Thread Number: 16077
Several have asked for pics of my stored Kenmores and WPs.....
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 268354   3/7/2008 at 19:05 (5,886 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Here are some pictures I took quickly today of some of the Kenmores and Whirlpools that I have in storage. I took two of the machines out to take home while taking these shots but I thought you all might enjoy seeing these. In this shot you can see two 1965 Lady Ks and a 1966.

I am no photographer and I apologize for the quality. Just figured you might like to see the gems that for a while I considered dumping. Thanks to AW.org I am now reinvigorated regarding working on these.

The headless machine (center, second from front) is a 1975 70 series quiet pak.

I will bring home tomorrow the machine in the lower left, front.





Post# 268355 , Reply# 1   3/7/2008 at 19:08 (5,886 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
And another lousy pic...

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
The 75's panel that I scavenged from another machine is sitting on the front of it's sister '74 (that I'm bringing home soon).

Post# 268357 , Reply# 2   3/7/2008 at 19:11 (5,886 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
funny....

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Here's one of those "funky" agitators that I have recently learned were called the 'Roto-Flex" when they came out in the 60s. They're cool because they have sparkly flecks in the plastic.

Post# 268358 , Reply# 3   3/7/2008 at 19:14 (5,886 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Oh well....

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
I guess I have my work cut out for me this spring and summer. No reason to get bored anyway. I'm thinking that the '79 plastic top may soon get its chance to get fixed up, then I'll delve into the older stuff in the back.

Post# 268359 , Reply# 4   3/7/2008 at 19:21 (5,886 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Now I'm feeling dumb

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Now that I posted these I feel like I shouldn't have. These machines are FILTHY. They were stored for years indoors in our warehouse's unused office, and now in the trailer for a while. Everybody else's stuff is so nice; I'll have to post some after-pics when these babies are fixed and cleaned up.

Post# 268361 , Reply# 5   3/7/2008 at 19:37 (5,886 days old) by rickr (.)        

rickr's profile picture
Cool machines dude! Thanks for posting. It is great to see these old treasures in any condition, restored or "as found"
The most important thing is that you have taken the time to save these.


Post# 268367 , Reply# 6   3/7/2008 at 20:59 (5,886 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
Gordon, they're gorgeous

mickeyd's profile picture
And you're flashing the holy grail of Agitators at least for me. The Penta-flex all slim and octopussy, and the elegant Penta-swirl piggybacking.

Thanks for posting and thank you most of all for joining this wonderful club.


Post# 268430 , Reply# 7   3/8/2008 at 08:54 (5,886 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Thanks go all around then Mickeyd....

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
I have been a washer nut all my life. I enjoy doing my laundry, I enjoy listening to my washers operate, and I enjoy working on them.

In the later 90s I became tired of working on my machines as doing so went from being a hobby to being work (not what I wanted in my spare time). I always knew that something would jump-start life back into my hobby, but rebuiding one machine in 2003 for a co-worker, doing work on my mother's dryer, then more or less rebuilding one of mine didn't give me the spark I needed. It took AW.org to do that.

So, I thank you too because viewing this site daily for the last month or so has been a real thrill. Today, for the first time since 1997, I have two washers in my garage to bring back to life, and I'm doing that for my fun and enjoyment. KEWL!

Thanks!


Post# 268446 , Reply# 8   3/8/2008 at 10:21 (5,886 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)        

gansky1's profile picture
Nice load of KMs - those 65 Ladies will be stunning!

Post# 268463 , Reply# 9   3/8/2008 at 12:04 (5,886 days old) by petek (Ontari ari ari O )        

petek's profile picture
Just call it your "waiting room" , no need to apologize. I have lots of dusty, needs fixing, if I ever get to it, appliances and vacuums shoved into the back end of my furnace room/workshop, under the stairs etc. I'd rather see any pictures than none.

Post# 268467 , Reply# 10   3/8/2008 at 12:30 (5,886 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
Middle-aging, the counting capability and perception are com

mickeyd's profile picture
but I see three L.K.'s , two with transparent plastic tabs, and a piano key. What have I got wrong here?

Would you consider selling the pentaflex agitator if it's a spare? They free up so much more room in the tub, and the turnover vistas are phantasmagoric !!


Post# 268486 , Reply# 11   3/8/2008 at 15:04 (5,886 days old) by suds14 (Pittsburgh)        

Great pictures. The third washer from the back on the right hand side looke the the Kenmore my grandma had. You have a great bunch of older machines. These were they best type of washers. Thank for the pictures.

Post# 268495 , Reply# 12   3/8/2008 at 15:40 (5,886 days old) by dynaflow (rockingham nc)        
hey neighbor

dynaflow's profile picture
Since we r not that far aaprt id love to come visit and browse
ron


Post# 268496 , Reply# 13   3/8/2008 at 15:44 (5,886 days old) by filterflo (Chicago Area)        

Gordon, wonderful collection of vintage Kenmores. When I was a full time repairman I think I worked/repaired every single model you have shown there. Sure brings back fond memories of that design. Loved working on Kenmores! Diagnosing a problem was a snap on them........sure made for fast repairs.........

Post# 268497 , Reply# 14   3/8/2008 at 16:01 (5,886 days old) by danelto (State College, PA)        
Truly Amazing

Holy Rip!!!

I think a beautiful picture like that should be painted on the ceiling of a church!!!

Gorgeous!

The first pic--middle Kenmore--will it be for sale?

Dan


Post# 268503 , Reply# 15   3/8/2008 at 17:06 (5,886 days old) by goatfarmer (South Bend, home of Champions)        

goatfarmer's profile picture
So they're dusty. They look better than these do!

Post# 268527 , Reply# 16   3/8/2008 at 20:40 (5,885 days old) by 70series ( Connecticut.)        

OMG! All of those lovely machines. That first pic I am love with the most. That middle Kenmore with the center dial, and the one to the right of it both match exactly machines that relatives had. My relatives in Virginia had that center dial model. It was a late 60s model, which I found in quite a few neighbors' homes. The one next to it with the woodgrain console, and control panel raised slightly above the rest of it, belonged to relatives on Long Island, NY. That was an early to mid 70s model, and just as popular as the other one. I remember both washers having gold straight vane agitators. The center dial model had the cone shaped gold cap, whereas the other had the small cap that fit over the agitator mounting. I also remember the center dial model having the manual clean filter, and the woodgrain console model having the self cleaning.

I could go on and on. Thank you so much for posting these. I was waiting for this.

Have a good one,
James


Post# 268553 , Reply# 17   3/9/2008 at 00:16 (5,885 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
THANK YOU for all the great comments

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
I've been busy today with one of my refugees from storage, but I wanted to reply to a couple posts you guys made (thanks again by the way).

The Roto-Flex agitator, at least I think, belongs in one of the Ladies, if so, I can't sell it as I'll need it. If it's a spare, and I honestly don't remember since it's been so long, you're welcome to it mickeyd.

Re: the comments about the center-dial washer mid-way back. I actually have two of those. There were several other washers in the trailer that I did not photograph. I had already moved them onto the warehouse floor when I took those shots but I have another center dial Kenmore of the same vintage, but one model or so lower than the one in the picture. I would be glad to see both machines find happy owners...I only intend to keep a few for a working collection. I don't have plans to keep any of the Lady Ks (but I sure wish one of them was a '62,'63 or '64 Lady).

There seems to be a lot of us washer folk here in the NC area. I'd be glad to show anyone the trailer (you have to climb into it in normal circumstances) and we can talk shop too! I have made a friend from this site who lives in town and is real joy to talk to - he might enjoy a visit as well.

I think I covered it all - thanks again everyone.



Post# 268577 , Reply# 18   3/9/2008 at 08:20 (5,885 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)        
Question about a 1962 Lady Kenmore (???)

"kenmoreguy64":

I am also a Kenmore fan just like yourself (me having using them when I was a kid..... starting out with a 1967 24" One-Speed/One-Cycle model..... then moved onto a 1978 Large Capacity 2-Speed/4-Cycle model..... then a 1967 2-Speed/3-Cycle Model 70, a 1990 Direct-Drive Model with Dual-Action Agitator and then finally now, a 2007 Kenmore Elite Oasis..... encoutering a 1963 Lady Kenmore and a 1966-67 Lady Kenmore with a Keyboard Console owned by other relatives in between), and even though, I have seen all of the various Lady Kenmores over the years (from the VERY first one that "Uni" restored a few years ago (a 1957 "all porcelain" model) to the last one, which was a 1998 Direct-Drive Model with Electronic Controls and a Lighted Console), I have never seen what a 1962 Lady Kenmore looked like.

So then tell me...... what does a 1962 Lady Kenmore look like?? Did this machine have a console that is similiar to the 1963 Lady Kenmore Model 800 (but maybe this machine has REALLY originated in 1962), or did it come out with a different console that changed from year to year (like for example..... they went from the toggle keys in 1960 to a touch control panel in 1961)???? Did the 1962 also had a touch control panel, or was the 1962 Lady Kenmore the first one with a "push-button with click stop timer arrangement"???

If you have a picture of a 1962 Lady Kenmore, could you please post it???

Thank you in advance.......

--Charles--


Post# 268587 , Reply# 19   3/9/2008 at 10:44 (5,885 days old) by jasonl (Cookeville, TN)        
Another 800!

I see a dream machine in the right rear! And OMG! Is that Avocado????

There's also a 1968 "No guesswork" washer in front of it with the sliding panel. Those are cool too!


Post# 268595 , Reply# 20   3/9/2008 at 11:10 (5,885 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Re: a '62 Lady K

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Charles,

I have only seen one '62 Lady K in my life. It belonged to our neighbor when I was a kid. My mother had a 1961 Kenmore 70 (there's a clone of it in the trailer, but some "brilliant engineer" years ago transplanted one of those early 70s plastic tops on to it).

Moms machine and the neighbors '62 Lady both had bearing chatter problems, which I think was not unusual. The two together, if they were in the same room, could have drowned out a marching band.

Anyway, the '62 seems to have been the basis for the '63. I have no idea why, but I have seen about a dozen '63 Lady Ks over the years - in aqua, coppertone, and white. I could have had one as-is when I bought my sister's washer from the same guy, but I didn't have room for it (kicking myself now almost DAILY). The '62 has the same style control panel, though I remember the dial being smaller, the push buttons were white in color with letters A thru H but had printing on them too and Kenmore pastel colors. The pregnant Roto Swirl was still in use, and the machine had an "800" tab on the far right corner of the top. It had "automatic washer" in classic script printed above the controls. The '63 is clearly a decendent of the '62, and I think even a casual observer would recognize the lineage.

Still not sure why so many '63s seem to be out there.

I hope that helps Charles!


Post# 268596 , Reply# 21   3/9/2008 at 11:26 (5,885 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Hey Jason!

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Yepper that is another 800. I thought of it when I saw the white one at lighted controls recently. I don't know much about that machine yet because I acquired it late in my dealings with these and put it directly into storage.

A local appliance store gets weekly truckloads of old machines from Maryland. Not sure why they do that, but they have for years. It came in, and went immediately to the yard, which means that eventually it would go into the scrap bin. So I helped myself. Actually a few of the machines in my storage came from there.

I think the recent 800 in white (is that yours?) may be a tad nicer cosmetically but I'm hoping someone will want that 800, and it is indeed Avocado.

The no-guesswork machine is surely the dark horse of that trailer. I think it is going to need a new cabinet as the right front leg gusset was rusted nearly away 10 years ago. I was given that machine by an enthusiastic co-worker, but I said "Gee thanks!" and went on my way wondering what the heck to do with it. If anyone knows of an Avocado cabinet out there in decent shape, I can probably do a cabinet swap and the machine would be dandy.

I have a white no guesswork machine too, though it is not in the trailer. I took it on trade from a guy who was using it until 1992 when the pump went out. It's dirty like the others, and that's an ugly gash in the porcelain, otherwise it's a pretty cool machine.

Have a great day everyone, more washer work awaits me.



Post# 268597 , Reply# 22   3/9/2008 at 11:27 (5,885 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Another two views

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
With the access door open

Post# 268598 , Reply# 23   3/9/2008 at 11:29 (5,885 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
The money shot....

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
I like white and gold together.

Post# 268676 , Reply# 24   3/9/2008 at 21:06 (5,884 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)        
Re: Re: a '62 Lady K

"kenmoreguy64":

Wait a minute..... Remember that night that I was uploading of washers that were out in 1961, and there were two models that I have uploaded.

(01). A "mid-priced" Model 70 with the three controls on the right side of the panel (there were two versions of this machine..... there was a one-speed version and there was a two-speed version..... the one I uploaded for you was the two-speed version).

(02). An "upper-end" Model 70 with the eight colored push-buttons with a small control knobbed cycle-timer in the middle (which was (I am assuming) the #2 model...... just below the Touch Control Lady Kenmore that year).

Remember when I have uploaded pictures of those two machines for you???? Okay now..... you mean to tell me that picture of the second machine that I have uploaded for you was what the 1962 Lady Kenmore looked like??? Okay then...... if that's the case, did it have a lighted console just like the Lady Kenmores before it did???

I'm curious now.......

--Charles--


Post# 268683 , Reply# 25   3/9/2008 at 22:08 (5,884 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Charles,

Though similar, especially by verbal/written description, the 62 Lady K and the 61 high-line 70 are a good bit different in appearance.

The '62 Lady K's eight buttons are white, with printed on colors of yellow, aqua, etc. instead of being fully colored like the 61 model 70. I think the '62 had a flourescent lighted panel to the left of the timer & buttons just like the '63, but I am not certain of that.

The '62 looks like the cousin to the '63 that it is. The 1961 model 70, though presumably a product of the same cosmetic design shop, does not have the same styling cues that the other two have.

The '61 seems to have the last remnants of 50s styling, whereas the 62 and 63 seem to have set the stage for a round-dial, streamlined approach that was seen in 63 model 60s and 70s, and well into the later 60s on model 70s, etc.

I'll try to get you a pic from a catalog. I have to have an assistant at work scan it....that'll be fun explaining!!

What catalog had the model 70 in it that you scanned? I am still glad you did that for me, btw!


Post# 268687 , Reply# 26   3/9/2008 at 22:58 (5,884 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)        
The Early 1960's Kenmore Model 70 Washers.....

"kenmoreguy64":

I have Sears Catalogs from the following years:

1957, 1960, 1961, 1963, 1965, 1966, 1967, S/S 1968, F/W 1968, 1969, 1971, 1975, 1976, 1981, 1983 (Canadian), 1985, 1986 and 1992.

I would like to add a 1962, a 1964, a 1978 and a 1979 to complete the collection.

The catalog that I have uploaded those Model 70s from was a S/S 1961 Sears Catalog.

Thank you for asking......

--Charles--


Post# 268701 , Reply# 27   3/10/2008 at 04:26 (5,884 days old) by 70series ( Connecticut.)        
1962 Lady K.

I think I may have found them. From the description given of a 62 Lady Kenmore above, I remembered the thread in the early 2007 archives entitled "TV Sitcom Washer Trivia Question" In Post# 178387 you see Donna Reed standing in front of a Lady Kenmore pair. They are said to be 1963 machines, but I always thought they looked a little different. The 1963 Lady Ks did not have the words "Automatic Washer" scripted above the controls like these do, and the oonsoles in this pic look more squared compared to the slight oval shape of the 63s. In addition, these machines have that plate on their top right front corners, which is not on 63 models or thereafter, but is on models from earlier years. I had never seen a 62 Lady K, and always wanted to know what they looked like. Upon reading Kenmoreguy's description above, I realized these machines must be the 62 Lady Ks.

Have a good one,
James


CLICK HERE TO GO TO 70series's LINK


Post# 268719 , Reply# 28   3/10/2008 at 07:07 (5,884 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)        
1962 Lady Kenmore Set....

"70series":

Yep..... I think that about sums it up. Given the description that "Kenmoreguy64" has given me about a 1962 Lady Kenmore Washer that his neighbor had when he was a kid, and looking at the picture that you have just described in the link (I did check the picture out just now), I NOW also think that that's a 1962 Lady Kenmore Set in that photo. The sides of the control panel look EXACTLY like the ones that I seen on the 1961 Touch Control Lady Kenmore Set.

But now, my question to you and/or "Kenmoreguy64" is that the plates that are seen right in front of both of the machines, could it be possible that the plates say Lady Kenmore on them??? Because I don't see the Lady Kenmore name on the control panel(s) themselves.

Also..... Did the 1962 Lady Kenmore Dryer had push-buttons with a dial as well as the Washer did???? From the looks of the photo, it looks like it did. Unless they're nothing more than fabric cycle descriptions engraved in the panel on either side of the Dryer's timer.

--Charles--


Post# 268731 , Reply# 29   3/10/2008 at 09:30 (5,884 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Guys -

I think the dryer had engravements like you're suggesting. The 63 Lady K dryer didn't have button aside the knob like the washer did, and mechanically I don't think the two years were very different.

I was just thinking the same thing about where "Lady Kenmore" is written on the machine. Of course I forgot to bring my catalog with me today, or I'd look now.

That tab on the top had said "Seventy" on some models in 61, perhaps earlier too, then I've seen "70" and "800" on others from 62. I am not sure if the Lady says that or 800. Again, I'll check the catalog when I get home tonight.


Post# 268753 , Reply# 30   3/10/2008 at 14:46 (5,884 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
HI Guys! Sorry to add to the confusion......

mickeyd's profile picture
the 4th&5th pics in the link are those of my 62 Lady Kenmore--or so I was told. But when I opened her up the brass switcing plates for the bleach and softener dispensers say 64. Dating machines (HAHAH) remains one of life's great mysteries for me.

Enjoy the pictures and forgive the new confusion ;'D


CLICK HERE TO GO TO mickeyd's LINK


Post# 268760 , Reply# 31   3/10/2008 at 15:33 (5,884 days old) by suds14 (Pittsburgh)        

Kemoreguy64,

Thanks for posting the 68 kenmore washer pictures 3-9-08. That was my grandma's washer, only hers was avacoda green, and had the suds saver. It brought back some great memories for me.

Thanks

David


Post# 268770 , Reply# 32   3/10/2008 at 16:07 (5,884 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Figuring out an elusive Lady's age...

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Mickeyd -

I think that is a '63. If the model number is anything like 110.6304800, 801, 802, etc. then it's a 63 model. Anything that is a 63 model could have been made from the later half of 1962 well into 1964. The parts you were looking at could well be original and therefore the machine was made in 1964, OR the parts themselves were made then and replaced to the machine at some point later on, or scavenged from a later model.

My personal 1986 made Kenmore (August production) is actually a 1983 model release. In my rebuilder days, I had two copies of one machine that were '74 models made in 76 and 77, then I got another years later that was made in 78, yet was the same model. The 78 even had the short centerpost engineering that came out that year.

Some models only lasted a year or a season with Sears, others stayed out there for three or four years. I'd love to know how those decisions were made.

WAY COOL washer, btw. Years ago I could have had one of those and I screwed up and didn't get it. Has yours been restored or is that beauty an original? VERY nice indeed. Lots of my friends mothers had those growing up, one lady, who had 5 kids and a mother of her own at home, had two at once with a dryer (a 60 series) in between. When they were both running I'd go nuts. My friend just tolerated my enthusiasm...


Post# 268771 , Reply# 33   3/10/2008 at 16:10 (5,884 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
David / Suds14

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
It's cool to be reminded of these old machines, isn't it? I bet your grandmother's wasn't as dirty as mine, but I'm hoping that this summer mine will have new bearings and other new parts, and be like new again.

Post# 268812 , Reply# 34   3/10/2008 at 19:47 (5,884 days old) by jamman_98 (Columbia, SC)        
OMG

jamman_98's profile picture
My dad has the matching dryer to the Kenmore 800 with the hidden controls!!. Be still my heart!! I'd love to see it. I'm down in cola, sc just and hour and a half away.

jamman_98
Joe


Post# 268831 , Reply# 35   3/10/2008 at 21:17 (5,883 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
i hate to bust your nuts, but GAHD Kenmore had UGLY machines back in the day.
Many of the other vintage brands are cool and nice looking. But jeez, these are pretty bad.

No offense.


Post# 268839 , Reply# 36   3/10/2008 at 21:39 (5,883 days old) by rickr (.)        

rickr's profile picture
Why don't you post some pics of your restored Maytags for us johnb300m? I know you must have quite a few, as they are the most easy brand to find. Only because they only changed the console design twice in 30+ years.....

No offense.



Post# 268850 , Reply# 37   3/10/2008 at 22:25 (5,883 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
they're machines, not your children.
i love old machines as much as you do.

but these kenmores are styling nightmares.
just making an observation.


Post# 268897 , Reply# 38   3/10/2008 at 23:51 (5,883 days old) by 70series ( Connecticut.)        

First, I will say I believe that all Kenmores are just as beautiful and good looking as all other vintage brands.

John: While it is true that machines are not children, you must remember that their collectors take pride in them nontheless, just as you have with your washers I am sure. Therefore you should not be surprised at any negative response you may receive to your comments. You may claim no offense and mean it, but your verbiage IMHO could easily be seen as offensive. Kenmoreguy64 was kind enough to post these pictures, and did so at the request of members, and you should have taken that into account.

You are welcome to your opinions and observations as we all are, but if those opinions could offend unnecessarily, it would be better to refrain from rendering them, and adding unpleasantness to an otherwise happy thread.

Have a good one,
James


Post# 268930 , Reply# 39   3/11/2008 at 07:45 (5,883 days old) by jons1077 (Vancouver, Washington, USA)        
I like the Kenmores...

jons1077's profile picture
It's not always about whether or not a particular machine looked good in our current perception. It's about these machines bringing back good memories. At least that's what it is for me. Alot of people would walk by an avocado green machine or one of these Kenmores and say it looks horrible. When I see one of those black-panel BD Kenmores I think of my childhood because it's what I grew up with. I couldn't care in the least otherwise. I think that's where their beauty is. Granted, some machines are simply beautiful. Terry has the most gorgeous Maytag! :-) Thanks for readin.

Jon


Post# 268965 , Reply# 40   3/11/2008 at 10:18 (5,883 days old) by rickr (.)        

rickr's profile picture
I do not think of washing machines as children. Personally, I do not want any of the machines posted. However, I do think that it was kind of the owner to post the pics, and offer to repair these to anyone here that may want a 1960's to 1980's machine.
The styling on these are similar to other brands of the same era. Think fake woodgrain, ect. One persons trash is another persons treasure with this hobby. There are people here that would love to own one of the machines pictured. There is no reason to post rude comments, just because these machines do not interest you.

BTW: How is your collection coming along? Do you have anything to show us?

Just making an observation...... <:


Post# 268991 , Reply# 41   3/11/2008 at 11:28 (5,883 days old) by kenmoreguy64 (Charlotte, NC)        
Re: the styling nightmares....

kenmoreguy64's profile picture
Here's my take on this discussion:

While I will admit that some Kenmores are more attractive in my eye than others, I don't presume that anyone else should share the reaction that I have to them. If someone likes the same things as I do, GREAT, we can have a lot to talk about. If they have a different passion, that's great too, I'm happy that they have one.

I don't have many fond memories from childhood of Maytags, GEs or any other brand that doesn't do much with the lid raised. As a young kid, I may not have had the hours of cheap amusement had it been that my folks bought something other than their 1961, 1974 and 1983 Kenmores (though I may have adjusted accordingly). Fact is, we had Kenmores and I continued that by buying my own later. Today we still have them and I very much enjoy a Kenmore, styling nightmare or not. You'll never catch me making an excuse for appreciating what I do. It's ironic that my granmothers both had Whirlpools, most of our neighbors had Kenmores or WPs as well, so I grew up thinking those machines were "the bomb" and I still do.

In my storage can be seen a 1974 Kenmore (front-most machine on the left in the first pic). That is a clone of my mother's second washer. I am planning on treating that machine to a total restore this spring/summer, which will involve renewing the mechanicals using new WP parts, and repainting the cabinet which is yellowed now and has some surface rust. It's going to be a decent amount of work, but more fun than real work due to my memories of that machine (I was 10 when we got ours and 18 when we sold it to a friend of mine). I would have no interest at all in devoting that much time to a Maytag, they simply don't "do it" for me, but I'm not going to advocate to anyone that their Maytag or otherwise is anything less than just as valuable and important to them.

I think we're really fortunate to have AW.org as a forum to discuss our washing machine and appliance hobbies. Let's face it, there aren't many other venues out there....we should respect the feelings of other members and be appreciative of the opportunities we have with AW and therefore work to keep the experience fun and enjoyable.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy