Thread Number: 45396
Whirlpool trash
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 664887   3/10/2013 at 12:22 (4,054 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        

I know some of the members here might disagree with me but I think the new belt drive whirlpool washers, Cabrio washers and Duet front loaders are all complete trash, or at least the current models. I also think its very rude that whirlpool can stick good company names like Maytag on this junk they are making and make it look like a Maytag with the center dial and all that...I think its outrageous. I also know that many members here think that Herrin Maytag (Performa/Atlantis) washers were total junk but I would much rather have my Maytag Performa than one of these junk ''belt drive'' whirlpools. I know they have all the issues with balancing which is kind of annoying but I have had my Performa for 7 almost 8 years and it has had minor mechanical problems that needed fixing but it still has the original transmission and motor! I always make sure to load it right and not to stuff it to the top like most people do and it has been working like a charm for years...now id like to see one of these newer Maytag Bravos washers last that long under daily use with all those electronic controls....I was so mad when Whirlpool closed the real Maytag plants because then i knew that would be it...no more real Maytag's...just Whirlpool's in disguise. You know it wasn't too bad when they were still making direct drive machines but now there is no quality or durability put into the machines whatsoever, especially with the new energy saving standards which in my opinion aren't very good energy standards if you have to buy a new washer every 4-5 years!




Post# 664892 , Reply# 1   3/10/2013 at 13:02 (4,054 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)        

pierreandreply4's profile picture
me i agree that my duet washer is trash i would much rather have my inglis superb 2 direct drive washer my duet is near 10 years old but i fine the cleaning poor because of the little water inside when i am use to have clothes submerge in water if i had to buy a belt drive washer of the vintage era i would go with the inglis superb washer in harvest gold with matching dryer to have if i needed a warm rinse option

Post# 664899 , Reply# 2   3/10/2013 at 13:14 (4,054 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Honestly...

mrb627's profile picture
Maytag stopped being Maytag long before Whirlpool closed the plant...

Malcolm


Post# 664907 , Reply# 3   3/10/2013 at 13:58 (4,054 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        
I know that Maytag's were no longer real Maytag's bu

At least the Performa machines were still half Maytag, they were made out of a rather cheap Maytag transmission and balancing system designed by Maytag which was not the best design but I still think they could outlast any Whirlpool belt drive if used properly and you have to remember Maytag still made its Dependable Care line of washers until late into 2007 when Whirlpool shut them down too...I would never disagree with someone if they said an Amana/Maytag SAV series washer was junk though...they were total pieces of crap and Maytag really failed on that design.

Post# 664959 , Reply# 4   3/10/2013 at 18:55 (4,054 days old) by repair-man (Pittsburgh PA)        

Sadly, the new belt drive models are proving to be very unreliable even at a year or two old. And I can't even tell you how many customers I know of that have sent them back for performance reasons. As a long time fan of direct drives (yes, I know they were not the absolute best) I had hope that Whirlpool would continue with a good top load machine.

Post# 664961 , Reply# 5   3/10/2013 at 19:20 (4,054 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        
They can't seem to leave well enough alone....

My grandmother has a 1996 Roper direct drive washer that's on the outs with a worn out neutral drain pack and a broken/unhooked spring somewhere in the drum but that thing went through so much laundry in the past that its a miracle its lasted until 2001 let alone 2013! I never really liked it because of the insanely fast agitation motion and rather slow spin but i gotta say Whirlpool really must of took pride in making that washer because its really lived up to getting the clothes washed quickly and effectively every time..

Post# 664990 , Reply# 6   3/10/2013 at 22:15 (4,054 days old) by Iheartmaytag (Wichita, Kansas)        
I have a Duet Clone

iheartmaytag's profile picture
A Maytag 5000 Series Steam washer and dryer. Going on four years and they are not bad machines. The washer recently had to have a service call due to a pressure switch telling the controller that it was flooding when in fact it had not water in it at all. It was fixed under the extended warranty and back in business.

What I was told was that there were two different Duet models, one was made in Germany, like mine is, the other was manufactured in Mexico. The problem machines were from south of Texas.

I was, however, told the day I purchased the machine to always have it plugged into a surge protector and I would prevent many problems. I was told this as well with my new Kitchenaid dishwasher that is being delivered.

The Maytag 300 Series bought in 2007, and the last "real Maytag" design has been trouble from day one. Maytag's dependability reputation took quite a hit in the last years before it's ultimate death. Though I have stated many times I am no
whirlpool fan, at least they saved Maytag from being purchased by Haier.


Post# 665011 , Reply# 7   3/11/2013 at 00:23 (4,054 days old) by arbilab (Ft Worth TX (Ridglea))        

arbilab's profile picture
Let's not forget that Whirlpool itself was a good name until relatively recently and is no longer.

Post# 665029 , Reply# 8   3/11/2013 at 06:05 (4,054 days old) by alr2903 (TN)        

I think they have all seen the "handwriting on the wall". Why would they continue to put engineering dollars into a machine that will be phased out by mandatory energy standards? I will hang onto my Tag, LAT model as long as I can. The admiral direct drive and new dryer I have are adequate, still far short of what i remember as great performers. alr

Post# 665032 , Reply# 9   3/11/2013 at 06:36 (4,054 days old) by drewz (Alexandria, Virginia)        

drewz's profile picture
air2903, I think you have it correct, Whirlpool is just making top loaders to serve that very small market segment. Whirlpool knows they are going to be phased out so why bother to build a quality top loader. Should you want a Whirlpool DD top loader purchase a Commercial Whirlpool top loader w/o coin slot it is still old school for now.

Post# 665095 , Reply# 10   3/11/2013 at 12:16 (4,053 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
And Here We Are Again...

mrb627's profile picture
I said this a few years back, Americans are going to be weened off of the top loader one way or another. Looks like the manufacturers are going to design top loaders that are SO BAD, Americans will accept mediocre FLers with open arms.

Malcolm


Post# 665116 , Reply# 11   3/11/2013 at 14:05 (4,053 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        
That is probably true...

I see where you guys are going with this...maybe they are actually purposely making them terrible so people will want front loaders but still Whirlpool has a hotline for failed drum bearings in their front loaders you know, and ''Maytag'' Maxima front loaders also have lots of drum bearing issues and those machines usually cost over $1000

Post# 665150 , Reply# 12   3/11/2013 at 16:58 (4,053 days old) by DigAPony ()        

Correction: Americans are being forced, not weened off Top Loaders.

Same as goes for phosphates in our detergents, the incandescent light bulb, R12 refrigerant, and so on.

None of which is free market driven.


Post# 665256 , Reply# 13   3/11/2013 at 22:15 (4,053 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)        
Also

pierreandreply4's profile picture
also whirlpool duet washer generation 1 2004 the tub might also risk falling so that will cause the washer not to start and i also think its wrong to force consumers to buy front load washers not everone would know how to start a front load washer or has the space for such a machine.

Post# 665321 , Reply# 14   3/12/2013 at 05:52 (4,053 days old) by retro-man (- boston,ma)        

As far as space goes I have whirpool duets and they are mounted on top of each other. Takes up far less space than a toploader and a dryer next to it.
Jon


Post# 665325 , Reply# 15   3/12/2013 at 06:13 (4,053 days old) by dj-gabriele ()        
None of which is free market driven

CIT. "Same as goes for phosphates in our detergents, the incandescent light bulb, R12 refrigerant, and so on"

So you'd rather live with inferior refrigeration equipment and polluting gases?
New alternatives like R410A offer up to 100% better performance and don't contribute to ozone depletion. I hope for a large scale use of CO2 and propane/butane refrigerants, but sadly those are still in the niche market because of price and diffidence!

Classic incandescent bulbs? Good riddance!
Halogen and fluorescent are much much better and give a better luminous flux per watt!

Phosphates? Detergents have none of those since ages and we still have fantastically clean clothes! Actually EU detergents are highly rated overseas as many forum members say!

And to finish it: Whirlpool IS trash! None of their appliances I ever owned gave me any kind of satisfaction, expensive repairs and lackluster performances!


Post# 665330 , Reply# 16   3/12/2013 at 06:48 (4,053 days old) by washer111 ()        
Defending all the "Naughty Stuff"

We've still got them here in Liquid laundry detergents, some powders and dishwasher powders/liquids (Esp. Finish/Fairy, both containing >30% Phosphate). 

I'd hate to see our dishwasher performance if no-phosphate really does affect performance, but, we thankfully have a home water softener, so it shouldn't be an issue for us. 

 

As for R-12 vs. Newer stuff, I can safely say that R-12 works great in the appliances that used it. I had a Kelvinator Cyclic Fridge/Freezer that got the freezer down to a nice -30ºC!!! It kept the fridge icy cold too - on the "proper" thermostat setting. R-134a is nowhere near as effective, which explains our freezer/fridges struggling. One must also bear in mind that the refrigerators these days barely have enough "oomph" to get that cold as it is. 

As for R-600a, until cheap China manufacturers can make something that won't go BANG! (Esp. in Automobiles), I don't really want it. Granted, our Hisense chest freezer uses it, and has marvellously short cycles and stays pretty darn cold too. 

 

And it's not the refrigerants fault. It is the fault of city councils and lack of law enforcement pertaining to the disposal and release of refrigerants. You still get HVAC servicemen here that (instead of) safely disposing gasses from rooftop A/C units, simply vent the stuff to the atmosphere and claim the system suffered a leak, and needs replacement - since it COSTS THEM money to dispose the gas, and they have to carry it down (Time is money!). R-12/R-22 etc are GREAT, but proper disposal is the key, as with anything. 

 

I've seen a newer Whirlpool BD machine here in Australia. Looks heavy duty, but they are forever breaking down. They sound like steam trains (LOUD and lots of chugga-chugga), and have hopeless spin speeds (I've seen one in person. It couldn't have been spinning faster than around 400rpm). Their FL machines are okay - the one I've used is cheaply built, bad dispenser drawers (cracked/broken, even with gentle use), and it grumbles loudly during spin (used on 40/60º regularly too). Water level is up to the very bottom of the glass door though - which is pretty nice, but thats about the zenith of it!


Post# 665354 , Reply# 17   3/12/2013 at 07:55 (4,053 days old) by repair-man (Pittsburgh PA)        
better for the environment ?

I would love for someone to explain to me how these new wonderful "efficient" appliances that have to be manufactured, sold, delivered, removed and recycled every 5 to 10 years (or less) have less impact on the environment than a good product that lasts say 15 to 20 years or more.

Post# 665355 , Reply# 18   3/12/2013 at 08:09 (4,053 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)        

pierreandreply4's profile picture
me i am wondering the same thing just look atthis dryer that my grandmother own from 1970 to around 2010 year she had to replace her dryer it lasted her 40 years, its sad to see that they decided not to keep such good quality in term of appliances. And also if every 5 or 10 years we have to replace an appliance they need to think that it fills the local dump site when the best way and option would be to somehow recycle the appliance bu a:)eather send it to a specilise repair shop that would repair and resell the appliance as a refurbish set or b:) try to recycle the old appliance by making something else like for exemple: new appliances with recycle material from the old appliance. Thats my toughs on this.

Post# 665413 , Reply# 19   3/12/2013 at 14:45 (4,052 days old) by roscoe62 (Canada)        
Interesting Thread

I've thought about this myself seeing how the newer top loaders are being built to have a short life span and phase them out with FL'rs so people are forced to buy something they may not want to start using and in all probability the newer FL'rs will be built the same way of these top loaders.
So where does recycling and repairing come into place to save the environment when we'll run out of space with useless appliances 5-10 years old? My employers mother replaced a stackable unit no older than 5yrs when the repair was going to cost more than a new unit, I don't get it ??? Are we heading back to the days of the rock on the river again, lol ???


Post# 665427 , Reply# 20   3/12/2013 at 16:00 (4,052 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        
I bet washing clothes in the tub would be more effective tha





Its really starting to look like they're doing it on purpose....this video proves that they are trying to make washers fill up with such little amounts of water that the action of the agitator is ripping the clothes! so basically this is a dry rinse. what a piece of junk.


Post# 665446 , Reply# 21   3/12/2013 at 17:40 (4,052 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)        
me i have a feeling just to recycle washers there will be a

pierreandreply4's profile picture
i think just to recycle older machines to avoid filling the dump somewill rather buy these classic models lol






Post# 665457 , Reply# 22   3/12/2013 at 18:51 (4,052 days old) by beekeyknee (Columbia, MO)        

beekeyknee's profile picture
We all complain about the quality of these machines. Why doesn't some of the more entrepreneurial and ones with more means start a repair and distribution center to save and sell these old appliances. We seem to have a growing community of people here that feel this way. Bigger things have been started with less support. I don't think the government could do anything to stop it. It could be checked on ahead of time with an attorney.

I'm sure many here would jump at a chance to work at a place like that, especially if it was run by the right person, someone that would make it a fun and educational place to work. Then maybe people would start to learn skills again, jobs would be created and these companies that are turning out landfill fodder would set up and take notice. Maybe they would learn that planned obsolescence isn't really eco-friendly and start making something worth buying again.

I know that most people believe that the government can't be fought and whatever they say goes, but I for one still believe in the American dream. Especially when enough people are behind it with growing numbers supporting it. No, it would not be easy, but nothing good is ever achieved with out hard work. As each day goes by, more and more of these machines are going to the crusher when they really aren't in that bad of shape. Think of the energy and resources it took to make those machines. Is that good policy?

Now enter defeatist. Shoot it down. I'm sure someone will. Not being confrontational, but that seems to be the way it goes here. Realist enter too, but there is a big difference between realism and defeatism. Keep in mind, sometimes we make our own reality. Cheers, everyone.


Post# 665522 , Reply# 23   3/13/2013 at 04:05 (4,052 days old) by qualin (Canada)        

Well, all I really have to say is that if you think you can design and build a better machine yourself, go ahead. Nobody is stopping you from doing that.

Personally, I think voting with my wallet is the best approach. Rather than focusing on who makes junk and complaining about it, it probably is better if we buy from the manufacturers that don't make junk and build quality goods.

This is why I foresee myself purchasing Alliance made washers and dryers for the rest of my natural life. By the time my washer breaks down and can't be repaired, I'll be at retirement age.


Post# 665528 , Reply# 24   3/13/2013 at 04:54 (4,052 days old) by chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture
Whirlpool's water saving top loaders are the biggest trash ever put on the market. Everyone that I know who has bought an HE whirlpool made top loader has hated it with a passion. You just cant get clothes clean in that little water in a top lading basket. The auto fill machines are hit or miss on the right fill level. A large number of the early generation auto fills have needed there fill level sensors replaced. The newer BD auto fills are less service prone, but, its still a fill gamble.

The lower end BD that have a manual fill selector actually get the tub full and do a good job of cleaning. But the lid lock to compensate for Whirlpool being to cheap to instal a tub break on the splutch is a huge pain to deal with, and adds 10 minutes alone to the cycle. Both to make sure the lid has latched and the fact the control wont unlock the lid until the tub has completely stopped, which adds several minutes after each spin.

Service wise a number of these machines need pump/lid lock/control replacements. Not sure why though. When ever I go to Lowes I always see 2 or 3 new BD being returned for either not working or not cleaning.

Now that Whirlpool is a full blown monopoly they can get away with selling anything. The foriegn manufactuers like LG, Samsung, Haier and those that are trying to enter the American market are being sued/bullied by Whirlpool into raising there prices on show room floors or not selling there all together. GE is their only real competator, but its made to appeal to home builders and landlords and the low end market. That and the fact where ever Appliances are sold the sales floor is dominated by whirlpool made brands that smother out the few other manufacturer models sitting there. The elctronic's industrie is nothing like this.

Unless you have thousands to spend on a Miele or Bosch you stuck with Whirlpool. Marketing and gimmicks at work...


Post# 665566 , Reply# 25   3/13/2013 at 09:27 (4,051 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!)        

gansky1's profile picture
A good friend of mine that lives nearby replaced a 95 plastic-tub Hotpoint washer with a Maytag belt-drive when they first came out a few years ago. He's had no trouble and no complaints so far. Full disclosure, they are not laundrophiles and likely have never noticed water levels, etc. 'If the clothes are wet and stuck to the tub, the wash is done' is more the line of thinking, as with many people.



Post# 665584 , Reply# 26   3/13/2013 at 11:48 (4,051 days old) by petek (Ontari ari ari O )        

petek's profile picture
re that video above about the Maytag Centennial with hardly any water in it.. Is that for real how they work, it doesn't appear to a an HE model because of the agitator. It looks more to me like there's a problem with the water level sensor and if working correctly would have more water in there. ?



Post# 665589 , Reply# 27   3/13/2013 at 13:01 (4,051 days old) by chetlaham (United States)        
Maytag Centennial HE

chetlaham's profile picture
That machine in the video has automatic load sensing that adds the correct amount of water. Technically the machine isnt supposed to have that little water, for an impeller model its about right, mabey a tad more.

Underfiling is sometimes a very common problem with auto fill Whirlpools, Ive seen that many times. Not sure about this machine but on older sensor models when you lift the lid during the wash and rinse it fills to the top afterwards.

Either way seeing that video really boils my blood, I like his comment though about how that got on the market.


Post# 665593 , Reply# 28   3/13/2013 at 13:21 (4,051 days old) by DirectDriveDave ()        

Another reason why I love the mechanicals on our DD washers.

Post# 665602 , Reply# 29   3/13/2013 at 14:04 (4,051 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        
I just bought a Haier top loader

In January, its not a direct drive model or whatever the Fisher&Paykel washers are for sure, it also seems rather cheaply manufactured but for $350 and a deep/full rinse on the quick cycle it seems like a pretty good machine to me so far.....

Post# 665611 , Reply# 30   3/13/2013 at 15:23 (4,051 days old) by WP-Dude22 (Trinidad and Tobago )        
wp trash

well i talked to the fella who owns that Maytag in the video and he said they came to check it out but they found no errors so im thinking he had a bad control board.

i have the whirlpool variant of this its a revision 3 meaning some design/ structural changes and maybe a re calibrated board and sensing algorithm for the most part it senses correctly but sometimes with a small load i find it should add more water.

then there are times i will watch it an think you should add more water and it will stop agitating and add some more water and wash again or add some more water think a bit then add some more then wash.

i think sensing is done using 3 things
1) the weight o the load during sensing spins the heavier the items in the drum the longer or shorter it will spin after the motor pulse.
2) the length of time it take to saturate the load and being filling up to a level the pressure sensor will pic up.
3) sensing strokes the more clothes in the washer the harder it is for the washer to make its full 180/360 degree sensing arch. during sensing strokes the water level is low and from watching the washer the level is determined by how long it take to saturate the load the 3 level of water i saw for sensing stokes are (just below the rotator, right where the fins join the center pole and in between the rotator and where the bottom of the fins join the center pole.

this is the sensing part of the cycle :



(fills to where the fins join the center pole lowest sensing level)

small load would have liked a little more water but shockingly came out clean with he detergent (guess the concentrated cleaning worked here):





the rinse water level largish load it washed @ that same water level too





mine works and im happy with it but to me whirlpool still need to refine the water level singing , get a quieter pump, all drums should be stainless steel by now, and the agitator design should have been like in the cabrio model with the agitator i liked that design a bit futuristic and it was right down to the bottom of the drum no gap under it, most importantly would it have killed whirlpool to apply a small voltage in to the motor to power it in the reverse direction of spinning so that would have slowed the washer to a stop faster, start with a small voltage and increase till the drum stops dont think that would have wore out the belt if done right. oh and bring back self leveling are legs come on whirlpool we went backwards by removing it
check the image for sensing water levels ...


Post# 665616 , Reply# 31   3/13/2013 at 15:38 (4,051 days old) by WP-Dude22 (Trinidad and Tobago )        

this agitator would have been better suited to the slower action as well if the fins where more stiff n less flexible / rubbery

Post# 665621 , Reply# 32   3/13/2013 at 15:47 (4,051 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        
well..

The last video of the full rinse is ok but as for the small load i like my clothes swimming in water....i mean after a few loads of laundry the washer is still using the same amount of water, if that makes sense...so why is it that they don't just fill up the full way on all cycles? that would be a good question for whatever idiots came up with this idea to conserve water in washing machines because I don't really see why it matters how much water they use??? if the world is gonna run out of water its gonna happen there is nothing they can do to stop it and if thats what they think is going to happen then they are really stupid....thats all i can say!

Post# 665624 , Reply# 33   3/13/2013 at 15:51 (4,051 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        
@beekeyknee

Yes that sounds like a great idea but I don't think there is a market for old washers .Unfortunately everyone wants the new pretty glossy colored front loaders or the new stainless steel drum top loaders...But if someone ever did create a store like that I would sure end up buying my appliances there....that's for sure

Post# 665629 , Reply# 34   3/13/2013 at 16:11 (4,051 days old) by repair-man (Pittsburgh PA)        

The newest models have the "powerwash" (or something like that) feature that is supposed to fill to the max setting. I guess it bypasses the auto fill system. Never saw it in action but maybe this is Whirlpool's way of still meeting the government standards on the normal cycle and still offer the customer an option for a more traditional wash.

I do believe that with some modifications these could be good machines. The question is (as others point out here) does Whirlpool wan't them to be good ?


Post# 665642 , Reply# 35   3/13/2013 at 17:27 (4,051 days old) by logixx (Germany)        
The newest models have the "powerwash" featurat is

logixx's profile picture
Deep Water Wash it's called an works only on the Super Wash cycle. :-/

Post# 665658 , Reply# 36   3/13/2013 at 18:55 (4,051 days old) by DigAPony ()        

Unfortunately, there is little to no profit to be had selling refurbished older machines.

Unless you can find a regular supply of near mint condition, low mileage machines at bargain prices one would be hard pressed to break even after time, fuel, parts and labor cost are added in.


Post# 665659 , Reply# 37   3/13/2013 at 18:59 (4,051 days old) by norgechef (Saint George New Brunswick )        
I hate that

You have to use the longest wash cycle to get a full wash and rinse on Whirlpool/Maytag bravos washers...and a wash that takes 2 hours may start to wear out the motor after a while, don't you think?

Post# 665668 , Reply# 38   3/13/2013 at 19:32 (4,051 days old) by alr2903 (TN)        

Wow after watching the above video in reply #20. Thanks Norgechef. The tweak between the 2011 and the 2013 water levels is very noticeable. alr

Post# 665943 , Reply# 39   3/14/2013 at 21:44 (4,050 days old) by WP-Dude22 (Trinidad and Tobago )        

@alr 2903
yea the revision 3 of the washer the water level is more accurate but the normal setting skimps on water unless its a large or medium load. I tend to use super wash for most loads as it adds just a bit more water for small loads and and goes through 3 wash modes for large loads ... with large loads it does a lower than clothes wlevel wash, then stops adds more water agitate, then fills to the correct level. super wash even does a stop then a very strong 180 degree arc to distribute / mix the load in-between.

bulky / soak /rinse and spin all bypasses the water level sensing (bulky starts of with a high speed 90 degree arc).

quick wash defaults to the lowest water level highest it may attempt to fill is just under the rotator if so much ( meant for 2 to 4 items to me a waste of a cycle slot )

delicate senses but i never did a big load on it but it starts of with a extra low 90 degree arc then regular 180 arc with another slow 90 arc before draining

if the machine senses that the agitator is not making a full 180 degree arc or is doing it to slowly it will add more water till it thinks the drag in the agitator is corrected they are not bad machines and i bet revision 4 will be better (although i suspect whirlpool has a redesigned version coming out with even better sensing and more substantial changes like a higher spin speed, SS tub, heck maybe even a new agitator design.

I JUST HATE THE NOISY PUMP THE SPIN IS SUPER QUIET WHEN THE PUNK SHUTS OFF. IF THERE IS NO WATER PUMP IS LOUD AS HELL WP SPEND MONEY ON A QUIET IMPELLER / PUMP DESIGN PLZ

i find the washer should do random 90 degree high speed agitation mode in-between the usual 180 arc on super an normal cycles but the washers results are good

pic below of a medium load washer that load was turning over well in that water


Post# 665944 , Reply# 40   3/14/2013 at 21:47 (4,050 days old) by WP-Dude22 (Trinidad and Tobago )        

large load pic it was a very dirty load that pilled up after the old washer was cutting corners on cleaning / died the old washer got alot of licks/work

Post# 666100 , Reply# 41   3/15/2013 at 18:23 (4,049 days old) by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY)        
I'm so afraid

mark_wpduet's profile picture
that something is going to happen to my 2004 Duet and the thought of buying a modern machine. Even though mine is from 2004, that's ancient for a washer by today's standards unfortunately, because it actually uses water compared to what I saw in the Maytag video above. That's pretty freaking gross

Post# 666224 , Reply# 42   3/16/2013 at 08:49 (4,049 days old) by roscoe62 (Canada)        
@Mark

Maybe by then the only thing will be a FL'r available to you, so here's hoping that they will be manufacturing something that is still a decent machine to use and worth investing.If enough people are complaining through consumer watch dogs,etc. about what they have to choose from now and getting poor service, hopefully they will have to do something to accomodate demand.If FL'rs are all that is left I wonder what brand will take the lead??

Post# 666681 , Reply# 43   3/18/2013 at 01:21 (4,047 days old) by alr2903 (TN)        

Hopefully some new upstart like I-Wash. The T/L machines are not quite doomed, but 20 years ago you would call warranty service for what the new machines offer in washing/rinsing ability today. Just my 2 cents. alr

Post# 668624 , Reply# 44   3/26/2013 at 23:05 (4,038 days old) by laundromat (Hilo, Hawaii)        

laundromat's profile picture

The only current top loaders I would even consider looking in to are the LG and GE. The rest,I wouldn't even bother to open their lid.John L. had one at his shop in for repair and I was shocked to see the loose tub movement similar to Frigidaire's indexing but movinng both ways instead of just counter clockwise.Its spin speed too had issues. The Cabrio does nothing for me and the ones I have seen in production leave much to be desired. The LGs however,are quite effective in thoroughly washing and rinsing using less water and their all stainless steel tub and impeller does'nt get scratches from metal zippers like the plastic ones do causing the fabrics to fray.

 

 I like the Duets and have two different sets hooked up and running. They do our daily (4) loads and I was able to rig them to increase the water level about 1/4 the way up the window. one set is their original with the booster in the washer anc the other set is about two years old and was still under a Lowes three year service contract.The older set has the risers and the newer set is stacked real high because the washer alone has the riser.They are both out on the lanai. My LG Mega Capacity pair are in the laundry room and are used for the king size bed clothes and area rugs.


Post# 669221 , Reply# 45   3/30/2013 at 14:50 (4,034 days old) by funnut ()        
My Maytag Bravos experience

A very interesting thread and useful to those shopping for a W/D. I will weigh in with my experience. I live in a very remote mountain area of northern New Mexico. We are building our house, almost finished after 4 years! For the first several years after we bought the land in 2006 we lived in a little trailer to observe the sun movements, decide on the building site, and then build the first part of the house. I bought a used TOL KitchenAid washer and put it on 2 pallets next to the trailer, outside. I washed with water from the outside shower spigot to get warm water and used Calgon to soften the water. I winterized the washer Nov. to March and covered it with a tarp when not in use. Drying was done on clotheslines strung from nearby pine trees.

By 2010 I was ready to buy a new W/D set as the laundry room was finished, although we were still living in the trailer. I had researched for over a year and rejected a FL washer for various reasons: smelly washer reviews, wiping the gaskets, having to leave the door open, hard to add items after starting a cycle, etc. After much much study I decided to buy the TOL Maytag Bravos with onboard heater and TOL Bravos steam dryer. The onboard heater turned out to be a lifesaver when the house water heater had problems, I washed for several months with only cold water coming into the washer and the onboard heater had to heat the water from cold. I will never have another washer without its own heater.

I read the manuals for the washer in great detail. I read forums including this one and G-Web. I quickly learned that the "Bulky" cycle was THE one that would provide enough water and a cascading spray action to actually get my laundry clean. I use this cycle 90% of the time and occasionally use the Delicates cycle when I have a very small or delicate load. I use a couple of other "tricks" to get more water in the washer: I add about 60 oz. of water before starting the cycle (using an empty detergent bottle to pour on water to weigh down the load) and sometimes I stop the load using the pause-add garment feature to make the washer "think" more items have been added. I realize using a higher amount of water defeats the HE Energy Star "features," but I'm far more interested in getting my laundry clean than in saving a few gallons of water per load.

We have a whole-house softener and I always use the second rinse option. My laundry gets truly clean, I've never had a stain that didn't come out using the Bravos. I can do a full load of anything on the heavy soil setting - with a double rinse - in 59 minutes, about 20 minutes additional if I turn on the onboard heater.

Over the past 3 years I've continued to do research, mainly because my daughter inherited my old Kenmore Elite Catalyst set that I know is going to give out pretty soon. She is very busy with school, work, family and won't have time to research like her retired mom. I think all the HE water-saving Energy Star hoo-hah is a bunch of crap. You cannot get laundry clean without the right combination of enough water, good detergent, thorough washing, AND rinsing - all in soft water.

I bought my Bravos set from the local NM appliance store, Baillo's, and purchased a 5-year extended warranty for all my appliances. My previous experience in my last home, with at least 1 repair on several appliances per year, plus our extremely remote location with high service call mileage fees, made the extended warranty a no-brainer. My only disappointment with the Bravos set is I had to get the main circuit board replaced on the dryer after only about 3 months and the sensor still doesn't work correctly. I just have to check on it and use the dryer like the ones back in the 80s, before auto sensors would stop the dryer at the right time. This is annoying, but not a deal breaker. Also, I would've been better off with a lower model of dryer without steam, I seldom use it and I could just as easily spray some plain water over the items in the dryer to get the same result.

So I'm at the end of this quite-long saga, which I hope is helpful to those shopping and looking for reviews on different appliances. It's much much harder to buy appliances now than it was in the late 1970s when I bought my first home. Most brands were good and appliances lasted for many years back then, not so now. However, the take-away here is if you want a TL washer, find one that you can "trick" into using a higher water level. Avoid washers with a lid lock, unless you can hit a button to unlock it during a cycle.


Post# 669226 , Reply# 46   3/30/2013 at 16:11 (4,034 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)        
Modification

mrb627's profile picture

I don't think machines that have to be modified from their factory specification or somehow tricked should qualify, but most all machines on he market today have some frugality that needs to be overcome.

 


 

I am still curious as to why none of the GE badged LG top loaders have reportedly had the exploding problem.

 

Malcolm


Post# 669253 , Reply# 47   3/30/2013 at 19:29 (4,034 days old) by WP-Dude22 (Trinidad and Tobago )        

hmmmn @ funnut you should try the regular cycles and see but she has a point one wet item or towel with a dry load makes the washer add more water . i also figured out the sensing spins have some effect on water the if takes a long time to stop spinning = lighter load if the load is heavy stops faster so i put in a really small load and i used my hand to slow down the basket .... it did the sensing strokes and then fill half way up for 5 items of clothes ..... @ funnut does your bravos have the glass lid would like to see what yours does during sensing and first 10 min of a cycle

also super wash adds more water it will be low first but after 2 to 5 min it stops and adds water twice and if u stop it while its adding more water it will add more on top of that


Post# 669255 , Reply# 48   3/30/2013 at 19:33 (4,034 days old) by qualin (Canada)        

The way I see it, if you have to do anything more than add detergent and clothing to a washing machine, it isn't an automatic washing machine anymore.

Vote with your wallet and buy a washer which is truly automatic. No tricks, no fuss, no muss, no guessing, no tricking. We all know who makes them.


Post# 670170 , Reply# 49   4/3/2013 at 08:15 (4,031 days old) by repair-man (Pittsburgh PA)        
"We all know who makes them"

I would have to say that a new Speed Queen will require at least a one time "trick" to adjust the water level. I was at a customers house a week ago and they have a 6 month old AWN542. It was grinding away with a full load set to the max level. I looked inside and could not see any water. The water level was just a little over half full. I can't imagine that these machines will last too long in the avg persons home operating under these conditions. Not to mention what it's doing to the clothing.

Post# 670175 , Reply# 50   4/3/2013 at 08:44 (4,031 days old) by mtn1584 (USA)        
What???

The factory set level on a SQ is the third set of holes from the top. A one time adjustment, to the water level switch, is all the machine needs to fill to the row of holes. As far a damage to the clothes, NOT POSSIBLE, I have overloaded my AWN542, and never had an issue with clothing damage, as far as lasting, these washers have the best warranty in the business! Maybe you should stop peeking in your customers washers and take time to watch the Alliance factory testing video on YouTube which shows what lengths Alliance goes to test these washers!
Mike


Post# 670188 , Reply# 51   4/3/2013 at 09:40 (4,030 days old) by repair-man (Pittsburgh PA)        
Not trying to offend anyone Mike

Just saying what I saw. And if you read my post I said it needs a one time adjustment. If a customer runs full loads without enough water it will be hard on clothes. And the machine. I was on a call to repair the range but was asked to look at the washer. They are not happy with it. I increased the level so maybe they will be happier now. I know that Alliance goes to great lengths to build quality products but these machines do have some faults.
Ed



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy