Thread Number: 19126
Maytag Wringer E2LS
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 308895   10/12/2008 at 15:31 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        

wetguymd's profile picture
Its wash day!!




Post# 308896 , Reply# 1   10/12/2008 at 15:33 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Before

wetguymd's profile picture
Getting ready

Post# 308897 , Reply# 2   10/12/2008 at 15:36 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Add the Tide

wetguymd's profile picture
Lots of suds!

Post# 308898 , Reply# 3   10/12/2008 at 15:37 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Time to rinse

wetguymd's profile picture
And wring!

Post# 308899 , Reply# 4   10/12/2008 at 15:38 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Over flow of suds!

wetguymd's profile picture
Tide powder really does make lots of suds!

Post# 308900 , Reply# 5   10/12/2008 at 15:39 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
All drained

wetguymd's profile picture
drying out

Post# 308901 , Reply# 6   10/12/2008 at 15:41 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Drain cover

wetguymd's profile picture
Putting it back together after drying out

Post# 308902 , Reply# 7   10/12/2008 at 15:41 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Agitator and filter drying

wetguymd's profile picture
about ready to put back in

Post# 308903 , Reply# 8   10/12/2008 at 15:43 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
All done!

wetguymd's profile picture
I love this machine and use it every week!

Post# 308909 , Reply# 9   10/12/2008 at 17:22 (5,664 days old) by rpm ()        

Nice washer. I like the soft blue and stainless steel together.
I just took my wringer to the dump yesterday.I don't think it wanted to go. It sat in the front seat overnight and leaked oil all over the seat.
And yes, you can fit a round wringer washer in the front seat of a Lumina if you recline the seat back flat.
When I pulled up at the dumping station the guy couldn't believe I got it in there.
Anybody know how to get oil off of material?


Post# 308922 , Reply# 10   10/12/2008 at 19:07 (5,664 days old) by swestoyz (Cedar Falls, IA)        

swestoyz's profile picture
Hey Lyle, you have a very nice E2LS there! Looks pristine. Also love that you have the conventional lint filter agitator for it with the fill line right along the top filter inlet hole. Too cool.

Let us know what the serial number is that is stamped on the back side of the crown so we can tell what month and year it was made.

Thanks for posting!

Ben


Post# 308925 , Reply# 11   10/12/2008 at 19:27 (5,664 days old) by maytagmike (Burlington, Vt)        
agitator

maytagmike's profile picture
would your agitator fit a 1962 maytag e2lp?

Post# 308936 , Reply# 12   10/12/2008 at 20:56 (5,664 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Ben.... here is the serial number

wetguymd's profile picture
its 12680MY.... i'm guessing around 1972?

Post# 308937 , Reply# 13   10/12/2008 at 20:58 (5,664 days old) by swestoyz (Cedar Falls, IA)        

swestoyz's profile picture
Looks to have been built in November of 1971. Do you have the safety pedal disabled?



Post# 308966 , Reply# 14   10/12/2008 at 22:55 (5,664 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
Wow, I thought Maytag canned that agitator in 1965 with the introduction of the powerfin for 66. She certainly is a beaut. Makes me want to find one now...........*searches craigslist*



CLICK HERE TO GO TO qsd-dan's LINK on Los Angeles Craigslist


Post# 309838 , Reply# 15   10/17/2008 at 09:00 (5,660 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

Wow, Lyle ... that agitator is really nice in there!!

Do you like that agitator over the regular one? That particular version of the lint filter is quite effective in Maytag's classic automatics. The stainless steel does a really fine job in removing lint; much nicer than the poly ones that were made in the mid 1960's. I'm sure expense was a factor in switching to poly.

Those machines really churn up the suds with Tide, don't they? I love it and I feel like everything gets so clean! Not that you need the suds to get things clean, but it sure is a lot more fun that way, isn't it? :-)

Did you bypass your safety pedal? I sure have on mine; it is much easier that way. However, the safety pedal is great for wringing large items.

You gotta love the Maytag Conventional; Maytag sure knew what they were doing when they created those machines!!

:-)



Post# 309912 , Reply# 16   10/17/2008 at 19:11 (5,659 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Hey Geoff

wetguymd's profile picture
WOW!! What a beauty you have there!

The agitator that I have was an option in the machine when my parents bought it. I confirmed that with my mother. I love it because of the lint filter. It does do a great job in taking lint out.

One thing that I notice with the Tide is that there is always a residue under the agitator when I drain the water out. Its like some of it doesn't disovle.

I have been trying to find a new goose neck for the end of the drain hose. The orginial one coroded and I took it off.

I love the bright new shiny tub you have. Seems like bleach and detergents always spot them and I have tried many different types of "polishes" to get it shiny again but to no avail.

I would love to see pics of the other new machine you have. Do you use any of them?

I have been trying to find either a Kenmore Lady Vista or a Whirpool with the Surgilator agitator and the big open wringer.


Post# 309965 , Reply# 17   10/17/2008 at 23:40 (5,659 days old) by pturo (Syracuse, New York)        

I honestly don't think I would know how to run one of these things. Once the soapy water agaitation is done, then what do you do with the clothes? Do you wring them over the laundry tub or the machine? And what about rinsing? Back in the machine with fresh water and then re-wring them?

Post# 309976 , Reply# 18   10/18/2008 at 00:51 (5,659 days old) by tbolt25 (Kentucky)        
rollers separated

Those were some nice shots of the rollers separated. Nice wringer.

Post# 310036 , Reply# 19   10/18/2008 at 12:00 (5,659 days old) by countryguy (Astorville, ON, Canada)        

countryguy's profile picture
When I was a kid my mom had a wringer washer before she got her Maytag automatic. This is the procedure she used. She had twin laundry tubs both filled filled with clean water. The washer was positioned in front of the left tub. She would put the washed clothes through the wringer and into the left laundry tub. Then she would swing the wringer 90 degrees clockwise and put the clothes in the left laundry tub through the wringer and into the laundry tub on the right. Then she moved the wringer 90 degrees clockwise again. Now the clothes in the right laundry tub were put through the wringer and into the laundry basket. While doing this the next load of clothes was being washed.

Gary


Post# 310051 , Reply# 20   10/18/2008 at 13:36 (5,659 days old) by volvoguy87 (Cincinnati, OH)        
Wringing.

volvoguy87's profile picture
The water flows out of the wringer from the side the clothes are put in to. This way, the wrung out water flows back into the tub from which it came.

They thought of everything,
Dave


Post# 310100 , Reply# 21   10/18/2008 at 20:52 (5,658 days old) by maytaga407 (Heber Utah)        

maytaga407's profile picture
When I help my mom do laundry she had a wringer washer before she got her Maytag automatic. This is the procedure she used. She had twin laundry tubs both filled with clean water. The washer was positioned in front of the left tub. She would put the washed clothes through the wringer and into the left laundry tub. Put next load into wash, Then she would swing the wringer 90 degrees clockwise over the center of the 2-tubs and put the clothes in the left laundry tub through the wringer and into the laundry tub on the right. Then she moved the wringer 90 degrees clockwise. Now the clothes in the right laundry tub were put through the wringer and into the laundry basket. And then separeate and hang on the line to dry

Post# 310407 , Reply# 22   10/20/2008 at 09:01 (5,657 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

Lyle ... I use all of the Maytag's I have. It's hard to maintain the tub on the Model E. You're right, bleach and other additives can darken the aluminum. I've found that when I wash with my Model E, I just use plain Tide and I have mechanically softened water; that seems to keep it looking new. I also wipe it out thoroughly when I'm done.

Tide does leave a little residue in the "sediment zone" underneath the agitator. I just make sure I flush it really well after using it.

Since your gooseneck was corroded, do you attach a small length of hose to the end to pump out the water?

Here are some photos of some of my machines. I hope you all enjoy!

Here's my 1983 Model N2LPS set-up to use both rinse tubs.


Post# 310408 , Reply# 23   10/20/2008 at 09:07 (5,657 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

Here's a 1965 Model J that I acquired this summer; I love to use it, even though it is a gravity-drain (non-pump) model. It was still in use when I got it.



Post# 310410 , Reply# 24   10/20/2008 at 09:20 (5,657 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

I also have a 1963 Model N2LP ...

Post# 310412 , Reply# 25   10/20/2008 at 09:29 (5,657 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

I have one of each of the turquoise-accent versions and all but one of the red-accent versions (still need the E from the late 1950's/early 1960's).

Here's a "group shot" of my turqoise-accent ones.

I also have a Model A from 1930; it still runs great.


Post# 310427 , Reply# 26   10/20/2008 at 11:23 (5,657 days old) by redcarpetdrew (Fairfield, CA)        
Cornering the wringer market...

redcarpetdrew's profile picture
Geoff, you are the wringer version of the crazy cat lady... Have you ever turned down a wringer? LOL

RCD


Post# 310429 , Reply# 27   10/20/2008 at 11:36 (5,657 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

RCD ... Many! :-) Crazy Cat Lady, indeed!!

The ones that I have are "jewels" in my eyes. Out of the 6 that I have, 3 of them were brand new; never used.

The little 1983 Model N2LPS was still on the dealer's showroom after 25 years and they finally posted it to the Internet to get rid of it.

The 1982 Model E2LPS was purchased by a little old lady who had heard that in 1983 Maytag was going to stop making them. Her old Maytag Model E outlived her; that one was kept in storage for over 25 years when I got it.

The 1963 Model N2LP was bought for a woman whose husband built her a new house in the early 1960's and her old Maytag just "wouldn't quit" so she never used it. The Maytag was put in the basement and kept covered up for over 40 years.

I guess I've been lucky on these!!

:-)



Post# 310450 , Reply# 28   10/20/2008 at 13:33 (5,657 days old) by rpm ()        

Geoff, is there any order you use those machines in?
The first picture with the washer pulled up to the tubs with the laundry basket beside it, took me back 30 years.
Growing up as a child, the street I lived on had all elderly ladies that brought their wringers from the farm.
Seems like every basement had that set up.
Never could get enuff of watching those ladies and their machines on Monday mornings. Every lady seemed to have her own style when it came to using those machines.


Post# 310463 , Reply# 29   10/20/2008 at 14:40 (5,656 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)        

gansky1's profile picture
Beautiful machines, guys! I love the filter-agitator in the wringer. I saw a wringer with one at an estate sale a while back but they wanted $150 - too much for an agitator even if did come with a free washer.

I use my 'Tag rarely, no pump so it makes it a bit tedious emptying it with a bucket. I don't have double tubs so I cheat and use an automatic for rinsing and spinning so I guess I'm not really getting the most from my conventional washing experience ;-) When we were out at Fred's in Chicago last June, we used his 'Tag for towels and linens - rinsing in the double tubs. After we finished all the washing & rinsing, we put the washing in his Neptune to spin to satisfy our curiosity. You can imagine how that turned out...


Post# 310473 , Reply# 30   10/20/2008 at 15:10 (5,656 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

Brian ... no particular order; whichever machine I feel like using. I have been using my 1964 A700S automatic but wanted to have the Conventional experience this weekend!! :-)

That's funny that most of your neighbors had conventionals; most of mine had automatics!! I remember that my grandmother and my aunts had conventional machines. They would have "killed" to have a set-up like mine.

Greg ... for the most part, I use the automatic to rinse and spin dry, also.

I used to do all the rinsing in the tubs; now just my sheets, undershirts, pillowcases, etc. ... especially if I hang outside.

I bet the Neptune took out a TON of water, huh?



Post# 310491 , Reply# 31   10/20/2008 at 16:49 (5,656 days old) by polkanut (Wausau, WI )        

polkanut's profile picture
I prefer non-pump models myself, one less thing to go bad. My 1950 Speed Queen doesn't even have a drain hose, just put it over the floor drain, open it up, and let it drain.

Post# 310714 , Reply# 32   10/21/2008 at 15:10 (5,655 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Love the laundry room Geoff!!

wetguymd's profile picture
Wow ... wish I had the double tubs like that. Beautiful machines!!

Post# 310735 , Reply# 33   10/21/2008 at 16:46 (5,655 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

Thanks, Lyle ... I sure do enjoy working (playing, actually) in there on Saturday mornings!!

:-)



Post# 310794 , Reply# 34   10/21/2008 at 21:42 (5,655 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
Welcome Lyle--your agitator is to die for

mickeyd's profile picture
The E2LS I found in the trash was missing its gooseneck like yours, but I lucked out immediately when i found that the gooseneck from my 95 Whirlpool fit perfectly. Here's a shot, and in the next roll, will show it separately and the easy attachment. Also a shot of the striations, looking so much like a a sheaf of granite or slate or some wonderful rock formation. You can order this neck easily or play around with what you have or can find. The model number is LSP9245BWO, Whirlpool, from you local large appliance parts store.

Isn't Geoff's ulta-white, ultra clean laundry room exquisite. How I envy his visible backyard access. My basement is deep deep in a hellish pit.
Geoff ;'D how are we going to find those amazing black 'tators with the stainless steel lint filters--what fun they'd be!!!!

The pic shows the last of the 18 gallons, out and down the drain in just over a minute. One of us should show the gang the formidable size of the conventional Maytag pump.


Post# 310799 , Reply# 35   10/21/2008 at 21:52 (5,655 days old) by mickeyd (Hamburg NY)        
Your interiors are beautiful, Guys, but here's mine with

mickeyd's profile picture
;D

Just noticed you can also see the WP neck in the extreme upper right.

Now understand why you're so crazy about the E2LS--think I left a letter out!--in the preview mode and can't "screen UP"


Post# 310884 , Reply# 36   10/22/2008 at 08:33 (5,655 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

Mickey ... not planetary layering, but "infinite water levels"!!

I actually have a lint filter agitator for the conventional machine. Don Shier and I are sharing it right now. It's down at his place "visiting". We use it sparingly so as not to destroy the spline. It looks really good in Don's Mom's old E2LP. :-)



Post# 310890 , Reply# 37   10/22/2008 at 08:59 (5,655 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        
Found an agitator picture ...

Here's a picture of the agitators I have that Maytag used in their conventional machines.

There is one missing ... the one for the NX. It was a "post-less" agitator.

Do you see the lint filter agitator?

:-)



Post# 310894 , Reply# 38   10/22/2008 at 09:30 (5,655 days old) by gadgetgary (Bristol,CT)        
Geoff

gadgetgary's profile picture
My mother's Maytag wringer had an aluminum agitator sort of like the material of the tub.
It still was a heavy agitator.
I think the machine was purchased in the early 50's, or maybe even late 40's.



Post# 310898 , Reply# 39   10/22/2008 at 09:51 (5,655 days old) by tuthill ()        



Post# 310903 , Reply# 40   10/22/2008 at 10:08 (5,655 days old) by wetguymd (Maryland)        
Great collection Geoff

wetguymd's profile picture
I have never seen the dark blue one. Looks great. The aluminum (?) one like Jed has is great too. I wish they had the spline in them and would fit my machine.

Post# 310911 , Reply# 41   10/22/2008 at 10:41 (5,655 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

Gary/Lyle ... The first agitator to the left, in the back, is the cast aluminum one. Gary is right; it was made out of the same cast aluminum as the tubs were and was fairly heavy. Maytag used those in the first E, J, and N's from 1939 until the late 1940's. Post WWII was still using the aluminum one.

In 1949, Maytag started making red agitators because they were now making their world-famous AMP's (Automatic Maytag with Pump) and were making red bakelite agitators for the automatics. They remained consistent with the red bakelite agitator (2nd one) until they switched to the black bakelite in the mid to late 1950's (also in their automatics). They used black until 1966 when they switched to the turquoise one (far right).

The one that Jed has was used in Maytag's "gray ghost" series from the 1920's to 1940-ish when they stopped making them. There were a couple of different versions of that agitator.

Interestingly, the aluminum agitator that was used in the E, J, N's was also used in Maytag's last of the gray ghosts. I'm not sure of the number of the machine ... 32 maybe? But they had created the center plate and spline for the E, J, N's and switched the gray ghost to that version of the agitator. I have never personally seen that machine, but would think it would be pretty cool because of the agitator shaft; so different than the original ones. I think they called it the "low-post" agitator.

Fun!

:-)



Post# 310916 , Reply# 42   10/22/2008 at 11:05 (5,655 days old) by swestoyz (Cedar Falls, IA)        

swestoyz's profile picture
I'm always impressed with your knowledge of conventional Maytag's Geoff - thanks for sharring this information (and photos!)

Ben


Post# 310982 , Reply# 43   10/22/2008 at 14:59 (5,654 days old) by rpm ()        

Geoff, do you see any difference in the way the square tub washers wash compared to the round tubs?
I saw an ad that said the square tubs are like an extra pair of hands squeezing your clothes while they wash.


Post# 310998 , Reply# 44   10/22/2008 at 15:56 (5,654 days old) by geoffdelp (SAUK RAPIDS)        

Brian ... no, not really.

The big difference that is noticeable is "size" of tub. The round tubs hold 16 gallons of water and the square (both the E and J) hold 18 gallons of water, thus allowing you to wash more clothes at one time.

Also, the Model E with the aluminum tub kept hot water hotter longer. It had a splash "crown" that kept sloshing water in the tub; the N and J do not.

Whether the tub was square or round, the gyrafoam principle of washing was the same. The clothes tumbled toward the center of the tub ... the water currents were forced "through" the clothes instead of the clothes being "pulled" through the water by the agitator. If the machine was loaded correctly the currents were that strong. You can see that principle if you wash just a few clothes at a time.

You know, I've been looking trying to find why Maytag created the square tub; my guess was that it was simpler to create a mold for cast aluminum that way. It was also simpler to have rounded corners on the square tub.

Both round and square tubs slope towards the bottom; creating Maytag's famous sediment zone. Heavy dirt deposits are trapped underneath the agitator so as not be redistributed in the water; water stayed "fresher" for more loads. The operator simply lowered the hose occasionally to drain off the "crud" then she added more hot water and soap and kept on washing. I've never done that; I simply just change the water!! I have the luxury, however, of plenty of hot water and detergent.

I will say this about the square Maytag Model J, however. The Model J (square porcelain tub) was a mid-priced washing machine that was discontinued in 1969 (still not too sure why ... I assume it was because of lack of sales), but I find it to be more "user-friendly" than the N or E. The lid lifts completely off and because it is larger, blankets, rugs, etc., wash really well. It also fits up to square sinks better. I also find that I can stand along the left side of it when wringing and I can easily see behind the wringer. I like to use the J.

Round or square; Maytag conventionals were (and still are for some) a wonderful product.

Did you know that when Maytag was creating their first automatic, one of the criteria was that it washed as well as a Model E? Round automatic vs. square Model E. Go figure.

There's my sales pitch for the day!!

:-)

Ben ... you're welcome!!



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy