|
Thread Number: 13286
1961 Lady Kenmore Dryer - Today's POD |
[Down to Last] |  |
Post# 230168 8/13/2007 at 09:27 (6,094 days old) by unimatic1140  (Minneapolis) |
||
In Today's Picture of the Day, does anyone else find it strange that there is no temperature setting on this TOL dryer, just an "All Fabrics" button. And the dial to adjust the "dryness control" is located on the back of the machine, so you have to pull the dryer out to adjust this? My '57 Lady Kenmore has a infinate heat control that works really well. | ||
|
| Post# 230209 , Reply# 2 8/13/2007 at 13:11 (6,094 days old) by bpetersxx (laf in on the banks of the Wabash River) | ||
 | ||
|
Post# 230222 , Reply# 3 8/13/2007 at 14:00 (6,094 days old) by bobbins (Victoria, BC, Canada) |
||
|
Is this model similar to the Maytag Electronic? I wonder how this model works? I be curious to see the wiring diagram. Bob | ||
|
Post# 230242 , Reply# 4 8/13/2007 at 16:05 (6,094 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie) |
||
Funny they would put the dryness control on the back of the machine; It was inside the console on my parents' 1960 Model 80 (which was all pushbutton), as was the fragrance-dispensing bottle. I still want to know how the '61 LK washer sets water levels automatically. We see LK's in our members collections from many different years, but not '61. That's odd, isn't it? | ||
| Post# 230267 , Reply# 5 8/13/2007 at 17:23 (6,094 days old) by bpetersxx (laf in on the banks of the Wabash River) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 230280 , Reply# 7 8/13/2007 at 18:05 (6,094 days old) by alr2903 (TN) | ||
|
Is this a new POD i have never noticed this one? Must of been quite the "deal" for it's time. I can't imagine pouring a quart of water in that door sprinkler tank. alr2903 | ||
| Post# 230293 , Reply# 8 8/13/2007 at 19:14 (6,094 days old) by scott55405 () | ||
|
Far as the temperature, could this be a "Soft Heat" dryer, where you didn't adjust the temperature but rather it adjusted itself as the clothes dried? | ||
|
Post# 230296 , Reply# 9 8/13/2007 at 19:24 (6,094 days old) by appnut (TX) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 230335 , Reply# 11 8/13/2007 at 22:15 (6,093 days old) by bajaespuma (Connecticut) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 230353 , Reply# 12 8/13/2007 at 23:15 (6,093 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie) |
||
|
| ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
