Thread Number: 44382
Vintage KitchenAid Portable DW in Tennessee |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 652153 , Reply# 1   1/9/2013 at 23:00 (4,116 days old) by A440 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Thanks for the Heads up Barry! Why don't you go for it? It is an awesome dishwasher! It would be your favorite dishwasher! Brent |
Post# 652211 , Reply# 2   1/10/2013 at 09:26 (4,116 days old) by bwoods ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Thought about it, Brent, but I am running out of room! It is a nice machine, though. |
Post# 652225 , Reply# 3   1/10/2013 at 10:31 (4,116 days old) by A440 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I think you would regret not getting it. They are a dying breed.... |
Post# 652666 , Reply# 5   1/12/2013 at 12:42 (4,114 days old) by danemodsandy (The Bramford, Apt. 7-E)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Yes, KitchenAid used the "5" at the beginning of a model number to denote the convertible/portable version; the last digit remained the same as for the undercounter version.
So - KDS-17 means undercounter, KDS-57 means convertible/portable. They are nearly identical except for the cabinet, top and unicouple. I can't answer your question about rinses and purges, but I can tell you that the 17s are extremely desirable machines. If you don't get this one, you are turning down a machine many collectors find to be the best. |
Post# 652669 , Reply# 6   1/12/2013 at 13:00 (4,114 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 652778 , Reply# 7   1/12/2013 at 18:59 (4,113 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Actually have THREE final rinses, the KDS17 was among the top water using DWs of all time, they use about 20 gallons for a full cycle, in fact the other DW that I know of that used this much were the all plastic tank GEs from the late 70s with the dual wash arms. These GEs had more of an excuse for using this much water as they had no filter and their sump held about one quart of water that because of the poor pump design that GEs used was incapable of dumping all this extra water when it drained. |
Post# 652790 , Reply# 8   1/12/2013 at 21:04 (4,113 days old) by classiccaprice (Hampton, Virginia)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|