|
Thread Number: 30808
Samsung Eco Bubble...worst idea yet? |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 465429 9/25/2010 at 08:51 (4,960 days old) by Hoover1100 (U.K.) | ||
|
Most of us know that excess foam hinders washing action, surely this is just encouraging poor laundry habits? discuss... Matt CLICK HERE TO GO TO Hoover1100's LINK | ||
|
| Post# 465430 , Reply# 1 9/25/2010 at 08:53 (4,960 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 465435 , Reply# 2 9/25/2010 at 10:28 (4,960 days old) by amyswasher () | ||
|
Looks like a headache to me. It doesn't make sense to make foam in a FL. The demo another YT channel had, it wasn't that foamy. | ||
Post# 465447 , Reply# 3 9/25/2010 at 12:48 (4,960 days old) by foraloysius  (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 465467 , Reply# 4 9/25/2010 at 14:26 (4,960 days old) by electron1100 (England) | ||
More Shite | ||
| Post# 465499 , Reply# 5 9/25/2010 at 17:19 (4,960 days old) by robliverpool (england Liverpool) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 465535 , Reply# 6 9/25/2010 at 21:00 (4,959 days old) by amyswasher () | ||
|
Foam can be produced without a pump. It's called too much detergent. | ||
|
Post# 465572 , Reply# 7 9/25/2010 at 22:46 (4,959 days old) by CleanteamofNY ((Monroe, New York) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 465597 , Reply# 8 9/26/2010 at 00:22 (4,959 days old) by PeterH770 (Marietta, GA) | ||
No, I think this is interesting. Think "shampoo action". No water in the tub, just enough to generate suds. The problem I see is when the clothing is very dirty and as the dirt is suspended by detergent, the bubbles pop. How does the machine know to create more suds, or does it just constantly generate suds? Also, how do you control temperature of suds? If the first rinse is a spray rinse, it might be even more economical for water use. Interesting...
| ||
|
Post# 465600 , Reply# 9 9/26/2010 at 00:31 (4,959 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc) |
||
|
Will someone PLEASE turn off the BUBBLE MACHINE!!Sounds like this should be on the Lawrence Welk show.A washer that DELIBIRATLY makes suds-as others say-makes rinsing more difficult-wonder if this thing gets SUDS LOCK?Bet this will be at Best Buy soon. | ||
| Post# 465623 , Reply# 10 9/26/2010 at 01:04 (4,959 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas) | ||
|
This video got me thinking. Did you notice that the actors in the video were all hispanic? I think this machine will be marketed to people who still think that more suds equal more cleaning. Think of the oversuding mamacitas you see at the coin op. This is just one group of many that still think you need lots and lots of suds. | ||
|
Post# 465650 , Reply# 12 9/26/2010 at 04:51 (4,959 days old) by chestermikeuk (Rainhill *Home of the RailwayTrials* Merseyside,UK) |
||
"Most of us know that excess foam hinders washing action
But I`d say only when its on a level of water that impedes the washing action !!
My verdict is on hold until we see more, it could be a very unique concept, am assuming no water in the drum just thick cushions of foam bubbles!!!..think dry foam carpet cleaning!! Also, you can note that if they use conventional washing programmes / rythmns then sudz lock could be an issue.. But you watch certain machines get rid of suds...think Frigidaire, how many soap cakes have we seen whipped away in a fast spin..think Miele & Zug, with long fast interim spins, the Zug just seems to suck them out of the drum!! (not guilty m`lawd, visiting house guest!!) And if the claims of less power & water usage are correct, then it could be the next new thing!!!....or fad... | ||
| Post# 465768 , Reply# 13 9/26/2010 at 18:17 (4,959 days old) by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 465777 , Reply# 14 9/26/2010 at 19:00 (4,958 days old) by DysonAnimal () | ||
|
Mike: Refreshing to see someone taking an open-minded attitude towards new ideas! :) | ||
| Post# 465896 , Reply# 16 9/27/2010 at 04:12 (4,958 days old) by electron1100 (England) | ||
|
New Ideas | ||
| Post# 465907 , Reply# 18 9/27/2010 at 07:28 (4,958 days old) by electron1100 (England) | ||
|
Dodgy Grins | ||
| Post# 465917 , Reply# 19 9/27/2010 at 08:52 (4,958 days old) by DysonAnimal () | ||
|
I certainly wasn't trying to be unfriendly, Gary. Just took the opportunity to clarify my comment! I thought perhaps you were implying a previous washer had used a similar technology in the past. :) | ||
| Post# 465936 , Reply# 21 9/27/2010 at 10:11 (4,958 days old) by lavamat_jon (UK) | ||
|
Cost is... in the range of £500-548. TBH I actually quite like the design of these Samsung machines, have warmed to them - have quite a classic look about them. Jon | ||
|
Post# 465980 , Reply# 22 9/27/2010 at 14:58 (4,958 days old) by joe_in_philly (Philadelphia, PA, USA) |
||
Consumer Reports wasn't too impressed with the PowerFoam - which I guess is the same thing.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO joe_in_philly's LINK | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
