|
Thread Number: 49113
New washer test bei "Stiftung Warentest" |
[Down to Last] |  |
Post# 711058 10/23/2013 at 13:17 (3,827 days old) by henene4  (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany)) |
||
|
Just uploaded today... CLICK HERE TO GO TO henene4's LINK | ||
|
|
Post# 711059 , Reply# 1 10/23/2013 at 13:18 (3,827 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany)) |
||
|
Sorry, this is a comparison of all the test, but also new... | ||
| Post# 711073 , Reply# 2 10/23/2013 at 14:59 (3,827 days old) by frontloaderfan (Merrimac valley, MA) | ||
That sucks... | ||
|
Post# 711081 , Reply# 3 10/23/2013 at 16:07 (3,827 days old) by logixx (Germany) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 711082 , Reply# 4 10/23/2013 at 16:10 (3,827 days old) by frontloaderfan (Merrimac valley, MA) | ||
|
Stiftung Warentest | ||
|
Post# 711103 , Reply# 6 10/23/2013 at 18:31 (3,827 days old) by mrboilwash (Munich,Germany) |
||
Ryan, you can download a lot of their older tests for free.
I`m not sure if it`s social responsibility or only a clever way of marketing that obsolete tests are still on their servers for the public. "Warentest" focuses on a product`s performance whereas "Ökotest"`s focus is mainly searching for potential toxins. For examle a dandruff shampoo has been rated "good" by Ökotest (no dangerous ingredients found) and the same product was rated "poor" by Warentest because it was not effective to reduce dandruff at all. | ||
|
Post# 711369 , Reply# 8 10/25/2013 at 16:37 (3,825 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands) |
||
I purchased the magazine, the test was a very interesting read. The Gorenje failed (actually all three of the machines tested). It wasn't a big surprise, the BOL Gorenje machines feel and sound very flimsy so I noticed a few times in a German appliance store. Cheap and good was Beko. Very worth considering!
| ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
