Thread Number: 50236
Samsung To Show Off World's Largest Washing Machine at CES 2014
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 724634   1/2/2014 at 21:52 (3,764 days old) by logixx (Germany)        

logixx's profile picture
Yup, the capacity war goes into the next round: Samsung's 5.3 cu.ft. front loader

laundry.reviewed.com/news/samsung...

Picture:
www.econovill.com/wp-content/uplo...





Post# 724635 , Reply# 1   1/2/2014 at 21:54 (3,764 days old) by logixx (Germany)        

logixx's profile picture
and the top loader:
www.econovill.com/wp-content/uplo...

I notice there's a dedicated cycle for waterproof items. And "Niagara Wash".


Post# 724695 , Reply# 2   1/3/2014 at 09:04 (3,764 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
And so the LG8000, once King of Capacity at 5.2 cu. ft., is now a down-and-out has-been. Oh, how the mighty has fallen. Yup...one minute you're the hottest washer at the party and then some jerk that can hold one more hand towel than you steals your thunder.



This post was last edited 01/03/2014 at 14:21
Post# 724954 , Reply# 3   1/4/2014 at 07:30 (3,763 days old) by qualin (Canada)        

It makes me wonder, with machines with such large capacities, what kind of longevity should be expected from these machines?

What is the rated capacity of this machine?

I mean, a typical Triple loader at a laundromat has a ~6.1 cu.ft tub, but it's also designed to handle about 18 kg worth of clothing.

The title is a little bit misleading. It should be "The worlds largest consumer grade washing machine".

When you start to play with the big boys, they don't call it a washing machine, they call it a "Washer/Extractor"... Milnor sells one which can wash 318 Kilograms per load. :-)



Post# 724986 , Reply# 4   1/4/2014 at 09:47 (3,763 days old) by logixx (Germany)        
5.6 not 5.3 cu.ft

logixx's profile picture
The press release says it will handle 25 kg or 55 lbs. Realistically, a 5.6 cu.ft. tub will wash 16 kg or 35 lbs.

Post# 725028 , Reply# 5   1/4/2014 at 13:37 (3,763 days old) by toploader1984 ()        
Samsung

The problem with a machine this big is it is too big! My 5.0 cubic feet ge top loader tub was so large when i wash a queen size thick quilt it would always end up in a ball on one side of the tub, weather i used sheets/ towels or even the bulky cycle , if i put a sheet ir something in with it as a ''buffer'' to even the weight out it was too much and the quilt would not wash well, the ge may be 5.0 cubic feet but how much is actually usable? About half.

Post# 725044 , Reply# 6   1/4/2014 at 15:37 (3,763 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Thing Is

launderess's profile picture
With large or very large capacity commercial front loaders those that are bolted into concrete do not have nor require suspensions. Those units can and will spin even the most unbalanced loads regardless. Domestic units and or those with suspensions are normally happiest on normal cycles with full or close to it loads. Otherwise spinning usually becomes a problem.

Suppose modern computer programming of domestic machines will enable various systems/parameters to deal with out of balanced loads and spinning... but still.


Have seen persons at local Laundromat cram a twenty-five pound or more capacity washer with everything they own and no sorting. But honestly who has that much laundry on a routine basis?


Post# 725089 , Reply# 7   1/4/2014 at 19:19 (3,763 days old) by toploader1984 ()        
Ge

Laundress my ge did do a protocol if it detected a losd off balance, it would fill halfway with water then agitate drain the try to spin again, but if it is a big blanket or quilt or even a balled up sheet for tha matter agitating more is not going to do anything especially if it is in a ball, these new machines are a work in progress

Post# 725147 , Reply# 8   1/5/2014 at 04:35 (3,762 days old) by logixx (Germany)        

logixx's profile picture
That's how all the HE top loaders work because they can't rearrange the load without water. The only exceptions were the Calypso and the Maytag Neptune TL. You'll find that your new front loader will have less problems with blankets balling up - though it might still be fussy about getting them balanced.

Post# 725194 , Reply# 9   1/5/2014 at 10:36 (3,762 days old) by joe_in_philly (Philadelphia, PA, USA)        

joe_in_philly's profile picture
I find it interesting how press releases from Asian companies (at least to Asian audiences) are more humble than those from American companies. Can you imagine Whirlpool ending a press release by saying they will continue to work on their weaknesses?

CLICK HERE TO GO TO joe_in_philly's LINK


Post# 725217 , Reply# 10   1/5/2014 at 11:56 (3,762 days old) by mrwash ()        
Is there....

...a real demand for washers this big? I really can't imagine that a regular 3 person household will ever use the full capacity.

Post# 725230 , Reply# 11   1/5/2014 at 13:06 (3,762 days old) by logixx (Germany)        

logixx's profile picture
Everything is bigger in the US, so... Also, doesn't Consumer Reports rate capacity - the bigger the more points?

Post# 725231 , Reply# 12   1/5/2014 at 13:09 (3,762 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        

Well, keep in mind, it claims it can wash a round about 4kg load in 30 minutes! With a tub,even bigger that that of our dryer (3.95 ft³)!

Post# 725233 , Reply# 13   1/5/2014 at 13:21 (3,762 days old) by ozzie908 (Lincoln UK)        
Using an 8KG is more than enough ......

ozzie908's profile picture

for my household I struggle to find enough laundry to make up a full load as I am picky about sorting and won't mix things so I end up waiting for what seems an age before I can get a wash on.... half loads do not spin well so there is no sense in doing them.

 

Austin


Post# 725291 , Reply# 14   1/5/2014 at 15:52 (3,762 days old) by liamy1 (-)        
Samsung :(

I would never buy a Samsung anything ever again. I have a 12kg eco bubble and the next visit from the engineer will be the 5th time. The machine is 7 months old. :(

Post# 725295 , Reply# 15   1/5/2014 at 16:03 (3,762 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
a real demand for washers this big

launderess's profile picture
Sadly yes,

While the federal government and others are pushing front loaders onto Americans, many by and large have not changed laundry habits to resemble say Europeans who have had decades of experience. The idea of a "small" or "compact" 5kg/11lb washing machine is a horror to the majority of American laundry market. They are used to saving up the wash for days, or weeks on end, then dumping the lot into a top loader. Worse the long cycles for front loaders (which have grown even longer as energy restrictions have changed), means they will wait to get though wash day.

Oh and despite they probably will wash their duvet on average once per year many Americans insist on washing machines able to handle "commercial" or "bulky" loads.

Results for these large sort of machines on average have been less than thrilling. Many shake and or vibrate horribly mainly due to unbalanced loads. The loads are usually unbalanced because the 15lb capacity washer has problems dealing with the five or less pounds of laundry it is has to wash. This or you hear complaints about units taking ages to balance/distribute a load and or simply giving up and not spinning fully at all.


Post# 725297 , Reply# 16   1/5/2014 at 16:08 (3,762 days old) by liamy1 (-)        

Gotta admit Laundress, now that over here in Europe I have had a bigger machine (still not American standards though ;) ) The idea of going back to a 5kg machine fills me with horror too.

As above my 12kg is broke at the moment, and I am using a 7kg to tide me over, and I am finding it a struggle.


Post# 725301 , Reply# 17   1/5/2014 at 16:13 (3,762 days old) by liamy1 (-)        

Posted too early...

Agree with the fact that the bigger these machines are getting, the more problems that are becoming apparent.

I have never had a washing machine only last 7 months.

The only other machine I had which had a relatively short life span was a 8kg hoover (10,11,12kg were unheard of over here then) the drum cracked on it 3 times, it was surmised that the drum was too big for the high spin speed it had (1600rpm) so on the spin, the drum banged the sides of the machine and eventually cracked.


Post# 725313 , Reply# 18   1/5/2014 at 16:54 (3,762 days old) by Haxisfan (Europe - UK / Italy)        
8kg still falls under a fairly small capacity right?

haxisfan's profile picture
@liamy1... you scare me... should I be concerned? The warranty on my 8kg 1600rpm Hoover has expired just recently. I guess yours was a lemon... well, mine hasn't cracked yet and it's just over a year of age, however it's not as smooth when on spin as my other down-to-earth 6kg washer.

I'd also struggle to use a bigger machine than the 8kg... mainly because I tend to separate my laundry in many small loads: this enables me to do laundry 'little and often' without ever seing big piles in the hamper. I'll be willing to do a week worth of laundry all in one go only when manufacturers come up with a machine that can also fold your clothes and put them back in the wardrobe ;)


Post# 725336 , Reply# 19   1/5/2014 at 17:52 (3,762 days old) by liamy1 (-)        
Haxisfan

Sorry didn't mean to scare you. Mine was probably a lemon - also this is going back about 5 years now.

If I remember correctly, in all, the machine lasted just about 2 years

The first 2 cracks in the drum were within the warranty period, the last time it went was when the machine was out of warranty - IIRC somewhere between 18-24 months.

I could have pushed down the "it has not lasted a reasonable amount of time, sales of goods act route" but I was young and naive, also my over zealous mother in law just went and bought a new machine to replace it.

I'm sure (also I hope lol) that yours will be fine, and mine was just a lemon. Although I haven't/wouldn't consider buying another Hoover washer now.

My Mum used to (until very recently) swear by Hoover washers, she had the Hoover Nextra Front Loader for 10-12 years, with only minor repairs - motor brushes etc. Then 2 years ago, she replaced it with a Hoover VisionHD Front Loader and now that's messed up. Suppose its the old adage they don't make them like they used to.


Post# 725358 , Reply# 20   1/5/2014 at 19:00 (3,762 days old) by whirlykenmore78 (Prior Lake MN (GMT-0500 CDT.))        
This is a FALSE GIMMICK!

whirlykenmore78's profile picture

Unless they are building the machine to commercial washer/extractor specs which I am sure is not close to being the case.  There is NO WAY any current residential FL platform can repeatedly run this kind of load and not fail quickly.  Please don't bring up SQ as we all know they ARE commercial washers dressed up for home use.  I personally would NEVER trust a load that big to anything other than a true commercial laundry machine.

WK78


Post# 725455 , Reply# 21   1/6/2014 at 06:21 (3,761 days old) by Haxisfan (Europe - UK / Italy)        
Thanks liamy1

haxisfan's profile picture
Thanks for you kind words. What a coincidence you're mentioning the Hoover Nextra FL... I have 1 of them and it's nearly 10 years old... it's never had even minor issues, however one can hear the worn bearings now... however it's still in use as is and works a charm.

The 8kg Dynamic is an addition to this washer... I could say that by using it, touching it and living it during this passed year, it doesn't feel any worse made than the older sister, however it seems more aggressive during its operation. Having said that, so far so good... fingers crossed ;)


Post# 725896 , Reply# 22   1/7/2014 at 16:57 (3,760 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Unless they are building the machine to commercial washer...

launderess's profile picture
Exactly!

Unless the bearings and suspension are designed for a decent daily duty cycle at full capacity and cope with unbalanced loads it is likely this unit will be toast in
Would also like to see if this machine like the short lived Miele 4xxx series is sold at once capacity but limited in daily use to another. Yes the Miele was a huge machine but you were supposed to only load it half or three-quarter full. What sort of nonsense is that?


Post# 725925 , Reply# 23   1/7/2014 at 18:50 (3,760 days old) by whirlykenmore78 (Prior Lake MN (GMT-0500 CDT.))        
Thank you launderess!

whirlykenmore78's profile picture

Glad to know you know the truth as well. 

I would say if someone wanted a large FL. a Wascomat Professional Hybrid machine and matching dryer would be the answer.  They have been installing these @ the MN Women's Prison where I work and they are phenominal.  I also hear the same thing from multiple Laundromat operators and my Ecolab rep.

WK78


Post# 727812 , Reply# 24   1/15/2014 at 09:25 (3,752 days old) by ozzie908 (Lincoln UK)        
Sold the 8kg LG

ozzie908's profile picture
its been replaced by an AEG 88730 it says its a 5.5 kg load but to only put in 5 for best results, and you know what? it suits me down to the ground I love it no more fussing trying to get balanced no more waiting 3 hours to do a 60 wash ok so its getting on as it was built in 2001 but its made in Germany where they do still make things to last I have put brand new brushes in and sealed the leak on the water valves and it hums along nicely there is not much to hear apart from the pump that drains it and that will get replaced when it dies.

Austin


Post# 727814 , Reply# 25   1/15/2014 at 09:27 (3,752 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Wascomat Professional Hybrid machine

mrb627's profile picture
Any chance of getting a pic or 2 of the laundry facility?

Malcolm


Post# 727835 , Reply# 26   1/15/2014 at 11:49 (3,752 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
I get puzzled by a number of issues.....for one, who does need a machine that damn big?.....any FL with a capacity of 3 to 4 cu ft is plenty enough for a regular load...even 4 is pushing it....matching dryers were around 7 cu ft, plenty of equal space...

and so some advertise that it can wash 18 pairs of Jeans, but no where is it agreed to have a dryer that can dry that exact load....for the most part, the dryer should be 2X the size of the washer.....

most of these test loads of their claims, if you read the fine print, is an 8lb load....WTH is that?.....a machine costing close to $2000.00, with a huge 5 cu ft capacity, and can still only EFFECTIVELY wash a load no bigger than what my solidtub speed queen from the 60's can handle!.....and they want you to think your moving forward with technology!


Post# 727836 , Reply# 27   1/15/2014 at 11:53 (3,752 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
better yet.....check this one out.....can wash in 15 minutes, and dry in 14 minutes.....and the fine print again, tests based on the smallest possible load...a Haier portable machine can do that!...for way less than half the cost...

people will not wake up to EFFICIENT does not equal EFFECTIVE!

and lets not get started on Longevity!


CLICK HERE TO GO TO Yogitunes's LINK


Post# 727854 , Reply# 28   1/15/2014 at 13:36 (3,752 days old) by DirectDriveDave ()        

These machines are so crazy now, they make me laugh!


Post# 727859 , Reply# 29   1/15/2014 at 13:47 (3,752 days old) by MikeKLondon (London)        

Apart from the machines not being built to withstand loads that size, I'm not sure the foundations of the average UK home will withstand the vibration of a 15KG load being spun at 1600 rpm. Don’t think I will be getting one I like to sort my washing do a few loads a day. I can’t think why anyone would want to store their dirty washing for a week to fill a machine that size.

Post# 727863 , Reply# 30   1/15/2014 at 14:35 (3,752 days old) by logixx (Germany)        
if you read the fine print, is an 8lb load....WTH is that?

logixx's profile picture
It's the industry standard. I guess that's the average load size US consumers wash. most of the time, the fine print reads something like this:

"Based on AHAM standard for 8 lb. load"



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy