Thread Number: 69222
/ Tag: Vintage Automatic Washers
POD 2/10/2017 |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 920466   2/10/2017 at 06:04 (2,603 days old) by brucelucenta ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
This sort of appears to be late 50's/early 60's model? I don't really remember seeing one just like this before. |
|
Post# 920467 , Reply# 1   2/10/2017 at 06:10 (2,603 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 920470 , Reply# 2   2/10/2017 at 06:21 (2,603 days old) by Brisnat81 (Brisbane Australia)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Louis is right. It's a GMH General Motors Holden made model. Made locally in country. |
Post# 920478 , Reply# 3   2/10/2017 at 07:16 (2,603 days old) by Unimatic1140 (Minneapolis)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 920479 , Reply# 4   2/10/2017 at 07:22 (2,603 days old) by chestermikeuk (Rainhill *Home of the RailwayTrials* Merseyside,UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Nothing better than a colourful Frigidaire 3 ring agitator to start your day !!
Am gonna make a suggestion...when making a new thread for POD can we if possible along side the date write the make / model / date of manufacture if known please, if you look at many of these threads most people viewing past the day would not have a 3 ring clue as to what you have been discussing and it may be easier when doing searches on these marvelous machines and the resources library of AW... By the time many come to look and view i.e. late at night the time difference means you have no idea what was on the picture. You guys have a great history of these appliances, we need to build on that !! Peace out... Mike |
Post# 920491 , Reply# 5   2/10/2017 at 08:38 (2,603 days old) by MixGuy (St. Martinville, Louisiana)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Who has a model of the famous three ring agitator 1958-1962 model, that was a sprinkler for ironing. There was a jet action sprinkler made later also. |
Post# 920492 , Reply# 6   2/10/2017 at 08:41 (2,603 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 920495 , Reply# 7   2/10/2017 at 09:31 (2,603 days old) by swestoyz (Cedar Falls, IA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 920497 , Reply# 8   2/10/2017 at 09:43 (2,603 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 920501 , Reply# 10   2/10/2017 at 09:53 (2,603 days old) by Frigidaireguy (Wiston-Salem, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I have one of those 3-ring sprinklers. Really never knew exactly what it was for so you learn something everyday. Bob |
Post# 920503 , Reply# 11   2/10/2017 at 10:00 (2,603 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 920504 , Reply# 12   2/10/2017 at 10:15 (2,603 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Tom, thank you for the explanation of the sprinkler! I had no idea that even existed. Now I want one... LOL
Yogi, the 'built-in' suds-saver was kinda awkward and its use is much better explained in a Frigidaire owner's manual but the idea was to let the washer spin just long enough to empty the tub after the wash was completed. There was an odd-looking stopper that went over the drain hose (that looks like S&M gear...) to keep water from draining out. You then took out the partially spun clothes, put the drain hose into the tub, then completed the spin to let the water back into the tub. This must have been tricky in the models with a lid switch, no??
This post was last edited 02/10/2017 at 11:07 |
Post# 920509 , Reply# 13   2/10/2017 at 10:59 (2,603 days old) by Unimatic1140 (Minneapolis)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
|
Post# 920510 , Reply# 14   2/10/2017 at 11:18 (2,603 days old) by Vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield, East Midlands, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
It sounds rather like the system used in our Parnall Spinwasher (which had a solid tub) where, once the wash was completed the washed but un-rinsed clothes are removed and set aside whilst the next load(s) is being washed. The water is spun into the outer tub where it remains while the spin function is carried out, after which is it pumped back into the wash tub for the next load of dirty laundry.
This has pros and cons - on the plus side the wash water is going to be hotter as it does not have to sit in a sink cooling off whilst the rinse and spin functions are carried out. It would also be a rather simpler and cheaper machine to produce. Whilst on the minus side it is a great deal more work, not to mention having piles of damp laundry sitting about. I would imagine any housewife would have probably got on rinsing the first load in the sink whilst the second load was washing - not a million miles from a wringer washer I suppose. On the Parnall (which was semi automatic) the control switch was mechanically linked to a valve to divert the hot water back into the tub or into the sink depending on what function was chosen - see link for more details CLICK HERE TO GO TO Vacbear58's LINK |
Post# 920511 , Reply# 15   2/10/2017 at 11:39 (2,603 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
fascinating idea......
this manual use could be used for just about any style of this machine....or just about any type of solid tub machine.... while true a great deal more work, but emphasis on keeping the water hot, this most likely the best method... thanks for the info..... interesting how each manufacturer came up with their own design to save suds... |
Post# 920637 , Reply# 16   2/11/2017 at 01:41 (2,602 days old) by alr2903 (TN)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Oh my. Seems like double work and double the time. |