Thread Number: 38385
1977 Kenmore |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 569474 , Reply# 3   1/16/2012 at 07:47 (4,455 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 569480 , Reply# 4   1/16/2012 at 08:49 (4,455 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
To answer your question (and I am sure that if even I am wrong, Gordon will verify). I'm going to say 1980-81 (possibly later). --Charles-- |
Post# 569481 , Reply# 5   1/16/2012 at 08:53 (4,455 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
You're right, but they were different models at different times though, because sometimes, even the Lady K's were on sale. --Charles-- |
Post# 569486 , Reply# 6   1/16/2012 at 09:41 (4,455 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Charles -
Every one of the machines in that catalog excerpt are 1976 models. The stock numbers such as 26921, 26911, 26801, 26601, 26401, etc. are shown, where the second character from the left, a 6, is the digit for the year. Actually nearly ALL the line-up for 1977 was new. This was done because Sears split the previous one cycle of "Knit-Delicate" into two cycles, 8-minute Knit, and 6-minute Delicate. This was a stupid marketing gimick that changed a 4-cycle machine into a 5-cycle machine. Every two speed machine with the exception I believe of the portables got this change. Thus, the 26701 seventy series machine, which was the only 70-series large capacity machine for 1976 became the 27701 in 1977 and magically gained a new "cycle". The only machines that continued past 1976 were single speed models like the 26601 and 26401 (the '401 didn't hang around long though as there was a 26411 which was not featured in catalogs until '77 and '78 which had a Perm Press cycle instead of the Short). Also, a few models were added in 1977 which did not exist in 1976, including my 27741 - Moppy, which is featured in my photo album. This is a 27701 but lacks an off-balance switch and dispensers. It also did not have a porcelain top, and was marketed as a 'price buster' of sorts. A 27841 was also added to augment the previously lone 80-series machine. I'll attach a couple pics to show you what I am talking about. First, here is a 26651, my semi-famous Green Beast, 1976 60-series machine. Note where Knit-Delicate is one cycle. Gordon |
Post# 569488 , Reply# 7   1/16/2012 at 09:45 (4,455 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 569490 , Reply# 8   1/16/2012 at 09:54 (4,455 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
So to augment what Charles said...my answer to Bruce is that the machine they bought in 1977 could have been anything from a non-sale 60 series to a very discounted 1976 high-end model. Keep in mind with catalog prices that they did not include freight/shipping, which was included on sales floor pricing.
There was a 26901 which is not pictured above which was like the most expensive machine but with a Penta-Swirl. Most likely, at least statistically, your grandparents bought a 70-series machine, as this was almost always one of Sears' best sellers and very easily would fit in that price range. My 27741 pictured was a VERY common and good seller too for about 20-bucks less than the 27701. Your grandparents didn't retain the receipt did they? If so, the stock number on it will tell me exactly what they had. Gordon |
Post# 569494 , Reply# 9   1/16/2012 at 10:21 (4,455 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Steven/Wigwag -
Cool question, and you may be remembering a rather unusual machine. The first and only large capacity machine, and a VERY huge seller, to have this exact combination of 3 water levels, Five temps plus Auto Temp Control and the DAA was the 1983 model 23721, which is a 70-series machine and was THE best selling Kenmore of the mid 1980s. If you really are remembering a standard capacity machine, then you have a cool odd-ball model in memory. I think you're on the right track though if you remember the snore of the original DAA, which by 1979 had been revised to have agitator dogs (a design still in use today) vs. the original "stair step" notches. These notches when agitating made quite a racket. The first of these was a 1977 model 27851 which was indeed a standard capacity, 3-level, five temp +ATC machine. It was considered an 8-cycle machine (four 'off' sections) with Cottons white, cottons colored, perm white, perm colored, Knit, Delicate, Pre-soak and Pre-wash. This standard capacity combination of features first debuted as one of those new 1977 models. Most late-model standard capacity Kenmores never featured more than three water levels, from the mid 70s forward, but this model had a new timer which was capable of time-set temps. This is how that Auto Temp worked, where the temp switch allowed the timer's standards, or overrode them. Not all of Kenmore's timers were capable of doing this. Why Kenmore started this timer on a standard cap. machine I don't know, and I've never seen one in person. They were in the catalog year after year as the best standard capacity machine until 1980 or so, but apparently didn't sell well. The timer though went on to be one of the most commonly used washer timers in recent history, along with a couple WP timers and another Kenmore timer. I have an equally odd 1979 90-series machine which has an infinite water level (even weirder) but the same features. I will try to snag you a picture. It's odd to see a DAA in a standard capacity machine, but looking closely I've noticed that the auger is shorter, which makes sense. Neat memory Bruce! Gordon |
Post# 569499 , Reply# 11   1/16/2012 at 10:54 (4,455 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
CharlesWestie2 -
I never knew that Sears actually called prior customers about the DA. My Mom had a fall 1974 Kenmore that could have easily used it, but I never heard anything about a phone call - maybe they kept records only so far back? Anyway, the 76 Kenmore could have been anything from the 70-series, the one 80-series, to the first 90-series. I really like the Penta-Swirl in my '77 machine, though it chokes on really full loads, which is why the DA exists. I bet your sister would like a Speed Queen if she liked the Kenmore and Maytag? Gordon |
Post# 569541 , Reply# 14   1/16/2012 at 17:05 (4,454 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Charles -
I did some research online today and found out something fascinating about the 1976-1978 70 series machines. I had it all typed out, and the system lost my entire screen saying the webpage had expired. No time to re-type it now :-( I'll retype it tonight, but it's interesting, well for me, fascinating. Gordon |
Post# 569567 , Reply# 15   1/16/2012 at 19:08 (4,454 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 569604 , Reply# 16   1/16/2012 at 23:03 (4,454 days old) by supersurgilator (Indiana)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
No, they didn't retain the receipt. I had a feeling that it would have been a model with the penta swirl agitator. I just an't see them paying for the one with the DA one. |
Post# 569717 , Reply# 18   1/17/2012 at 16:42 (4,453 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Bruce -
My parent's first Kenmore was a 1961 also, and we had it until fall 1974. It was still running but loudly as the centerpost bearings were going or gone. It had washed for two adults and two babies / kids in that time including all cloth diapers. Not bad either I'd say. It could have gone on 13 more years if we'd had the bearings replaced. Charles - Here is a nutshell of the details I found yesterday that I had wanted to share with you. First, as mentioned, there was just that one 1976 Kenmore 70 in large capacity configuration. The same machine was available as a 1977 model but with the cycles re-arranged on the console a bit (this was just a console printing change as it involved nothing mechanical). The same was done yet again in 1978 as a second variation where this time the delicate cycle said "Knit", just 'knit', with a tiny 'delicate' right next to the 6 minute mark, but back to a single box around the whole cycle like in 1976. Why? I HAVE NO IDEA. In both 1977 and 1978 the 'cheap' 70 series was available like mine with no dispensers, one less water level, no off-balance relay, etc. What I found very interesting is basically that I confirmed your statement that your 1976 model was availabe into 1978. That surprised me, in fact, it appears that all three main 70-series models, the 1976, the 1977, and the 1978, which differed only in console graphics, seemed to all have been available into 1978, simultaneously. I cannot imagine why three mechanically identical machines were made at the same time - marketing must have convinced planning that they were needed. The cost of stocking three of the same thing as three different models would probably be checked more closely today. How I found this out is interesting too. In January 1978, an across-the-board configuration change was made where all centerposts were reduced in height by five inches. This improved the bearing issue to almost non-existent that I describe above, but I have loving/loathing mixed feelings about it. This caused a redesign of the baseplate, the basket drive and spin tube, and the inner basket. Most 1976 and 1977 machines gave way to 1978 models for this reason but the three 70s series machines lived on together, and both the 1976 AND the 1977 seventy series machines went on to get the revised parts, meaning they were in production in 1978. I found these parts lists on the Sears website. So I learned something yesterday Charles, THANKS! Gordon |
Post# 569724 , Reply# 19   1/17/2012 at 17:26 (4,453 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 569740 , Reply# 20   1/17/2012 at 20:20 (4,453 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
@ Gordon: I found those findings interesting at the time as well. Thanks as well... --Charles-- |
Post# 569748 , Reply# 22   1/17/2012 at 20:35 (4,453 days old) by MaytagA710 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Everyone loves more scans, here is that page from the same catalogue. |
Post# 569780 , Reply# 23   1/17/2012 at 22:39 (4,453 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Addend for Gordon: I forgot to add when we were discussing the 1976-78 Model 70 Washer. I forgot to add that our model was also a Sud-Saver model. Just a little something I wanted to add also, that's all. Regards... --Charles-- |
Post# 569817 , Reply# 25   1/18/2012 at 22:55 (4,452 days old) by gocartwasher ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
And fixed the water solinoid and sold it for $75 last summer |
Post# 570211 , Reply# 27   1/20/2012 at 17:27 (4,450 days old) by KenmoreGuy64 (Charlotte, NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
To my knowledge the ATC was strictly a Kenmore option, at least for belt-drives.
But indeed, it was tried on 'washers for the masses' on standard capacity mid to upper line models before it was more widely used. It was however offered on the 1976 Lady K. It wasn't offered on corresponding mid or upper line large capacity machines until several years later. Not sure I find the feature very useful. In fact, I use it now just because it is there but would never miss it. Gordon |
Post# 570213 , Reply# 28   1/20/2012 at 17:45 (4,450 days old) by cphifer5115 (Jackson, TN)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 570214 , Reply# 29   1/20/2012 at 17:52 (4,450 days old) by aldspinboy (Philadelphia, Pa)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 570215 , Reply# 30   1/20/2012 at 18:05 (4,450 days old) by cphifer5115 (Jackson, TN)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|