Thread Number: 37488
New-in-box ISE dishwasher |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 557376 , Reply# 1   11/17/2011 at 19:35 (4,542 days old) by retropia ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
This is the Classic Supreme model, model number CLSUP-5. This photo is of the right side of the control panel. It looks funky, but this is just the clear vinyl protective coating that has gone cloudy. |
Post# 557377 , Reply# 2   11/17/2011 at 19:36 (4,542 days old) by retropia ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
This is the left side of the control panel. The box is pretty much toast, with the front section completely gone. But it doesn't appear that the dishwasher has ever been out of the box. |
Post# 557378 , Reply# 3   11/17/2011 at 19:38 (4,542 days old) by retropia ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The interior appears showroom new. |
Post# 557379 , Reply# 4   11/17/2011 at 19:39 (4,542 days old) by retropia ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Cardboard spacers inside keep things from jiggling around too much. |
Post# 557381 , Reply# 5   11/17/2011 at 19:41 (4,542 days old) by retropia ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Serial and model number. |
Post# 557388 , Reply# 8   11/17/2011 at 20:19 (4,542 days old) by paulg (My sweet home... Chicago)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
My Kitchenaid portable has an identical interior. Well we all know that ISE/Emerson Electric and Hobart/Kitchenaid are VERY related.
I call my dishwasher "The Blaster". Though reserved largely for overflow dishes after parties, I use it on filthy stuff throughout the year or for grungy estate-sale finds. It even SOUNDS like it's scrubbing the tar off your dishes. Love it. |
Post# 557399 , Reply# 9   11/17/2011 at 20:46 (4,542 days old) by appnut (TX)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Doug, I think there's just a cosmetic differerence in the panels of the 3000 and the regular classic supreme, I vaguely remember seeing that somewhere. I"m disappointed thre's no mention of cycle time difference when the energy saver wash option is or isn't used. I owuld hope the cycle times wouled be extended a little bit more on the 400 & 700 just like they are on the comparable KAs. Comparing cycle times, looks like the TOL electronic version got short-changed compared to the others. Wouldn't want that myself. Thakns for all the book scanning. Now I have to go smoke a cigarette lol. |
Post# 557407 , Reply# 10   11/17/2011 at 20:53 (4,542 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557450 , Reply# 12   11/17/2011 at 23:12 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557452 , Reply# 13   11/17/2011 at 23:13 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557453 , Reply# 14   11/17/2011 at 23:14 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557454 , Reply# 15   11/17/2011 at 23:16 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557457 , Reply# 16   11/17/2011 at 23:17 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557458 , Reply# 17   11/17/2011 at 23:18 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557459 , Reply# 18   11/17/2011 at 23:18 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557460 , Reply# 19   11/17/2011 at 23:20 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557461 , Reply# 20   11/17/2011 at 23:21 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557462 , Reply# 21   11/17/2011 at 23:22 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557463 , Reply# 22   11/17/2011 at 23:23 (4,541 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557547 , Reply# 23   11/18/2011 at 08:30 (4,541 days old) by Jetcone (Schenectady-Home of Calrods,Monitor Tops,Toroid Transformers)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557575 , Reply# 24   11/18/2011 at 11:37 (4,541 days old) by retropia ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Peter, thanks for posting the brochure scans. That answers the question about the Classic Supreme 3000. That would look nice in our kitchen with the other white appliances; I may have to be on the lookout for one of these. |
Post# 557700 , Reply# 25   11/18/2011 at 23:16 (4,540 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 557717 , Reply# 26   11/19/2011 at 00:11 (4,540 days old) by joefuss1984 (Little Rock, AR)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 560009 , Reply# 28   11/28/2011 at 19:33 (4,531 days old) by mannyhitech ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Here is another view of this part. Thanks all, Manny |
Post# 560108 , Reply# 29   11/29/2011 at 07:23 (4,530 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That is the water feed tube for the upper racks wash arm, the larger round end pushes into a rubber fitting at the rear top center of the tub. And the smaller round spout points forward and mates with the back of the top rack to feed water to the top spray arm. Two little rubber tabs get pulled through the holes marked #9 to hold it in place.
The machine won't wash well in the top rack without this part in place, and from the look of this part it doesn't look like this machine is working all that well. |