|
Thread Number: 66811
/ Tag: Modern Dishwashers
whirlpool portable dishwasher |
[Down to Last] |  |
|
Post# 894892 , Reply# 1 8/21/2016 at 09:41 (2,794 days old) by appnut  (TX) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 894896 , Reply# 2 8/21/2016 at 10:37 (2,794 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 894902 , Reply# 3 8/21/2016 at 11:37 (2,794 days old) by chetlaham (United States) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 894904 , Reply# 4 8/21/2016 at 11:47 (2,794 days old) by appnut (TX) |
||
|
| ||
| Post# 894984 , Reply# 5 8/21/2016 at 21:07 (2,794 days old) by frontloaderfan (Merrimac valley, MA) | ||
WP portable tall tub dishwasher
I think this is probably the same one I bought back in July of 2013. I paid $700 for it new at the local independent appliance store. I used it probably twice a week and was always well pleased with the results. It seems to wash thoroughly and doesn't use a lot of water or electricity. I still have it, but my new apartment has a built-in GE somethingorother that is more convenient to use, so there it sits, side by side with the GE Hotpoint. Between the two, I think I prefer my WP portable...
Price: others know more than me here about this, but I would think $200-$300 would be a fair price if it is in good shape. | ||
|
Post# 895039 , Reply# 6 8/22/2016 at 09:19 (2,793 days old) by chetlaham (United States) |
||
|
Point Voyager | ||
| Post# 895263 , Reply# 9 8/23/2016 at 10:41 (2,792 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 895265 , Reply# 10 8/23/2016 at 11:00 (2,792 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago) | ||
|
^^^ error! | ||
| Post# 895466 , Reply# 11 8/24/2016 at 08:44 (2,791 days old) by vacerator (Macomb, Michigan) | ||
|
No worries johnB300, I've done it as well. | ||
| Post# 895564 , Reply# 12 8/24/2016 at 17:11 (2,791 days old) by Murando531 (Augusta, Georgia - US) | ||
This is the current Whirlpool removable filter platform, but I'm still not sure what the official design name is yet. I've seen it referred to as "Tahoe", "Resource Saver", and now "WashRight" recently. It's definitely BOL and probably won't be the quietest thing in the world, but for most users should be a fine machine. As far as I can tell, this model has no diverter valve, meaning both wash arms operate at once. This takes away a bit of spray power compared to the TOL WP I have, but it's in no way anemic, and while it may not take peanut butter out of the bottoms of cups in the corners of the top rack, it should clean fine other wise.
A model similar to this was used in an interior-action video that Reviewed.com did, and also on an episode of Mythbusters to try and "cook" lasagna inside the machine, the latter being slightly higher end as far as controls but exactly the same under the hood. | ||
| Post# 895585 , Reply# 13 8/24/2016 at 22:19 (2,791 days old) by Johnb300m (Chicago) | ||
|
asside | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
