseshoe sprays are even more effective because the all of the water is hitting the clothes, none splashing off the rim and into the outer tub. In fact, the WP LSP9245BWO uses automatic warm sprays in all cycles except energy saving "all cold rinses" cycle.

Gordon, when I moved in here, the very machine in your beautiful pictures was in the basement. I gave it to a niece when I bought the WP. But yours, like my former, has the great big tub, with no dual-action agi, yet it turns the clothes over just fine, no so fast at that wonderful ultra high level where there is actually more room for big stuff than with those giant agitators; and at lower levels the currents and the turn over are surprisingly impressive for such subtle stream-lined vanes.

This was great stuff to have for morning reading, way more exciting than the newspaper. The way you weave the personal with the technical--pepperoni pizza tubs, etc--is so much fun. Bet a lot of money that when you climb on your Kenmore horse for a long ride you make a lot of people here very happy. Have you found any of the Resource Saver WP/KM DD's that have spray rinse only cycles?


Post# 392216 , Reply# 27   11/10/2009 at 14:38 (5,252 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Mike -

I am surprisingly starting to realize a cool gem or two about DD machines. The threads I've been involved in on the Deluxe forum kinda charged me on that. There are some resource saver 2009 Kenmore 800s right now at the Sears outlet, however I draw the line at multi-hundred dollar purchases just for my entertainment. I may buy a BOL machine for $199 though, especially since I need a pitty-party for the loss of 21 washers today, lol.

You know what I mean?

THANKS for all the kind words by the way. Your 1972 LK Coppertone set awaits you in my garage.

G


Post# 392224 , Reply# 28   11/10/2009 at 15:04 (5,252 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
Synchronicity Serendipity

mickeyd's profile picture
I see we were writing to each other at the same time.

I hate to feel relief in your grief, unless as you say, the TURQ wipes the grief away.

See how your generosity comes right back at ya! You're the best, G.


Post# 392468 , Reply# 29   11/11/2009 at 10:52 (5,251 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Thanks Mike - you rock.

Post# 392472 , Reply# 30   11/11/2009 at 11:11 (5,251 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Rob -

I have a question for you. Do you think it possible that your grandmother's washer received at some point a replacement timer? If her washer had the exact same cycle layout as Moppy, then a second-generation replacement timer could be the reason it didn't have spray rinses.

The timer in Moppy and others like it was used for 12 years. That is a VERY long time - many timers in 1960s Kenmores were used only one season or even just on one model or two. This timer began use in 1974 in a couple machines, and lasted until the end of the belt-drives in 1986. During the late 70s and early 80s, it very possibly was the most common timer in existence.

There were three generations of this timer, as minor changes were made to them mechanically, etc. The second generation, for reasons unknown to me, had the lead or terminal moved that provides power for spray rinses. To make sprays work in a first generation machine, a jumper wire needed to be installed in the wiring harness and quick connect block. This is not a big deal, but it is a little time consuming and for those who don't like splicing wires, it may be a bit tedious. I am a fuss-budget in doing repairs, but for guys where time is money and they think someone won't notice or care, I am sure that some of these splices weren't done.

The third generation timer supercedes the other two generations and is a one-for-one plug and play timer. I love Whirlpool for that reason, meaning they make changes to production parts like everyone does, but they make changes happen in such a way that they still support existing product with common parts - at least when possible. This third generation timer had three active spray terminals, which accomodates the two older generations, so no jumpers were required. This was noted with a paper flier with each new timer. Kinda cool to me.

One of their other popular timers, which had a Pre-Soak in the cycle mix, still requires a jumper wire to this day.

Also Rob, the Hot/Warm temp selection was pretty common for Kenmore in the 70s on machines that didn't have five temp options, or the lesser switches which accomodated HOT / WARM / COLD (those machines gave the same temp for rinse as wash except on hot which had a warm rinse).

In 1979 when the 'energy saver' notations appeared on Kenmores, the three temp combination machines got all cold rinses and this was never changed back.

Gordon



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy