Thread Number: 49951
Solid Tub SQ 2 |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 721430   12/16/2013 at 10:09 (3,777 days old) by everythingold (Grand Rapids, Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
|
Post# 721431 , Reply# 1   12/16/2013 at 10:11 (3,777 days old) by everythingold (Grand Rapids, Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 721477 , Reply# 2   12/16/2013 at 16:13 (3,777 days old) by washman (o)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
were you able to determine? I wonder if it has the world famous Arc-Q-Cuate 210 transmission? CLICK HERE TO GO TO washman's LINK |
Post# 721478 , Reply# 3   12/16/2013 at 16:22 (3,777 days old) by swestoyz (Cedar Falls, IA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Matt - bummer to hear about the leak. Hopefully it won't take much to patch it up.
Washman - it has the same transmission as all other 70's SQ's. I believe Mark, Akronman, recently just picked up an earlier SQ, with additional photos and a video even. Same stuff. Ben CLICK HERE TO GO TO swestoyz's LINK |
Post# 721490 , Reply# 4   12/16/2013 at 17:16 (3,776 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
210 or not.......what these solidtub versions offered was a powerforced stroke mated to the whale tale paddles of the agitator......something that the Raytheon and Alliance machines sort of lacked in their designs.......
I would like to try and switch out a few agitators in both machines....just to see the variations of wash action...... thanks to Mark for this video of a ramped version in a solid tub... CLICK HERE TO GO TO Yogitunes's LINK |
Post# 721491 , Reply# 5   12/16/2013 at 17:20 (3,776 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
a Raytheon version.....not the greatest wash action.....
video courtesy of BrianL..... CLICK HERE TO GO TO Yogitunes's LINK |
Post# 721492 , Reply# 6   12/16/2013 at 17:22 (3,776 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
thanks to Westy for the video......
yet this is some great wash action...... CLICK HERE TO GO TO Yogitunes's LINK |
Post# 721505 , Reply# 7   12/16/2013 at 18:27 (3,776 days old) by washman (o)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
the "Raytheon" era of SQ was less than stellar, is that correct? |
Post# 721511 , Reply# 8   12/16/2013 at 19:03 (3,776 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 721595 , Reply# 9   12/17/2013 at 08:43 (3,776 days old) by everythingold (Grand Rapids, Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 721596 , Reply# 10   12/17/2013 at 08:48 (3,776 days old) by everythingold (Grand Rapids, Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 721597 , Reply# 11   12/17/2013 at 08:53 (3,776 days old) by everythingold (Grand Rapids, Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|