Thread Number: 68648
/ Tag: Vintage Automatic Washers
POD 1/6/2017 |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 914252 , Reply# 1   1/6/2017 at 06:02 (2,665 days old) by toploader55 (Massachusetts Sand Bar, Cape Cod)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 914256 , Reply# 2   1/6/2017 at 07:27 (2,665 days old) by Frigidaireguy (Wiston-Salem, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
This is the 1956 year model of the pulsamatic. I have the matching dryer to this machine. It is a "vented" model not the filtrator as the Unimatic version. Was not the best dryer but works sufficiently. Bob |
Post# 914369 , Reply# 4   1/6/2017 at 20:34 (2,664 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Robert and I tried all of the solid tub agitators in his 57 Pulsamatic when he first got it. Because of the shorter stroke of the pulsamatic, none of the pulsators, columns or the space-capsule made any appreciable difference in action. IIRC, the smaller pulsator of the Deep-Action made for a pretty pathetic turnover, the faster and shorter stroke depended upon the larger pulsator (energy ring) at the bottom of the tub to create enough current to move the wash load.
|