Thread Number: 43387
Whirlpool FL washers accumulate mold, class action lawsuit says
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 637927   11/9/2012 at 23:52 (4,157 days old) by Supersuds (Knoxville, Tenn.)        

supersuds's profile picture
No surprise to anyone here, but this story about a class action lawsuit for Oho residents against Whirlpool, from the Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper, has some interesting tidbits:

Two Ohio women named on the complaint allege that their Whirlpool machines don't rinse out all detergent and fabric softener, and the laundry drum on the machines doesn't completely drain. That, in turn, causes the washers to gather mold, they allege.

**********

The suit, before U.S. District Judge James Gwin, alleges that as mold problems became "undeniable," Whirlpool began recommending that machine owners run three successive cleaning cycles with a Whirlpool tablet called Affresh. That conflicts with Whirlpool's promotion of the washers as high-efficiency, according to the suit.

Several entrepreneurs responded to an "avalanche of consumer complaints" by designing products such as SmellyWasher and NuFreshNow to address mold problems, the lawsuit says.

A lawyer for the Whirlpool owners, Jonathan Selbin, said complaints multiplied because the company didn't adequately explain to owners of front-loading washers that they required different upkeep than top-loading machines.

"They're filled with gunk that gathers on the back wall behind the drum," said Selbin, at the New York office of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimman & Bernstein. "Their own internal documents all talk about the fact that they created a machine that's an ideal environment for mold growth."

Whirlpool, based in Benton Harbor, Mich., said in a court filing that the machines come with explicit guidelines on how to prevent the formation of mold -- described as "biofilm" -- including leaving the washing machine door open between uses so moisture can escape.

Whirlpool said at least 97 percent of all washer buyers have never experienced mold or odors and can't show any injury. Problems that did arise came from the "abuse, misuse or improper use of the washers," Whirlpool said in its defense.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO Supersuds's LINK





Post# 637930 , Reply# 1   11/10/2012 at 00:35 (4,157 days old) by arbilab (Ft Worth TX (Ridglea))        

arbilab's profile picture
My 14yo FL smells faintly like Tide HE and nothing else. All I do is towel the boot and NOT use softener.

Softener is only a good idea if you're in the business of selling softener. It gloms machinery and waterproofs towels. And it DOES grow mold.

Howcome this was never a problem with the Westinghouse FLs I grew up with? We didn't even towel the boot and it didn't have drain holes. But softener hadn't been invented yet. Neither had class-action lawsuits that I know of.

This reeks of idle lawyers looking for a hook issue and they found a few dumb hausfraus to leverage it off of. And I wouldn't end a sentence with TWO prepositions if I weren't somewhat indignant.


Post# 637943 , Reply# 2   11/10/2012 at 03:06 (4,157 days old) by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY)        

mark_wpduet's profile picture
Well my WP machine is approaching 8 yrs old and doesn't smell like mold. It smells like a hint of Tide HE too. I DO use liquid fab softener. But I purposely buy the cheap kind that is already somewhat watered down and I dilute it with white vinegar and there's no build up, even on the outer drum. You can see the heating element if you use a flashlight in the tub if you look at a certain angle.

Post# 637955 , Reply# 3   11/10/2012 at 04:22 (4,157 days old) by Hoover1100 (U.K.)        
I think that title should read

"Clueless consumers cause mould build up in their Whirlpool washing machines."

No offence but only in America would you get a lawsuit against a washing machine manufacturer because the owners don't use them properly.

Reminds me of those people who tried to sue McDonalds for making them fat...

Matt


Post# 637970 , Reply# 4   11/10/2012 at 06:19 (4,157 days old) by donprohel (I live in Munich - Germany, but I am Italian)        
A doubt...

I wonder if there is any connection between the fact that only in USA front-loading washing machines accumulate mould and the fact that only in UK enzyme detergents cause allergies.

Just a doubt...


Post# 637974 , Reply# 5   11/10/2012 at 06:43 (4,157 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

Probably also only in America does the government collude with detergent and machine manufacturers to drive down the water usage of washers and dishwashers, spread the falsehood that cold water cleans everything and play down the importance of rinsing. My father always taught that rinsing was as important as washing in soil removal. From the time that automatics appeared, one phrase appeared in all advertising, "cleans itself." This was a direct appeal to what people who used wringer machines knew was part of the washday process, cleaning out the machine after use.

None of my FLs have growth or smells, but they are mainly used with hot or warm water, 80F rinse water & STPP added to either TIDE he or Persil. Rinsing is thorough. Only in the case of dark colors is the wash 80F or lower using liquid Cheer with Colorguard and these are not garments worn next to the skin. The doors are left open and the dispenser drawers are removed from the Mieles and the dispenser chamber toweled dry because the little fill holes hold a lot of water.

Older tumbler machines used when hot and warm water in sufficient quantities were the norms for good laundering did not smell, but detergents had phosphates then and people used chlorine bleach more. Sometimes inadequate rinsing and over use of the washing product led to corrosion of the machines by the caustic residues of the detergents, but they were not slimy.


Post# 637980 , Reply# 6   11/10/2012 at 07:18 (4,157 days old) by seeitrun2006 (Commerce, GA)        
Duet HT

We have owned a Duet HT since November 2007. Have had never problems with mold. I use the instructions sent with the machine to clean the washer. I put in 2/3 cup of clorox beach, set to clean cycle and let her rip. I clean it probaly every 2~3 months. It cleans it right up! I clean for a family who has one of the first Duet's sold. Same thing it never smells of mold. We also leave our washer open when not in use.

Like some of you said...if some of these consumers would "read and follow instructions" these problems would not exist. Also leaving wet laundry in a sealed washer overnight causes these problems to escalate.

We knew family who owned a 1958 Westinghouse Laundromat washer and matching dryer. The mother washed clothes daily for 6 people (4-kids + parents). She always left wet clothes in her machine 24/7. The washer started to leak and a hole was discovered in the outer drain tub near the top of the tub. Apparently it was from the moisture from the wet clothes combined with the detergent attacking the outer steel tub.

My aunt had a 1953 Laundromat and never had a problem as she always left the door open after use. She never left wet clothes in the macine ever! She used that washer until sometime into the late 70's.


Post# 638002 , Reply# 7   11/10/2012 at 08:28 (4,157 days old) by foxchapel ()        
most American's do not know how to use a FL washer...

Probably 99.9% of us Americans grew up with and only know top load washers. Manufacturers did nothing to educate the general public on how to properly use one, or any HE machine, nor has our government, who is either encouraging or mandating lower water use in washers. Both sides of that class action lawsuit have some responsibility for the problems, IMO.

If fabric softener truly causes mold, seems to me that the washer manufacturers should not put the dispenser in a machine, or make it very, very small. That seems like a no-brainer to me, but what do I know? The one in my washer is frighteningly large.

Detergent residue is blamed for a lot of mold. I now have a Miele, and I have to do the math every time I add detergent, reducing whatever amount is on a detergent label to one-fourth or one-third that amount. I have to think about "just how dirty are these clothes?" and factor in the volume of clothing in the washer. It sometimes feels like a game of russian roulette, wondering if I have too little, enough, or too much detergent! Loser spends the next three hours running consecutive cycles to get the soap out.

Detergent label suggestion is too much detergent for our Miele, and I see soapy bubbles in the final rinse. Yes, soap (rainbow color bubbles), not clear water agitation bubbles. Our water is a moderate hardness, leaning toward soft.

The book that came with our Miele says to use the amount posted on the detergent label. My neighbor can do that, with her Whirlpool front load machine. Maybe hers uses more water. Maybe it rinses better. I don't know. Once I get old and senile, my washer will probably look like that old "I Love Lucy" episode. Costco HE liquid detergent label says to use more(!) in a HE machine than an old-fashioned machine. It gets really confusing.

So, I can see both sides of the class action lawsuit. IMHO, nobody and everyone is to blame. ;-)


Post# 638041 , Reply# 8   11/10/2012 at 12:26 (4,156 days old) by laundromat (Hilo, Hawaii)        

laundromat's profile picture

I have had what now seams to be hundreds of front loading washing machines. None of which EVER got ANY mold anywhere. The only times I have seen any mold on a front loading washer, it was caused by user ignorance and/or abuse. Now,most brands have a device that holds the door open to iliminate any growth of fungus and helps keep the interior fresher.


Post# 638057 , Reply# 9   11/10/2012 at 13:07 (4,156 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)        

gansky1's profile picture
Homemaking skills will not be improved by winning a lawsuit.
The judge would declare a mis-trial if I were on the jury. 'Can we have a peek inside these women's refrigerators, their ovens and the floor behind the toilet?' But I'm sure they won't have too much trouble finding a jury of these women's peers, sad to say.


Post# 638070 , Reply# 10   11/10/2012 at 14:44 (4,156 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
This is a VERY interesting thread....and say that for a fact of taking a survey.....

WHAT if you were on this JURY....how would you side on who is to blame, or at fault for such?......

I don't think I would favor either side, more of a 50/50 mistrial....

you have consumers who have no clue of doing laundry, or just plain negligence of operating a FLer, not to mention a traditional TLer...

and then you have a company like Whirlpool, who puts out a machine, that is not put into full detail to a consumer of its operation, or maintenance required.....

and then theres the silent partner, The Government, who insist on a Low water usage High Efficient machine, but not Highly Effective at doing its function, within these guidelines.....

it just seems were gonna hit a NO WIN scenario.....

but a lawsuit so ludacrist, would have the consumer winning......

What do you guys think, or how would you favor?


Post# 638075 , Reply# 11   11/10/2012 at 15:20 (4,156 days old) by arbilab (Ft Worth TX (Ridglea))        
On the jury

arbilab's profile picture
My prejudice would be that these owners were raised by wolves. And that only the plaintiff's lawyer makes out in these class actions.

Maybe I could set those aside and decide on the evidence and arguments presented. But it would be a hard sell and my BS detector would probably be going off the whole time. Cuz the whole premise goes against >20yrs experience using FLs properly.


Post# 638077 , Reply# 12   11/10/2012 at 15:25 (4,156 days old) by ronhic (Canberra, Australia)        
In this instance...

ronhic's profile picture
...and provided 2 factors are in place:

- there is a line towards the front of the instruction booklets asking the purchaser to 'Please read this instruction book' or similar; and

- there is satisfactory information contained in the booklet about 'how to maintain and care for your machine', which if followed, would prevent mould....

...I want Whirlpool to win.

In a society, such as the USA, that puts so much emphasis on the rights of the individual to seemingly do as they please, then the individual needs to take responcibility should they fail to follow instructions, warnings etc. provided they are contained in a sensible and accessible place.


Post# 638135 , Reply# 13   11/10/2012 at 19:59 (4,156 days old) by foxchapel ()        
then the individual needs to take responcibility . . .

Unfortunately, juries disagree. Several years ago or more, a guy won an injuries lawsuit against a tire manufacturer. I read about this in the American Bar Association Journal. The guy over-inflated the tire and it exploded on him. This, in spite of the appropriate pressure markings on the tire, which is why the story made the ABA Journal.

Juries always stick it to the corporation, no matter what. Let's not forget the McDonald's hot coffee trial. . .


Post# 638155 , Reply# 14   11/10/2012 at 22:58 (4,156 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Back in the 1970's Cessna, Piper & Beechcraft stopped making light aircraft for a number of years. Why? Because people were going out, getting drunk and then getting in these aircraft and killing themselves. The victims families decided to sue the plane's manufacturer because the plane crashed. Idiots.

Finally after several states passed laws preventing this kind of lawsuit did the manufacture of these airplanes resume.


Post# 638158 , Reply# 15   11/10/2012 at 23:52 (4,156 days old) by Supersuds (Knoxville, Tenn.)        

supersuds's profile picture

I've learned through experience not to judge the merits of a case by reading newspaper articles.

However...

 

What may be most significant is the internal company memos mentioned in the article, depending on what they say. That's what hurt the tobacco companies badly; for decades they denied any bad health effects from smoking when they'd been warned about it repeatedly by their own people. Same with the Ford Pinto and its exploding gas tank.

 

At this point, class action certification doesn't mean the case has been judged on the merits, just that there are a large number of plaintiffs whose claims are similar and can be consolidated into one proceeding. Later, the defendant will move for summary judgment, meaning the court can dismiss the case before going to a jury trial.


Post# 638179 , Reply# 16   11/11/2012 at 06:29 (4,156 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

As some home quarters grow smaller, designers of laundry rooms do not allow room for the doors of FL washers to be kept open enough to dry them out. Even a door left slightly ajar could be a hazard for leg injuries if the laundry alcove is along a busy hallway and there is traffic past the front of the machines. I thought that some or at least one manufacturer was using a fan in the vent system to dry out the machine after each use.

Post# 638181 , Reply# 17   11/11/2012 at 06:50 (4,156 days old) by Hoover1100 (U.K.)        
Speaking from experience

You can tell people till you're blue in the face to only use the correct dose of a good quality powdered detergent containing oxygen based bleach (or add some), use the hottest, longest and most vigorous cycle possible for the load you are washing, don't overload and leave the door ajar between uses otherwise they will have mouldy, disgusting machines. They simply will not listen, they are not interested and really do not care.

I have even cleaned people's machines out thoroughly for them and explained why they need to follow the above advice to keep their machine clean, only to come back several months later and find the machine dirtier than it was before and none of my advice followed.

The manufacturers can try as much as they like to educate people on how to use their machines, it won't make a difference, people think they know best and will always stick to their old habits.

Attempting to reeducate people on the topic of good laundry procedures is fighting a losing battle.

Also, if the machine is really located somewhere where the door cannot even be left with the latch pushed against the opening (all that is required to air it out, just for the seal to not be airtight) then the laundry area really needs relocating, or these people should really be buying top loaders (and leaving the lid up between uses ofcourse).

Matt


Post# 638192 , Reply# 18   11/11/2012 at 08:00 (4,156 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Thinking

mrb627's profile picture
I wonder how manufacturers will respond to this lawsuit. Whether Whirlpool wins or loses, the marketplace will respond in some form or another.

It sure seems like a washing machine that can detect an over sudsing condition should be able to detect trace amounts of detergent remaining in the next to last rinse and add additional rinsing when the ALLERGY rinse button is engaged.

Additionally, wouldn't an advanced rinsing profile minimize the risk of mold growth?

And while we are at it, how about introducing a PUR water filtration system to ensure incoming water was as clean as possible?

Malcolm


Post# 638206 , Reply# 19   11/11/2012 at 09:52 (4,155 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
1.  ALL washers, ALL brands, FRONTloaders and TOPloaders, can develop mold and munge.

2.  User carelessness and bad habits is the primary cause.  The push to cold (and cooler warm & hot) water promotes and exacerbates the problem.

3.  Suspect the reason for picking on frontloaders is the purchase cost premium and repair cost premium that's involved, and they're "newfangled" to the consumer-off-the-street.


Post# 638251 , Reply# 20   11/11/2012 at 14:52 (4,155 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Mould & Mildew Will Grow Anywhere Conditions Are Favourable

launderess's profile picture
Damp/humid conditions + warmth + food source ='s mould/mildew.

Washing machines both top and front loading have been around for almost >100 years now so where is this sudden plague of mould coming from? IMHO washing machine makers should lay some of the blame squarely at the feet of regulations/laws mandating water and or energy usage.

When washing machines in particular front loaders were allowed to use the amount of water required to get the job done we never heard of "washer cleaning" cycles. There was no need for such nonesense. Long as proper laundry techniques were followed including proper dosage of detergents with hot water, muck and grime were mostly flushed down the drains.

Today consumers use mainly liquid detergents and cool to cold water in washing machines that on average often do not rinse well. All that residue of soils and surfactants make up a nice breeding ground for mould.


Post# 638268 , Reply# 21   11/11/2012 at 15:59 (4,155 days old) by hoovermatic (UK)        

I have been using FL/h/axis TL machines almost consistently since 1981 and I have never had a mould/mildew/odour problem. I never wipe the door seal dry at the end of a cycle, I have never used a cleaning cycle or any washing machine cleaning product. I always leave the door ajar when the machine is not in use - simples! This sounds like lawyers making money from clueless consumers.

Post# 638357 , Reply# 22   11/11/2012 at 20:04 (4,155 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@foxchapel:

Tires rarely fail due to overinflation. If you're talking about the Ford/Firestone Ford Explorer fiasco, I can tell you that the suit wasn't brought or settled over overinflated tires.

And the talk-radio favorite example of McDonald's coffee didn't end up making that woman rich, either.

We had a 2-term President a while back that claimed minority women on welfare were driving Cadillacs, too.

Did you hear the one about the Doctor that bought a Craftsman mower and gave himself a heart attack because there wasn't anything in the instructions telling him to stop pulling the starter rope when it wouldn't start?


Post# 638372 , Reply# 23   11/11/2012 at 20:45 (4,155 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@Whirlcool:

I think you are talking about the General Aviation Revitalization Act.

While there were a spate of lawsuits from parties with an interest in small airplane crashes in the late 1970s and early 1980s, it's useful to think why that happened. People that bought small aircraft tended to be financially successful, which gave them the ability to buy small aircraft in the first place. Successful entrepreneurs tend to be risk-takers in their business dealings, and spread out their success into other endeavors. Type "A" personalities, if you will.

The genesis for the legislation that absolved light aircraft manufacturers from liability came from 2 things:

1. The recession of the late 1970s/early 1980s that pummeled the small airplane business. As a result, the market value of Cessna dropped dramatically. The recession of the late 1970s/early 1980s really hurt their business jet business. It hit their small airplane business, worse than the biz jet business but the core value of Cessna was the biz jet worth.

2. General Dynamics purchase of Cessna in 1986. General Dynamics had strong political connections (being a gigantic defense contractor that made everything from fighters to nuclear submarines) and used those connections to their advantage. They were buying Cessna for their undervalued business jet business, not their little airplane business.

Business jets are flown by professional pilots for the most part, and there are usually 2 crew members flying them. Not much liability attached to that.

General Dynamics wanted to buy the plum part of Cessna, and not have the little airplane part hurt their bottom line. Hence, the GARA act. Not drunk pilots or distraught wives.

But, as the saying goes, "everything old is new again". General Dynamics eventually sold Cessna to Textron - and Textron owns Lycoming, which makes piston engines for small airplanes, Bell Helicopter Company, and EZ-Go Golf Cart company.

So, things are never as simple as they seem.

If you're eyeballs aren't totally worn out by now, I can tell you about how we ended up with Allied-Signal, which managed everything from oil wells to nuclear warhead production. It's a fascinating story of American business, where the expected outcome was where Signal Oil would take over Allied Chemical...


Post# 638410 , Reply# 24   11/11/2012 at 22:19 (4,155 days old) by arbilab (Ft Worth TX (Ridglea))        

arbilab's profile picture
Don't get me started on Allied Signal. I was an inadvertant stockholder. They bought Ampex, which I already owned, and ran it into the ground. They also bankrupted Mack Truck. To escape their bad name reputation they bought Honeywell and adopted the name.

Post# 638413 , Reply# 25   11/11/2012 at 22:24 (4,155 days old) by jerrod6 (Southeastern Pennsylvania)        

Probably a combination of factors:

 

Ever wonder why Downy is now telling  you to shake the bottle well before each use.  Probably because they have removed some thickener that P&G found to contribute to build up in energy star washers - but they won't dare say that.

 

Then there is the washer and the government energy programs.  No one is telling consumers to use the hottest water the fabric can stand.  Instead everyone is telling folks to wash in cold water.  So what is cold?  60F, 70F, 37F?  Even if you wash in warm water -  warm is now 80F or less.  Hot on some machines is 110F for regular loads.  With ATC consumers cannot use water hotter than the washer will mix it. 

 

The Whirlpool user manual:   This states that bio-film may build up.  HUH?  Even when I saw the phrase bio-film,  MOLD did not come to my mind -  until I thought about it.  I wonder how many consumers read over that line and .....just didn't get it. 

 

Never had any clean machine cycle until recently.  Why would we need one now?  Use of cold washes, use of hot washes using temps that use to be considered warm, use of thick liquid detergents, over use of detergents since the instructions don't mention anything about adjusting for soil level at all ..just load size..  unless things are heavily soiled and then you are supposed to use more...and now we have pacs that can clean small loads and large loads because.....the pac can tell the difference and adjust for load size and soil level?......I bet not.


Post# 638420 , Reply# 26   11/11/2012 at 23:13 (4,155 days old) by Iowegian ()        

@arilab:

Wow, someone that remembers Ampex!

Alexander M. Pontienoff was a skilled engineer, but if it weren't for Bing Crosby bankrolling him...who knows what would have happened.

Short story: Magnetic tape recording technology was one of our spoils of war that we took home from the Nazis post WWII. Along with missile technology and jet engines...

Bing Crosby was getting tired of performing his radio show for the East coast, and having to stick around the studio to do it again for the West coast four hours later. Bing Crosby bankrolled Ampex because Bing only wanted to perform once a day.

Captured German technology, plus Bing Crosby's capital is what started Ampex...

Bonus points if you know who Jeep Harned was...


Post# 638431 , Reply# 27   11/12/2012 at 01:02 (4,155 days old) by arbilab (Ft Worth TX (Ridglea))        

arbilab's profile picture
Remember Ampex? I worked for them in 1969. Made my living making broadcast videotape work for ~20 years. The only Ampex video machines I DIDN'T work on were the tube version and AVR2.

Knew the Crosby connection, though I otherwise have general contempt for him as a person. Jeep is a new one on me. Know who E. Stanley Busby was?

Would you like to have the official Ampex book "Videotape Recording"? It's an incomparable reference to anyone interested in technical television history. I'm not likely to live much longer (or I wouldn't give it away) and nobody I know would value it. It's otherwise unobtanium as it was a corporate publication not a commercial one and could be a priceless collectable at some point in the future. I'd just like it to have a good home. It's the only thing I have that hardly anyone else could possibly have.


Post# 638441 , Reply# 28   11/12/2012 at 03:49 (4,155 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc)        
Ampex

YES!!!!Used to deal with their decks in the radio industry-WORKHORSES!!!lets see-Ampex 300,350,3200,ATR100,440,it goes on.The agency I now work for had the 300's in their studios-Rec/PB.The central recording branch used the 3200-high speed dubbing.Other radio stations had 350,700,440.Loved these machines-they worked well,built solid-and easy to fix when they broke.Back in the early 90's my workplace tried an AEG "Magnetophone" to try to replace the Ampex machines-Instead they went to Studer.810-HORRIBLE machines to work on.But they worked well otherwise.Now the Wash DC plant has gone digital and all of the Ampexes are gone-went to the Library of Congress-they use the machines to convert and transcribe digital audio material to analog-the analog archives better than digital and is easier to retrieve.The machines would be in their archives in Culpepper,Va.Now that I work on transmitters-so miss my ol' freinds the Ampexes.Have a few service books on the machines I worked on and the book Arbilab has would be interesting-if no one wants it,would be intertested-another AMPEX guy!!!And--I own an Ampex 300! still works-full track mono.It has the orig tube Rec/Pb amp.

Post# 638459 , Reply# 29   11/12/2012 at 07:55 (4,155 days old) by foxchapel ()        
the overinflated tire . .

@Iowegian - No, it was not the Firestone lawsuit. This was a guy putting air into a tire, at a pump, at a service station. I do not think Firestone was even mentioned in the article; pretty sure it was another brand.

Post# 638509 , Reply# 30   11/12/2012 at 13:37 (4,154 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Meanwhile Back At The Ranch

launderess's profile picture
If one goes by Internet complaints mould growing in this new crop of modern front loaders seems to be a major issue. None of the major appliance makers will admitt to it, and all suggest the issue is one of consumer's poor laundry habits (not leaving door ajar after use and so forth), but one can only guess it is tied into the puny amount of water these machines use.

Post# 638519 , Reply# 31   11/12/2012 at 14:16 (4,154 days old) by dj-gabriele ()        
but one can only guess it is tied into the puny amount of wa

NO, it's not!
My washing Candy machine uses the fantastic amount of 39 Litres of water per wash and we don't know the meaning of mould, same goes in the other washer, a Whirlpool, at a whopping 44 litres!

It's all down to bad habits!

A friend of mine and my sister have the same WIA600 Indesita washing machine, my sister's machine is pristine, as she was instructed on how to properly wash and maintain the machine, my friend's one is so mouldy that the door boot needed to be changed (by me!)


Post# 638573 , Reply# 32   11/12/2012 at 17:08 (4,154 days old) by nmassman44 (Brooksville Florida)        

nmassman44's profile picture
I can say that after my experience with the GE/Frigidaire front loader that we got from a friend that was so proud to wash only in cold water and never leave the door open to air it out..the smell was unreal not to mention the clumps of "biofilm" that came off the drum when I ran hot water and Tide washer cleaner thru it. After all those years of washing in cold his clothes smelled like they were washed in a sewer.
It amazes me how these detergent manufacturers push cold water washing...especially in a front loader. To me cold doesnt clean..its like washing your hands in cold water after you just cut up chicken and they are kinda greasy...it doesnt work well. But thats what people believe that it works. I always tell people you dont take a cold shower or bath when you bathe do you...


Post# 638577 , Reply# 33   11/12/2012 at 17:28 (4,154 days old) by foxchapel ()        
washing most of our laundry in cold water is like . . .

. . . washing a skillet in cold water, that has been used to fry chicken.

Post# 638614 , Reply# 34   11/12/2012 at 19:55 (4,154 days old) by sudsmaster (SF Bay Area, California)        

sudsmaster's profile picture
I second the fact that mold (really, fungus) can grow anywhere.

When I bought this house in '97, it came with a '78 GE Filter-flo. Nice washer, but it had this funky old cigar smell to it. When I lifted the top off it, there was a thick crust of brown mold all around the underside.

I figure the former owner had perhaps bought into the cold water washing myth. The washer is now parked in my collection in another building on the property, replaced by a Maytag Neptune that has never had mold in tub or odor problem, and I don't do anything special like keeping the door open. But then I do only hot or warm washes, with STPP. And the Neptune design provides aeration via ports in the door panel and a big gap in the detergent compartment lid. There is some slight surface mold in the detergent compartment, but that is easily removed with a sponge or brush once or twice a year.


Post# 638635 , Reply# 35   11/12/2012 at 20:48 (4,154 days old) by neptunebob (Pittsburgh, PA)        

neptunebob's profile picture
But the Neptune had another design flaw that grew mold. Above the dispensers was a plastic case that all of the fresh water went into. One day I unscrewed it and black mold everywhere! I had to use a screwdriver and bleach to scrape it all out. As I remember, the Kenmores we had had a smaller case the water went into but it was open on one side and made of polyethylene so water never hung around. Cleaning this case out did help keep the mold away from the rest of the machine until it grew again. And me and my mother always used hot water and often used bleach. Now we have the GE (LG) top loader and the drawer where you place the detergent and the softener has a coating of mold which has to be cleaned off, it will not even come off in the dishwasher. Somehow I think this machine will be a stinker too.

Post# 638637 , Reply# 36   11/12/2012 at 20:53 (4,154 days old) by neptunebob (Pittsburgh, PA)        
Oh, another thing...

neptunebob's profile picture
I cannot believe that Bing Crosby was such a wuss that he could not perform twice a day, althought we probably would not have videotape if he did not fund Ampex. I have performed in college and community theatre musicals where I had to be on stage for maybe 2 hours at a time and had to do it twice a day, the day before and the day after and while I was tired after ALL of that, if I can do it I see no reason Bing couldn't handle it. Maybe all of the smoking and being mean took his energy away? I also had to move furniture on stage and then after all was done help "Strike" the set and prepare the auditorium for the next use too.

Post# 638658 , Reply# 37   11/12/2012 at 22:33 (4,154 days old) by arbilab (Ft Worth TX (Ridglea))        

arbilab's profile picture
One gets the impression Bing was a diva. Got things 'his way' just because he could. But like you said, Uncle Alex's little DOD motor company couldn't have financed the audio machines without Bing nor the video machines without the audio.

E. Stanley Busby was the logic designer for ACR-25/AVR-1 among other projects. The VR-1000 team was Charles Anderson, Ray Dolby, Alex Maxey, Shelby Henderson, Charles Ginsburg and Fred Pfost. The anniversary of videotape broadcasting was Nov 30 1956.

Somebody would have come up with practical videotape if Ampex hadn't, but not in 1956 they wouldn't. As George Harrison said about Ringo's drums in Hard Day's Night, Ampex loomed large in my legend.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy