Thread Number: 11210
My first time using a front loader
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 201608   4/6/2007 at 13:31 (6,201 days old) by spats ()        

I am up my aunt's housesitting for a week. They bought a new front loader washer.

It is a Frigidaire model FTF2140ES3.

It was kind of neat to see how it washes. And how it rinses. It actually rinses 3 times before going into final spin.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO spats's LINK





Post# 201657 , Reply# 1   4/6/2007 at 16:49 (6,201 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        

rp2813's profile picture
Mike, you might end up spending most of your week positioned in front of the washer. I know I'm having fun watching my new Duet handle different types of loads on different cycles. The pedestal affords optimum viewing. I may have a life, but this Duet washer would give anyone cause to think otherwise.



Post# 201679 , Reply# 2   4/6/2007 at 18:25 (6,201 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
I've been an avid fan of frontloading washers since I first purchased one in the late 1980's. They clean very well, use less water and energy, spin clothes drier and are very gentle on fabrics.

Having said that, I added a Frigidaire toploading washer to my laundry room about 7 months ago. It sports a 1950s-derived Franklin transmission which utilizes an unequal agitator stroke and an indexing tub, which is great fun to watch.

The FL'er is definitely my daily driver, though; the toploader is no match for it in almost every respect. If you're interested, here's one of three videos I made (of the toploader) and posted on YouTube. You'll notice the clockwise agitator stroke is about 1/3 the length of the counterclockwise stroke. Old-school technology, to be sure.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO frigilux's LINK


Post# 201842 , Reply# 3   4/7/2007 at 09:07 (6,200 days old) by passatdoc (Orange County, California)        
I have the same machine at home

One year of outstanding performance. I just hope it lasts (being a new model, and priced lower than other full sized FL machines, I just hope they didn't cut corners in terms of longevity---I can deal with construction that is so-so rather than rock solid). There isn't much data because the model was introduced only about two years ago.

Be sure to use "HE" detergent. Regular detergent may oversuds and eat up the bearings. That looked like a standard bottle of Purex you were using. There is a Purex HE version and forgive me if you are using Purex HE and I missed it. Costco's Kirkland detergent is HE-compatible and might make a nice housegift for your aunt, if there is a Costco nearby.


Post# 202132 , Reply# 4   4/7/2007 at 23:29 (6,200 days old) by jasonl (Cookeville, TN)        
Sorry, Spats

I hate to break the news to you...

You're hooked now!

I love my Oasis but I miss my Frigemore :-(


Post# 202381 , Reply# 5   4/8/2007 at 22:07 (6,199 days old) by spats ()        

Yeah, front loaders are different, yet interesting to watch :) I sat down there 3 time while up there and watched it, hehe :)

No, it is not HE detergent. I will tell her about that, and she does shop at Costco, as that was what the fabric softener was, Kirkland Signature.


Post# 202386 , Reply# 6   4/8/2007 at 22:16 (6,199 days old) by decodriveboy (FL, US)        
Question

I still don't get how the wrong detergent can destroy bearings, or whatever else on these new FL's. Can someone explain this for me?

Why was detergent type not an issue with old FL's?


Post# 202419 , Reply# 7   4/8/2007 at 23:25 (6,199 days old) by toggleswitch (New York City, NY)        

toggleswitch's profile picture
oversudsing.

Muck in the form of water and detergent, etc. gets where it is not supposed to.

Water like oxygen brings decay, rust contamination, etc.
Mostly I guess it washes away the necessary grease/oil/lubrication.


Remember the proportion of detergent is not relevant to quantity of clothing; the quantity of detergent is neccessary to be stoichiometrically balanced (in proper porportion to) the amount of water present.

In a nutshell if the machine washes with 1/4 of the water used by a top-loader (in ne fill), you'd use 1/4 of the detergent the top-loader requires.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO toggleswitch's LINK


Post# 202425 , Reply# 8   4/8/2007 at 23:57 (6,199 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
You know, I used to think that, but now firmly belive in using HE detergents in a front loader unless the detergent in question is low sudsing. One can get down to one tablespoon of regular Tide powders and still have sudsing problems. Have also found it takes more rinses to get out non-HE detergents as opposed to say Persil. Case in point when using Persil or P&G's "Pro" Tide Stain Remover powder (which is HE and according to the MSDS is really Tide powder, but we're not on that now), by the third of five rinses, the water is clear. This does not always happen with other detergents.

It is important is that one is able reach the necessary concentration of detergent to water without heavy suds. Sometimes using less regular detergent does not allow that to happen. The results may not be apparent after the first wash, but subsequent loads result in dingy, grey and dull whites and colours. Also since oils and muck are not being dissloved and washed away they tend to linger in the washer causing a build up that leads to the whiff many complain about in their machines.


Post# 202426 , Reply# 9   4/9/2007 at 00:12 (6,199 days old) by brettsomers ()        

from what i remember, liquid purex is low sudsing, so should be okay.

Post# 202543 , Reply# 10   4/9/2007 at 15:09 (6,198 days old) by rolls_rapide (.)        
Frontloaders...

Spatz:

Two things that you have to be careful of:

I see that there is a dirty mark on the door seal; this means that either there is insufficient detergent, or incorrect detergent, or possibly iron content in the water. Frontloaders require a hot maintenance cycle to be run, with a quality powder, to wash away any residues (dirt, stale detergent, etc).

Secondly, liquid detergents: if placed into the drawer, they have a tendency to run straight into the tub, then down into the sump, where they are not used for washing. In the UK, washer manufacturers usually recommend use of a dosing ball, placed on top of the clothes, in the drum.


Post# 202548 , Reply# 11   4/9/2007 at 15:50 (6,198 days old) by mrboilwash (Munich,Germany)        

mrboilwash's profile picture
Do traditional US non-HE detergents contain any corrosion inhibitors ?
Maybe that explains the bearing spider trouble ?!?


Post# 202550 , Reply# 12   4/9/2007 at 16:00 (6,198 days old) by rolls_rapide (.)        

Liquid detergents are not all they're made out to be. Excessive overdosing can eventually cause the drum spider to rot through. In the medium term, bad odours can build up from liquid residues.

Good quality powder detergents and hot washes will prolong the life of the machine.


Post# 202663 , Reply# 13   4/9/2007 at 22:08 (6,198 days old) by spats ()        

Ah, thanks for the info guys :)

I'll also pass this info along to my aunt.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy