|
Thread Number: 37827
LET THEM EAT CAKE! |
[Down to Last] |  |
|
Post# 562557 , Reply# 1 12/11/2011 at 04:18 (4,691 days old) by CleanteamofNY  ((Monroe, New York) |
||
 It's true but biased! The cake was placed in the dead zone, did you noticed? Directly in the center of the lower rack where cleaning is the least effective and the lady did not open the third dishwasher door for all to view even if the interior was all wet! As you know, all dishwasher will dry a load pretty well if flashing was done at the end of the cycle. So this show and tell was half true! Kenmore done this years ago and the cake was placed on the top rack if I remembered...... 
| ||
|
Post# 562560 , Reply# 2 12/11/2011 at 04:43 (4,691 days old) by mrboilwash (Munich,Germany) |
||
Miele had a similar ad in 1967 with a filter system dishwasher.
Could be just a sales gimmick to sell an obsolete technology. I doubt that the three filter dischwashers were run with hot enough water in this test. CLICK HERE TO GO TO mrboilwash's LINK | ||
|
Post# 562562 , Reply# 3 12/11/2011 at 05:01 (4,691 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands) |
||
If the rest of the cake is still in the middle, there is no reason for the conclusion that the filter is the reason for it.
And after 57 minutes? Most new dishwasher take way longer than that, we have been discussin that before. After 57 minutes the main wash hasn't finished yet. IMHO this is just a sales gimmick. If they would do an honest comparison they would let the machines finish their cycles. | ||
| Post# 562733 , Reply# 4 12/12/2011 at 01:30 (4,690 days old) by qualin (Canada) | ||
|
Wow, I didn't realize that sales gimmick was that old. Heh.. That's about as classic as the "Phonebook in the washing machine" trick. :) | ||
|
Post# 562735 , Reply# 5 12/12/2011 at 02:06 (4,690 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage) |
||
Next Time Skip The Sink | ||
|
Post# 562739 , Reply# 6 12/12/2011 at 03:07 (4,690 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage) |
||
|
But Wait There's More | ||
|
Post# 562745 , Reply# 7 12/12/2011 at 04:25 (4,690 days old) by mrboilwash (Munich,Germany) |
||
|
| ||
|
Post# 562752 , Reply# 8 12/12/2011 at 05:58 (4,690 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc) |
||
|
The phone book test was for testing the washers suspension system-the off balance spin. | ||
|
Post# 562755 , Reply# 9 12/12/2011 at 06:31 (4,689 days old) by mrboilwash (Munich,Germany) |
||
|
| ||
| Post# 563158 , Reply# 11 12/14/2011 at 07:56 (4,687 days old) by Iheartmaytag (Wichita, Kansas) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 563306 , Reply# 12 12/14/2011 at 19:20 (4,687 days old) by rpms (ontario canada) | ||
 | ||
|
Post# 563339 , Reply# 13 12/14/2011 at 22:23 (4,687 days old) by Frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 563358 , Reply# 14 12/15/2011 at 03:35 (4,687 days old) by qualin (Canada) | ||
|
To Frigilux Holy carp! A bowling ball?!?!?! You'd think that would damage the agitator! Man, I think the true test of the durability of any washer, top loading or front loading, would to have it wash a bowling ball! I personally would love to see a professionally made commercial doing that. | ||
| Post# 563621 , Reply# 15 12/16/2011 at 20:32 (4,685 days old) by toploader55 (Massachusetts Sand Bar, Cape Cod) | ||
Well,  | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
