Okay by luck I washed the RED tableclothes in with the WHITE napkins in the Jetcone washer with JET AWAY lint removal.

The result was the WHITE napkins came out covered in RED lint so they looked red-pink! 

Into the 1970 GE FILTER FLO they went with the WHITE filter pan in place for contrast, then into the Speed Queen dryer to remove any - if any- remaining lint.

was assayed today:

0.4 grams of lint

under 0.1 grams of lint, who caught more??????

school's back in.

Jon, again, was the FF lint dried in at least a 140 degree oven for at least an hour before weighing ?

the "other Lefever" had said to me that he felt the dryer would always catch more lint than the Filter Flo, which as we can see is not the case hands down.

Someone else can pick up the testing or it can wait for a wash in with other witnesses.

the requirements of MS , I can bake the pan lint at 140 degrees for an hour this afternoon. Then weigh and measure AGAIN.

here are the results of what John requested: Pan lint goes in at 4:33 140 degrees for an hour

p

PM Still 140 degrees

to give John's idea a handicap the dryer lint was left out in the basement all day absorbing ambient basement humidity and the pan lint has been dried per request.

the dryer lint again since the scale was turned off and on that way it will be assayed at the same time as the baked pan lint:

see the Pan lint loose some moisture 0,2 grams but it still was double the weight of the dryer lint even after the dryer lint was allowed to breath moisture from the basement all day.

The napkins were used for the burger meal with Eddie and John but the tableclothes were already in the JetAction machine when I tossed in the white napkins. It was a stroke of luck I wasn't thinking about Louis request to use contrasting materials. So it all came together at the last minute. Now we have a format anyone can reproduce.

"Ding" Filter Flo Lint wins over Dryer lint by a mile.

"But any comparison between the weight the washer and dryer caught is invalid. The washer had the chance to extract the lint first so less remained for the dryer to have a swing at."

Phil, the proposition as presented to me was that dryers lint systems will catch more lint than washers lint systems; especially it was surmised that the best washer filter system was made for the WP/Kenmore machines. I can't say from this test wether GE or WP has a better or worse filter system.  I did not test a WP product but the  Filter Flo system.:

 so if they are inferior to  WP/Kenmore then we should see a greater discrepancy if we had used a WP/K product. 

So I understand your statement but the claim was made and addressed as made. I can't change horses in midstream.

reunited again one last time: And thats the way it is May 15, 2013

Jon when you REWASH items covered with lint they did not produce of coerce the washer has an advantage because it has first crack at catching foreign lint.

Now go get a real load of clothing and wash it in the GE FF and then dry it in your dryer, then have the lint at the same temperature and humidity and then count the individual lint particles and let us know which one wins. [ when I said a dryer will catch more lint than a GE FFs filter I meant more individual lint particles ] Now get to it before I have to come up there and really slap you, LOL.

From Lefever # 3, # 1&2 have never been heard from on this site, YET but if three of us already here can't beat you in to submission I might get them on board.

I've earned my margaritas boyz.

I see hardly any lint using my Speed Queens, but lots with the FF. However the GE Combo and the Duomatics do fill their traps up with lint that has to be emptied from time to time.