Thread Number: 31433
FL Machines Really Do Clean!
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 474285   11/9/2010 at 22:45 (4,909 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Last week I came down with a really bad cold. I was stuck in bed for a good amount of time. But now I am feeling better, but I want to relate an experience I had about this time.

I was laying in bed one afternoon feeling like total crap. Sammy, our large Chocolate Lab was laying up on the bed with me, I guess for moral support. All of a sudden he starts vomiting, all over the bed. And I mean a lot!

I felt so dizzy and tired I just threw the comforter (cotton polyfill with twill exterior) in the closet without cleaning it. I fell back asleep and forgot to tell Karen about this. Well today I took the comforter out. Yuck! Dried dog vomit all over the comforter for over a week. I was wondering if I should just throw it away and buy a new one. So since it's my job to go to the coin op, I took it and the mattress pad (which got soaked as well)to be washed. Man, did that thing stink.

I got to the laundry, found a newer Wascomat SU630CC and put in the comforter. Selected heavy soil and extra rinse option as well as hot wash. I then used about 60ml of Foca and about a capful of bleach (the comforter is light beige) and let the machine rip. The machine did its thing and I noticed that the water levels were about 1/3 of the way up the door. Finally the machine had a totally clear rinse & spin.

When I removed the comforter I was shocked to find no trace of the stain or smell at all! I was impressed! Even if this comforter was able to fit in our TL machine, I don't think it would have cleaned it properly.

Now the question is, I used a commercial FL machine. Do home FL machines clean as well? This one I used at the laundry did seem to use a lot of water!





Post# 474288 , Reply# 1   11/9/2010 at 23:21 (4,909 days old) by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY)        

mark_wpduet's profile picture
Yes........Wascomats are great...........When I first started to read this, I thought you were referring to HOME FL washers, since a lot of people seem to have issues as to whether or not they actually clean........A heavy commercial machine will always clean well (I think)

Post# 474289 , Reply# 2   11/9/2010 at 23:37 (4,909 days old) by Dustin92 (Jackson, MI)        

Our Frigidaire gallery only washes in about 3 inches of water. It cleans everyday soil pretty well. It will hold a queen size comforter, and will clean everyday dirt from it, but probably would not do well with dog vomit on a load that big. I honestly think it uses too little water, as you never see water while it is washing, just what runs down the door as the clothes tumble. I have to say the rinsing is fair at best, I always use the extra rinse option, which causes it to do 3 rinses instead of 2. I think it should have 4, with the extra rinse making it do 5 or 6! I think overall a top loader is better. answering your question, do home front loaders actually clean- yes, but dont expect miracles like you had. I have washed a twin size comforter with dog urine on it, and it took 2 heavy cycles, with hot water, plenty of detergent, bleach and extra rinse to totally remove the smell.

Post# 474291 , Reply# 3   11/10/2010 at 00:02 (4,909 days old) by alr2903 (TN)        

I do not know about now but the Milnor machines in the 70's and 80's used huge amounts of water, with the sudsline half way up the window. They were many of them in New Orleans, probably because the Milnor plant is in Kenner La. Back then it was shocking to use a wascomat machine, as they were not as generous with water as the Milnor's. The coin op i use here for comforters and mattress pads are the "Electrolux" versions and seem to use alot of water especially in the rinses. alr2903


Post# 474295 , Reply# 4   11/10/2010 at 01:06 (4,909 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Well If You Mean "Commercial" Front Loaders

launderess's profile picture
Then yes, they do clean quite well. OTHO if you are referring to those modern domestic units that trickle a bit of water into the drum, then roll clothes about, I wouldn't be too sure! *LOL*

Have three washing machines; the Hoover TT, older Whirlpool "convertible" and the Miele. Anything that is really soiled/stained goes into the last,no questions period.

Know one will get slammed for this, but a properly loaded, chemically dosed and allowed enough water to get the job done, will out clean most if not all top loading washing machines without all the palaver of pre-treating/soaking/washing.

Laundering bulky items in today's front loaders can be tricky because they simply do not use enough water. Also since it seems the darn fools responsible for design have been got at by "tree huggers", it is hard to find work arounds to add more water if needed.

Those large commercial machines are great for many reasons, one in particular is because there is enough room inside the drum for "lifting and dropping" of wash. This action along with a nice healthy water level does make a difference. It is why with proper chemicals and water temps you can get things clean with <15 minutes of wash time, versus the 30 minutes (or longer) of some domestic machines.


Post# 474319 , Reply# 5   11/10/2010 at 06:18 (4,909 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
My new-issue Frigidaire uses very little water and it actually cleans remarkably well. However....it would probably not be too successful handling a large amount of dog vomit. If you were to shake most of the dried debris off the comforter, then I'd have no problem recommending washing it in a modern front-loader.

If copious amounts of dog vomit are not a regular part of your laundry grime, then yes, new front-loaders clean very well.

I've washed comforters and blankets laden with cat hair (after giving them a shake-out first, of course) and my ultra-low water use washer handled them just fine. Quite a bit of pet hair was removed by the washer, and the rest was caught in the dryer's filter.

While I find watching vintage front-loaders in action far more enjoyable than watching a front-loader, I'll take a front-loader---especially a new one, with huge capacity and uber-fast spin speeds---over a top-loader as my daily driver every time. My washer cleans a huge load highly stained kitchen whites using about 17 gallons of water (including a prewash and extra rinse). The results are always flawless; the load is dry in about 35 minutes. Can't argue with performance like that!





Post# 474324 , Reply# 6   11/10/2010 at 06:48 (4,909 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Before I went to the coin op, I put the comforter on the driveway and swept all the excess "debris" off of it. But is sure did have some nasty stains on it.

But when it happened I kept asking myself "why does this have to happen when I am sick?" Normally none of our dogs throw up very often. It's a rare instance.


Post# 474332 , Reply# 7   11/10/2010 at 08:42 (4,909 days old) by amyswasher ()        

Animals can catch illnesses from people, and vise-versa.

Post# 474337 , Reply# 8   11/10/2010 at 08:59 (4,909 days old) by Dustin92 (Jackson, MI)        

I forgot to mention that the FL machines at our local laundromat, which are IPSO machines of all sizes, use less water than our Frigidaire and do not clean well at all.

Post# 474339 , Reply# 9   11/10/2010 at 09:02 (4,909 days old) by Toggleswitch (New York City, NY)        

toggleswitch's profile picture
...And dogs and cats are empathic. (Is that the word /concept I am looking for?

The dog may have been feeling what you were psychically, if not physically.

.....Or you both ate the same bad Chinese-food! :-)


Post# 474375 , Reply# 10   11/10/2010 at 12:03 (4,908 days old) by Hoover1100 (U.K.)        
I for one (and I'd bet the vast majority of people over

Would say that a modern, domestic front loading machine washes (and rinses) CONSIDERABLY better than a commercial front loader.

The cycles are too short, the water levels too high (making the wash less effective)and the lack of accurate temperature control makes them pretty useless on most heavy soil IMO, they do an ok job, but a modern domestic front loading machine is far better at removing tough dirt.

Glad they got your stuff clean though!

Matt



Post# 474408 , Reply# 11   11/10/2010 at 15:57 (4,908 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
In Both Commercial and Domestic Laundry Settings

launderess's profile picture
Amercians by and large are wedded to using chlorine bleach for stain removal/whitening where possible, hence the "short" cycles.

As for water temperature and control, frontloading commercial and laundromat washing machines can be set for either automatic temperature control, and or connected to a source to supply heat (steam, electric and or gas). Most laundromats do not bother with heating as in introduces more costs. What all commercial laundromats and laundries do have are recirculating pumps that keep the water from the heater moving about so there isn't the cold water "lag" when machine fills.

Hot water going into the machine can be as hot as the heater is set (though most machines probably have some limit set by the maker, usually around 160F or less to protect incoming water valves and so forth), some laundries/laundromat machines will inject various amounts of cold water as the machine fills, even on "hot" to prevent using too high a water temperature, others simply take what is given. Again this is all controlled by the owner of the laundry/laundromat.

All things being equal, two "short" washes are better for cleaning very soiled laundry than one long cycle. Especially with American laundry detergents which by and large are designed for short wash cycles usually found in top loading washing machines. Indeed until recently no such thing as "HE" detergent exsisted on these shores, well ok, there was "controlled suds" detergent, but by and large Amercians use whatever detergent (normally designed for top loading machines), in laundromat washers.

As the amount of water used for the wash cycle is decreased, the length of the wash cycle must increase to compensate. Otherwise there is a very real risk all laundry will not be saturated with the detergent/water solution thus cleaned.

Domestic front loading washing machines have greatly increased their wash times over the past few years, this is in response to "Energy Star" ratings causing them to use less water. However as even "Consumer Reports" has finally noticed this can and often does lead to increased wear on laundry. Long cycle times coupled with low water levels increase not only the friction of wash action, but the length of time wash is exposed to such.


Post# 474410 , Reply# 12   11/10/2010 at 16:47 (4,908 days old) by supremewhirlpol ()        

IPSO COMMERCIAL FL MACHINES CLEAN QUITE WELL THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!!

Post# 474411 , Reply# 13   11/10/2010 at 17:08 (4,908 days old) by Hoover1100 (U.K.)        
Hmmm

In my experience one long wash cycle in a domestic machine is far more efective that 2 short washes in a commercial machine, even with a high temperature of hot water I find they just set in stains compared to a cold fill, heated machine.

A lower water level/long wash I find is far more effective than a shorter wash with a higher water level too.

As for clothing wear, I find clothes are less worn from our modern machines than they used to be with our previous machines which used more water and had shorter wash times, they're certainly a lot less worn than in my Hotpoint twin tub (but that's a whole different debate).

Maybe it is just detergent design, I'd have to use an American detergent to compare.

As for Ipsos, not wishing to cause offence, but I've never found the 28min Hot wash on the ones at our local Laundrette to be particularly effective.

Matt


Post# 474416 , Reply# 14   11/10/2010 at 18:25 (4,908 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Commerical & Laundromat Washers In The US

launderess's profile picture
By and large do a cold or warm water "pre-wash" before the main cycle, often regardless of the temperature chosen for the later cycle.

Being as this may, now that computer controls are making headways into laundromat washers, in the name of energy savings, some programs allow one to skip pre-wash and or charge extra for hot water washes.

American laundry detergents by and large are designed to work quite quickly, again because of the short cycles(top loaders) on these shores have.

Case in point; did a load of badly soiled table linens last night in the Miele using the newer version of Tide "HE" "Free and Clear" liquid.

Since the boilers are now on (heating season) water out of our taps is >130F, so in an effort to save a bit on electric by avoiding having the Miele do a cold to 120F or 140F wash (my main setting to get good bleaching action for certain stains), did a cold pre-wash first using a bit of Tide, then onto a "hot" wash using a hot fill and boosting temp the rest of the way up.

After the pre-wash water drained, decided to peep at the wash in order to see if any stains were left that could be set by incoming very hot water. To my surprise the linens were almost totally clean. Not sure how long the pre-wash is on my older Miele, but it is much less than the wash cycle, and am guessing <10 mins.



Post# 474429 , Reply# 15   11/10/2010 at 21:33 (4,908 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
Launderess, I discovered the same thing with a load of stained kitchen whites. The washer had just drained the pre-wash water, and I noticed a stray black sock in the load. While digging around in the load to locate and remove the sock, I noticed that many of the stains were already gone, or nearly so. The pre-wash is 10 minutes in temp-controlled cold water on my Frigidaire.



Post# 474433 , Reply# 16   11/10/2010 at 23:25 (4,908 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
Animals can catch illnesses from people, and vise-versa.

ronhic's profile picture
Amy....

Generally not....


Post# 474436 , Reply# 17   11/10/2010 at 23:41 (4,908 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

The week before I got this horrible cold I went to my doctor for my annual check up and stress test. His office is in a 28 story office tower that is full of doctors offices. If I go in that building OCT-MAR I always get sick a week later. I usually only have one cold per year, thank goodness.

The washer I used to wash the comforter did do a cold water prerinse and warm water rinses except for the very last one, which was cold water. I think this contributed to the final result as Laundress indicated.

AFAIK, the only illnesses that could be passed from dogs to humans is hookworms, roundworms and ring worms. And if you get bit by a tick that may be on your dog could transmit Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. But if you keep your dog current on heart worm preventatives and flea control, this shouldn't be a problem. Most heart worm preventatives like HeartGard contain intestingal worm preventatives.


Post# 474463 , Reply# 18   11/11/2010 at 10:47 (4,908 days old) by jerrod6 (Southeastern Pennsylvania)        
Happy with my FL

I have gotten better performance from my FL than any top loader I have used and I don't use chlorine bleach in it. Mine is a bit older, purchased in 2002, so it might use more water than newer ones.

It has longer and shorter programs but defaults to the shorter one unless I select the extended option. The short wash lasts between 12 and 20 minutes depending on the load size followed by 2 or 3 rinses with high speed spins between each. I use this short wash for almost every cotton load except heavy soiled white socks and underwear. I use extended for the heavy soild white load and add a prewash which can be added to any program. I also use the prewash with stained items. The prewash lasts for 15 minutes and fills with tap cold water which is then heated to about 100F before the water is pumped out. The main wash then continues with whatever temperature you have selected.

So far very good performance from my FL.



Post# 474492 , Reply# 19   11/11/2010 at 13:25 (4,907 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
My 2002 Frigidaire front-loader used far more water than my new one does. The new machine cleans extremely well---and it should, considering the very concentrated detergent solution in the tub.

I believe I would have had to use 3-4 capfuls of detergent to get the same concentration in my old machine; and my laundry room would have been full of suds.


Post# 474561 , Reply# 20   11/12/2010 at 00:15 (4,907 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Much As One Loves The "Coolness" of A Top Loading Wa

launderess's profile picture
Methinks sooner or later the Whirlpool will be gifted to a family member. So many of my older relatives are downsizing into smaller homes, and would welcome the unit.

American "HE" detergents by and large are the same as their higher sudsing cousins, just a bit of foam control agents added. So it makes sense such detergents have kept their "hit and run" aspects, that is giving good soil and stain removal in a short period of time.

Now if only one could squeeze one of these into my laundry room! *LOL*


CLICK HERE TO GO TO Launderess's LINK on eBay


Post# 474566 , Reply# 21   11/12/2010 at 00:25 (4,907 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
Blimey.....

ronhic's profile picture
...you don't want much Launderess....

Post# 474573 , Reply# 22   11/12/2010 at 00:50 (4,907 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
No, I Don't Do Things By Halves

launderess's profile picture
Do I?

*LOL*


Post# 474574 , Reply# 23   11/12/2010 at 00:53 (4,907 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
Welll.....

ronhic's profile picture
....even a half load in that would still be 17.5lb.....



Post# 474575 , Reply# 24   11/12/2010 at 01:20 (4,907 days old) by dirtybuck (Springfield, MO)        
Oh Laundress...

My word! Stop being so picky and choosy. :)

Post# 474586 , Reply# 25   11/12/2010 at 05:24 (4,907 days old) by CleanteamofNY ((Monroe, New York)        

cleanteamofny's profile picture
Gurl....., you gonna need one of these to get all the water out of your towels!

CLICK HERE TO GO TO CleanteamofNY's LINK on eBay


Post# 474612 , Reply# 26   11/12/2010 at 09:46 (4,907 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
Launderess---The Milnor would be great! You'd have the "800-lb. gorilla" of washers, that's for sure...and it could definitely hold a king-size comforter.



This post was last edited 11/12/2010 at 13:03
Post# 474628 , Reply# 27   11/12/2010 at 11:56 (4,906 days old) by LordKenmore (The Laundry Room)        

lordkenmore's profile picture
"AFAIK, the only illnesses that could be passed from dogs to humans is hookworms, roundworms and ring worms."

There is also rabies! And while rabies can be prevented by shots, I have known people who have decided "not to bother." As far as I know, none of them had a problem--but that could have changed in a hurry.

Fleas are another possible problem. They're said to be able to carry disease (remember the plague?). Past that, they are just plain annoying.


Post# 474635 , Reply# 28   11/12/2010 at 13:09 (4,906 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Diseases

mrb627's profile picture
Past that, they are just plain annoying.

The fleas or the dogs?

Malcolm


Post# 474818 , Reply# 29   11/13/2010 at 10:42 (4,906 days old) by LordKenmore (The Laundry Room)        
The fleas or the dogs?

lordkenmore's profile picture
The fleas. I live in an area that has a huge flea problem, and it's something all around that many drives people with dogs crazy.

Although, it's fair to say that dogs have their annoying moments. A few years ago, a roommate had foster care dog that would sleep on my bed at night. It truly tiresome explaining night after night: "This is your half, this is my half. We share the bed! You don't get the whole thing!"

Of course, I'm sure dogs would say humans have annoying moments. For example: "That thoughtless human made me take a bath, just because I had fun playing in mud puddles all afternoon!" Or: "That human makes me eat this icky dog food stuff, instead of the GOOD thing HE'S having!"



Post# 474911 , Reply# 30   11/13/2010 at 21:35 (4,905 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Texas is very bad when it comes to fleas. If you use a good flea preventative and vacuum your home regularly you can keep the fleas away.
I am very allergic to fleas. If I get bit the area swells up a lot. We just switched to Advantage for fleas as Front Line doesn't work anymore. It seems the fleas have adapted.
This entire year I haven't seen a flea on any of our 4 dogs.


Post# 474948 , Reply# 31   11/14/2010 at 06:05 (4,905 days old) by retro-man (- boston,ma)        

Borax is a natural killer of fleas and ants. Just sprinkle some onto your carpets and walk around in it to make it go deep into the pile wait for an hour than vaccuum. kills fleas and their eggs. have been doing this for years and no fleas and no collars or drugs on the dogs.
Jon


Post# 474957 , Reply# 32   11/14/2010 at 06:43 (4,905 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Drugs on Dogs

mrb627's profile picture
I am not a big fan of that flea repellant that you apply to the back of the dog's neck. I tried it one time with my dog and it really seemed to irritate him to no end. He stood there looking at me with his head cocked to one side and one of his eyes twitched uncontrollably. I bathed him several times till I thought it was mostly gone. Now I use the medication that you put in his food.

Anyway, the BORAX does work. We used it religously growing up in South Florida. Love that it drove the palmetto bugs away.

Malcolm


Post# 475085 , Reply# 33   11/14/2010 at 17:04 (4,904 days old) by Jetcone (Schenectady-Home of Calrods,Monitor Tops,Toroid Transformers)        
I can tell you 1950's Bendix front loaders

jetcone's profile picture
do clean! I use a warm soak cycle before wash and that seems to take care of most things.
In testing my new detergent "Splash" last month, I set the table with Mom's white linen tablecloth, sure enough a guest spilled a whole ladle of pasta sauce onto it. I let it sit two whole days before attempting a wash in Splash, I used two doses, one for the warm soak cycle and one for the hot wash. It came out brilliant white, partly because of the formulation and partly because of the Bendix front loader with its 20 minute wash cycle. No bleach was used BTW!

So front loaders do clean I feel they do it better than top loaders.
Now as far as rinseing goes with the new HE machines well thats another topic for another thread.



Post# 475143 , Reply# 34   11/14/2010 at 21:34 (4,904 days old) by tlee618 ()        

Yay Jon, so glad to hear that you are making progress with "Splash"!!

Terry


Post# 475144 , Reply# 35   11/14/2010 at 21:42 (4,904 days old) by dirtybuck (Springfield, MO)        
Back To The Borax For A Second...

OK, so if Borax is put on the carpet and then vacuumed up with dead fleas, if there are live fleas in the bag, will it still kill the fleas in there? Will there be any need to change to a new bag?

Just curious.


Post# 475164 , Reply# 36   11/15/2010 at 05:22 (4,904 days old) by retro-man (- boston,ma)        

no everything should be dead in the bag not only from the borax but nothing can live in a vaccuum i believe. not because of the vaccuum machine itself but the term vaccuum. i think it is impossible for anything to breath in a "vaccuum"
jon


Post# 475168 , Reply# 37   11/15/2010 at 06:06 (4,904 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Oh I Don't Know About That

launderess's profile picture
Was watching a news show several weeks ago and they covered that "famous" exterminator who is now on cable televison.

A reporter followed said exterminator around on a call to a local home *INFESTED* with roaches. I mean they were under the fridge, behind the fridge, behind painting/photographs hung on the walls, behind cabinets, in cabinets and so forth. Anyway, as part of his arsenal to deal with bugs,the man sprays some sort of attractant then scoops up the roaches as they come out with a vacuum cleaner (carried on his back via a strap). Reporter asked what happens then (with the bugs in the sack), and exterminator replies "you don't want to know", so one assumes the things aren't all dead in that vacuum bag.



Post# 475182 , Reply# 38   11/15/2010 at 08:49 (4,904 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
@whirlcool

My late, beloved Ridgeback (named Korky; passed away Feb 2010 at fourteen years of age) once vomited on the bed's fitted bottom sheet. Soaked through the sheet, the mattress topper, and moistened the mattress pad (did not soak through to mattress. In addition, comforter and cover were soiled, by direct contact with ground zero.

In two loads, I had everything washed and dried and back on the bed. I did have to take the fitten bottom sheet outside and shake off the debris before washing. Of course, this was live as it happened, not a forgotten item in a closet, but I didn't have to go to a laudromat and I did it all at home (in the middle of the night, as this happened about midnight).

The one caveat is that it was summer and I was using a lightweight IKEA synthetic comforter that was only full/queen size. Not warm enough for winter but just right for summer. Had I been using one of the thicker winter-weight king size comforters, I'd have had to go to the laundromat, it won't fit in my 3.5 cu ft Frigidaire (I have a lightweight king size that WILL fit, but not the heavier winter-weight model).

Someday my spider will break and I'll need to go shopping. Most likely one of the 4.0+ cu ft models will accomodate everything that I wash, including king size comforters. However, I'm not the type to throw something out that works. So the current washer---which was mid-size when it was purchased, with 3.7 cu ft WP's being the largest on the market in early 2006---will be the daily driver until such time as the spider fails.


Post# 475194 , Reply# 39   11/15/2010 at 09:52 (4,904 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Commercial FL Washers

mrb627's profile picture
I don't recall ever having poor results from a commercial FL washer. Of course, if you are using a poor detergent or not enough, no machine can make up for that.

Bendix - would like to see a video of the Splash test...

Malcolm


Post# 475424 , Reply# 40   11/16/2010 at 07:13 (4,903 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
Jim---If you like your current Frigidaire washer, you'd love the new ones with the 4.8 cu. ft. tub, and a dryer with a 7.0 cu. ft. drum. The dryer is wonderful: The "Anti-Static" option works very well, and the "Add Steam" option helps keep shirts from wrinkling. I use the "Steam Refresh" cycle all the time, especially for the casual dress pants I wear to work.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy