Thread Number: 13779
Bad News About High Efficiency Washers |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 237137 , Reply# 2   9/18/2007 at 12:34 (6,058 days old) by seamusuk (Dover Kent UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Really need to get their facts right...... Front load machines have been pretty much standard in the UK/Europe for over 30 years. The bearings are at the BACK of the drum/tub- there are none round the door!. The sludge is detergent residue caused by a combination of low temperature washes and use of liquid detergent- a service wash of a full measure of powder detergent and the hottest wash possible once a month should prevent this. Having said that I must confess im not totally convinced by the videos ive seen of HE top loaders... Seamus |
Post# 237140 , Reply# 3   9/18/2007 at 12:51 (6,058 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Isn't the "clean washer" setting designed to remove any accumulation of sludge etc? My Duet has this option. It uses quite a bit of water and really thrashes it around. I do notice that the mesh screen "socks" that I use on the end of the drain hose do fill up with lint much faster than they ever did with my old TL machine and I'm replacing them more often, but if this is due to rough treatment of the clothing, that goes contrary to everything I've ever heard about how FL machines are better on clothes. |
Post# 237175 , Reply# 7   9/18/2007 at 16:16 (6,057 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
What CR did say was that most front loaders sold today are not as gentle with washing as in the past, which is a natural occurance of using less water. However one wonders how CR loaded it's front loaders, that is were they mixing towels with shirts, and so forth. Top loading washing machines were handicaped in that most simply cannot wash as before due to water restrictions. You cannot do laundry in any sort of "immersion" technique if one does not have adequate water for immersion to take place. Have seen photos of muck and such stuck onto washing machine outer drums, but much of that was caused by factors ranging from soap/detergent use to water quality; and of course failing to use hot water often enough to disslove all the muck and soap in the first place. L. |
Post# 237186 , Reply# 8   9/18/2007 at 17:06 (6,057 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 237200 , Reply# 12   9/18/2007 at 19:10 (6,057 days old) by decodriveboy (FL, US)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Keep in mind that AU and UK washers are low-water use--but they use enough. Here in the US, the front loaders barely get the clothes wet. |
Post# 237205 , Reply# 13   9/18/2007 at 19:44 (6,057 days old) by irishwashguy (Salem,Oregon.............A Capital City)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That is about all I could say. With the implemation of an internal water heater, it does help to break down dirt, and do away with detergent build up. I love my washer, they were spendy, you, in the long run get what you pay for, remember , they did have frond loaders back in the day, and there are lots of laundries in the states that only have front loaders, many are here in the NW, and Portland, where water cost a premeium, it makes sence that we would want to use less water, and my washer does two to three rinses, on top of the interm spins which also remove soap and water.It is also built like a tank. |
Post# 237215 , Reply# 15   9/18/2007 at 21:27 (6,057 days old) by toggleswitch (New York City, NY)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 237223 , Reply# 17   9/18/2007 at 22:15 (6,057 days old) by zipdang (Portland, OR)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I think it's interesting when front-load HE machines are trashed for their low water usage. I own such a machine, and it doesn't "wet wipe" or "damp wash" at all. There really is water in there! Those tilted tubs are deceiving; they may look waterless at the front of the tub near the window, but at the rear of the tub there are several inches of water. I used to have a White-Westinghouse front loader from the pre-HE era; it even had a water level control dial. It used more water than today's HE front-loaders, but quite honestly it didn't get clothes any cleaner. In fact, it washed no better than a top loader and was a horribly slow spinner, which meant clothes took longer to dry. It takes some adjustment going from a traditional top-loader to a high-efficiency front-loader, and my guess is that most people who make the change don't do all of their research to properly adjust their washing habits. Too much detergent and improper sorting, both of which can lead to excessive linting, are likely to blame. We're an informed group here, but that doesn't mean everyone else is. |
Post# 237229 , Reply# 18   9/18/2007 at 22:55 (6,057 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'm chalking that whole rant up to generalities. It is not fair the lump all HE front loaders into your accusation. Now all I can comment on is my own experience. And it contradicts what you have written here Mr.TechniGeek. I am an Industrial Engineer, so I too am no slouch with the mechanicals. Below are my findings and ratings (subjective of course to personal observation). I've grown up with a Maytag LA511. It uses ALOT of water on XL load and washes "quite well." It has an "in agitator" lint filter which catches alot of debris, but not much lint. No it's not faulty, because the Maytag Neptune dryer it's mated to only has half a screen-full of lint. So the wear in the LA511 is "acceptable" and not excessive...based on my observation. LA511: washes "quite well" (8/10) Upon entering college, I was thrust into a new realm of laundry; the college laundry room, equipped with SpeedQueen front loaders. They would have 2 post rinses and when observing washers that were broken with standing water, looked like they used a fair amount of water. I washed my clothes in these machines for 2 years. And found them "acceptable" washers. They got the clothes clean, but I think had too short of wash periods to get tough stains out. One caveat, they were ALWAYS broken. Mainly to rear bearing failure due to students dumping full capfulls of standard detergent. SpeedQueen FL: washes "acceptable" (6/10) Moving out of the dorms and to an apartment, I've now experienced Maytag Neptune FLs at the local laundromat. This, is my favorite washer. The Neptunes wash quite well and are good at getting alot of (not all) tough stains out. The Neptunes I think are some of the most thirsty FLs out there too, so that means they rinse quite well with 3 post rinses usually. My aunts have a first gen. Neptune pair and they did have to have the pully, wax motor and bearing repaired mostly under warranty. And since then it's been perfect according to them. I'd go out on a limb and call the Neptune the "more reliable" FL out there. Maytag Neptune FL: washes very good. (9/10) On both front loaders I've used, I've never noticed any adverse signs of clothing wear. Understanding how a FL works, it makes very little sense to me that a properly operating FL would wear clothes more than a thrashing TL...even the slow helical drive machines beat the crap out of the clothes more than a FL would. I will believe a lawsuit of sorts against Whirlpool on the Calypso machines. I've never really heard good things about them. I hear alot of them break before 3 years. That in itself deserves a lawsuit, especially for how expensive of a machine they were. Don't generalize. All you know is what you know. It's impossible to know everything. Knowledge is a limit as it approaches zero. You're always heading there, but you'll never get there. |
Post# 237305 , Reply# 26   9/19/2007 at 11:14 (6,057 days old) by mrcleanjeans (milwaukee wi)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Why did CU bash today's top-loaders and praise the front loaders for washing ability then say the opposite in the "sludge article"? |
Post# 237307 , Reply# 27   9/19/2007 at 11:29 (6,057 days old) by revvinkevin (Tinseltown - Shakey Town - La-La Land)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Here in the U.S. we do not have any top-loading H-axis/tumble washers available (that I know of), all are front loading. While we do have top loading "high efficiency" washers, they all have a vertical drum. This is why we refer to the top load and front load machines they way we do. Side note: Fisher & Paycal does now have a TOP-loading H-axis DRYER that is rather neat, though I have heard nothing about it's performance. |
Post# 237310 , Reply# 28   9/19/2007 at 12:12 (6,057 days old) by toggleswitch (New York City, NY)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
~Here in the U.S. we do not have any top-loading H-axis/tumble washers available. Not well-known, but available! :-) CLICK HERE TO GO TO toggleswitch's LINK |
Post# 237329 , Reply# 30   9/19/2007 at 14:25 (6,056 days old) by dixieland (Memphis)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Ok - so the U.S. Detergent Market is going liquid (which is considered "bad" for a FL Machine) while our Washer Market is unapologetically going FL.... just laughable. |
Post# 237457 , Reply# 34   9/20/2007 at 07:02 (6,056 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Is caused mainly by abrasion/friction. Thus a pair of jeans worn for rough work versus another only for "dress" will probably wear faster. Bed linen is a good example of wear and usage. In general, unless one is doing some very unusual things in bed, linen should wear for quite along time, especially if it is made from pure line. However if those same bed lines are treated harshly during the laundering process, they will wear, and in some cases wear quite quickly. Back when laundry meant beating textiles with sticks, against rocks, with paddles etc, linen would often be in shreds within a year from such rough treatment. It certianly would have been darned and patched to death to cover up the damage. This is why overloading any washing machine, repeatedly will cause wear and damage to textiles, especially if a top loading washer is used. Items simply are thrashed against the beater instead of water being moved through them/moved through water. H-Axis washers use a version of "beating laundry against a rock", and can indeed under certian circumstances cause wear and damage to textiles. This one reason why certain cycles such as "Delicates" and "Permanent Press" advise to load the machine one half/less than full, and or use large amounts of water in relation to the load. The excess water, often combined with gentle drum movements cushions textiles to prevent wear. It is also why detergents for wools and delicates for use in H-Axis machines tend to create more froth than normal "HE" detergents. The froth cushions the wash action thus giving gentle cleaning. |
Post# 237549 , Reply# 37   9/20/2007 at 18:33 (6,055 days old) by andrewinorlando ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Rapunzel - Very well said. |
Post# 237597 , Reply# 40   9/20/2007 at 22:39 (6,055 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Commercial front loaders are built to a much different standard, and thus cost more than what the average American consumer would pay for a washing machine. If there wasn't a large market for high end Miele washing machines that ran into the mid-thousand range, they certianly wont' pony up for a sturdy built, but expensive front loader. Commercial front loaders basically are built to last the duration(the way washing machines used to be built), and are easily servicable with off the shelf replacment parts. |
Post# 237604 , Reply# 41   9/21/2007 at 00:20 (6,055 days old) by sudsmaster (SF Bay Area, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
This is OLD news; these machines were introduced in the late 90's and early 21st century. They have been surpassed by later HE washers, both top and front loading. It's a shame Technigeek didn't seem to know anything about later HE washers sold in the USA in the past five years, nor about the very reliable, efficient, and effective European front loaders which have been available here for a few decades. Technigeek chose to mention two of the worst HE washer models made in the past 10 years or so. The Calypso was a notoriously unreliable machine. Bad basic design, it would seem. Pump problems, and then the "nutating" u-joint mechanism was inherently prone to failure, or so it would seem. It was a unique and short-lived design, and in no way representative of the HE washer phenomenon. The first and second generation solid-door Maytag Neptunes had a number of engineering issues. The Neptune wasn't an inherently unreliable design, but the initial manufacturing/engineering decisions cheapened various components too much and the rest is history. By the third generation, however, the 5000B, 6500 and 7500, the machines were pretty well sorted out, but it was still a very good idea to get an extended warranty. By this time, wax motors were replaced with solenoids, a drain had been added to the door boot, an internal heater was available on the top model (highly recommended) to ensure 130F temps, a fast tumble-flush action was added to the last rinse to help purge the outer drum of lint/debris, the quirky and failure-prone motor assembly was replaced with a far more reliable design, the recirculating pump was omitted (eliminating a point of failure and it wasn't really needed), etc. I have a Neptune 7500 and have NEVER had a mold/odor problem in the drum/tub. Some mold appeared in the detergent dispenser after some six years of use, but it's easily wiped away. Hey, my shower gets more mold if it's not regularly cleaned. The thing washes very well, has plenty of water, doesn't rip up fabrics, and is easy on the eyes. If you overload a front loader, then yeah, the load may ball up and refuse to unwind. So don't overload it next time. Guess what? A traditional top loader will reward overloading with lousy washing results as well, if not a much shortened machine life. Avoid jumping on the bandwagon to be among the first to purchase a new "revolutionary" design: it's sure to have major teething problems. This seems to go for most techie products, from cars to computers. |
Post# 237625 , Reply# 45   9/21/2007 at 05:30 (6,055 days old) by twinniefan (Sydney Australia)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Lederstiefel1, I could not agree with you more about twin tubs,I would not swap mine for the world as you say they are economical, faster and heaps more fun to use. I know that over 1 million Hoovermatics were sold here in Australia a long time ago,sadly they were discontinued in the mid 1980's I think. The trouble today is most people are just lazy and just want to throw their laundry in (mostly in 1 large unsorted load),set the machine and go away and do something else. I must say though I am actually very tempted to go and buy a large top loader because I am sick and bloody tired of my state government telling me what is best for me and basically what I should and should not own Cheers. Steve. |
Post# 237639 , Reply# 46   9/21/2007 at 07:25 (6,055 days old) by mr_jms ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Sudsmaster: I have the second Maytag Neptune model, purchased in May 1999. I have never had any issues with it, no services calls, no mold. Works great. |
Post# 237776 , Reply# 49   9/21/2007 at 22:54 (6,054 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Most all commercial/laundromat washing machines come in a "soft-mount" line. Thee units are designed for OPL and other applications where installing a "pit" and or bolting down is not an option. However adding a suspension and pump system, makes these washers slightly more expensive than the already expensive (by consumer standards)commercial washing machines. If one is willing to travel, there are always all sort and manner of commercial units on eBay, many times MIB or uncrated. Problems one forsees would be wiring (most all commercial washing machines run on 220v/3ph power), but then again there may be some small units designed for OPL,beauty shops and the like that run on normal 120v power. Or, they can take a page from Miele and others and run the 120v power and use types of inverters (if that is the correct term), to convert the single phase to three phase internally. |
Post# 237795 , Reply# 52   9/22/2007 at 06:33 (6,054 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'd like to know more about the Catalyst washer. Could you post pics, videos, etc? |
Post# 237798 , Reply# 53   9/22/2007 at 07:07 (6,054 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
DecodriveBoy Many would debate how great the average coin operated/laundromat washing machine gives results. Remember the SQ front loader is based upon their coin op washer, cycles and all and they are not highly rated. Laundromat washing machines have usually one cycle. Does not matter if one chooses "Normal/Cottons", "PP" or "Delicates"; the fills, cycles, tumbling action is all the same. What changes is merely the water temperature for washing. Now some newer laundromat washing machines with computer/processor controls have a bit more flexibility, but they are very pricey. By and large laundromat washing machines are well built, but sturdy machines, simply designed to do simple laundry day in and day out for years on end. Nothing fancy mind you, just "washing" clothes. Now if you really want to get fancy, there are commercial front loaders that have computer controls which allow all sorts of user programming, right down to tumbling direction/duration; but those machines are VERY expensive. Why Three Phase Power For Commercial Front Loaders? IIRC the story is that three phase motors are much more robust than single phase. They are also better suited to heavy loads and less likely to stall. Just the thing for when a Wascomat 50/lb washing machines goes right into spinning with an over full load of wet laundry. If you notice most if not all laundromat washing machines don't pfaff around about spinning the way their domestic cousins do; they simply rev up and away they go. That takes some power! |
Post# 237837 , Reply# 55   9/22/2007 at 11:27 (6,054 days old) by sudsmaster (SF Bay Area, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
You may have noticed that most single phase medium to large AC induction motors (such as on home shop drill presses and older washing machines) give out an audible click as they start up and then spin down. This is the sound of a centrifugal switch. When first started, a special starting circuit in tandem with a capacitor gets the motor running. After it reaches a certain RPM, the centirfugal force trips the internal switch and turns the starting circuit off. Then the regular 110 or 220 single phase circuit takes over and runs the motor for as long as you like. The starting circuit is needed because for this particular type of motor, single phase current alone cannot get the motor spinning. This type of motor is called a split-phase AC induction motor. Smaller appliances like fans and hand mixers may use other designs, such as shaded pole, or even use brushes and commutators as in the universal motor design. A three phase motor (and some types of smaller single phase motors) don't have this starting problem. The three phases can provide balanced and smooth impulses that create a rotating magnetic field. The three phase motor is simpler and more compact than a single phase motor of equivalent power, and runs smoother with less vibration. It will also typically last longer than a single phase motor. CLICK HERE TO GO TO sudsmaster's LINK |
Post# 238123 , Reply# 59   9/23/2007 at 20:45 (6,052 days old) by westyslantfront ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I love my top loading Whirltag. It is a great washer for $398.00 rather than spending $1,200.00 each on front loaders. Ross |
Post# 238124 , Reply# 60   9/23/2007 at 20:49 (6,052 days old) by decodriveboy (FL, US)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
And I also think it is very nice. |
Post# 238159 , Reply# 61   9/24/2007 at 01:25 (6,052 days old) by sudsmaster (SF Bay Area, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I don't quite see why the LG "Water Plus" option would add much, if any, time to the cycle. Also, few front loaders take "hours" to complete a cycle. Most are done within an hour, and most can do rapid washes of lightly soiled items in 30 minutes. For example, the Neptune - the longest cycle I can set is about 109 minutes - the shortest is about 30 minutes. I puposely select the longest cycle for Whites, most of the cycles I run are about 60 minutes. Most front loaders seem to have plenty of wash/temp/spin options, so I don't quite get the complaint of lack of flexibility. The one thing most of them don't offer is overflow rinses - for good reason!!! |
Post# 238272 , Reply# 63   9/24/2007 at 18:46 (6,051 days old) by dadoes (TX, U.S. of A.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
One has to wonder what were the specifics of the test that ended with seven pounds of sludge in a Calypso. The final rinse water level is higher than the preceding wash/rinse phases. For folks not familiar with Calypso's water use and action, notice in these video clips that water showers down the sides of the tub numerous times during the cycle. 60 RPM spin while wash and rinse water showers over the clothes should keep the tub flushed during normal use. Each clip is about 5 MB, but only 15 seconds. Running with no clothes: Normal sump level during nutation Nutation on heavy duty cycle Water level in tub during nutation 60 RPM final rinse shower Washing a load: 60 RPM wash water spray Nutation Spray rinse during final spin |
Post# 238280 , Reply# 64   9/24/2007 at 19:40 (6,051 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That is footage of you second Calypso right? Could you show some vids inside the tub where all the action is? |
Post# 238313 , Reply# 65   9/24/2007 at 22:40 (6,051 days old) by ultramatic52 (Mexico City)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Here are the URLs to the videos I posted in youtube of the Catalyst washer. Please let me know if you have troubles watching the videos. If you have any questions don´t hesitate to ask. |
Post# 238315 , Reply# 66   9/24/2007 at 23:18 (6,051 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 238441 , Reply# 69   9/25/2007 at 16:13 (6,050 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hey DADoeS, did your first Calypso which is currently in the hands of bpetersxx have those sludge problems? |
Post# 238456 , Reply# 70   9/25/2007 at 17:14 (6,050 days old) by dadoes (TX, U.S. of A.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
bpetersxxx does not have my first Calypso. The one he has was procured locally in his area by hisownself. Both of mine, the platinum machine purchased on 10/14/2006, and the white bought on 8/2/2007, are in my possession. I have not disassembled the platinum for a look at the tub, but having observed it from outside with the panels removed, there appears to be no sludge. The white also did NOT have a build-up of sludge per se. The residue in the tub was light and flaky. The layer on outside of the basket was of a more heavy, sticky variety (probably softener-related), but washed off easily with water and a nylon scrub brush. I am running a Whitest Whites load in the white machine at this moment. Hot wash, cold rinse, heavy soil, soak option. Wisk HE liquid + oxy-booster powder. No LCB or softener. |
Post# 238468 , Reply# 73   9/25/2007 at 18:07 (6,050 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
hello i think the sears kenmore he5t as the same option just see the link CLICK HERE TO GO TO pierreandreply4's LINK |
Post# 238473 , Reply# 74   9/25/2007 at 18:17 (6,050 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Nope, I don't think it has one. You are probably thinking of the similarly styled LG TROMM SteamWasher. |
Post# 238605 , Reply# 77   9/26/2007 at 14:37 (6,049 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 238745 , Reply# 79   9/27/2007 at 02:29 (6,049 days old) by dadoes (TX, U.S. of A.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
IWL12 and GWL08 are not HE machines, although IWL12 could be considered pseudo-HE. I don't think it can accurately be said that F&P "[does] not want" consumers to use fabric softener, being that all their machines have a softener dispenser of some ilk. Use in moderation, definitely. I have had some softener build-up on both machines in the base of the agitator and on the basket hub (direct line-of-fire where it dribbles when dispensing). I wouldn't call that a system-wide case of scrud or sludge as there were no significant deposits elsewhere. A "machine clean" hot soak cleared it some but not as well as I wanted, so I pulled the agitator and finished the job with a brush. When I use softener with the lint filter (which goes down into the agitator), there is noticeable softener residue (feels slippery/greasy) on the filter if I pull and clean it immediately after a load. I've never paid attention to how much of it would wash off during the next load if softener wasn't used. The typical consumer may believe that softener falls into the "more is better" category, which it surely does not. Softener is typically dosed according to the load size ... as in physical mass of clothing. Frontloaders and HE toploaders deal with a higher concentration of softener by volume of water than do standard toploaders, so it seems reasonable that softener build-up may be more likely to occur. However, I'd expect more residue to occur in the dispenser tray and injection path to the tub than on the basket and tub themselves. |
Post# 238751 , Reply# 80   9/27/2007 at 03:09 (6,049 days old) by lederstiefel1 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I never have that problem as we do not use softener anymore! In TLs and Twinnies there's no need for it - the washing is much smoother and softer than when washed in a drum - less rubbing! Ralf |
Post# 238833 , Reply# 81   9/27/2007 at 15:21 (6,048 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
What about the Fisher & Paykel AquaSmart WL26CW1? It is an HE machine because it does not have an agitator. It does have a fabric softener dispenser. |
Post# 239762 , Reply# 83   10/1/2007 at 10:06 (6,045 days old) by coldspot66 (Plymouth, Mass)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Another interesting link. CLICK HERE TO GO TO coldspot66's LINK |
Post# 239795 , Reply# 84   10/1/2007 at 15:15 (6,044 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Oh yeah, I read the manual for the Duet Steam washer online and the part of the manual that talks about cleaning the inside of the machine mentions to put in 2 Afresh tablets and then run the "Clean Washer" cycle. |
Post# 239852 , Reply# 86   10/1/2007 at 19:28 (6,044 days old) by decodriveboy (FL, US)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Let me clear that up Tom....I wasn't referring to high-quality brands like Miele, but towards American-manufactured machines. It would be wonderful if we had washers like the ones in Europe. Sorry for the confusion if anyone took it wrong. |
Post# 239886 , Reply# 87   10/1/2007 at 21:45 (6,044 days old) by sudsmaster (SF Bay Area, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Poor engineering and build quality is not the exclusive domain of American front loaders. Numerous traditional top loader designs of the past decade or so, from established "quality" names like Maytag and GE, often have been found quite lacking when it comes to reliability and washing results. Witness the self-destructing GE plastic transmission, the dumbing down of hot water settings to 90F, and the general cheapening of construction of a design that should require little to no R&D expense. Such washers have more or less become a commodity, not an investment. They don't have planned obsolescence, like over-ripe fruit, they have genetically limited lifespans. While the Neptune has had more than its share of issues, there are many satisfied owners (myself included). Other reliable American design and mfg designs include the Speed Queen and the Staber. Most of the rest of the front load offerings from American brands are designed and/or manufactured overseas. |
Post# 240011 , Reply# 88   10/2/2007 at 14:54 (6,043 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Fisher & Paykel is another dependable brand but is not made in the USA. |
Post# 240019 , Reply# 89   10/2/2007 at 15:42 (6,043 days old) by dadoes (TX, U.S. of A.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
FunGuy, you aren't researching your facts very well. F&P has a factory in Clyde, Ohio for washers & SmartLoad dryers, and probably the SmartDrive motors used in Oasis & Cabrio & Bravos. Someone on another message board posted in October 2006 that his new IWL16 is labeled made in the USA, although his DEIX2 at that time still said New Zealand. They may also have a facility in California, obtained during the purchase of DCS.
|
Post# 240022 , Reply# 90   10/2/2007 at 15:55 (6,043 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Sorry, my bad. Also, I think the entire Oasis, Cabrio, Bravos machines and also the dryers are made in the USA as well. Also, Staber washers and dryers are made in Groveport, another city in Ohio. |
Post# 240642 , Reply# 94   10/6/2007 at 08:40 (6,040 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Have owned front loaders for more years that one cares to remember and have not once been bothered by mould. Well the vintage Miele came with a bad problem in that regard, soon saw to setting that right. If one uses proper detergents and keeps the door of a front loader open between uses, mould is so much less of a problem to almost rank nil. Many Americans insist on shutting up their front loaders after wash day, and leave the machine sitting for days at at time that way. Well mould needs warmth, food and moisture to grow, all of which happens in a front loader when it is shut up. There is also Americans insist on very large machines so they can do laundry once a week or fortnight. Again leaving a the machine shut up for that long unused is bound to cause problems. If one passes any laundromat that has front loaders, more often than not you will see all the doors to the machines left open after closing. Heck, shut up your dishwasher for several weeks and leave it unused and it will develop a whiff about it as well. Don't bother with "cleansing" cycles either, but then again do tend to launder at least one load at temps >180F every few weeks, so that is that. Maybe once every six months or so will run a descaling wash with the Miele powder, but between using STPP in most wash loads, and Persil which contains a built-in limescale preventer, things are pretty good in that department. |
Post# 240657 , Reply# 95   10/6/2007 at 09:55 (6,040 days old) by toggleswitch (New York City, NY)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 240673 , Reply# 97   10/6/2007 at 11:41 (6,040 days old) by dadoes (TX, U.S. of A.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
FunGuy, I've run the cleaning cycle on my IWL12 only ONE TIME. You make it sound as if I do that often, which I do not. As I understand it, the cleaning cycle on Whirlpool-family front loaders sense via rotational feedback whether there are clothes in the drum and won't run with a load. I can't say about the Cabrio/Oasis/Bravos/AquaSmart, but F&P agitator top loaders will wash clothes on the cleaning cycle. In fact, using the cleaning cycle is the only way to get a full-fill hot wash on the GWL11/15. |
Post# 240675 , Reply# 98   10/6/2007 at 11:58 (6,040 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Too bad most people dont know that. |
Post# 240856 , Reply# 99   10/7/2007 at 10:05 (6,039 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I agree with Launderess, problems with mould in frontloaders is mostly caused by people not leaving the door ajar. Keeping the door closed is asking for mould problems. But this is not a frontloader problem only, some toploaders have these problems too, especially when they have a sealed lid. The Maytag Atlantis was notorious for this according to many complaints on the internet. Older toploaders don't have a seal on the lid, but the Atlantis does. When the lid is not left open after use there is a big risk of getting mould, especially under the top. |
Post# 240868 , Reply# 100   10/7/2007 at 11:36 (6,039 days old) by funguy10 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That's among the list of problems with the Maytag Atlantis. (Yay! It's the 100th post!) |
Post# 242792 , Reply# 105   10/16/2007 at 16:25 (6,029 days old) by 2drumsallergy ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hello Funguy10, Miele appliances most certainly are sold in the USA. David |
Post# 242844 , Reply# 108   10/16/2007 at 20:07 (6,029 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 242849 , Reply# 109   10/16/2007 at 20:31 (6,029 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 242962 , Reply# 110   10/17/2007 at 12:24 (6,029 days old) by 2drumsallergy ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi Folks, Yes I did mention physical disability in my previous post. I did not mean to cause offence to anyone. If I have offended anyone please accept my sincere apologies. David |