Thread Number: 30749
Washer Recommendation
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 464634   9/21/2010 at 14:25 (4,959 days old) by khrios ()        

The old Whirlpool finally bit the dust. I would appreciate your washer recommendations. These are our needs:
1. We have a large family, and do about 13 loads per week.

2. Simplicity of operation is important. My elderly mother is not very comfortable with touchpads and electronics.

3. Water efficiency. Water is expensive in No. California.

4. It should handle heavy loads, such as jeans and bedding.

5. It should clean the clothes. We have a son with very sensitive skin, and detergent residue would be a problem.

6. Finally, it should be reliable, and built to last.






Post# 464662 , Reply# 1   9/21/2010 at 17:45 (4,959 days old) by mtn1584 (USA)        
SPEED QUEEN

SPEED QUEEN TOP LOADER WITHOUT A DOUBT!
LONGEST WARRANTY IN THE INDUSTRY
BUILT LIKE A TANK
BUILT TO LAST
HEAVY DUTY.....CAN HANDLE A FULL/QUEEN COMFORTER 3.3 CU FT CAP
QUIET OPERATION
DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB OF WASHING
700 RPM SPIN
MUCH BETTER BUILT THAN ANYTHING OUT THERE TODAY...AND THE COMPANY STANDS BHIND THEIR MACHINES
BUILT IN AMERICA
BUILT IN AMERICA
BUILT IN AMERICA
GOOD LUCK MIKE,
BY THE WAY I OWN THE AWN 542 AND SO DO MANY OTHER MEMBERS ON THE SITE GO TO SPEEDQUEEN.COM FOR MORE INFO


Post# 464663 , Reply# 2   9/21/2010 at 17:51 (4,959 days old) by supremewhirlpol ()        

"SPEED QUEEN"-> If you have speed queen money, they ain't cheap!!

MOL or BOL Whirlpool/Kenmore TL will probably work. Looks like most FL machines are out of the question. khrios, how much money you looking to spend?


Post# 464666 , Reply# 3   9/21/2010 at 18:23 (4,959 days old) by mtn1584 (USA)        
I KNOW THEY AINT CHEAP BUT..................................

YOU REALLY GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR!!!!!!
$649-700 FOR THE SQ AWN 542 ONCE IN WHAT SQ ESTIMATES IN AT LEAST 20 YEARS OR THOUSANDS ON A PLASTIC LADEN FL WASHER WHICH WILL ONLY LAST 5-7 YEARS. IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD A SQ I WOULD STICK WITH A TRADITIONAL WP FAMILY TOP LOADER, MAYBE AMANA.


Post# 464667 , Reply# 4   9/21/2010 at 18:25 (4,959 days old) by khrios ()        

I have 2k to spend. That better be enough! I thought I would just go to Sears and buy a Whirlpool or a Kenmore. Then, I started reading, and found they are not built like they used to be. They are falling apart! So, I would rather pay more up front. I do not want a "disposable" machine.

I thought of buying an old machine, but I need water efficiency. 13 loads x 40 gallons = 520 gallons of water per week. Water here is expensive!! My water bill is obscene.

The Speed Queen sounds like it might be a good fit. How much water does the TL use?

Is a FL machine out of the question? Does Speed Queen make one? Any good?


Post# 464677 , Reply# 5   9/21/2010 at 19:18 (4,959 days old) by supremewhirlpol ()        

khrios, In that case, NOTHING is built like it used to be. A SQ TL is still considered a "disposable" machine. If you got 2K to spend, get a used commercial FL. It will last much longer than that SQ TL, and is totally rebuildable.

Post# 464681 , Reply# 6   9/21/2010 at 19:31 (4,959 days old) by khrios ()        

I want to spend enough to satisfy the requirements above, not a dime more.

If there are less expensive options, I would love to hear them.



Post# 464684 , Reply# 7   9/21/2010 at 19:37 (4,959 days old) by supremewhirlpol ()        

Well...do your research, I'm sure you will find something.
Good Luck!


Post# 464687 , Reply# 8   9/21/2010 at 19:45 (4,959 days old) by khrios ()        

I saw that the Speed Queen makes a FL machine. Do you recommend those as well? Thanks,

Post# 464690 , Reply# 9   9/21/2010 at 19:47 (4,959 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
Speed Queen makes a well designed FL machine.

Post# 464714 , Reply# 10   9/21/2010 at 20:23 (4,959 days old) by khrios ()        

Well designed is good. I assume it has the same warranty as the TL. Would it be able to handle 13 loads a week, heavy loads, such as bedding, and still clean my clothes?

I hope, I hope the answer is yes...


Post# 464752 , Reply# 11   9/22/2010 at 00:53 (4,958 days old) by DanManTN (Tennessee)        

danmantn's profile picture
From SpeedQueen.com concerning FL (same commercial unit they install in laundromats, etc.)

"The Energy Star qualified Speed Queen Horizon washers help you conserve water by averaging just 13.9 gallons per cycle. Its green story continues with a super-high 300 G-force final spin, which removes more water from loads to greatly reduce drying time. And at just 44 minutes per cycle, Speed Queen's Horizon washer delivers quality wash results faster than many competing models." FORTY FOUR MINUTES, not hours.

Speed Queen brings to you the industry’s best warranty on all of our washers and dryers.
3 years on parts and labor. 5 years on the motor.*
5 years on the cabinet.* 5 years on bearings and seal assembly.*
Lifetime on all stainless steel wash baskets and outer tubs.*
* Limited. See Speed Queen warranty bond for details.

I have the 542 TL, others will have to comment on the load size for the FL. Judging from the ones at the laundromat, I would guess the capacity is similar to a topload washer--meaning that a full size fluffy comforter is probably about as big of a load as you would want to run in it. The topload has water reduced to what you would be similar to a med-high setting on older washers (to meet requirements). You will either have to manually add water (hold down 'reset' on water level switch) to select washes to get to the traditional XL water level, do more loads, or adjust the water level in the control panel - if you are handy in that way.

Hope that helps.

Dan





Post# 464775 , Reply# 12   9/22/2010 at 07:29 (4,958 days old) by yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
An inexpensive option would be Frigidaires Gallery Series, the one with the small round port hole, some may argue, but this version seemed to hold up the best for me, I still have it as a backup, I paid $1000.00 for the set in 1997, now their around $600.00 to $800.00 for both....at this price you could have 2 sets STACKED, and get twice as much done in half the time....before I got several machines hooked up, I was running this set by itself, with 6 kids, from 2 to 4 loads a day!....one of the few machines I have that has never needed a repair, I have the Kenmore version......if you have a Sears Outlet near you check them out...or check the link for OnLine....their starting around $350.00...with original warranty

CLICK HERE TO GO TO yogitunes's LINK


Post# 464793 , Reply# 13   9/22/2010 at 10:22 (4,958 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Speed Queen FL

mrb627's profile picture
I seem to recall reading that the Speed Queen FL has a duty cycle of 20 loads per day. I think it can handle your needs.

Malcolm


Post# 464795 , Reply# 14   9/22/2010 at 10:27 (4,958 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
SQ FRONT LOAD WASHER

combo52's profile picture
Is the best choice for HD use. This is exactly the same as thier commercial machines and you should be able to get one for around $1500.00 dollars, they also have the longest warranty in the industry. No SQ laundry products are considered disposable, the quality control on these are better than at any time in history. SQ laundry appliances should have a serviceable life of 20-30 years, a longer life than any home machines in history. Even the porcelain outer tubs of the TL models have a lifetime free replacement warranty against leaks, no other washer manufacturer ever did this on all thier machines not even WP or MT.

Post# 464796 , Reply# 15   9/22/2010 at 10:36 (4,958 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
SQ WASHERS

combo52's profile picture
I neglected to address your concern about water use, The SQ top load machines are good except they are conventional top loaders and they are not very water efficient. The lack of a dual action agitator really cuts down on the amount of clothes you can put in a load and get good results. But they are a good choice for some.

Post# 464809 , Reply# 16   9/22/2010 at 11:40 (4,958 days old) by khrios ()        

From what you are saying for durability and reliability, and water efficiency, I should go with the SQ FL.

My one concern is that Consumer Reports gave the Speed Queen TL bad marks for cleaning clothes. Also, the sales person at the local appliance store said the Speed Queen front load will not clean well, because of the short cycles.

Have you found this to be the case? What is your opinion?


Post# 464812 , Reply# 17   9/22/2010 at 11:42 (4,958 days old) by khrios ()        

I forgot to mention in the post above that the salesman was trying to sell me a Miele....

Post# 464814 , Reply# 18   9/22/2010 at 11:47 (4,958 days old) by khrios ()        

Oh, and someone else mentioned the Speed Queen front load has vibration issues. I really wouldn't want the machine dancing all over the laundry room every time I wash sheets, or jeans or other heavy items.

Is this a valid concern?


Post# 464821 , Reply# 19   9/22/2010 at 12:08 (4,958 days old) by Pulsator (Saint Joseph, MI)        
Videos

pulsator's profile picture
Here are some videos of a Speed Queen front load washer running. This is the Imperial version, the outer-case is stainless, the internals and cycles are the same though. They belong to our very own mrb627!

CLICK HERE TO GO TO Pulsator's LINK


Post# 464822 , Reply# 20   9/22/2010 at 12:09 (4,958 days old) by 48bencix (Sacramento CA)        
I tried to see it

The SQ website directed me to Filco in Folsom. But it's closed so I called the Filco on Fulton Ave. in Sacramento. The salesman said he can get SQ but would recommend Maytag Bravos. I have looked at the Maytags and read all of the reviews. They seem to need to rebalance for a spin which uses more water and time. The tub is suspended with almost no resistance. On the Maytag website are commercial machines with or without the coin box. That might be a good choice. Whirlpool has them too. They are obviously the traditional direct drive machines. Whirlpool probably knows that the newer Bravos type machines would not last in a laundramat situation. So I still have not seen a SQ in person.

I still would like the traditional agitation system and do not mind the fairly small tub that those types of machines have. The Bravos types really wear the fabrics because there is so little water. Oh, yes, I like the SQ because it still spins full of water, for that nostalgic operation sequence that has been around since the solid tub era. Front loaders are always another choice for lower water usage and probably the Whirlpool HT type is still among the best.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO 48bencix's LINK


Post# 464905 , Reply# 21   9/22/2010 at 20:46 (4,958 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
SQ FRONT LOAD WASHER

combo52's profile picture
The SQ FL washers are a little more prone to vibration issues as they don't spend 20 minutes trying to decide if its the right time to spin. For this reason I don't recommend them for the upper floors on weak frame houses. On a solid or concrete floor you should have no problems. When SQ went to the current big door models they lengthened the wash time to 24 minutes from 8 in the model that CR tested, I recommend if you are concerned about cleaning really dirty and want a longer wash cycle to get the model with the water heater. The heater will add 10 to 30 minutes to the wash cycle. The worst thing about the SQ TL models is the lack of a neutral drain, because there is no clutch the belt takes all the strain while its trying to pump out the water, as a result you don't get great belt life out of them. MT dependable care machines did a lot better with this slipping belt system because the belt was much longer and the main drive pulley was larger and aluminum not plastic this helped dissipate the heat build up that occurs when the tub is trying to get up to speed. SQ also has an idler pulley which flexes the belt backwards which further stresses the belt.

Post# 464969 , Reply# 22   9/23/2010 at 06:44 (4,957 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Speed Queen FL Cleanliness

mrb627's profile picture
I have not had any issues with clothes not coming out clean in my SQ FL. In fact, I think it cleans better than the previous LG washer I had. Perhaps because of the true horizontal tub.

I find that the cycles are more flexible than you might think. Want a longer wash time? Stop and restart the machine. Want to soak something? Stop the machine, soak for whatever period you wish, restart the machine on spin only. Add fresh detergent and start the machine in the cycle of your choice.

Rinsing. I also think this machine rinses better than the prebious LG. It starts with a 25 second spin spray before the first rinse. A fine mist is sprayed over the load as it slowly spins in distribution mode. This mist is a SUDS KILLER. Also, the rinses are short. 60 seconds actually. Minimizing tumble time in the rinse prevents suds from building back up. Tumbling clothes in each rinse session for 4 or 5 minutes is a waist of time. They don't call them Speed Queens for nothing...

Malcolm

( of course, you probably can't go wrong with a Miele machine, either )


Post# 464974 , Reply# 23   9/23/2010 at 06:49 (4,957 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Idler Pulley

mrb627's profile picture
If my memory serves, the idler pulley on the SQ TL machine applies pressure during agitate mode. When the drive reverses for spinning, the belt slips easily on the motor pulley because the idler is on the wrong side to be effective. This is what causes the clutching action of the belt during spin.

Someone had a video demonstrating this, it may have been Dan.

Malcolm


Post# 464978 , Reply# 24   9/23/2010 at 06:55 (4,957 days old) by toggleswitch (New York City, NY)        

toggleswitch's profile picture
For saving water a front-loader is a must. And so is re-setting the machines for additional rinses when there is sensitivity to detergents and chemicals.

In the old days, a Maytag was a week to two weeks pay. If you want a truly durable machine, you may have to spend that much (same proportion to earnings) today.

It is ridiculous to want the same quality that occurred in the past at the prices of today's machines .. prices relative to income (LOW!).

I'd say get a top-loader only if you can reuse rinse water as the next load's wash water, or pump the rinse water onto your lawn via a sprinkler. it is my understanding that such a thing in illegal in most places.

Don't use too much detergent or chemicals and let the wash cylinder air-out, nd RINSE RINSE RINSE and any front-loader will suffice. (NOT 'BE FABULOUS'; I said suffice!). LOL


Post# 465007 , Reply# 25   9/23/2010 at 08:04 (4,957 days old) by khrios ()        

One more question, would the Speed Queen FL fit king sized bedding and comforters?



Post# 465010 , Reply# 26   9/23/2010 at 08:07 (4,957 days old) by mtn1584 (USA)        
YOU CAN LEAD A HORSE TO WATER BUT................

You can listen to a salesman, or to people on this website who own Speed Queen products and are very happy with them.
#1 Speed Queen top loaders have a 3 year parts and labor warranty, 5 years on the transmission, ten on the motor, and lifetime on the tub.
BRAVOS HAS ONLY A ONE YEAR PARTS AND LABOR WARRANTY.
#2 Consumer Reports is NOT the be-all and end-all of opinions and results, ultimately it is people like us who buy these products and use them on a daily basis, not just for several days of testing.
#3 I have owned both a Whirlpool and a SQ top loader. The SQ cleans better, hands down. It is gentler on clothes and with the large stainless steel tub, you can wash very large loads.
(You will have to raise the water level, something very simple, even I was able to do it.)
#4 Malcolm is well versed on the Speed Queen FL machines.
#5 Either way why don't you start a new post.....Speed Queen TL & FL vs. Maytag Bravos and see what results you get.
I wish you well.
Mike


Post# 465014 , Reply# 27   9/23/2010 at 08:12 (4,957 days old) by khrios ()        

Will do Mike...

Post# 465042 , Reply# 28   9/23/2010 at 10:56 (4,957 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        

In defense of the 3.1 cu ft Frigidaire FL, the controls are manual dials and would not be a challenge for your mother. Virtually all other FLs have electronic control buttons which might be confusing for her. (Having recently taught my octogenarian father how to do laundry, I am thankful he had a Maytag TL with simple dials....). As another reader pointed out, for $2000 you could be TWO pairs and stack them. Two 3.1 machines running at once would surpass any single machine for capacity.

As far as washing a king sized comforter, doubtful in any conventional (center agitator) TL because the space occupied by the agitator. A large (4.4-4.7 cu ft) FL such as Electrolux or LG or the new Frigidaires would do the trick, but I am afraid that even the simplest of electronic controls might frustrate your mother. Why not take her shopping and let her inspect the controls?---that's how many older shoppers buy a tv: they look at the remote control to see if they can handle it.

If you decided to go with two stacked sets, try to find a showroom with a stacked set on display (our Pacific Sales showroom does this) to be sure the dryer height and controls are not too high for your mother. Frigidaire does sell a 3.1 FL washer/dryer attached unit with both washer and dryer control dials mounted below the dryer door; comes in both gas or electric dryer. Though the "list" price for this model is $1200-1300, it's not unusual to see them marked down to $1000
because of newer, "hotter" models on the market. However, if you buy the more usual separate units and stack them, the dryer controls will be on top. I've seen the 3.1 washer on sale for under $500; if your water district or utility company is offering rebates, it's even less (you generally won't get rebates on a TL because they use at least twice as much water).

I have a neighbor down the street who bought the combination Frigidaire unit because she wanted dial controls and would have had trouble reaching controls on the top front face of the dryer. In her case, of course, the downside is that if one component (washer or dryer) cannot be repaired, she has to throw out the whole unit.

Question (forgive me if you addressed this elsewhere): are you planning to keep your existing dryer? In other words, is all this advice about stacked units not applicable to your situation? Given your need to conserve water, you might want to take your mother to look at say Electrolux base models, which are now down to $1000 and 4.7 cu ft (enough to do a comforter) to see if she can handle the controls. A touchpad is out of the question, but maybe she can handle dials and buttons. Some of these washers also have programmable "custom" programs where you could create a one-touch procedure for your mother to use. Bear in mind that since the final spin speed on FLs is faster than on TLs, the clothes come out much dryer and drying times are about halved. In my case, I have a Frig 2140 (basic 3.5 cu ft FL) with a spin speed of only 950 rpm (not that impressive). Perm press clothes dry in about 25 minutes, including cool down, and heavy loads like towels are dry in about 45 minutes. With my former TL, the drying times were twice as long.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO PassatDoc's LINK


Post# 465049 , Reply# 29   9/23/2010 at 11:57 (4,957 days old) by khrios ()        

I have two old Whirpool dryers. Both do an adequate job. I am not replacing them.

I like your advice of taking her shopping. It's a great idea.

I also thought of creating a one button custom program for her to use, if I find a machine with such a feature.



Post# 465069 , Reply# 30   9/23/2010 at 14:46 (4,957 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Domestic FL's and Comforters

mrb627's profile picture
The SQ FL will handle a king sized bedspread, but for a comforter, I seriously doubt it. Comforters are best left to the professionals or at least the mega front loaders at the laundramat.

As for controls, they don't get much simpler than the SQ FL. Leave it set for the Regular cycle and all you Mother has to do is push the start button.

Malcolm


Post# 465077 , Reply# 31   9/23/2010 at 16:01 (4,957 days old) by Dustin92 (Jackson, MI)        

We have a frigidaire Gallery front loader, It has a single knob to select the cycle and regular push buttons to select water temp, soil level, and options. after you change the options, soil level or temp on a cycle, it saves the settings so you can just hit start and thats it.It cost less than 800 dollars and was worth it. The drum is large enough to wash a queen size comforter. the cycle settings are somewhat limited,(you cant select all of the options or temps on every cycle) it also cleans clothes well and rinses well (if you dont pack it full) and has a third rinse option.

Post# 465085 , Reply# 32   9/23/2010 at 17:05 (4,957 days old) by khrios ()        

Good to know. Thanks.

Post# 465087 , Reply# 33   9/23/2010 at 17:14 (4,957 days old) by DanManTN (Tennessee)        

danmantn's profile picture
Yep, I take my king size 'fluffy' comforter (as opposed to a bed spread) to the laundromat - it pretty much requires the 50 lb machine at the laundromat to handle it! And besides, that's like 1% of your laundry.

Here's the video link of the SQ TL belt drive that Malcom mentioned. See my other videos for wash cycles, etc.





type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385">





Post# 465101 , Reply# 34   9/23/2010 at 17:54 (4,957 days old) by khrios ()        

I love the video. My 24 yr old son is a newly minted mechanical engineer, loved your videos. He is voting for the Speed Queen.

Post# 465107 , Reply# 35   9/23/2010 at 18:12 (4,957 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Imperial

mrb627's profile picture
Here is a short video of the Imperial FL in operation.





type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="873" height="525">


Post# 465128 , Reply# 36   9/23/2010 at 21:31 (4,957 days old) by danmantn (Tennessee)        

danmantn's profile picture
Is one capable of lusting for stainless steel? Lol

Oh, and by the way the SQ FLs are avail in a more traditional rear control format...which would match an existing traditional dryer...thought I would mention.


Post# 465223 , Reply# 37   9/24/2010 at 08:03 (4,956 days old) by khrios ()        

Guys, so I am ready to take my mom to shop for the Speed Queen Front Loader and our local dealers don't have them in stock...What a pain!

I would like to contact the company to see if they can direct me to a dealer that has them.

Do any of you have the company phone number? Thanks, Ann


Post# 465227 , Reply# 38   9/24/2010 at 09:15 (4,956 days old) by yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
Go to their website www.speedqueen.com... and locate a dealer near you by zip code...

Post# 465274 , Reply# 39   9/24/2010 at 12:17 (4,956 days old) by DanManTN (Tennessee)        

danmantn's profile picture
I don't know that SQ HQ would know private dealer's inventory (since they don't own the dealer). It may be a bit challenging to locate one that has them in stock - most mom 'n pops order as they get the request. For example, the mom 'n pop that I bought my 1st SQ set from (and will the 2nd next month) has the mid-range top loader on display, but no FLs. Go figure.

I would do as Yogi suggested, get the list from the website and call around...could always look at dealer A and buy at dealer B that has the better price. Prices do vary! So check 'em all. California should have a bigger selection of dealers than I did here in TN.



Post# 465298 , Reply# 40   9/24/2010 at 14:17 (4,956 days old) by khrios ()        

Okay...I'm done. I chose the Electrolux IQ Steam over the Speed Queen FL. The reason was the size, plain and simple.

In every other way, the Speed Queen seemed superior; kinda' like comparing a a 1964 Mustang vs a Miata.

Thank you all for sharing your knowledge and expertise.

I will post a review once I have had it for a few months.



Post# 465302 , Reply# 41   9/24/2010 at 14:36 (4,956 days old) by DanManTN (Tennessee)        

danmantn's profile picture
Congrats, I hope you enjoy your new washer and it brings years of trouble-free service. Please give us updates over the coming months.

Post# 466860 , Reply# 42   10/2/2010 at 10:08 (4,948 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        

@khrios: did you take your mother shopping with you? Did she think she could handle the controls? If I recall, the IQ model has mainly buttons and dials and less touchscreens, which would be in your favor (in terms of user-friendlier for your mother). I imagine if you showed her the default cycles (Heavy, Regular, etc) and the "start" button, she could learn to run several different cycles, albeit without customizing them with extra features. The defaults (rinses, spin speed) should work.

One of the major areas where she (and you) will need re-education is in the type and amount of soap to use. Use HE preparations only. I stay away from liquids because they tend to gum up the dispenser and the molding into which the dispenser fits; one doesn't see that problem with powders. Assuming you are using a powder (say, Tide HE), use 2-3 tablespoons per load, no more than that. Measuring cups are pretty much passé at those small quantities. I bought some extra coffee scoops (30 ml = 2 tablespoons) and use 1-1.5 scoops per load. Your mother may be used to dumping in 3/4-1 cup of detergent into a TL, so this will be a learning curve for her.

A number of people here have posted good experiences with Sears Ultra Plus HE powder detergent. Costco sells a house brand of detergent that is labeled "HE", but if you read the directions, it says "for both top and front loading washers" which to me says they didn't reformulate for lower suds/better rinsing, they just re-labeled it.

I am not certain how a product earns the "HE" logo (pay a fee?). Tide HE on the back has a list of manufacturers (Miele, WP, Electrolux/Frigidaire, Bosch, etc) that endorse/approve the formulation---how this is earned (fee? meet certain quality standards?), I don't know. I pretty much use either Tide HE or Gain HE, though latter is hard to find in California (sometimes VONS or Ralphs carries it). Gain HE powder was reviewed by CR only once in the past 3-4 years, but it scored very high (as good as Tide HE but cost less).

Prices are the same as for the non-HE variety, but if you use 2-3 tbsp/load, your detergent costs will drop significantly. Tide HE washes fairly well, but not as well as Henkel's Persil from Germany, or Unilever's Persil versions (I have used UK Persil and Via from Sweden, which is the name used for Unilever Persil in that country). If you have friends who visit from Europe, or friends whose business travel takes them to Europe, you may be able to con them into bringing you boxes of these detergents when they fly Europe-California. Persil in Germany is sold in tough plastic pouches that pack nicely and don't break. The cardboard boxes tend to leak/rip when packed in luggage (after security goes through them) so I always place them in gallon size Zip Locks for safety.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy