|
Thread Number: 7779
Todays POD---- |
[Down to Last] |  |
Post# 150613 8/26/2006 at 07:16 (6,451 days old) by gyrafoam  (Wytheville, VA) |
||
|
That is the only S.Q. I ever remember seeing with a side-ways opening lid. Anyone else ever seen one like that? | ||
|
|
Post# 150617 , Reply# 1 8/26/2006 at 07:51 (6,451 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 150625 , Reply# 2 8/26/2006 at 09:03 (6,451 days old) by unimatic1140 (Minneapolis) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 150626 , Reply# 3 8/26/2006 at 09:06 (6,451 days old) by unimatic1140 (Minneapolis) |
||
|
The Double Mint Twins | ||
| Post# 150636 , Reply# 4 8/26/2006 at 10:08 (6,451 days old) by nasadowsk () | ||
|
Rob - what's that RCA to the right? CTC-5? 7? 9? | ||
|
Post# 150659 , Reply# 5 8/26/2006 at 12:43 (6,450 days old) by appnut (TX) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 150690 , Reply# 6 8/26/2006 at 17:54 (6,450 days old) by oldwasherguy (Ladson SC) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 150695 , Reply# 7 8/26/2006 at 18:16 (6,450 days old) by hreodbeorht () | ||
|
what's that RCA to the right? CTC-5? 7? 9? Looks like a CTC-7 
| ||
|
Post# 150720 , Reply# 8 8/26/2006 at 20:29 (6,450 days old) by unimatic1140 (Minneapolis) |
||
|
Yes I have two of them, I'm going to take the best parts of both, since both a relatively rough and make one good one. Phil, as for the TV that is a CTC-7 that I've been waiting to restore, I restored my CTC-9 and it works beautifully, I use it almost every day. Don any washer can be cured of its saftely lid switch blues with a little mechanical work. | ||
| Post# 150728 , Reply# 9 8/26/2006 at 20:52 (6,450 days old) by alr2903 (TN) | ||
|
Uni's double mint twins I can never really make out that Logo on front middle of cabinets kind of egyptian looking? arthur | ||
| Post# 150730 , Reply# 10 8/26/2006 at 21:17 (6,450 days old) by nasadowsk () | ||
|
A 9 and a 7? You need a 5 and 4 to complete the set ;) (actually, I've heard little good about the 5's). I've got a '7 with remote. It's a nice set :) | ||
|
Post# 150732 , Reply# 11 8/26/2006 at 21:24 (6,450 days old) by gyrafoam (Wytheville, VA) |
||
|
LMAO----- This is why I shouldn't try to post anything first thing in the morning! The S.Q. in my workshop has a side opening lid-----DUH! | ||
| Post# 150741 , Reply# 12 8/26/2006 at 22:50 (6,450 days old) by mrcleanjeans (milwaukee wi) | ||
|
Is it true about the SQ? Was this "Royal Pair" famed for dependability ? | ||
| Post# 150971 , Reply# 13 8/27/2006 at 22:09 (6,449 days old) by mrcleanjeans (milwaukee wi) | ||
|
Like I was asking,was this a TRULY dependable pair?Who knows the answer? | ||
|
Post# 150977 , Reply# 14 8/27/2006 at 22:45 (6,449 days old) by unimatic1140 (Minneapolis) |
||
|
Like I was asking,was this a TRULY dependable pair?Who knows the answer? That's all advertising nonesense. There is really no way to determine that because Consumer Reports didn't start reporting on Frequency of Repair that early. But if you look in the library, the 1958 Washer Report from CU shows Speed Queen as rated dead last out of 21 Automatics reported on. Top rated machines of the '58 Report: #1 Was the Ultra-Clean Frigidaire Unimatic, #2 was the first Helical Drive Maytag, #3 was the Lady Kenmore Cycla-Fabric. | ||
| Post# 150983 , Reply# 15 8/27/2006 at 22:50 (6,449 days old) by mrcleanjeans (milwaukee wi) | ||
|
I get by with a little help from my friends Thanks Robert,I appreciate you and all youv've done both here and the vacuum website,and as for that site,thanks to the creativity and genious of the others also,it is now a reality. | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
