Thread Number: 61011  /  Tag: Modern Automatic Washers
Amana vs. Speed Queen
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 836322   8/12/2015 at 21:08 (3,150 days old) by bwoods ()        

I've been eying this Speed Queen on Craigslist and am about to succumb to buying it.

Thanks to Laundress and some of you others I am beginning to get a handle on the McGraw-Edison/Raytheon/Amana/Speed Queen/Goodman/Alliance soap opera (or at least think I am. :)

last year I acquired a Goodman built Amana washer. It was the TOL 3-speed model with the 710 rpm spin, compared to the 640 rpm for the two speed Amana's. I absolutely loved it, for the two weeks it worked.


It held a ton of clothes, had great turnover, spun quietly with very little vibration, and the clothes came out of the spin quite dry. However, apparently, the triple lip seal had been leaking water into the transmission and it locked up permanently, burned up the belt and stunk up the house. I reluctantly trashed it instead of buying a new transmission and bearing. A mistake on my part.

So, does the Speed Queen in this picture use a different seal than did Goodman? In looking at a schematic of the Speed Queen, the components look almost identical as those of the Amana. So is Alliance using Goodman's poorly designed seal which will most likely cause transmission failure down the road?

In the close up of the Alliance manufacture's label (see link below), it indicates the machine is only an 18 pounder. The Goodman-Amana I had stated it had a 3.3 cu ft tub, and it certainly looked larger than other 18 lb machines I have had. So is Alliance, for some reason, using smaller tubs than the Goodman Amana?

Does anyone know about the spin speed of the Speed Queen versus that of the Goodman/Amana? If the tub is smaller and the spin speed is less I can't see any reason to go with the Alliance version of the machine and will just wait until I find another Goodman built unit (and hope I don't have seal leakage again.)

knoxville.craigslist.org/for/513...


CLICK HERE TO GO TO bwoods's LINK on Images Craigslist





Post# 836352 , Reply# 1   8/13/2015 at 02:33 (3,150 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        
Dont think, buy it lol :)

chetlaham's profile picture
The spin on the Speed Queen is 710 RPM. The Speed Queen here is an Alliance made washer which is light years ahead of Amana let alone any modern washer in terms of reliability. I am unsure of the sealing mechanism, however an Alliance made machine will easily last 15 years. I would not think twice about buying this machine, you scored. The only down side (and I could be wrong) is that the machine might be a single speed model.

The Speed Queen washers made in that last 10 years are hands down the best washers on the market and have been for over a decade. The modern Speed Queen design rivals the orbital Maytags that were in production before Whirlpool bought Maytag.





Post# 836353 , Reply# 2   8/13/2015 at 02:38 (3,150 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        
Ohhh...

chetlaham's profile picture
Forgot to add. What ever washer and dryer her family bought her I want the same. :D Id do anything for a new in box Dependable Care or belt driven Whirlpool. Either that she is not aware of what a real washer is supposed be like. In any case her loss is your gain, and at $125 it worth it.

Post# 836395 , Reply# 3   8/13/2015 at 07:15 (3,150 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Used SQ TL Washer

combo52's profile picture

Is an Alliance built washer and has a much better seal design and placement than the MT-Goodman built washers. Alliance uses a better seal and the seal assembly is also raised off the bottom of the washers outer tub which keeps it from being affected by mineral build-up and other crud as much.

 

The tub capacity of the Amana you had and the used SQ is the same.

 

The Amana could have been fixed, it just needed a new seal and top bearing, the transmission should have been fine. The downside to fixing is you still have the same bad design and if you do not have soft water and use too little detergent the seal will fail much sooner again. The other downside to fixing is that it can be very difficult to disassemble and replace the top bearing and seal in these washers. We are seeing the seal and top bearing fail in some SQ TL washers even during the 3 year warranty, especially when people are over rinsing clothing, such as always using the 2nd rinse option and again using too little detergent, cheap detergent and have less than great water conditions [ over 3 grains of minerals in their water supply ].

 

Most  of the current SQ TL washers that have been sold in recent years and are being sold today will be trashed when the main seal fails. It is just too labor intensive and therefore costly to repair this design washer, GE TL washers since 1995 and all WCI-Frigidaire TL washers also fall pray to this bad design and as a result very few are ever repaired when they have a serious problem.

 

Even WPs inexpensive new Belt-Drive TL washers can be repaired easily in less than an hour in the home without working up a sweat when the main seal-bearings or transmission fail.

 

 


Post# 836406 , Reply# 4   8/13/2015 at 08:15 (3,150 days old) by bwoods ()        
good information

Thank you both for the information. I may get the Speed Queen, if it's not a one speed unit.

Although, I did save the control panel and motor from the Amana. I wonder is SQ and Goodman use the same wiring color coding. If I swap out the control panel and motor, I can get three speeds and a warm rinse.


Post# 836429 , Reply# 5   8/13/2015 at 11:26 (3,149 days old) by maylingsmom ()        
combo52

I am hijacking this thread to ask you a question. What did you mean by ""using too little detergent, cheap detergent" and seal and top bearing failure in Speed Queen? I had not heard this before so interested. Are you asking those people whose machines you are repairing (or do you repair?) how they were doing their laundry?

Post# 836435 , Reply# 6   8/13/2015 at 12:40 (3,149 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Single Speed

mrb627's profile picture
The machine in the CL ad is a single speed machine.

Malcolm


Post# 836462 , Reply# 7   8/13/2015 at 16:11 (3,149 days old) by bwoods ()        
speed

Thanks, Malcom. I was afraid that might be the case.

Post# 836466 , Reply# 8   8/13/2015 at 16:28 (3,149 days old) by bwoods ()        
amana set on CL with odd agitator

Here is something odd. A Goodman-built Amana with a strange agitator. Have any of you ever seen this type agitator on a non-Whirlpool Amana? Did somebody replace the agitator with a different design, possibly. Even the lid diagram (if you look closely) has the regular Amana/SQ type agitator shown.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO bwoods's LINK on Greenville Craigslist


Post# 836484 , Reply# 9   8/13/2015 at 18:30 (3,149 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
that's a Norge design from when Maytag was building these.....

not favored by many, but for the few I got a hold of, decent machines that held a lot...pumps seemed to be a weak spot for some....


Post# 836485 , Reply# 10   8/13/2015 at 18:42 (3,149 days old) by bwoods ()        
norge/maytag design

Thanks, Martin. So apparently Maytag did not change the earlier Goodman design control panel for a while, so this must have been one of the first Maytag-built Amanas. Had they changed the problematic seal at this time? Was it still utilizing Goodman's transmission and hi-speed spin?



Post# 836498 , Reply# 11   8/13/2015 at 19:46 (3,149 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
not sure about it being a Goodman......I know the term they were using was a "Dual-Drive" tranny, basically double the gears, which caused equal weight, and no counter balance was required....

the only ones I knew were trouble prone for seal failure was the Raytheon built Amana/SQ......

once Alliance took over for SQ, those issues were first priority.....so far so good....better reliability than the Raytheon design....


Post# 836499 , Reply# 12   8/13/2015 at 19:51 (3,149 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Amana Washer With A Dual Action Agitator.

combo52's profile picture

Yes these were only made after MT owned the Amana name. After MT bought Amana they continued to use the SQ style transmission [ Goodman never made any big changes in these washers ]. The DAA was used in some Amana models after MT cheapened the Amana-SQ style washers by using the Non-Repairable Norge style transmissions in both the Norge and SQ platform washers.

 

The DDA was by far the best agitator ever used in these SQ designed washers, it is too bad that SQ does not use them today, they not only allow you to wash more clothing in a given load and also are far more genital on your clothing.

 

John L.


Post# 836503 , Reply# 13   8/13/2015 at 20:12 (3,149 days old) by bwoods ()        
thanks

Good info! Thanks.

Post# 836527 , Reply# 14   8/13/2015 at 21:58 (3,149 days old) by PhilR (Quebec Canada)        
...and also are far more genital on your clothing.

philr's profile picture

John, that made me laugh!!

I thought this was a characteristic of some Frigidaire agitators!

 

;-)


Post# 836547 , Reply# 15   8/14/2015 at 00:38 (3,149 days old) by Gusherb (Chicago/NWI)        

This post has been removed by the member who posted it.





This post was last edited 08/14/2015 at 00:56
Post# 836584 , Reply# 16   8/14/2015 at 09:04 (3,149 days old) by bwoods ()        
Aman-Goodman brochure

genitals aside....

The Speed Queen/Amana/McGraw-Edison/Ratheon/Goodman/Alliance/Maytag/Whirlpool saga has got to be one of the more convoluted in laundry history. I have been doing a little research.

Apparently Goodman bought the Amana line in 1997, but did not make any major changes until the 1999 model year in which they re-engineered many things and this line stayed in production until Maytag bought them out in 2001.

Goodman did a very nice job of revamping Raytheon's machines, but the engineer in charge of the bearings must have been asleep on the job as that seems to be the Achilles's heel.

I vaguely remembered a posting of the brochure from the 1999 Amana line on AW.org and finally found it. Mike (nmassman44) posted it about 4 years ago. It's very interesting to look at the changes/improvements that Goodman did to the Raytheon design.

The link is below and the post # is 488918.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO bwoods's LINK


Post# 836627 , Reply# 17   8/14/2015 at 14:26 (3,148 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        
Raytheon Design

chetlaham's profile picture
Was that the one with 2 belts and pump to the right?

Post# 836655 , Reply# 18   8/14/2015 at 16:48 (3,148 days old) by repair-man (Pittsburgh PA)        

I agree that that is not the correct agitator in the Amana machine. As Combo said the Dual action agitatorwas used in all the Amana design machines after Maytag cheapened them and changed the transmission. But as I remember it this was also when they changed to the Maytag style control panel. The Amanas at that time would have been the two tone white/gray style. And had a gray fabric softener dispenser. This machine has the Amana style panel that Speed Queen still uses today. Almost immediately after Maytag bought Amana they introduced a Maytag labeled model with this panel. This is not a Herrin built Norge design machine.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy