Thread Number: 53329
POD 5-12-2014 - 1-18 sock ad |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 756581   5/12/2014 at 18:09 (3,633 days old) by roto204 (Tucson, AZ)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
|
Post# 756596 , Reply# 1   5/12/2014 at 19:36 (3,633 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
that is an interesting catch Nate......
but this JetCone ad could be right, if you notice back to the Frigidaire/Kenmore commercial, it was compared to Kenmores newest DualAction agitator, yet for the Dual Action test, Kenmore didn't use a 1-18 for the comparison...they only used a Whirlpool clone, Maytag, and a GE Filterflo.... sometimes the proof is in the advertising.... |
Post# 756608 , Reply# 2   5/12/2014 at 20:09 (3,633 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Even spelling or grammatical check software wouldn't have caught that!
No(w) if it had been a Westinghouse or Whirlpool ad, one might have thought they were subliminally directing the reader to add the W.
Regardless, something like that would have sent the boardroom at Sterling Cooper into a major panic. |
Post# 756611 , Reply# 3   5/12/2014 at 20:28 (3,633 days old) by Maytagbear (N.E. Ohio)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'm more than reasonably certain that the "now/no" formulation is deliberate on Frigidaire's part. Great turnover was a hallmark of GM Frigidaire laundry. Just my dos centavos. Lawrence/Maytagbear |
Post# 756614 , Reply# 4   5/12/2014 at 20:46 (3,633 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 756622 , Reply# 5   5/12/2014 at 21:38 (3,633 days old) by wayupnorth (On a lake between Bangor and Bar Harbor, Maine)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 756636 , Reply# 6   5/12/2014 at 22:32 (3,633 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 756659 , Reply# 8   5/13/2014 at 01:14 (3,633 days old) by PhilR (Quebec Canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'd be very surprised if using "No you don't" wasn't intentional... It makes a lot of sense since the two situations pictured are shown side by side on a single page so you see both of them at the very same time!
"Now you don't" would be more appropriate for a video or at least for a two-page ad!
Or how about that:
Now you don't see much!
Or anything!
Can't tell what's in but it does seem to have a great rollover (until it fills more for the overflow): CLICK HERE TO GO TO PhilR's LINK |
Post# 757097 , Reply# 9   5/15/2014 at 03:39 (3,631 days old) by StrongEnough78 (California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|