Thread Number: 31029
Why UK machines usually different from US
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 468227   10/9/2010 at 19:39 (4,939 days old) by washernoob ()        

I was just thinking... why are the UK type machines usually front loader with a round door, where as in the US its almost always front loaders with big doors or top loaders?


Why has one not followed the other? Is there a need for just front load types over there? Is it a space issue perhaps/

Just curious. :)





Post# 468233 , Reply# 1   10/9/2010 at 20:12 (4,939 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
Welll.......

ronhic's profile picture
....it's a bit of everything from my experience living in the UK.

The majority of UK homes are smaller, and dare I say often much older, than their Nth American equivalents. It is not common to have a cellar or separate laundry room, particularly in homes built before say, 1980 (and yes, I did just pluck a date....correct me if I'm wrong please).

As a result, most machines needed to be usable as an additional work surface in the days before fully integrated kitchens...Twin tubs, small top-loaders, single tub wringers (where the wringers folded into the tub for storage) and front loaders could all be had with work surfaces. They also needed to be able to be moved to the kitchen sink for use.

Moving into the latter decades of the last century, fitted kitchens became more common which enabled a more integrated machine. As people pulled out old cabinets and put in new kitchens, they made allowances to have a dedicated washing machine space near the sink - this gave access to the hot/cold water and waste pipes. It also meant not having to wheel machines to the sink and helped free up space in the kitchen.

Front loaders are the only machines that are suitable for building under a benchtop....so after many years of running different types of machine, UK manufacturers (and now retailers) defaulted to building (though no longer built in the UK) and selling front load machines with very rare exceptions to this.

As to the size of machines, this seems to have almost sorted itself out. The vast majority of front load machines sold in the UK and Europe over the past 40years have restricted themselves to a fraction under 60cm/2 feet. It is a common and convienient size that works well with washing machines, dryers (also often in a kitchen) and dishwashers with most kitchen cupboards and drawer units being available in 30cm, 45cm and 60cm sizes (1, 1 1/2 and 2 feet).

Door size is also limited to overall machine size. You can put a bigger door in a 27" machine than you can a 24" machine and still retain the same structural rigidity....also, the drums of Nth American machines are larger in diameter and therefore volume.

Hope this all makes sense. UK and European guys, please feel free to correct me.

On another note though, Australia has also accepted the UK/European standard for kitchens....but most Australian homes have a laundry room. However, as people renovate, there is a move to a smoother, more integrated look in the laundry...so often appliances are no being built under the counter.....which is, along with water restrictions and a call to be more enviro friendly, causing a dramatic increase in front loader purchase.


Post# 468234 , Reply# 2   10/9/2010 at 20:13 (4,939 days old) by Maytagbear (N.E. Ohio)        
I may be totally wrong, but I think I heard it here at AW---

One thing is size. Until fairly recently, homes in the UK have been smaller than those here in North America. Many overseas people just run a load or two of washing a day, whereas many of us in the States still do 3-5 loads of washing on one day a week. This is facilitated by the US's greater use of tumble dryers. Only fairly recently have dryers shown up more prominently in the UK and Europe.


I remember (does anyone else?) an article from Reader's Digest, around January 1974, where two families who owned appliance stores, one near Chicago, and one in Italy. The wife in Italy thought (and with reason) that a dryer was highly expensive to operate.


Another BIG thing is energy prices!! Typically, energy has been much more expensive in the UK and Europe, and front loaders use less hot water (often heating their own from faucet cold) and less total water. Also, overseas washers have generally had higher spin speeds, for better water extraction.


There's more, but I will now defer to our beloved English/Scottish/Welsh members to either blast me or add details.


Lawrence/Maytagbear


Post# 468248 , Reply# 3   10/9/2010 at 21:52 (4,939 days old) by washernoob ()        
Wow!

Thank you guys! That is helpful and seems very logical!

I didn't know basements were uncommon in the UK in older homes. But now I can see why the space would be an issue, as many houses are non extendable, connected type. US homes are dominantly single, not connected, and can be extended off each side when more space is needed.


Also didn't think of the mobility issue of the washers. I just cant imagine wheeling something like a 50s bendix duo into the kitchen to do a load of laundry! :)


Post# 468293 , Reply# 4   10/10/2010 at 04:54 (4,939 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        
There is more to it...

foraloysius's profile picture
In the sixties Miele, Bosch and Constructa and perhaps others had appliances that were wider than the standard 60cm. My mother had a Bosch washer that was 67cm wide. The older Miele G45 dishwasher I had also was 67cm as is this Constructa dishwasher. Manufacturers were free to give their appliances the size they wanted. But late 60's or early 70's the European standard in kitchens was introduced. The standard size for appliances became 85cm high, 60cm wide and max. 60cm deep. This standard was introduced to make it easier to fit in whatever brand of appliances into a standard kitchen. Since then European frontloaders almost all have the same size. This especially applies to the UK where it seems more a custom to have the washer in the kitchen.

The size of the machines might be smaller than an American washer, but at that time a European washer still would hold 5kg of laundry which is the same as 11lbs. I think that would be the amount of laundry a Unimatic can wash.



Post# 468294 , Reply# 5   10/10/2010 at 05:03 (4,939 days old) by aegokocarat (United Kingdom)        

and over here our washing machines have 3 compartment drawers well some do coz aeg go themselves 4 compartent drawers anyway on ours it is prewash mainwash and softener on yours it detergent bleach softener and liqudid detergent (i think)

Post# 468295 , Reply# 6   10/10/2010 at 05:05 (4,939 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
In other countries than the UK European toploaders are more popular. They are even a tad smaller than the frontloaders but on average hold the same amount of laundry. Especially in France these toploaders are very popular, more so than the frontloaders. These toploaders are of the H-axis type. The first H-axis toploader was made in Switzerland by V-Zug. Here is a picture of it.

Post# 468296 , Reply# 7   10/10/2010 at 05:09 (4,939 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
Toploaders come in all kind of sizes. I have a small AEG toploader that is in size much smaller than European frontloaders. Still it can hold 4kg (9lbs) of laundry.

Post# 468309 , Reply# 8   10/10/2010 at 08:24 (4,939 days old) by Vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield, East Midlands, UK)        
Chris is right on target

vacbear58's profile picture
with his description, I could hardly have put it better myself. Just a couple of things to add: In the US there was a long tradition of wringer washers with centre agitators, in the UK there was no such legacy. I believe the first auto was a Bendix (so a tumble machine) but I presume that a top loader was more acceptable to the US market given the history.

True there were similar washers in the UK pre WW2, but not common, and the first "popular" machine (for reasons already discussed) was the Hoover 0307, not a centre agitator machine. The first autos here (in any number) were also tumble machines (Bendix & English Electric) and it was not until 1963 when there began to be some variety, not only centre agitator but also H axis. But as Chris explains the ability to put the machine under a counter top became crucial.

Louis, I love the Constructa dishwasher! As you say, the machines were all variety of sizes, although interestingly all the top loaders I could find (including a Frigidaire "thumper")were all 60cm or slightly less. But interesting also to see how the European standard brought us our Matchbox Hoovers and the Hotpoint & Servis machines which were actually even smaller than that, but still washed 9lb.

And of course hardly anyone except me has their laundry equipment in the bathroom in the UK

Al


Post# 468388 , Reply# 9   10/10/2010 at 15:39 (4,939 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
And of course hardly anyone except me has their laundry equi

ronhic's profile picture
Al,

Would that have something to do with the Electrical Safety Standards and no 240V outlets (or even wall light switches) in bathrooms?

I know that in flats here, there is a pretty reasonable split between those that actually have a small laundry and those that have plumbing in the bathroom, but then we can have a 240V outlet too....


Post# 468395 , Reply# 10   10/10/2010 at 17:02 (4,938 days old) by Vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield, East Midlands, UK)        
Electrical standards

vacbear58's profile picture
Outlets are (or were) permitted as long as they are not accessible from the bath, in my case they are well protected just above the stacked drier.

I think it is more a case that UK bathrooms are just as small as UK kitchens. Having had the washer and drier in the bathroom in my last home (apartment) when I was viewing this house as soon as I saw the space in the bathroom the measuring tape was out straight away and I was very pleased to see there was enough space to accommodate them in a similar manner. The space would otherwise be wasted and, in my small kitchen, it would have been difficult to accommodate a separate washer and drier as well as dishwasher etc.

The only form of outlet allowed for general access in UK bathrooms are two pin sockets for shavers or in my case a toothbrush, fused at 1 amp, they frequently have dual voltage.

Al


Post# 468407 , Reply# 11   10/10/2010 at 18:20 (4,938 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
We were very lucky with our flat....

ronhic's profile picture
....the bathroom may only have been 6' x 6', but the kitchen was 10' x 10'.....

The outlet situation is similar here....but my aunt in Southend-On-Sea struggled to find an electrician who would install a socket in her bathroom 15yrs ago....eventually she got one put in the airing cupboard....


Post# 468423 , Reply# 12   10/10/2010 at 20:16 (4,938 days old) by Mrx ()        

there are very restrictive wiring regulations in the UK and in Ireland about installing any appliance in a bathroom. It's just down to the generally more conservative approach taken when it comes to electrical safety.

The size of European washing machines is definitely a product of modular kitchen cabinets and a desire to at least semi integrate laundry appliances.

it's true to say that some of the housing stock is older, but most houses built from the 1950s and1960s onwards here seem to have utility rooms. Certainly, in suburban areas and in rural areas.

Its also common to have laundry appliances in garages too.

even in small houses and apartments, the laundry is increasingly found as a stack in a closet. Although, its occasionally integrated into the kitchen. Fully integrated laundry appliances (totally hidden) are also sometimes used.

Basements are absolutely unheard of in this part of the world. They're an essential in North America due to the very harsh winters as they insulate the house from very cold ground and provide a warm space for plumbing etc.

digging out a basement in an area as wet as these islands would also cause serious problems with dampness from ground water etc.

Also, standard size european machines can take up to 9kg of laundry. There's really no demand for larger capacity machines as they will easily handle a large hamper of clothes without fuss.

marketing also killed the top loader here. Most people here of my granny's generation would see top loaders as low tech, semi automatic and obsolete. the front loader, integrated into a modular kitchen or utility room was a symbol of modernity in the 60s and 70s. To most people here "front loader" IS automaric.


Post# 468557 , Reply# 13   10/11/2010 at 16:41 (4,937 days old) by solsburian (SE Northumberland)        

The block of flats I live in were built before 1919 for the local coal mine workers and our kitchen is tiny – about 300cm x 140cm (10 feet by 5 feet roughly). Both my grandmas had small kitchens and so did my Parents who have a 1985 semi detached.

Apart from space constraints and marketing, I believe top loaders here were negatively associated with twin tubs.


Post# 468595 , Reply# 14   10/11/2010 at 19:03 (4,937 days old) by hydralique (Los Angeles)        
Spin Speeds . . .

Because front loaders naturally have better balance than top loaders, I believe it is easier to have a high spin speed in a front loader. Most American top loaders never had very high spins, with the Frigidaire thumpers being the exception. If you don't have a dryer and live in a humid climate having the extra spin speed is valuable indeed and a manufacturer selling slow-spinning machines would be at a distinct disadvantage. Frigidaire introduced their fast spinning automatics in the late '40s when dryers weren't universal here in the US. WCI dropped the fast spin at the start of the '80s when they ruined . . . er, um, took over Frigidaire, undoubtedly feeling it wasn't worth the money at that point because most everyone had a dryer.

Even today in Europe dryers aren't as common as in the US, and what with increasing energy costs keeping drying time down is important even for those with dryers.


Post# 468715 , Reply# 15   10/12/2010 at 04:30 (4,937 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK)        

aquacycle's profile picture
I think all the other guys on here got it spot on. In the UK, houses are much smaller - especially houses built around the late 1800's. Most houses were built as 2 up - 2 down houses in rows for mill workers. Although a lot of these did have cellar's, they were mostly coal cellars used for storing coal for ranges and heating. It's also important to note that most of these houses were not built with in-door plumbing and shared toilets were built at the end of the street or behind the row. The next big wave of houses came in the post-war 1940's when local authority council housing started appearing, but obviously at the time washing machines not widely available, especially to families on low income, who would be living in this type of house. Most homes in the UK have washing machines in the kitchen. so it is necessary to save worktop space, and have appliances that fit under the counter top. Newer houses often have utility rooms, or plumbing in the garage, but this is a relatively new thing. I have to say, in my tiny 2 bed terrace house, I cannot imagine having a top-loading machine. It would literally take up half my kitchen.

Post# 468795 , Reply# 16   10/12/2010 at 14:38 (4,937 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        
Hydralique

foraloysius's profile picture
I wonder about your statement that frontloaders naturally have a better balance than toploaders. Is there a basis for this? Lots of people in the USA have problems with vibration when they change from a toploader to a frontloader.

Post# 469016 , Reply# 17   10/13/2010 at 08:21 (4,936 days old) by mrboilwash (Munich,Germany)        

mrboilwash's profile picture
Space might have been an important reason too, but I believe the main reasons for FL machines being so dominant in Europe was because of much higher energy costs here.
I could also imagine that their gentleness and thoroughness was an important factor.
In Germany almost every house has a cellar and AFAIK we never ever had an automatic agitator washer on the market.
There have been wringer washers and twin tubs with agitators but no automatics.
I think our earliest Automatics had no advantage in water efficiency and they often spun much worse than any US Toploader.


Post# 469039 , Reply# 18   10/13/2010 at 12:33 (4,936 days old) by dj-gabriele ()        
The wife in Italy thought (and with reason) that a dryer was

I second that ;) Here in Italy at an average of 0,25€/kWh operating a dryer can cost up to 2€ (2,80 USD) per load!

Anyway big size machine are present in Europe too, just have a look at the Hotpoint-Ariston Extendia at 11 (real) kg of laundy or the Whirlpool Dreamspace at 10 or 11 (real) kg of capacity.

It's just a matter of how common they are!


Post# 469097 , Reply# 19   10/13/2010 at 21:19 (4,935 days old) by jerrod6 (Southeastern Pennsylvania)        
2 up 2 down

AquaCycle:

Pardon me, but can you describe what a 2 up 2 down house is?


Post# 469098 , Reply# 20   10/13/2010 at 21:35 (4,935 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
what a 2 up 2 down house is?

ronhic's profile picture
Simple...

2 living spaces downstairs - Kitchen and 'Front Room' (living/lounge room)

2 bedrooms upstairs...

Note that there are no bathroom references. A 'traditional' 2 up/2 down property would have had an outside toilet with bathing most likely to take place in the kitchen in a removable tub close to hot water and warmth....


Post# 469262 , Reply# 21   10/14/2010 at 05:59 (4,935 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK)        

aquacycle's profile picture
Ronhic got it spot on! A lot of these were also back to back houses. Most of these were built for mill workers in the 1800's and often large families were crammed into these small houses. My house is an old 2 up 2 down house. I do have indoor plumbing and a bathroom now though, thankfully!

Post# 469263 , Reply# 22   10/14/2010 at 06:14 (4,935 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK)        

aquacycle's profile picture
For more info, check out this link

CLICK HERE TO GO TO AquaCycle's LINK


Post# 469264 , Reply# 23   10/14/2010 at 06:18 (4,935 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK)        

aquacycle's profile picture
and this one...

this is the type of house I live in now. I'd like to point out though, it is not of low quality, or poorly lit, or poorly ventilated anymore lol. But you should get what I mean. Even after modern refurbishments, it would be an incredibly tight squeeze to fit in an american-style toploading washing machine and matching dryer. This is how my washing machine and dishwasher are set up in my kitchen:


CLICK HERE TO GO TO AquaCycle's LINK


Post# 469291 , Reply# 24   10/14/2010 at 13:00 (4,935 days old) by ultimafan ()        
I will simply echo what everyone has said...

That many UK houses wern't bulit with utility rooms hundreds of years ago. It's also I think convenience, as many kitchens are located next to the garden door, so if it's a sunny day you'd take the washing out and hang it to dry. I think US users tumble dry all year long, with many of us using it mostly during the rainy weather. (That being said, we don't have the best of weather either!)

Of course we still have top loading machines but they're not very common. I reckon that due to us liking to have our washing machines in the kitchen, manufacturers have taken a hint and instead made large capacity machines like the 11kg LG steam and Hotpoint Aqualtis to fit standard kitchen spaces so they fit in the kitchen. It's mostly common to see just a washing machine installed in a kitchen with no dryer, sometimes the washing machine is placed next to the dishwasher. People with utility rooms have washers and dryers, or even have both in the kitchen too.

I think back in the 60's or 70's people preferred twin tubs and toploaders, but gradually everyone has grown to accept front loaders, which is probably why they are so common here.


Post# 469310 , Reply# 25   10/14/2010 at 13:54 (4,935 days old) by solsburian (SE Northumberland)        

When I was young, a couple of my older relations still clung on to their twin tubs (that was in the 90's) simply because when their homes were built or modernised, the kitchens were not kitted out with extra water taps or drains for a washing machine. I have fond memories of my maternal Grandmothers Hoover twin tub that had its agitator mounted on the side of the tub rather then in the bottom. My other Grandmother’s Hotpoint Liberator was more interesting though!

Post# 469341 , Reply# 26   10/14/2010 at 17:12 (4,934 days old) by Vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield, East Midlands, UK)        
And I will echo it too

vacbear58's profile picture
With the added proviso that a great deal of the housing stock built in the UK in the 20th century, at least pre-war, also had very small kitchens. When house hunting in the past I have been staggered to see kitchens not much more than 5ft wide - certainly not big enough for 60cm counters on either side, and often with two doors as well. Certainly not built for the wealth of modern appliances. It was only with changes in building regulations that houses began to have decent sized kitchens, especially public housing stock

Post# 469441 , Reply# 27   10/15/2010 at 07:19 (4,934 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK)        
solsburian..

aquacycle's profile picture
I know just what you mean. Both sets of grandparents in my family were on automatics by the time I was born in 1990, but my great grandparents both still used Twin Tubs - my Great Grandma Parker (grandads mum) had a Hotpoint twinny, and my Nana (grandma's mum) had a Hoovermatic. My Nana was 96 when she died in 2000. She was still very mobile, but couldn't deal with lugging out the twin tub once a week to do her washing. In her early 90's my great aunt bought her an automatic, but she always swore blind that her old Hoovermatic cleaned everything way better than the Indesit that replaced it, but she appreciated it's ease of use.

Post# 469672 , Reply# 28   10/16/2010 at 10:05 (4,933 days old) by solsburian (SE Northumberland)        

In the end both of my grandmas gave up their washing machines and let my parents do it. When they used to do their washing, I always used to love to help out, especially with the Hotpoint!

At out flat, we have just replaced our beloved Bendix Super Compact (its spin was too slow for me) with a Hoover slimline washer dryer, space is still a bit tight though!!


Post# 469704 , Reply# 29   10/16/2010 at 14:30 (4,933 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK)        

aquacycle's profile picture
In all honesty, dude, I think you were probably better off with the bendix lol. Not a fan of modern Hoover washers, I'm afraid, but hope you're getting the best out of it and enjoying it all the same :). I've got a Miele W562 Prestige Plus and a Hoover Electron dryer. Grandma still has her 1980 Hotpoint matching set :)

Post# 469715 , Reply# 30   10/16/2010 at 16:40 (4,932 days old) by solsburian (SE Northumberland)        

When we can afford to get the kitchen done we'll probably get a Miele WD.

To be honest I'm not a fan ether of the Candy "Hoover" machines but its quite handy with its slim depth and the dryer side is not too bad ether. However on its first wash, when on the final spin, it was so unbalanced that it knocked out one of the plugs covering the holes for the transit bolts! I just hope it can last a couple of years!

Unfortunately my Grandma who had the Liberator chucked it out when she got a Bungalow. She also had a Hotpoint dryer stacked on top of it (it was the next generation one as it had a clear door and didn't have the pasted buttons). She only ever used it as a store for the soap powder!


Post# 469717 , Reply# 31   10/16/2010 at 16:43 (4,932 days old) by favorit ()        
OMG !!!!!!!

Here she is !!!!

Thanks Louis for posting that Constructa dishwasher with the window :) She's the very one we were talkin' about time ago

AquaCycle, what about that slimline Zan-o-Lux dishwasher ??
Is she nice at washing pots and pans even on the fast cycle ?


Post# 469862 , Reply# 32   10/17/2010 at 08:20 (4,932 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
You're welcome Favorit, I just recently found a few pictures of it. Here is a picture of the inside.

Post# 469864 , Reply# 33   10/17/2010 at 09:25 (4,932 days old) by mrboilwash (Munich,Germany)        
OMG now I`m getting excited, too !

mrboilwash's profile picture
Notice that dishwasher has 4 little seperate sprayarms for the bottom rack !
Have seen one of them in the trash when I was still a child but I didn`t know until now it was a Constructa.
Did they also come without a window ? I don`t seem to remember it had one...
This one and an old Bauknecht are the only German DWs I have ever seen with a plastic interior.


Post# 470092 , Reply# 34   10/18/2010 at 12:47 (4,931 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        

foraloysius's profile picture
Actually there was a model without a window, at least Siemens sold the same machine without a window. It was a Siemens GS. According to the brochure I have (I must reinstall my scanner sometime) there was a model GS 12 (without water softener) and a model GS 13 (with water softener).

In the late seventies (early eighties?) Bosch and Siemens had a BOL dishwasher with a plastic interior (in the Dutch brochure the material was called Hostaleen PP). The Siemens model was the WG3800. I don't know what the equivalent Bosch model was but I know there was one, I once had a date with somebody who had a BOL Bosch dishwasher with plastic interior.


Post# 470114 , Reply# 35   10/18/2010 at 14:01 (4,931 days old) by chestermikeuk (Rainhill *Home of the RailwayTrials* Merseyside,UK)        
I once had a date with somebody who had a BOL Bosch dishwash

chestermikeuk's profile picture
Louis you made me laugh after a heavy day with that line!! That could be straight out of a Victoria Wood Acorn Antiques sketch...LOL

Talking of British washing machines - my avatar pic is the first true all British Washing Machine - The Servis Model A produced 1929...about to undergo a spa & motor tuneup...only 50 of them ever produced and its thanks to the Spa of Neil (aka Fanny) that it was found in a local spares shop around the corner from the Servis HQ in Darlaston, West Midlands...



Post# 470118 , Reply# 36   10/18/2010 at 14:18 (4,931 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK)        
Favorit...

aquacycle's profile picture
The Lux is absolutely brilliant! The longest cycle is about 55 minutes and washes everything without the need to rinse things in the sink before hand.

Post# 470129 , Reply# 37   10/18/2010 at 15:17 (4,931 days old) by solsburian (SE Northumberland)        

Here are pics of our new Hoover WD and our old Bendix Compact. BTW After just over a week of owning the Hoover, it appears to have developed a fault!

Post# 470276 , Reply# 38   10/19/2010 at 11:46 (4,930 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        
Acorn Antiques

foraloysius's profile picture
We should have a thread about that. I had never heard of it before. I saw a short clip, very amusing. It somehow reminded me of Last of the summer wine.

Post# 470296 , Reply# 39   10/19/2010 at 12:25 (4,930 days old) by vivalalavatrice ()        
Oh Louis!!!

That UNIMATIC!!!

Post# 470319 , Reply# 40   10/19/2010 at 13:39 (4,930 days old) by AquaCycle (West Yorkshire, UK)        
solsburian..

aquacycle's profile picture
..whats up with the Hoover?

Post# 470322 , Reply# 41   10/19/2010 at 13:56 (4,930 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        
Diomede

foraloysius's profile picture
If you want to see such a Unimatic in real you should visit the V-Zug museum sometime in Zug, Switzerland. It's not very big, but there are some nice machines. I have been there some years ago and was allowed to make some pictures. The link goes to my photos.

BTW, it would be better to discuss the problems with that Hoover in a separate thread in the Deluxe Forum.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO foraloysius's LINK


Post# 470327 , Reply# 42   10/19/2010 at 14:13 (4,930 days old) by solsburian (SE Northumberland)        
@AquaCycle

It has a KG Mode that is supposed to weigh the laundry and adjust the time and spin, while it will weigh the laundry, after the incident with the out of balance spin, it will no longer indicate if KG mode has been enabled or not and it seems to be confused about the number of rinses its supposed to do. Furthermore, when I checked the filter, a chunk of concrete was wedged in the bottom of the cover and there were smaller traces of concrete around the handle of the pump cover. Since we’ve had it for just over a week, someone from Currys is coming out to check it.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy