Thread Number: 33296
Why no balance ring for 24-inch early DD Whirlpool? |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 501173 , Reply# 1   3/4/2011 at 07:20 (4,801 days old) by COMBO52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 501176 , Reply# 2   3/4/2011 at 07:43 (4,801 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
They learned the trick from Maytag's AMP machines with the oil-filled balance ring as part of the top of the tub. With WPs, though it is water and if left in freezing conditions, it can freeze and break the plastic ring. |
Post# 501202 , Reply# 3   3/4/2011 at 09:50 (4,801 days old) by COMBO52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The WP built washers do use water in thier balance rings but as they are only 1/2full they can freeze with no damage if the washer remains in the normal upright position, but they can break from freezing if the washer is laying on its side when it freezes. Many FL washers use liquid filled balance rings and they contain some sort of antifreeze to keep them from being damaged when they are exposed to freezing temperatures. |
Post# 501297 , Reply# 4   3/4/2011 at 15:36 (4,801 days old) by magnumopus (FL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Thanks for the replies. Using oil would make more sense; over time water and/or antifreeze would presumably cause corrosion. (Just look at what water does to the underside of a basket's center post.) |
Post# 501385 , Reply# 5   3/4/2011 at 20:44 (4,800 days old) by COMBO52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Water will not cause any corrosion when it is completely sealed as no additional oxygen adams are being introduced to allow rust and corrosion. The water filled rings were normally plastic anyway, plus the water filled rings are much more environmentally friendly when the washer gets recycled than oil would be. |
Post# 501393 , Reply# 6   3/4/2011 at 21:02 (4,800 days old) by magnumopus (FL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Ahhh...I never considered those variables. Thanks. |
Post# 503916 , Reply# 9   3/13/2011 at 20:14 (4,791 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I've begun getting interested in Kenpools (Lord, help me). Looking at some of the examples of the tubs on many of the BD Kenpools, it is obvious that there's no balance weight, at least on the washbasket. With machines like these, where they use a long LONG neutral drain, isn't it logical that no balance ring is necessary when all the dead weight basically falls to the bottom of the washbasket? I always thought that that was one of the big advantages to a neutral drain vs. a throw. I used to hold the washbasket of our Filter-flo with my hand to simulate a neutral drain and to see if I could improve the balance of that machine. |
Post# 503972 , Reply# 10   3/14/2011 at 07:48 (4,791 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Yes Ken it does help balance to have all the clothes laying in the bottom of the tub when starting the spin cycle. The BD WPs & KMs had enough weight in the baseplate and gearcase assembly + a fairly calm spin speed of 515-525 RPMs that they didn't need a balance weight on the spinning basket. Although they have an add on balance ring for late 1970s super capacity BD washers to help resolve complaints about excessive vibration on these machines.
Ken falling in love with WP laundry products is only natural as the more you see of them the more you like them. Its very much like politics the more you know the more likely you will have a liberal view of things. |
Post# 503986 , Reply# 11   3/14/2011 at 09:22 (4,791 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Ken -
I am going to expand upon what John said a little bit. Although the BD Whirlpools and Kenmores are heavy in construction, and probably does help "hold down" the machine in an iffy spin, these machines like any other can have problematic spins at times. All that weight in a BD may help stabilize a machine, but it acts against it too if a load is unbalanced because the machine is slinging around all that weight - once the momentum is there, it tends to keep going. My experience is that a poorly loaded BD, meaning that the user didn't think about the dynamics of what they're loading, may not recover from this throughout the entire load. If one were to have a load of darks consisting of jeans to knit shirts, I would always load the jeans opposite one another in the basket and make sure they are offset, then layer other items of similar weight (when wet), etc. If you were to load the jeans on one side and the knits on the other, the basket may look like it volumes-out fine, but those jeans will never spread out evenly, especialy in a full load, and the basket will be out of balance for spin, and probably dramatically so. |
Post# 503989 , Reply# 12   3/14/2011 at 09:43 (4,791 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
John,
My visit to your warehouse began my indoctrination into the cult of the Kenpools. It's hard to not be won over by someone else's enthusiasm. Also our discussion about the parts used in the Kenmores vs. the Whirlpools was enlightening and really did make me reconsider Kenmores.
As for being a Liberal, as a mentor once described George Orwell to me, I'm a conservative leftist.
...and just for the record, the washing machine that really began my fascination was a Whirlpool. When I was born, this (or something very close to this) was in the apartment kitchen hooked up to the sink (one speed, no water temperature selection, 24" wide, a beautiful turquoise control dial, an agitator I haven't seen since, no safety switch!!, and I was heartbroken the day we moved and my Mother sold it to one of her models): |