Thread Number: 42567
Speed Queen Front Load Machines
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 626361   9/20/2012 at 14:46 (4,228 days old) by Iowegian ()        

Hi folks,

We're looking to replace a Maytag SAV series washer. I like the Speed Queen machines and was wondering if anyone has any experience with the Speed Queen FL machine in an upstairs laundry room. Our house was built ca. 1999 with engineered wood (I-beam) floor joists and seems to be pretty stiff as far as wood frame houses go.

Thanks for any insight.





Post# 626371 , Reply# 1   9/20/2012 at 15:50 (4,228 days old) by laundromat (Hilo, Hawaii)        

laundromat's profile picture

As nice as they are in design (inner and outer stainless steel tubs with perferated stainless steel paddles) and features, they are expensive and have smaller tubs ( 3.1 cu ft) then most competitors. The Maytag/Whirlpool/Amana front loaders have bigger capacity and are a bit more reasonably priced. LG also makes a larger capacity washer and Frigidaire Affinities are great in capacity, convenience and they make models as low as $549 at Lowes. I went to the Sears OutletStore here and found a new Frigidaire top of the line Affinity inthe box for only $400! I bought it for my brother who had a similar washer you have that went and took a crap ( berrings and pump )  so I gave him the Affinity. He said that he and his wife noticed how much cleaner their clotheswere gettiing and how much less lint was accumulating in the dryer.Renie told me that the clothes never loked or smeled as clean as their new washer gets them.


Post# 626373 , Reply# 2   9/20/2012 at 16:04 (4,228 days old) by Pulsator (Saint Joseph, MI)        

pulsator's profile picture

I have a Speed Queen FL washer and I LOVE it! It's definitely one of the best washers I've ever used! It does lack on features and there is no soil level selection but that doesn't really bother me. Less stuff to break! It's been my experience with the spin that the spin bursts tend to be a bit unbalanced if you don't have a full load, but they only last about 6-8 seconds before stopping to let the pump catch up. After the wash and between rinses, instead of doing a full spin, it does 4 pulse spins, getting gradually faster with each pulse. The only actual full speed spin the machine does is the final spin. (It does 4 pulses first then goes full speed for the final spin.) I can't say that I have any clue how the machine would react with your floor (mine is on cement), it'll probably shake a bit, but during the pulse spins, it's only for a few seconds at a time and then it moves on, the final spin tends to balance better and it has always been smooth sailing for me when the final spin comes around. Yes the machine costs more and has less features, but it's built so much better!!! As for the capacity, I've done comforters in mine with no issue. The Electrolux Wave Touch dryer I use with it also has issues coping with the size of the loads that come out of it. (And that's and 8.0 cubic foot dryer!) So I don't think that it has any capacity issues. The longer wash time certainly means it can cope with more laundry. It also seems to be far more balanced during the pulse spins and final spins if it's filled up. (And it never gets fussy about balancing trying to get the clothes just right for an eternity!) And it only takes 44 minutes for a regular load. Better than most FL machines today!


Post# 626375 , Reply# 3   9/20/2012 at 16:07 (4,228 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@laundromat:

I'm leery of Whirlpool/Maytag/Amana FLs after reading lots of stories of machines going bad after just a couple of years. Maybe there are thousands and thousands of good ones that we never hear about, and we only see the horror stories of the bad ones, who knows?

Not too interested in Frigidaire/Electrolux either, since they closed their Iowa plant a few years ago and moved production to Mexico leaving 900 people out of work. I'm not inclined to reward their greed to save a few bucks.

Thanks for the input just the same.


Post# 626376 , Reply# 4   9/20/2012 at 16:18 (4,228 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@Pulsator:

Thanks for the info. I really like the SQ philosophy of putting the money into the mechanics rather than doo-dads like touch screens and musical jingles, but no dealers around here stock them. They'd have to order one in. Wish I could see one run on a wood floor, that would make the decision to buy much easier...


Post# 626379 , Reply# 5   9/20/2012 at 16:30 (4,228 days old) by Pulsator (Saint Joseph, MI)        

pulsator's profile picture

Something I should add, mine came with special feet adapters for upper floor installations. They clip onto the front 2 feet and are about 3 inches in diameter. They are large adhesive pads that stick to the floor and will hold the washer still if it starts shaking. It may shake but, if properly installed, the pads will not allow the machine to walk. Also, I have never had my machine jump. If it decides the load is too unbalanced for a pulse spin, let alone the final spin, it will stop and redistribute. The Speed Queen difference is that it will only stop if it thinks it'll jump or the tub will bang against the cabinet. Most machine seem to try and keep their shocks from having to do any vibration absorption (which makes sense considering how cheaply made most of them are.)

 

There are others on this site (I'm can think of 4 or 5 at least) that have Speed Queen FL washers and they all love them. Hopefully someone will have some experience with them on a wood floor...


Post# 626380 , Reply# 6   9/20/2012 at 16:35 (4,228 days old) by mrx ()        

SpeedQueen and Miele tend to do no-nonsense designs with control panels. Miele's are a bit more sophisticated in terms of options, but they're relatively gimmick-free compared to some machines, especially some of the LGs and Samsungs which are more like a mobile phone than a washing machine.

The most important aspect of a washing machine is the design of the drum, the sturdiness of the build, the mechanical design of how it prevents the drum from vibrating too much i.e. shocks, springs etc and the power and reliability of the motor.

A front loader with a fairly mediocre size drum, but a powerful motor and excellent drum design will still produce far better results than a machine with a bigger drum, loads of fancy electronics if it has an inadequate motor and a badly designed paddle / drum system.

Remember, with a front loader your aim is to flush water through the clothes. They aren't tumble dryers and they don't necessarily need loads of room for clothes to tumble. What they need is an ability to slosh loads of water (not necessarily use lots of water) through the load using paddles and powerful rotation (i.e. lots of torque).

Also, when it comes to rinse performance, a front loader relies more on spin extraction than on sloshing around in water. You're aiming to wash - spin - re-saturate - spin - re-saturate - spin - fabric soften - final spin.

So, again that performance is dictated by mechanics, not electronics or drum size.

That's why I would say the SpeedQueen machines are quite likely to be excellent.
Same goes for Miele and a few others that are almost achieving commercial laundromat build quality scaled down for a household design.


Post# 626393 , Reply# 7   9/20/2012 at 17:28 (4,227 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@Pulsator:

Thanks - I downloaded SQ's install instructions and I didn't see those mentioned, only the typical rubber feet that go over the leveling bolts...


Post# 626397 , Reply# 8   9/20/2012 at 17:39 (4,227 days old) by laundromat (Hilo, Hawaii)        

laundromat's profile picture

I still say it's the users who don't follow the easy directions and never take care of their appliances that cause most of the problems with front loading washers.They either leave the door shut after use causing mildew, use a high sudsing detergent instead of HE, use way too much bleach causing rust and corosion, and never check pockets for loose change or other foreign objects. That may be why 99% of the broken models I have restored are still in use years after I repaired them. I prefer the larger capcity models and,in fact, will be getting LGs new 30" set in SS when I return home. Before I left, I set up the area where they'll look great and be more practical. I had to wait until they arrived to be sure I had the right measurements. I setup dliery for 10/25/12. I readthese will easily wash up to 25 pounds of dry laundry. Anyway. I ope whatever you buy works great and does meet your needs.


Post# 626398 , Reply# 9   9/20/2012 at 17:43 (4,227 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@mrx:

I've read lots of good things about Miele. Unfortunately, they just can't be found where I live. The company website lists two dealers in my area. Neither one stock any of their models. One dealer who normally stocks a lot of product from many manufacturers has nothing at all. The other dealer, who advertises as a "Factory Direct" kind of place doesn't really stock anything from anyone, they are just a storefront that ships product from a warehouse hundreds of miles away.


Post# 626399 , Reply# 10   9/20/2012 at 17:59 (4,227 days old) by bobo ()        

I've yet to go look at Miele machines at my local Miele boutique, but the Speed Queen FL looks quite promising; it's got a bigger drum, and probably just as well-built as the German machines at a price cut! The only two SQ dealers in my area are quite far away from my home, so I have to plan some time to go there in the coming weeks.

Post# 626400 , Reply# 11   9/20/2012 at 18:02 (4,227 days old) by Maytagbear (N.E. Ohio)        
If I were

buying a new washer, I'd mortgage my cat for the Speed Queen front loader. If.



Lawrence/Maytagbear


Post# 626401 , Reply# 12   9/20/2012 at 18:06 (4,227 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@laundromat:

As machines become more complex, there are more potential failure modes, including operator error. But good software design takes operator skill into account. Shouldn't laundry equipment be the same?

I don't envy the appliance manufacturers. I bought my first new washer ca. 1984-85. It was a DD Whirlpool, middle of the line and it cost $425. That was a lot of money to me, luckily the mom and pop dealer carried me for 90 days to pay it off. $425 in 1984 money is like $950 today. But today you can buy a technically complex front loading machine for $950 or a functional top-loader for $425. They have to be wringing (no pun intended!) every last labor and material cent out of those machines to hit those price points.



Post# 626406 , Reply# 13   9/20/2012 at 18:41 (4,227 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
"Technically complex "

launderess's profile picture
Does not have to automatically equal poor quality and or early demise due to planned obsolescence. It all comes down to design and quality.

Commercial laundry and dishwashing machines have long been technically complex with various amounts of computer controls, the difference however is how the systems are designed and installed to isolate them from certain damage.

Both in laundry and dishwashing machines you are going to encounter environments that are moist and warm, something computers/motherboards don't normally like. If certain electronic/computer controls are not protected to an extent from such things it will hasten their demise/shorten their useful lifespan.


Post# 626418 , Reply# 14   9/20/2012 at 19:26 (4,227 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@Launderess:

Microprocessor control of laundry and dishwashing equipment is relatively new. The benefits of microprocessor control for laundry and dishwashing equipment are not as obvious as they are for, say, automobiles, where fuel economy and engine longevity have increased greatly over the last couple of decades. If we were to compare water use to fuel economy, then yes, the appliance makers have succeeded. If we were to compare engine life to laundry machine life, I don't think the appliance makers have succeeded.

Perhaps GM needs to get back into the appliance business!


Post# 626438 , Reply# 15   9/20/2012 at 21:10 (4,227 days old) by whirlykenmore78 (Prior Lake MN (GMT-0500 CDT.))        
SQ FL.

whirlykenmore78's profile picture
Is probably about the best you are going to get today unless you want a Miele which would give you more cycles and options. Depending on where in central IA you are you should look on line for dealers in either the Des Moines area or the Minneapolis area. One for sure in The Minneapolis area that carries both lines Miele and SQ is Warner's Stellian. I do not know of any in Des Moines.
WK78


Post# 626443 , Reply# 16   9/20/2012 at 21:40 (4,227 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@whirlykenmore78:

I spent way more time in my younger days than I'd like to admit as a dish dog, so I know all too well about the Hobart dishwashers. They took all of about 2 minutes to go through their cycle - not enough time to sneak out for a smoke or to flirt with the waitresses. Thanks for the pic and the memories...LOL!

I still remember how chuffed I was when I got to be a prep cook - coring and chopping dozens of iceberg lettuce heads a day, slicing cases of tomatoes and so on. But it was a lot better than getting steamed by that damn Hobart dishwasher, and I got paid the same $2.25/hr...

I'll check out SQ dealers away from here if I really have to, but I'd like to trade locally if at all possible. SQ distribution around here isn't so good because for years everyone bought Maytag if they could afford it, and Whirlpool was the brand of choice at the next lower price point.



Post# 626457 , Reply# 17   9/20/2012 at 22:23 (4,227 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
I checked Consumer Reports, and Speed Queen front-loaders received a very low score for "freedom from vibration" during spins. This probably doesn't matter if you're installing it on concrete, but it might be of some concern in an upstairs laundry room.

Receiving best scores for vibration:

Samsung WF511AB ($1300)
Samsung WF520AB ($1400)

Kenmore Elite 4154 ($1300)
Kenmore Elite 4153 ($1000)

Shop by model, not brand, as other Samsungs (priced $600-800) scored poorly for vibration.


Post# 626464 , Reply# 18   9/20/2012 at 23:03 (4,227 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@Frigilux:

I saw the same thing, but I'm not as likely to take C-R ratings as seriously as I would have years ago, having owned some of their "recommended" stuff that turned out to be real duds.

Funny thing about their laundry ratings is that the Speed Queen stuff is rated low by C-R but rated very highly by owners. Are Speed Queen owners hopeless romantics longing for the old days of quality machines built in the U.S. by manly men with a welding torch in one hand and a 3lb. hammer in the other, that would be blinded by dingy whites? I really don't think so.

Conversely, the machines that are rated "best" by C-R have the lowest consumer ratings. Kind of makes one wonder whether C-R has any reason for being these days.

Go figure...


Post# 626718 , Reply# 19   9/22/2012 at 02:27 (4,226 days old) by qualin (Canada)        

To Bobo:

In Canada, you want to look for Huebsch. Alliance doesn't sell the Speed Queen brand in Canada, unfortunately. Fortunately, Huebsch = Speed Queen so it's not that bad.

To Iowegian:

We have our Huebsch placed on a concrete floor in the basement and I can feel the concrete floor shaking on certain kinds of loads from across the basement. I think I would have serious reservations about using a SQ machine on a wooden floor... but I would probably expect noticeable amounts of vibration with certain kinds (But not all) loads.

To Laundromat:

Ours has a 3.3 cu.ft tub, which is a 94 litre capacity. This is larger than a European style front loader, but not as big as some of the huge Samsung and LG machines out there. Personally, I think a 3.3 cu.ft drum is perfectly OK for two people or maybe a smallish family of 3-6 people. I usually leave washing the comforters to the laundromat.

To Pulsator:

I've never seen my Huebsch stop, even after the outer tub was banging against the cabinet. (It only did it twice on a pulse spin, then it didn't do it again.) I suspect near havoc and mayhem would have to be happening before it would finally give up.

To everyone else:

I have to admit that out of all of the machines, the Huebsch model which I have has as many "features" as a bottom end consumer machine, but this thing is like a brick craphouse.. it just takes whatever we can throw in it and keeps on going. I have a lot of confidence this machine will last decades without issues.



Post# 626719 , Reply# 20   9/22/2012 at 02:57 (4,226 days old) by bobo ()        

Thank you Qualin for the info.

I'm heading to my local Miele boutique this Sunday, just to get an idea of what a well-built machine feels like. I highly doubt the European machines (W3033) are big enough for my needs, as I want to wash a Cal-King duvet cover and a fitted sheet in one load. The SQ sounds promising, as it's got a 3.3 cu.ft drum, which should be big enough for my needs. Still have to find a place to see the washer in person though. So for now, the SQ is on the top of my list.


Post# 626755 , Reply# 21   9/22/2012 at 09:03 (4,226 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

I have the current SQ. I knew what it was before I bought it so I am not disappointed but it has pluses and minuses. It is a very rugged machine. Unlike so many of the FLs out there, this one does not have to be perfectly balanced to go into spin; its construction can take some vibration in spin. It is brilliantly engineered to shut off the pump during the surge spins to avoid air locking. The pump comes on again as the tub slows when there is plenty of water over the pump intake for positive pump outs. More importantly, the tub stays in the distribution speed between the surges so it does not have to redistribute before each surge spin. My Duet would usually go into the initial phase of spin prety well, but the water spun out of the load (because the speed ramped up too quickly) quickly overwhelmed the pump which tripped the flood sensor. The whole machine, except the pump came to a stop while the water slowly drained out. It then had to rebalance, which proved a very difficult task involving many attempts. It is possible to slowly ramp up without overwhelming the pump with too much water; my Miele W1986 does it beautifully, but the software in the Duet was not sophisticated enough.

The Speed Queen has many good points, but now it is time to make you aware of its shortcomings. First of all, its controls are little more than those of a coin-op machine with a couple of wonderful additions. A 24 minute, plus or minus, wash is too much for many things. It can be rough on fabrics. There should be something to allow cycle modification. Second, the surge spins are totally inadequate for removing enough water from the fabrics, especially heavy fabrics, for good rinsing. A FL uses a very small amount of water. Rinsing is a process of diluting the amount of detergent in the load. The best FLs, like the W1986, spin at very high speeds between the water changes for cottons. That means less water from the previous fill is carried over into the next rinse. If you ever stop the SQ after one of these surge periods and set the control to SPIN, you will see, if your machine drains into a tub, how much water is retained in the load. If you cannot see how much water is spun out, you could stop the machine and reach in and squeeze the load to get an idea of how wet they still are. In commercial installations like launderettes, carrying over this larger amount of water in the load before each rinse makes the washer use less total water because it does not have to resaturate the load for each rinse. It is not as bad as the commercial top loader that just drains part of the wash water out and then fills for rinse, but it is a similar principle. It also reduces total cycle time since it does not have to allow for a couple of minutes of higher speed spins between the water changes and that is also important to a commercial laundry operation. If any or all of this bothers a user, they can always do like I do and time the wash for a period shorter than the maximum, then turn the dial to OFF, then turn it to SPIN and let the load go through a real spin. Then start each rinse manually by setting the timer to RINSE & SPIN. No one machine is best for everything. This one is good for many things, but it could have been made better, like many other machines, if they were not designed under the shadow of stupid energy regulations thought up by bean counters and if SQ was interested in offering a thousand dollar machine with features comparable to other thousand dollar washers.


Post# 626767 , Reply# 22   9/22/2012 at 10:13 (4,226 days old) by logixx (Germany)        

logixx's profile picture
I second what qualin said about concrete shaking. I used these Speed Queens at a dorm where they were installed on a concrete first floor. The floor would noticeably vibrate during some spin cycles. But that's the same with Miele. These washers rely on their weight, rather than on sensors, steels balls or gel packs, to stop the unit from moving around. There are several reports from European users saying how their Miele goes into spin unbalanced because the overall construction of the washer can handle it - but then again, European homes usually don't have a wooden construction like in the US (or Canada, I suppose).

Alex


Post# 626772 , Reply# 23   9/22/2012 at 10:58 (4,226 days old) by bobo ()        
It can be rough on fabrics?

Tomturbomatic:

You said that the washer is rough on fabrics; is it because the actual wash cycle is too long (24mins), that's causing it? Is there a way to make shorten the wash cycle? I think my 20 year-old TL spends about 15mins agitating and, for some odd reason, that machine is making everyone's clothing in the house looking rough and old.


Post# 626864 , Reply# 24   9/22/2012 at 17:28 (4,225 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

I saw some wear on items. The drum is large so there is a lot of tumble action. I don't know if you are aware of this, but their first model had something like an 8 minute wash and Consumer Reports said its cleaning performance was not up to that of the other machines so with the next model, SQ greatly increased the wash time. My laundry is not that dirty so it does not need to wash as long, plus I wash in hot or warm water so I am not trying to remove heavy soil with cold water.

Unfortunately, I have found no way to modify the machine's cycles, other than by turning it off and doing as I stated above, because like so many new machines, it does not actually have a timer dial you can use to shorten a part of the cycle. The rinse periods are very short, so I sometimes turn it off after a couple of minutes of tumbling and then restart the rinse to give it extra time to make better use of the water. Just a textiles do not instantly give up soil, they do not instantly give up detergent in rinse water so a little bit of extra time tumbling in the rinse can make the rinsing more effective.

You might be able to get by with less agitation time with your top loader. Please hang on to it, if for no other reason than if you have one item to wash, it is very difficult to get it to balance well enough in a FL for it to spin. With a TL, you can often spread out and position the item in the bottom of the tub to get it to spin, even if at first it might trip the out of balance switch before you manually reposition it. You can't do that in a FL.


Post# 626866 , Reply# 25   9/22/2012 at 17:34 (4,225 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
Bobo

ronhic's profile picture
Firstly, consider what you will wash and how often you wash them before deciding a larger capacity machine is the way to go.

Consumer magazines both here in Oz and in the UK have found that consumers rarely if ever reach the capacity of the machine - don't let looks deceive you! Choice magazine has just revamped their testing procedures to focus on 'average load' rather than 'full capacity' as a result. It appears that people only put in about 3.5kg of washing regardless of the machine size.

A machine that is comfortably or fully loaded rather than partly loaded will generally spin better and without excessive vibration.

Miele machines are generally 6.5kg or larger these days and as an indication of capacity, my old 4kg Hoover stated a full load was 8...yes 8!!! single bed sheets and 8 pillow slips.

Any European machine will be capable of taking a KS cover and a bottom sheet...in fact, they'll take 2 of each, not be at 'capacity' and not even blanch at it. Don't be put off by what appears to be a smaller tub. Just fill it and go!


Post# 626882 , Reply# 26   9/22/2012 at 18:53 (4,225 days old) by bobo ()        

Our family of three don't have that much stuff to wash since we do the laundry every other day; it's only when we need to do the bed linens that a bigger machine will speed things up. Of course, we want our clothes and linens to last as well! My parent's bed is a Cal-King, while mine is a Queen size. Our present washer is a 20-pound TL, and the Cal-King bed linens fit fine. We have a "bed linen day" where we wash all of them in one day. If the Cal-King fitted sheet and duvet cover (our largest load) can be washed together, then we don't have to split that into another load and end up washing 3 loads. A family friend of ours has the Miele W4842, and I think it is too big for our needs. We will rarely reach half the capacity of that thing, except for the Cal-King bed set. The Speed Queen fits our needs - at least on paper - as it's got a 3.3 cu.ft drum, a size that's right between the Miele W3033 and W4842. Anyways, I found a dealer that carries both Speed Queen and Miele, and we'll probably go there tomorrow since it's close to our home.

Post# 626891 , Reply# 27   9/22/2012 at 19:17 (4,225 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Miele 4***** Series

launderess's profile picture
First they have been discontinued by Miele, so if you want one better act quickly as dealers will not be getting anymore new stock. Rumor has it Miele was losing money on each unit and for that and other reasons decided to pull the plug.

Next though the 4xxx units are indeed large per directions in the owner's manual they are only loaded 3/4 drum max. This is opposed to say quasi and or "large" front loaders that follow the age old principles of loading the drum full leaving about a fist's worth of space at top.


Post# 626916 , Reply# 28   9/22/2012 at 20:57 (4,225 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Long Wash Times

mrb627's profile picture
If you suspect the 24 minute wash time is too long, switch to the delicate cycle for lightly soiled laundry will cut it down to 14 minutes. You may have to add a stand alone spin only cycle to wring out your item, but the results should better fit your needs.

Malcolm


Post# 626924 , Reply# 29   9/22/2012 at 21:19 (4,225 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        
Good idea

Except that the Delicate cycle skips a spin between the rinses.

Post# 626955 , Reply# 30   9/22/2012 at 22:18 (4,225 days old) by bobo ()        

I guess a 24-minute wash isn't that bad, as we run 2 regular cycles (2x15mins of agitating) to make sure our clothes are clean. Maybe our washer isn't that great.....

Post# 626960 , Reply# 31   9/22/2012 at 22:35 (4,225 days old) by bobo ()        

Sorry, I forgot to add this in my previous post (I couldn't edit it): What is the wash/agitating time for Miele machines?

Post# 626962 , Reply# 32   9/22/2012 at 22:42 (4,225 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Delicate cycle

mrb627's profile picture
The Delicate/Bulky cycle on my Imperial machine does not omit the pulse spins between rinses. The rinse program matches the other cycles exactly.

Malcolm


Post# 626971 , Reply# 33   9/22/2012 at 23:24 (4,225 days old) by qualin (Canada)        

I think the biggest reason why the wash time is so long on the Huebsch/SQ machines is because the engineers were forced to bring down the water levels so the machine would use less water. Less water = More wash time required to get the clothes clean.

Since a few members on here like to increase their water level, (Cough Cough) that suddenly negates the need for the longer wash times. On the other hand, it really improves rinsing capability and takes more soap out of the clothes.

I personally find that my Huebsch front loader, even with its 25 minute wash cycle, is still more gentle on my clothing than the 8 minutes of washtime in my old GE top loader.

I do agree that it would be nice if Alliance sold a retrofit kit which could allow the user to select wash time and water level on their front loading machines. I would pay whatever Alliance would charge for a kit like that.

I think it is a shame that Miele discontinued their 48xx models. Their large capacity machine was on my shortlist next to Huesbch. The reasons why I picked the Huebsch over the Miele:

- Longer rated cycles. The Miele was rated to 15,000 cycles, the Huebsch to 25,000
- The Miele uses a composite plastic outer tub, the Huebsch uses a porcelain covered steel tub. Less potential for smell.
- Huebsch offered a 3 yr warranty, Miele only offered 1 yr. If Miele is so good, why don't they stand behind their products? Most other washer manufacturers are only 1 yr as well. (To add another 2 years to Miele would have cost $1000 extra.)
- The Demo set I looked at was a year old and both washer and dryer were $4000. The Huebsch set I bought was $1300 cheaper. It would have been $1700 cheaper if I had bought new.
- Huebsch machines are made in Ripon, WI. The Miele machines are made somewhere in Poland if my memory serves me right. So, waiting for parts isn't as long.
- Any commercial laundry equipment service depot can service a Huebsch. Their machines are mechanically identical to their laundromat equipment. Miele requires that the machine must be repaired by an authorized service depot.
- Much more intuitive controls. More knobs than buttons. Miele has no knobs, all buttons. This is more of a matter of personal preference.

The downsides to not buying Miele:

- The Huebsch has less cycles than the Miele. Then again, I don't see myself using a "Beach Towels" cycle anytime soon.
- The Huebsch has a 3.3 cu.ft drum, the Miele has a 4.0 cu.ft drum.

Uhm... that's about it. So, picking the Huebsch was a no brainer over the Miele.. Now, if I was living in Europe, the Miele would have been my first choice. (Hopefully, it would have been cheaper too.)


Post# 627073 , Reply# 34   9/23/2012 at 14:49 (4,225 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@Tomturbomatic:

Thank you for the very informative post!

Do you feel that the fixed 24 minute wash time causes more wear on fabrics than a conventional top-loader set to a standard 8-12 minute wash cycle?

How would you rate the rinsing performance if you let the machine do its thing with the extra rinse function selected?

Part of my interest in the SQ FL is water savings. We pay right at $0.01/gal (water and sewer cost). We do about 9 full loads a week, so the FL's additional cost could be recovered in 5-1/2 to 7 years versus the SQ TL. Then, anything after that time would go "in the bank" so to speak.



Post# 627077 , Reply# 35   9/23/2012 at 15:12 (4,225 days old) by AutoWasherFreak ()        

I would love to have a SQ front loader, a SQ top loader, and for a dryer the SQ double dryer. If I'm going to dream, I'm going to dream big, LOL.

Post# 627078 , Reply# 36   9/23/2012 at 15:13 (4,225 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@ronhic:

The whole subject of machine capacity is something that should be much clearer than it really is. I remember when U.S. machines were rated by weight, but somewhere along the line, they changed to volume. And now there are different volume measurement methodologies (IEC and DOE) that make things less clear than ever. Probably even less so in the case of some front loaders that advertise 4+ cubic foot capacity, but owners complain about the machines not being able to find a balance solution to spin out and abort the cycle sometimes...

The Amanatag we have now has a 3.2 cubic foot tub IIRC. I think it is pretty close to the same size as the big Whirlpool DD machines that we owned previously. I think the Whirlpools may have been deeper but smaller diameter tubs.

The SQ FL has a 2.82 cubic foot capacity listed in one part of their website, but it also mentions 3.0 and 3.3 in other places. I imagine that number depends on the measurement method, though.

My better half, bless her, stuffed one of our Whirlpool DD machines full of throw rugs. Broke the coupler between the motor and transmission. But that was an easy fix - $5.00 for the part and about 30 minutes time. I really liked our DD Whirlpools. We owned three of them over a 25 year period and the only reason we ever got rid of any of them was because we sold them with our houses when we moved. In 25 years I replaced 2 pumps and one drive coupler - that's pretty darn good reliability in my book. Simple is good.



Post# 627081 , Reply# 37   9/23/2012 at 15:36 (4,225 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@mrb627:

Using the delicate cycle sounds like a reasonable work-around.

Do you add the separate spin cycle because the delicate cycle uses a lower spin speed?

Is the amount of wash water the same with regular, perm press and delicate?

Thanks


Post# 627086 , Reply# 38   9/23/2012 at 15:51 (4,225 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@qualin:

Thanks for the comparison between your Huebsch(SQ) and the large Miele machine.

$4k for a laundry pair? Wow! I wonder how many people that buy at that price point actually do their own laundry or have domestic help doing it. Kind of like the people that buy $7,000 ranges that are only used by the caterer.


Post# 627089 , Reply# 39   9/23/2012 at 16:01 (4,225 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
Capacity

ronhic's profile picture
I coiuldn't agree more. Capacity is very hard to determine when measurements differ.

All I can offer is that Europe and Oz still use the weight method to determine and enable comparison. Speed Queen front loaders here are rated at 8kg.

Now, on the issue of cycle times and wear on clothes. My own experience is that clothes, in general, will last significantly longer washed in a front load machine than they will if washed in a top-load machine. A wash component of 24 minutes isn't long either....my shortest 40c cotton wash on my machine is 68 minutes...38 minutes of that is washing, but there are 2 rinses and 3 spins that follow.

There is a reason front load machines don't have a lint filter. They don't need one as they produce significantly less lint which, in turn, means there is less wear on your clothes...



Post# 627091 , Reply# 40   9/23/2012 at 16:05 (4,225 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Delicates

mrb627's profile picture
I would only add the additional spin if the items being washed are heavy and too wet to dry in a reasonable amount of time. Many times, wrinkle free items would finish better in the dryer without the additional spin.

Malcolm


Post# 627098 , Reply# 41   9/23/2012 at 16:24 (4,225 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

When the Delicate cycle skipped the spin was when I had the extra rinse option selected. It drained and went into the distribution speed, but did not spin after the extra rinse. Maybe it should not have done that, but I have not bothered with it since. I bought it mainly for rugeand was looking for a cycle with a higher water level.

As for wear, I never noticed much wear with my TLs, but I do not load them heavily. Tumbler action washers used to be gentler on the fabrics, but with the reduced water levels, they are not as gentle as they used to be.

I tried the extra rinse option, but found it to be a waste of water for my rinsing preferences because of the partial extraction between water changes. You might come to different conclusions.


Post# 627136 , Reply# 42   9/23/2012 at 18:42 (4,224 days old) by bobo ()        

@Malcolm:

I just figured out from this site that you also have the Miele W3033; compared to the Speed Queen, how much smaller is the drum of the Miele? Are you able to wash just as much clothing as the SQ, or you have to downsize?


Post# 627147 , Reply# 43   9/23/2012 at 19:20 (4,224 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Load Size

mrb627's profile picture
Between the two, I find that the load size to be only slightly smaller in the Miele. And I don't really notice any better or worse rinsing in the Miele either. The Miele does take considerably longer to complete a cycle with similarly options to the Speed Queen.

Malcolm


Post# 627151 , Reply# 44   9/23/2012 at 19:39 (4,224 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@mrb627:

Do you sense any differences in gentleness/fabric wear between the SQ and the Miele?


Post# 627182 , Reply# 45   9/23/2012 at 21:27 (4,224 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
I just found out my local LG/Whirlpool dealer is now carrying Speed Queen. I'll have to go check it out.


Post# 627232 , Reply# 46   9/24/2012 at 03:20 (4,224 days old) by qualin (Canada)        

I think that if I lived in an Apartment or a Condo, where the washer could be installed in the kitchen European-style, a Miele W3033 would be a great machine for two people. We'd probably have more frequent loads, but it would be a luxury in comparison to having to use common area laundry.

Post# 627354 , Reply# 47   9/24/2012 at 18:17 (4,223 days old) by bobo ()        

Just an update:

My parents and I went to 2 places to look at the machines in mind. We went to a big box appliance wholesale to see the Miele W3033, but they didn't carry that model, just the Novotronic W1612. The drum of the machine was SMALL; there's no way that you can put a Queen sized fitted sheet in there, let alone a King size! I think the W1612 and W3033 have the same drum capacity, so I would assume that the W3033 would have the same small drum. The salesperson was trying to persuade us that the Miele and other European machines were "crap," and Samsung would be a wiser and better choice. The Korean set was very well-priced too, at $1200CAD for the washer (4.3 cu.ft drum) and the dryer. We knew what was "crap" so we thanked the salesperson and headed to the Speed Queen/Huebsch dealer.

At the SQ dealer there was an Imperial Series Stainless Steel washer/dryer set at the front door. The price of the set was shocking; $2999 for the washer and $1999 for the dryer. The drum of the washer was quite a bit bigger than the Miele, but still small compared to the Samsungs and Maytags. The salesperson looked very honest (compared to the one at the big box store), so I asked her if a King-sized duvet cover and a fitted sheet could be washed in one load. She said no, and kindly told us not the get the FL for one simple reason: the knobs and controls are electronic, and will have problems after 5 years (just right after the warranty expires, of course, LOL). Quite a few of her customers complained that a $3000 washer stopped working after 5 years (i.e., people can accept a Korean machine breaking down in 2 years, which cost $700). She recommended the toploaders, where the switches and timers are still mechanical. And for comparison, she also showed us a 2-year-old Samsung that was heading to the dump field, and a Whirlpool. Both of those machines were made almost entirely out of plastic, including the drum. The stainless steel was just a thin piece of metal "glued" on to the plastic drum to look like a true metal unit.

In conclusion, after looking at our 2 top choices, both didn't suit our needs very well. Our top priority was to wash the King-sized bedding in one load, and none of the machines could do that. We could go back to a toploader, but the Huebsch TL unit didn't look convincing enough that washing our clothing in it would make them last any longer than in our current machine, as the Huebsch TL has an agitator with threads around it (think huge bolt in the middle of the drum). Hopefully there will be more FL from Miele with bigger drums, and wait for the free 10-year warranty promotion to show up (we just missed it). For now, I'll continue to do more research and learn more about the technology here, but stop looking at machines in person.


Post# 627357 , Reply# 48   9/24/2012 at 18:37 (4,223 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Whatever

launderess's profile picture
Have a vintage Miele w1070 which is rated to hold about 5kg (ll pounds of wash) and am doing a load of four (4) king sized cotton sateen sheets atm. While the drum was full when dry sheets were loaded, just opened the door after the wash water drained and the load compacted down to between one-half to three-quarters full.

The Miele w3033 is rated to hold slightly more than mine (IIRC 5.5kg) so draw your own conclusions.


Post# 627358 , Reply# 49   9/24/2012 at 18:56 (4,223 days old) by bobo ()        

@ Launderess

I would assume you literally stuffed the drum full with no space at the top? I thought it was no-no to overload the washer like that!


Post# 627361 , Reply# 50   9/24/2012 at 19:04 (4,223 days old) by paulc (Edinburgh, Scotland)        
bobo

paulc's profile picture
I have a Miele rated at 6kg, I could comfortably get two king sized bedding sets ( 2x duvet covers, sheets, pillow cases )with no problems.

Post# 627364 , Reply# 51   9/24/2012 at 19:26 (4,223 days old) by bobo ()        

There is a possibility that the drum unit in the W1612 is smaller (5.5kg according to Miele Canada) than other 6kg machines (W3033 - but it's also rated 5.5kg in Canada, but 6kg in the US); so dare I say that it is not possible to wash four King-sized sheets in the W1612, but possible in other machines with a bigger drum and a lower weight capacity rating.

It just blows my mind to imagine so much laundry stuffed into such a small drum; even when the load is wet, there's probably no room for the stuff to move around, and with so little water, I don't see how clothes and linens get cleaned properly. I have to see it to believe it!


Post# 627376 , Reply# 52   9/24/2012 at 19:50 (4,223 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Er, No. Did Not "Stuff The Washing Machine Full"

launderess's profile picture
Thank you very much.

Have been keeping house with this Miele washer long enough to know it's limits and how to load.

More than enough room for a folded fist was left at the top of the dry load, which by all professional and domestic measures is deemed good and proper.

Again the proof was in that after the wash was soaked down the load tumbled freely within the "10 to 2" or "10 to 4" clock measure.

It is quite easy to tell when a Miele or at least my model is over stuffed. It makes horrible noises and you can literally hear the wash moving about in one soild mass.


Post# 627379 , Reply# 53   9/24/2012 at 19:58 (4,223 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Pay Attention Son, You Might Learn Something

launderess's profile picture
As Foghorn would say:



Post# 627385 , Reply# 54   9/24/2012 at 20:40 (4,223 days old) by logixx (Germany)        

logixx's profile picture
Front loaders can be loaded to the top. Naturally, you're not supposed to force item in with your foot... but 'to the top' can be fine.

This is my washer doing towels. Towels are especially forgiving because a load of them will shrink down quite a bit. Of course, my washer is a European one so it has long cycles etc. etc. But it just goes to show that you can fill the drum up and still get some nice tumbling.

Alex


CLICK HERE TO GO TO logixx's LINK


Post# 627416 , Reply# 55   9/25/2012 at 00:00 (4,223 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
Bobo

ronhic's profile picture
Listen to what people on here who have European machines say about them.

Learn from our many many years experience.

Miele will certainly make a couple of different drums for the various size machines that they retail, however, without exception, every single Miele machine produced in the past 40 years and in current production can take a KS quilt cover, fitted sheet, flat sheet and 4 pillow cases as a minimum.

4 kingsize sheets would also work equally well given 8 single sheets equates to 4kg and a king sheet is approximately the size of 2 singles.


Post# 627421 , Reply# 56   9/25/2012 at 00:55 (4,223 days old) by bobo ()        

@Launderess

Wow. Just wow. I'm speechless! I wonder if a King-sized duvet cover and fitted sheet would work; now I have to find a place that will let me try!

@logixx

The drum of your washer is larger than the one I saw in the W1612. I would say the drum size in the Miele was close to the size of a 12 quart stock pot:



Post# 627426 , Reply# 57   9/25/2012 at 02:32 (4,223 days old) by chestermikeuk (Rainhill *Home of the RailwayTrials* Merseyside,UK)        
Has.....

chestermikeuk's profile picture
Somebody been sniffing the HE again!!!

Bobo if you really want user friendly advice and information from tried & tested users then please dont insult our understanding and intelligence by above said picture!!! The actual drum of the washer is much larger than the window of the washer.

All Miele washing machines from vintage to modern are perfectly capable of washing said king cal queeny whatever duvet covers and sheets!!

We hope you take the information above, and it is always as well to check out what you require and make an informed decision and purchase!!

p.s. just washing two king duvets, 8 pillow cases and 4 t-shirts in the Servis Quartz rated 4.5kg, which does a better job of washing, rinsing and less creasing than the Fagor 6kg washer - more water and no holes in the drum...LOl


Post# 627429 , Reply# 58   9/25/2012 at 03:03 (4,223 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
Bobo

ronhic's profile picture
I think you might like to consider some deep inhalations over that stock pot or else one of us may just tip it over your head and start banging it with a wooden spoon!

Post# 627431 , Reply# 59   9/25/2012 at 03:40 (4,223 days old) by ozzie908 (Lincoln UK)        
Size is not everything :)

ozzie908's profile picture
The PW 6065 I have is rated at 6.5 kg its a whole kg less than the Aqualtis I had before but I have not noticed any considerable difference in what I have put in it in fact the Miele will wash and spin a rug I would never have considered putting in the Hotpoint.

Austin


Post# 627435 , Reply# 60   9/25/2012 at 04:28 (4,223 days old) by qualin (Canada)        

Hey Bobo...

The Imperial Huebsch set are the absolutely top of the line machines. You pay extra for that stainless steel cabinetry.

You should have been looking at the white versions, especially the rear control ones. I picked up my ZFN50R for $1900, while the Imperial is $2700 here.
If you want quality, you have to pay for it. You don't need stainless steel though.

I don't believe for a second that electronic controls are any less reliable than mechanical controls as long as the machine is being fed good clean power.

As for the need to wash king sized items, how often do they plan on doing this?

Realistically, you will not find a decently priced machine which can wash king sized items which is well made and will last.

Since washing king sized items isn't something everyone does every day, those kinds of things are best left up to a laundromat, because even if you can fit the items into the machine, there's no guarantee they won't scorch in the dryer.

Get out of the mentality that you need an extremely large machine to do day to day laundry. You don't. The Miele you saw can hold a lot more than you think, even though the drum appeared to be small.

My Huebsch can wash 12 pairs of jeans in one load if I stuff it right to the top. That's four weeks worth of pants for me. That is plenty.


Post# 627467 , Reply# 61   9/25/2012 at 10:07 (4,223 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

To someone unfamiliar with Mieles, the drums look small at first, but they are not. My 5kg W1918 washes a larger load than a standard tub Maytag and the 6 kg W1986 washes more than the deep tub 806, but to a Maytag user looking into the Miele it would not seem possible. Granted, it takes a lot longer in the Miele than in the Maytag, but it does a great job. Because of the decades of top-loading agitator washer experience over here, people think the drums of front loaders need to be huge, but they don't. I remember years ago when we had the tub out of a 3 belt Westinghouse tumbler out of the machine and it was almost the size of the tub in a GE V-12 when you considered that the GE tub did not fill to the top and the Westinghouse tub did not have to accommodate a big agitator, but with the small opening, it looks smaller. A tumbler washer can do a great job, but it can't do a great job with the laundry if it is built cheap and does not extract well between water changes.

Post# 627482 , Reply# 62   9/25/2012 at 11:28 (4,223 days old) by bobo ()        
If I offended anyone here, I'm deeply sorry, but I didn&

No, I'm not trying to insult anyone here. The picture of the stockpot was just a reference of what I saw in the W1612. I also haven't seen the W3033 in person, it was an assumption that the drum would be the same size as the W1612. The Bosch and Asko washers I saw at the wholesale store had bigger drum units than the W1612, so it could be just that machine that had a small drum in my eyes.

@ Qualin

I asked the salesperson if she could order the non-stainless-steel units, and she said they would no longer sell the FL. I can probably try another dealer though. My parents like the Miele better (other than the drum size), probably due to price (~$2000 vs. $2999), and my dad was questioning where the electronics of the Huebsch unit was made (he thinks Mexico/China). We wash the King-sized bedding every 2 weeks, and the nearest laundromat is a 20-min drive away. It would a hassle to go there every 2 weeks to wash only 1 load. The problem is we don't have a lot of laundry to do (it's just the 3 of us), and we use the washer/dryer every other day so dirty clothes won't pile up. It's just the King-sized bedding that we need to take care of. And I thought the Huebsch FL could fit that big load, but the salesperson said it wouldn't work.


Post# 627526 , Reply# 63   9/25/2012 at 16:27 (4,223 days old) by bobo ()        
Sorry, I take my words back.....

My mom and I went to another appliance store today, and looked at the Miele W3033. There was a W1612 as well, but the drum was considerably bigger than the one we saw yesterday. This is strange: With 3 pairs of eyes (not very good eyes though!), we all saw the drum of that W1612 was really small, dull gray in color, and was literally a stockpot tilted on its side. But the machine we saw today, with exact model number, looked different. The drum was shiny, bigger, better quality, and most importantly, convincing enough that our King-sized bedding was going to fit in it with no problems at all. The W3033 was the machine of interest, and the price was acceptable to us. Only one little thing though: We like to put shoes and some delicate items (and teddy bears!) in the dryer, but the salesperson today said a rack is not available. Is there any way to dry the items in question?

Of course, the SQ FL is still on our list, just that I have to email another dealer for a price quote, and ask if they can order in a non-stainless set.


Post# 627528 , Reply# 64   9/25/2012 at 16:34 (4,223 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        

ronhic's profile picture
Provided you're not talking about putting the actual quilt in, the Miele will just shrug it's shoulders and get it done.

...with results that should have you questioning why more people don't look past their misconceptions and hang-ups about 'size' and own them.

...and why you put up with so called 'good results' which were nothing of the sort compared to what a Miele can deliver.


Post# 627536 , Reply# 65   9/25/2012 at 17:37 (4,222 days old) by bobo ()        

From my own experience, I think it's hard for the average North American to accept a smaller machine to be in their laundry room. We question whether everything we have (3 people) will fit in that drum, let alone seeing clothes moving around in it while washing. The TL washers and dryers we're used to seeing are big with even bigger drum units. Being accustomed to these monsters, it's hard to make sense out of a small washer with a smaller drum. Even the salesperson today admits that Miele washers are more suitable for 1-2 people, than a family of 3 or 4. I guess it's just a North American perspective.

Post# 627544 , Reply# 66   9/25/2012 at 18:49 (4,222 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Let's Go To The Video Tape, Shall we?

launderess's profile picture
Both the W1612 and W3033 have the same size rated tub, 5.5 CuFt. The only difference is in appearances and or cycles.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO Launderess's LINK


Post# 627547 , Reply# 67   9/25/2012 at 19:01 (4,222 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
This Debate Has Been Going On For Ages

launderess's profile picture
Between North Americans and Europeans regarding front loading H-axis washing machines.

Bottom line is you pays your money and you takes your chances.

Laundromat and or commercial laundries size their equipment according to the dominate loads presented by customers and or what is required for fast through-put.

A 5-6kg (11 to about 12 pound) capacity front loader should be able to handle most everyday normal wash loads. If you want to get things done faster you take a page from commercial/laundromat washers and look for fast cycle times. If however your main needs run to very large loads on average twice a month or so (and this includes duvets, duvet covers, quilts, etc) then go for a larger capacity washer with or without fast cycles.

Ideally H-axis washers give better laundering results with less problems/vibrations when used at or near full capacity. Having a 20lb washer when you only do 10lbs on average weekly is sooner or later asking for trouble with some models today. Most simply cannot figure out how to balance a "small" load and or will simply do so even if it is unbalanced; banging and clanking away.



Post# 627551 , Reply# 68   9/25/2012 at 19:20 (4,222 days old) by bobo ()        

For some odd reason, according to Miele Marine website the W1612 and W3033 are rated as 6kg washers. The machines look exactly the same as the ones on Mieleusa.com.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO bobo's LINK


Post# 627557 , Reply# 69   9/25/2012 at 19:54 (4,222 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
*Sigh*

launderess's profile picture
You've not heard of rounding up then?

No one is going to call out Miele or another maker over .5 CuFt of space.

By adding that percentage point to the formerly 5 CuFt drum Miele has gone from a 5kg capacity (claimed) to 6kg.


Post# 627561 , Reply# 70   9/25/2012 at 20:24 (4,222 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        

ronhic's profile picture
Miele don't offer a model in our market under 7kg these days.

Here is the weight guide out of my parents Italian made Electrolux.

Laundry weights
The following weights are indicative:
bathrobe 1200 g
napkin 100 g
quilt cover 700 g
sheet 500 g
pillow case 200 g
tablecloth 250 g
towelling towel 200 g
tea cloth 100 g
night dress 200 g
ladies’ briefs 100 g
man’s work shirt 600 g
man’s shirt 200 g
man’s pyjamas 500 g
blouse 100 g
men’s underpants 100 g

Lets just accept that it is a QS quilt cover and sheets and that the KS one you're referring to weighs 1kg.

But just for kicks and giggles, lets use 1.5kg, that means a Miele will have no issue whatsoever taking:

- KS Quilt cover 1.5kg
- KS fitted sheet say 700gm
- KS flat sheet say 1kg
- 4 pillow cases 800gm

Total load = 4kg....well under the 5.5 or 6.0kg capacity.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO ronhic's LINK


Post# 627600 , Reply# 71   9/26/2012 at 00:09 (4,222 days old) by bobo ()        
I thought Germans were very scientific..... :)

Half a kilogram is quite a bit, in science of course!

That's what I thought too, the 5.5kg and 6kg machines are the same.


Post# 627803 , Reply# 72   9/26/2012 at 21:07 (4,221 days old) by Jetcone (Schenectady-Home of Calrods,Monitor Tops,Toroid Transformers)        
I 've had the Horizon FL

jetcone's profile picture
on the third floor of my house for 12 years and I only ever feel it slightly and that is during the pulse spins, once it gets up to speed only once in a while the wine glasses will vibrate at 1000 RPM"s but that is high frequency vibration, its not the whole house rocking.
BTW Horizon is the same machine as SQ, Horizon is sold on the Alliance commercial side , it is identical to the SQ FL.



Post# 627944 , Reply# 73   9/27/2012 at 17:34 (4,220 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

I thought to measure tonight, as I washed a load of bath sheets, the water left in the load after the pulse spins. I put a bouquet under the drain hose in the sink after the pulse spins as it went into the final spin. 3.5 quarts of water were spun out BEFORE it went into the high speed spin. At the end of the drain after the high speed spin, there were 5 quarts of water in the bouquet. That is water I spin out after each water change; the wash and the first & second rinses to make the rinsing more efficient.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy