Thread Number: 75614
/ Tag: Vintage Automatic Washers
Progress report on the 57 GE washer |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 994270   5/15/2018 at 12:47 (2,144 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
4    
I am staying true to my pledge.... to work on the '57 GE washer, that is!
After spending the winter out in the garage, I figured the first thing to try would be the motor. Recall that I A: had a big screaming beeyach of a time getting that motor out but B: I did manage to repair the starting switch.
My motor repair skills must be improving...
|
|
Post# 994273 , Reply# 1   5/15/2018 at 12:52 (2,144 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I wanted to try a water test, but the 'nag centre' of my addled brain said "don't". I yielded to the nag and tried to see if I could remove the tub. I did and without wrecking the filter-flo hose or the suds return hose. A miracle!! |
Post# 994274 , Reply# 2   5/15/2018 at 12:55 (2,144 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
My nag centre was right... the transmission boot was split (quite probably from a 7-hour shake session moving the washer on its side...). So out it went! |
Post# 994276 , Reply# 3   5/15/2018 at 12:59 (2,144 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I have been prepping for this restoration for years and I am glad I had the good sense to have gotten a new boot!! This one was gotten in 2013 at Modern Parts... Installation went just fine! |
Post# 994277 , Reply# 4   5/15/2018 at 13:01 (2,144 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I was feeling courageous so I re-installed the pump and ran water into tub...
View Full Size
|
Post# 994278 , Reply# 5   5/15/2018 at 13:04 (2,144 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Well, the boot was good and leakproof but there was a drip around where the pump sits below the tub. That wasn't completely unexpected, so off with the pump and off to dig for the silicone...
View Full Size
|
Post# 994279 , Reply# 6   5/15/2018 at 13:08 (2,144 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
While I had the pump out, the nag centre kicked in with a concern about the flapper valve inside the pump. I need to pay more attention to this nag centre... the flapper valve was stuck and would not have directed water into the filter-flo return pipe. That was cured with a brief soak in hot tap water. |
Post# 994280 , Reply# 7   5/15/2018 at 13:11 (2,144 days old) by Blackstone (Springfield, Massachusetts)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 994281 , Reply# 8   5/15/2018 at 13:14 (2,144 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I re-installed the pump, with a coating of the old reliable blue RTV silicone on the gasket. At this point I figured it would be wise to test the water inlet valve (yeah, I know...me thinking of that BEFORE I reassembled the washer!!). Well it checked out and should be fine when Maiden Wash Day rolls around. I won't get back to the house in Ogden until Friday now but you can bet there will be another water test!! Stay tuned ...
View Full Size
|
Post# 994288 , Reply# 9   5/15/2018 at 14:00 (2,144 days old) by pulltostart (Mobile, AL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 994292 , Reply# 10   5/15/2018 at 14:24 (2,144 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 994293 , Reply# 11   5/15/2018 at 15:19 (2,143 days old) by potatochips ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Nice job, Paul! Thanks for sharing. Cant wait to see the end result! |
Post# 994297 , Reply# 12   5/15/2018 at 16:30 (2,143 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 994310 , Reply# 13   5/15/2018 at 18:32 (2,143 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
You are an inspiration. Tell Hubby to build you another storehouse. These models were the beginning of the raised panel Filter-Flo's that lasted until 1963; were and are my favorites. The pink color is so GE and splendid and, as we both know, was lateraled over to the dishwashers for many years. The backsplash design on these units was clever and unique; leftovers were used up for a near-TOL model for the beginning of the 1958 line, but then disappeared. Aferim! Do you have the proper copper filter pan for this machine?
View Full Size
|
Post# 994320 , Reply# 14   5/15/2018 at 19:56 (2,143 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Yes, I was thrilled to see it was still there when I first got the washer!
And here's an oddity, perhaps because this is a "Canadian" model - the model tag identifies it as a WA857P, yet on the lid instructions the model is stated as WA855. The model tag also has the CSA (Canada Standards Association - the equivalent of UL) but states the machine was born in Appliance Park, USA. Go figure...
View Full Size
|
Post# 994324 , Reply# 15   5/15/2018 at 20:16 (2,143 days old) by pulltostart (Mobile, AL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 994352 , Reply# 16   5/16/2018 at 08:26 (2,143 days old) by appliguy (Oakton Va.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 994354 , Reply# 17   5/16/2018 at 08:32 (2,143 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That could well be... I've got a Frigidaire dishwasher (a '57 according to the US date charts, but seller had a bill of sale from '58) that was made in Dayton but had the CSA stamp.
Not sure when, but GE (and Frigidaire among others) did start building appliances in Canada. I'd have to guess in the early 60s - I remember that the fabled GE V12 set of my youth definitely said "Made in Canada, eh" on the model tag... |
Post# 994359 , Reply# 18   5/16/2018 at 09:51 (2,143 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
After watching the movie right away, I thought, how is that Wizard Paul getting the GE to agitate without water? And then, OH MY, a suds. Have never had the GE suds experience. Is it as much fun as classic WP/KM--pump on full speed! Must be cool to see the suds coming from the top, huh?
Good luck, my friend, but you always manage regardless. Have a Turquoise surprise coming soon you'll enjoy! |
Post# 994368 , Reply# 19   5/16/2018 at 12:02 (2,143 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
It's not wizardry, honest! GE solid tub machines from 1953 on had a 'water saver' button on the upper-end models - it simply bypassed the pressure pad at the bottom of the tub and started agitation. Unlike the WP/KM/Inglis models with Suds-Savers, GE doesn't have a 'spot' on the timer where the agitator runs while the pump returns saved water to the tub.
Why I know this was in place in '53 was because that's how I got that '53 of mine to agitate! Actually, the switch on the '57 is a little sticky; it should be a momentary contact.... |
Post# 994370 , Reply# 20   5/16/2018 at 12:08 (2,143 days old) by Unimatic1140 (Minneapolis)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Super cool work Paul, very impressive! You'll love the '57 GE. That pump flapper was an issue for sure in that design. Can't wait to hear about its first wash in decades!
Working on my '58 GE I've learned a lot about the electric circuit of this machine, and it's quite complicated compared to most of the time, but it works well. |
Post# 994383 , Reply# 21   5/16/2018 at 16:30 (2,142 days old) by appnut (TX)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 994749 , Reply# 22   5/20/2018 at 18:53 (2,138 days old) by lesto (Atlanta)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
This is so exciting. The 57 was such a unique and attractive model with the timer on the left. Can't wait to see pics and video of it's maiden wash! |
Post# 994860 , Reply# 23   5/21/2018 at 21:25 (2,137 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
It was a long weekend here in Canada and it was also the first time in three weeks that Hubby and I got to spend an entire weekend together. But I wasn't going to let that get in the way of the 57 GE washer restoration!! So, the goal this weekend was to leak-proof the pump/tub area...
View Full Size
|
Post# 994861 , Reply# 24   5/21/2018 at 21:28 (2,137 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I got it right this time. It 's holding vater! In the 2nd picture, I wanted to see just how much water was needed to make the pressure pad switch click on. It's a lot! Oh, right, it's a GE...LOL |
Post# 994862 , Reply# 25   5/21/2018 at 21:35 (2,137 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
As the leaks were resolved, I figured this would be a good time to start prepping the cabinet for a new paint job. There was a lot of grime on the cabinet from storage but also quite a few rust spots (the machine sat idle in a basement for 32 years). Getting the trim plates off was a challenge but I did it! The only paint that got applied today was a good coat of POR15 on the base. |
Post# 994863 , Reply# 26   5/21/2018 at 21:46 (2,137 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
And just for the thrills of it, I thought I would investigate the suds valve assembly. Full disclosure: I am most likely not going to put the suds saving system back into this machine initially. I already have 2 suds savers and only 1 washtub! And restoring this GE system is going to need some creative and innovative thinking. Which means I am beat... lol Well nonetheless I took the suds valve apart. The word 'cruddified' is all I could think of ( if that is even a word). Look at the stuff that was in there! Even the ubiquitous bobby pin... Well at least I have a NOS gasket for the valve! The plan for this coming weekend is to paint the cabinet. But there is a washer rescue mission planned for this week also. Such excitement!! |
Post# 994865 , Reply# 27   5/21/2018 at 22:12 (2,137 days old) by pulltostart (Mobile, AL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 994892 , Reply# 28   5/22/2018 at 06:21 (2,137 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Lawrence, it is held on with both mechanical fasteners and adhesive. Those three black blobs remind me of the stuff used on the old asphalt floor tiles. I'll guess that was a mid-production-run hack by GE to assuage complaints of the panel vibrating when the machine would spin... I shall use the same technique on re-assembly! |
Post# 994940 , Reply# 29   5/22/2018 at 13:48 (2,137 days old) by Unimatic1140 (Minneapolis)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
In the 2nd picture, I wanted to see just how much water was needed to make the pressure pad switch click on. It's a lot! Oh, right, it's a GE...LOL
LOL is right Paul. The service manual says to adjust the switch (I assume by bending the metal actuating arm, ironically they never tell you how to adjust it) so 4 to 6 gallons is in the outer tub before activation begins. I've found that about 2 gallons is more than enough to operate the filter-flo stream just fine, thank you. GE. |
Post# 994985 , Reply# 30   5/23/2018 at 06:59 (2,136 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I should pay you for these lessons. I really should.
View Full Size
|
Post# 994986 , Reply# 31   5/23/2018 at 07:05 (2,136 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 995362 , Reply# 32   5/27/2018 at 17:07 (2,131 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Amazingly, I managed to mostly ignore the 'new' 58 Philco Bendix combo and continued to work on the 57 GE. This weekend was devoted to its beautification - which pretty much meant painting. I think it went well! |
Post# 995363 , Reply# 33   5/27/2018 at 17:13 (2,131 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I almost made a big blunder... the housing for the control panel was not going to look nice on a freshly-painted body. So I repainted it, too! Bonus - with the switch bank out, I was able to get the water saver switch to release as soon as one takes one's finger off. That's what the manual said it was supposed to do. Sonny Service would be proud.... |
Post# 995364 , Reply# 34   5/27/2018 at 17:15 (2,131 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The lower aluminum trim panel looked way better after a bath! |
Post# 995365 , Reply# 35   5/27/2018 at 17:18 (2,131 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
And the washer top needed a good scrub. I think I'll need some rubbing compound on those water stains on the lip. |
Post# 995366 , Reply# 36   5/27/2018 at 17:22 (2,131 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Of course I wasn't going to forget the plastic control panel. It cleaned up very nicely. There was a section of paint missing where the fluorescent tub would shine through - wasn't sure what to use but drywall primer/sealer seemed to work. It will be a bit lighter than the original paint, but if I take up smoking.... |
Post# 995367 , Reply# 37   5/27/2018 at 17:28 (2,131 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
And for my last trick, I thought I'd get the trim panel and strip back on. Hubby and Canyon thought they were hearing the soundtrack from "The Exorcist"... It did not go well... I had a devil of a time trying to seat the lower panel on its three upper mounting lugs. In the end I gave up and used construction cement. Same for the upper chrome trim strip. I broke off one of the mounting tabs on re-installation so I tried cementing it, too. We will see next week when I take the straps off how well my idea worked. Fingers crossed!! |
Post# 995371 , Reply# 38   5/27/2018 at 18:27 (2,131 days old) by pulltostart (Mobile, AL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 995374 , Reply# 39   5/27/2018 at 18:45 (2,131 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 995382 , Reply# 40   5/27/2018 at 19:08 (2,131 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Lawrence, I don't have a paint booth - it's all done in the garage (with the garage door nearest the machine closed...damn mosquitoes...) Louis, I am using Rustoleum appliance epoxy applied with a foam roller. It works so much better for me 'cause my hands shake so got-danged much that I can't do a decent spray-paint job...
|
Post# 995460 , Reply# 41   5/28/2018 at 16:58 (2,130 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 995493 , Reply# 42   5/28/2018 at 21:12 (2,130 days old) by ken (NYS)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
What results do you get with regard to smoothness? I used the same Rustoleum epoxy applied with a foam roller last year on a refrigerator. I wasn't very satisfied with the results. And I even thinned it hoping it would flow out better. It was quite warm when I did it so that probably contributed to it drying faster. I called Rustoleum to ask if it could be sanded and was told yes.
I had originally decided to paint it with spray cans and did both doors that way. But the cans started spitting so I switched to the roller. Funny thing the spots created by the spitting flowed out enough they aren't that noticeable unless you look closely. The doors came out much smoother than the cabinet. With the doors being the part most seen I decided not to bother with the work of sanding and buffing the cabinet. |
Post# 995495 , Reply# 43   5/28/2018 at 21:35 (2,130 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 995672 , Reply# 44   5/30/2018 at 15:40 (2,128 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Ken - I think temperature definitely has an impact on the application of the Rust-Oleum paint. It was in the low-60s last weekend and it seemed to work well for me. Something I noticed on the application instructions was that 'recoat is possible in 1 hour'; I've tried doing that on three recent projects (the '47 Bendix, the '47 Launderall, and this '57 GE) and it seems to work well. On the GE, I was extra paranoid and gave a light recoat after 24 hours as well.
For sanding, I've tried to sand rough spots and I found it didn't work that well. Perhaps because I had applied a thicker coat of paint I found that the surface 'tore' rather than 'sanded'.
|
Post# 995681 , Reply# 45   5/30/2018 at 16:28 (2,128 days old) by ken (NYS)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 995721 , Reply# 46   5/30/2018 at 18:23 (2,128 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 996100 , Reply# 47   6/3/2018 at 17:05 (2,124 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
This weekend's goal was to get the 57 GE back together again and test it. Well, that was the goal at least. The paint was dry and looking good. With hubby's help, I got the tub back in with no damage to the suds or filter flo flumes. I was lucky enough to have a good tub gasket from the doomed '60 GE and a new fill flume! |
Post# 996101 , Reply# 48   6/3/2018 at 17:07 (2,124 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
With the agitator back in and control panel put back together, it was starting to look like a washer again. |
Post# 996104 , Reply# 49   6/3/2018 at 17:18 (2,124 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I reconnected the colourful maze of wires and figured it was time for a dry test.
And that's where the wheels fell off....
I started the machine, heard the fill solenoids buzzing happily then I hit the water saver button. POW went the breaker...
Knowing my weaknesses with wiring I assumed I made a bad connection somewhere. Nope. Recalling the silly mistakes I had made with the timer boxes of the 66 Inglis and 65 Lady K which caused an accidental short, I pulled the timer and switch bank from the control panel. There was nothing glaringly obvious there. At this point I can only think that my motor repair has gone south. Why the machine worked fine a couple of weeks ago is beyond me. Perhaps I shifted or dislodged something in the motor or one of the motor connections somewhere but I have shifted or moved the washer that much.... The thought of getting that friggin' motor out again is not a happy one. Sigh....
View Full Size
|
Post# 996141 , Reply# 51   6/4/2018 at 08:04 (2,124 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
James, I had the very same thought about the water saver switch! My "logic" had me checking whatever I had messed with recently and that switch was number one on the list. It tested OK, though... I did also notice that the 'pull on' 'push off' switch in the timer is no longer working so I am worried I knocked or disturbed something in the timer. The panel fluorescent light didn't want to work on the first test either, but that was because I hadn't seated the bulb in the socket firmly.
I'll not be playing with the GE again until the weekend, but I have a test plan. Among the tests will be to hook up another GE washer motor outside of the machine and see if it works when connected to the 57's wiring. I also have this hare-brained idea that one of the connectors underneath the motor may have slipped. Well, I will find out on Saturday with any luck. I'll warn Hydro this week.... LOL |
Post# 996145 , Reply# 52   6/4/2018 at 08:53 (2,124 days old) by pulltostart (Mobile, AL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 996150 , Reply# 53   6/4/2018 at 09:18 (2,124 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Thanks Lawrence.... I'm trying not to get too upset about it but considering my track record with GE washers.... GGGGRRRRR!
James, forgot to mention that I removed the entire suds saver assembly and all wiring from that patchboard. I had a sudden flash (pun intended) that perhaps, just perhaps the breaker went pow because of the speed solenoid on the clutch (the wash and spin speed selectors were both in the slow setting) but that wasn't it either. Trying not to obsess about this. Grumble.... |
Post# 996278 , Reply# 54   6/5/2018 at 12:07 (2,123 days old) by potatochips ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Looking great, Paul! I can see the light at the end of the tunnel. Its almost there. |
Post# 996290 , Reply# 55   6/5/2018 at 14:31 (2,123 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Interesting that the inlet flumes for your P and my P both seem to have been outfitted with the Rinse Dispenser diverter spout on the top of it even though that dispenser wasn't introduced until 1958. Or is that a replacement? Mine looked like it was original, not shiny like yours.
Please clean that Filter-Flo Flume and the undersides of the lid with a detailing brush and an acid before I have to look at it again; it's like nails on a chalk board. (1. Ducking, 2. Running). |
Post# 996458 , Reply# 56   6/7/2018 at 11:23 (2,121 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
3    
I am preparing for a further attempt on the washer this weekend and thought it might be prudent to make a flowchart. Hmmmm.... maybe THIS is why my track record with GE's is so poor...
View Full Size
|
Post# 996460 , Reply# 57   6/7/2018 at 11:29 (2,121 days old) by pulltostart (Mobile, AL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 996461 , Reply# 58   6/7/2018 at 11:30 (2,121 days old) by ken (NYS)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
|
Post# 996463 , Reply# 59   6/7/2018 at 12:09 (2,121 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
|
Post# 996470 , Reply# 60   6/7/2018 at 12:54 (2,121 days old) by potatochips ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I have a mid 80s wiring diagram I could mail you Paul if needed. |
Post# 996647 , Reply# 61   6/9/2018 at 12:54 (2,119 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
While I do believe gremlins can play tricks on you when you are not looking, I still figured I should try the 57 GE again. Well ok, I triple-checked the wiring first... Nothing was glaringly obvious so I figured I'd try a power test. But this time, I tried the washer in spin.... Sonofab.... started right up and went to full speed! Then I tried advancing to rinse and POW. The breaker tripped. During the spin I heard solenoids buzzing and I observed the push-pull switch on the timer did not work.... So I still have an electrical issue, possibly with the timer. And I can't help but fret that it might be a shorted winding for clockwise/activation operation but I want to find out why that push/pull switch isn't working and why the solenoids stay on... Stay tuned.... |
Post# 996650 , Reply# 62   6/9/2018 at 13:16 (2,119 days old) by Unimatic1140 (Minneapolis)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
Hey Paul, it really doesn't sound like the motor because all the timer does is reverse the polarity of the voltage into the start windings. If the motor works in one direction it should be fine in the other. It sounds like a miss wiring of some sort or an issue with the timer. Please keep us posted.
|
Post# 996663 , Reply# 63   6/9/2018 at 15:45 (2,118 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
5    
And that would be me... LOL I did some continuity testing and was troubled that there seemed to be'hot' power flowing to certain components through the neutral feed from the line cord. I checked the wiring diagram again and.... wait for it.... The white lead from the line cord had to be connected to the red-black terminal on the patch panel! How did I mess that up you ask? Well when Mr. Know-It-All very carefully (HA!) checked the connections it seemed fine - three white wires were connected to the white terminal. Except I neglected to trace the wires... I was and should have been 1 wire short on the panel because I disconnected the suds return valve and pump. I connected the wire line cord wire to the red-black terminal and all my troubles went away! The GE fills when it's supposed to and tricking it into activation with the water saver now actually starts activation. Timer runs, push-pull switch works, and it even spins. Film at 11... LOL Seriously I am greatly relieved and will post videos probably early next week. Now to raise a glass to victory!! |
Post# 996670 , Reply# 64   6/9/2018 at 16:57 (2,118 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 996674 , Reply# 65   6/9/2018 at 17:39 (2,118 days old) by pulltostart (Mobile, AL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 996739 , Reply# 66   6/10/2018 at 11:57 (2,118 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
3    
That's all I will say for now. Video proof coming tomorrow or Tuesday. |
Post# 996759 , Reply# 67   6/10/2018 at 16:48 (2,117 days old) by lesto (Atlanta)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Awesome. Can't wait to see the video! So glad you found the wiring problem. The 57 is such a rare find. Love the pink and grey activator cap! |
Post# 996806 , Reply# 68   6/10/2018 at 22:01 (2,117 days old) by potatochips ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Im glad you got this running Paul, and what a machine to work on too. This is a real beaut of a machine, special and milestone machine. Congratulations, were all proud of you! |
Post# 996820 , Reply# 70   6/11/2018 at 09:05 (2,117 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I apologize in advance for the video quality. My shakes and shudders make it a challenge to take video with my phone (still haven't gotten a new camera...) and I was pretty darn excited too - these are the very first tests with water in the washer. Now, I have to do some serious rearranging down in the Ogden Laundry to make room for not only the 57 GE, but that 58 Duomatic, too!
|
Post# 996821 , Reply# 71   6/11/2018 at 09:06 (2,117 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 996822 , Reply# 72   6/11/2018 at 09:12 (2,117 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Here's the first spin post-restoration. It seems as if it takes a while to spin out the water, but then again it's not a Frigidaire.... LOL
What has me slightly puzzled is the way the Sudskill behaves on this model - the spin cycle pauses but there's no water flowing in as it does on the '51 (and supposedly on the '53). I did read the service manual (no comments, please) and did not see anything to indicate that the WA855 does a water-spray Sudskill. Could that possibly be because of the suds-saving capability in this model? I know that both the Kenmore and Inglis suds-savers will divert the spray rinse drain water to the drain port that goes to a standpipe and not into a wash tub.... Anyway, something else to keep me up a night.
But boy, this was a sweet victory. Can't wait to try some clothes soon!!
|
Post# 996823 , Reply# 73   6/11/2018 at 09:23 (2,117 days old) by swestoyz (Cedar Falls, IA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
Oh Paul, this is wonderful! So happy for you and the progress you've made with this amazing GE! I believe you are the only one in the club with a working '57?
The spin does seem a bit slow but I'm no expert on these. If it is indeed slower than normal it may take a few loads for the clutch shoes to break themselves in again. Ben |
Post# 996831 , Reply# 74   6/11/2018 at 10:31 (2,117 days old) by pulltostart (Mobile, AL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 996923 , Reply# 76   6/12/2018 at 00:46 (2,116 days old) by stricklybojack (South Hams Devon UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 996935 , Reply# 77   6/12/2018 at 06:57 (2,116 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 996936 , Reply# 78   6/12/2018 at 07:14 (2,116 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Archie,
AFAIK the suds-kill is built into and underneath the Fill-Flume. There's a small metal plate inside the inlet port that constantly diverts some of the water down into the outer tub. I noticed it when I first broke into my 850-P, brilliantly cracking the hard plastic flume so I got to dissect the thing. That's when I noticed the flume had a port for the rinse dispenser on top and a port on the bottom to send water into the outer tub, presumably to add water to start activation but also to rinse spun suds down the drain. I haven't operated the 850-P for many years, but the spray rinses on the other Solid Tub FF's I've seen have two generous 20 second spray rinses on either side of the big pause.
Being a FF, our first Solid-Tub oversudsed frequently(until some serviceman told us to use Dash instead of Tide) and I don't think the suds ever stalled that machine. Usually the suds cake would rise above the balance ring and get pushed out into the outer tub through that big gap between the ring and the lid that they later closed up with a rubber boot.
View Full Size
|
Post# 996939 , Reply# 79   6/12/2018 at 07:45 (2,116 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Interesting!
Ken, I didn't see any kind of a metal diverter plate on the broken fill flume nor on the NOS replacement I put into the 855... And further, I did not observe power to the cold solenoid during the spin after the wash cycle either while testing or in the timer cam charts in the book. I can't help but think the suds-saver models didn't do a cold spray sudskill... The manual that I have seems to detail on both of the suds-saver models offered in '57 but not the non-suds models. I have to do me some more diggin'.
I have observed a bit of splash back while the machine is filling and I now think it may be due to the rinse tray inlet. That didn't debut until '58, n'est-ce que pas?? Thanks for that illustration - it has been most enlightening!!
|
Post# 996942 , Reply# 80   6/12/2018 at 08:47 (2,116 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I don't see why that would be so. The suds saving would happen during the "throw"; the water isn't sprayed until a few intervals after that. I am assuming that they designed the saver pump solenoid to divert back to the regular drain hose in that time. You will want to cap off that rinse port, most probably. I've seen NOS Solid Tub flumes both with and without that port; I have to assume my flume wasn't OE.
More importantly, is the Suds Return System working? I just was given a Solid Tub Suds Saver by Jon Charles and I can't wait to get an external tub and a return hose to see and watch it work.
I remember first reading about the feature in 1969 in the 1969 Consumer Reports article on washing machines (those Debbie Downers poo-pooed them overall), but I had never seen one. I guess they might have been popular in rural areas where housewives were being encouraged to give up their Wringer Washers where they were used to saving the water. My maternal Grandmother would have bought that feature but I'm betting my Mother steered her away from it because the idea back then was to get her to stop going down to the basement to do the laundry where she had a wringer machine and one of those old beautiful huge laundry sinks for storing the water. Exactly what I need right now but I know I have a Homart tub buried somewhere in the bowels.
There isn't a cycle description in the manual for the 855 P? I'll dig my 1957 GE Service manual out and look at it. Then I'll clean up my entire house and property, by myself, sell it and move to Vancouver BC so I can look at pictures of Justin Trudeaux instead of Krusty the Klown, and have Chinese food in Richmond. Hey, it could happen. This post was last edited 06/12/2018 at 09:53 |
Post# 996948 , Reply# 82   6/12/2018 at 10:56 (2,116 days old) by turquoisedude (.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I've decided not to put the suds-saver system back into the 57 GE for the moment. I have the key component, a brand-new-still-in-the-GE-envelope gasket for the suds valve but I have to do some finagaling to replace the rotted hoses and figure out how to mount a modern replacement solenoid on the valve. I am itching to play with the 'new' GE, what can I say...
Interesting that the sudskill-spray-rinse was not around in the later 50s machines. Always good to know! |
Post# 996964 , Reply# 83   6/12/2018 at 13:36 (2,116 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Both my 1960 T models have/had spray rinses. My WA1050T has the spray rinses I described above and the WA630T that we had in the '60's also had spray rinses.
I'm pretty sure the '59 TOL also had it, but I hope members with 1959-1957 models will chime in. I have service manuals from all 4 years; when I find where I put them I will publish the cycle descriptions if they indicate spray rinses. It may be that 1960 was the the last year of the Solid tub but the first year with spray rinses and plastic filter pans.
View Full Size
|
Post# 996966 , Reply# 85   6/12/2018 at 14:00 (2,116 days old) by Unimatic1140 (Minneapolis)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
The little nozzle on the top of the fill flume is for the fabric softener dispenser. The suds kill pause (75 seconds) was simply meant to stop the tub before reaching full 610rpm speed and let the suds settle down about before going into spin again. If there are a lot of suds in the outer tub, the suds act as a brake and stops the tub from coasting very fast, otherwise the tub usually doesn't even reach a full stop during the suds kill pause. I remember the 1951 model having a spray during the suds kill but my 1958 model does not have a spray rinse at all. I wish it did and may have add that lol.
|
Post# 997099 , Reply# 86   6/14/2018 at 00:03 (2,114 days old) by hippiedoll ( arizona )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 997121 , Reply# 87   6/14/2018 at 08:06 (2,114 days old) by peteski50 (New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|