Thread Number: 41026
POD Westinghouse 18lb capacity top loader
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 606811   6/28/2012 at 05:26 (4,313 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

18 pounds, my a$$




Post# 606814 , Reply# 1   6/28/2012 at 06:10 (4,313 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
True; 18-lbs. of bricks, maybe. At any rate, a workhorse of a washer. One of these was passed around among three of my friends over a couple of decades, and was still going strong when it was finally retired due to the complete rust-out around the cabinet just above the tub.

Post# 606819 , Reply# 2   6/28/2012 at 06:57 (4,313 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)        
Way back in 2003...

gansky1's profile picture
We measured out a 16lb load for this Westy - and it couldn't handle it...

This washer is a bit older than the POD and the 18 pound advertising campaign but about all that changed was the graphics on the panel and the advertising.


Post# 606820 , Reply# 3   6/28/2012 at 06:58 (4,313 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)        

gansky1's profile picture


Post# 606821 , Reply# 4   6/28/2012 at 06:58 (4,313 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)        

gansky1's profile picture


Post# 606822 , Reply# 5   6/28/2012 at 06:59 (4,313 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)        

gansky1's profile picture


Post# 606823 , Reply# 6   6/28/2012 at 07:05 (4,313 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Real Westinghouse Top load washers

combo52's profile picture

18 Pounds ? Toms reaction was the same as mine when I read that. With the indexing wash tub and a ramp style agitator these washers struggled to turn over large loads, yes they actually did pretty well with light loads.

 

WH TL washers from the time they started making them in the later half of the 1960s were always throw away washers in the repair trade. After WH worked out a lot of initial problems and got these working fairly well they sold out to WCI around 1975 and up to and especially after this time the cost of replacement parts were threw the roof so it made most repairs just not worth it. I always said their were only two parts that were worth replacing on a WH TL washer, the inlet valve and the belt. Just about any other problem was too expensive to fix, a timer was over a $120 for just the part, if any thing happened to the water pump [ which was assembled on top of the motor ] it usually took the motor out with it, very expensive and if the transmission had any problem at all this repair literately did cost as much or more than the washer cost. Like GE WH had a lot of transmission oil seal leaks at the bottom shaft seal, but unlike GE who offered an economical remanufactured transmission that could be installed in under a half an hour you faced a two hour job with parts costs of over $150. And this was the 1970s-1980s so needless to say very few WH TL washers ever got new transmissions and a lot of these washers were retired early. The only washers worst than these in this time period were the things already comming from WCI under the Kelvinator and Gibson labels.

 

But every once and a while you would see a WHTL washer that did manage to last upwards of 20 years or so and after WCI merged these two designs and got their quality control together they did build a lot of TL washers that were not as problem prone and some put in pretty respectable lives, but all the way to the end of the Frigidaire TL washers I never saw a single one that was worth the effort to replace the main seal, main bearings or transmission on, except in the case of the 24" and 27" stacks where the higher cost of replacing the complete machine sometimes made the repair make sense.


Post# 606833 , Reply# 7   6/28/2012 at 08:08 (4,313 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
I have this model machine, or one very similar.  Supposedly is a 1977 model.  Five temps, variable water level, normal & gentle cycles but there's no designated soak.  I've used it several times.


Post# 607139 , Reply# 8   6/29/2012 at 15:45 (4,311 days old) by scrubflex (bronx, new york)        

How much could it really handle?

Post# 607453 , Reply# 9   7/1/2012 at 13:37 (4,309 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Westinghouse 18LB washer

combo52's profile picture
Probably in the 8-12# range depending on the fabric.

Post# 607539 , Reply# 10   7/1/2012 at 22:37 (4,309 days old) by tecnopolis (Ocala/Dunnellon, Florida 34481)        

tecnopolis's profile picture
"Weigh to save" on a top-loader of that era must have been rare?

Post# 607548 , Reply# 11   7/1/2012 at 23:14 (4,309 days old) by scrubflex (bronx, new york)        

So, which machines had the larger washtubs, the mid/late 60's or 70's?


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy