|
Thread Number: 34265
Finally, I found it - Gorenje simple&logical |
[Down to Last] |  |
|
| Post# 514371 , Reply# 1 4/28/2011 at 11:10 (4,745 days old) by nrones () | ||
|
2nd picture :) PICTURE 2 
| ||
| Post# 514372 , Reply# 2 4/28/2011 at 11:11 (4,745 days old) by nrones () | ||
|
3 :) PICTURE 3 
| ||
| Post# 514373 , Reply# 3 4/28/2011 at 11:27 (4,745 days old) by aegokocarat (United Kingdom) | ||
|
get it Dex it looks cool! :) Tom | ||
| Post# 514393 , Reply# 4 4/28/2011 at 12:41 (4,745 days old) by optima (Cumbria England) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 514395 , Reply# 5 4/28/2011 at 12:45 (4,745 days old) by whirlpolf () | ||
|
love the symbols so cute! Especially that little friendly sheep for woolens. Btw. didn't Candy make oval shaped portholes in the 70s? Neat machine, get it! Joe | ||
| Post# 514402 , Reply# 6 4/28/2011 at 13:04 (4,745 days old) by targus () | ||
|
Hello, Siemens1833 on youtube owns one of these and you can see it in this video. Maybe you can ask him what temperature options there are but I think you can wash @ 90° CLICK HERE TO GO TO targus's LINK | ||
| Post# 514404 , Reply# 7 4/28/2011 at 13:11 (4,745 days old) by aegokocarat (United Kingdom) | ||
|
@Optima the indesit moon cant do a rinse and spin prog! | ||
| Post# 514410 , Reply# 8 4/28/2011 at 13:41 (4,745 days old) by optima (Cumbria England) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 514411 , Reply# 9 4/28/2011 at 13:42 (4,745 days old) by aegokocarat (United Kingdom) | ||
|
still i would prefer it to have a seperate button for that though | ||
| Post# 514412 , Reply# 10 4/28/2011 at 13:48 (4,745 days old) by optima (Cumbria England) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 514418 , Reply# 11 4/28/2011 at 14:34 (4,745 days old) by dave886 (united kingdom) | ||
|
i would rather use this than the moon. | ||
| Post# 514429 , Reply# 13 4/28/2011 at 15:11 (4,745 days old) by optima (Cumbria England) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 514434 , Reply# 14 4/28/2011 at 15:30 (4,745 days old) by gorenje (Slovenia) | ||
released in 1997 | ||
| Post# 514435 , Reply# 15 4/28/2011 at 15:42 (4,745 days old) by gorenje (Slovenia) | ||
|
spin speed on jeans cycle
...well 900 / 10000 rpm for jeans I think its quite enough, first because I don't think a 1400 or 1200 rpm spin would do such a so big difference and than because I thing the jeans programs on today washers are made so to avoid those nasty stripes and wrinkles that may occur on jeans because of a too stron spin.
Ingemar | ||
| Post# 514444 , Reply# 16 4/28/2011 at 17:21 (4,744 days old) by Haxisfan (Europe - UK / Italy) | ||
Window yippee!
It looks quite nice and futuristic... and it's got nothing to hide as the Moon... but a lovely porthole window :-)
@gorenje: I see the criteria behind drying jeans... however I can't really be bothered with that so when I've got a garment made of jeans in the load I just make sure I select a higher speed: my criteria is that as such item would typically be thicker and heavier than the rest, it'd take longer to dry hence me trying to get the machine to extract as much water as possible. I see the logic in possible streaking as you suggested though! @nrones: 'whirlpolf' was talking about oval portholes rather than oval tubs... I personally don't remember standard Candys to have that shape porthole but I recall seing one version of the Aquamatic with a squat shape door. The machine you showed doesn't have any rinse and spin cycles but perhaps these can be obtained by special sequences of button depressions... maybe you can try and download the manual for this washer straight from the company's site, you know the language and should be able to know what to look for ;-) | ||
| Post# 514450 , Reply# 17 4/28/2011 at 17:50 (4,744 days old) by Rolls_rapide (.) | ||
|
spin speed on jeans cycle 900/1000 rpm is not enough - especially in Britain's climate. Spinning at 1400 or 1600rpm removes more water from the clothes, which is vital if you tumble dry. Electricity prices are dear enough as it is. | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
