Thread Number: 4955
Modified Agitator
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 109081   2/11/2006 at 11:32 (6,620 days old) by the7 ()        

Modified the agitator for an 95/96 Maytag Depandable Care TL.

The original Angel Fins were cut off to form straight fins in on the upper portion.
The original Angel Fins tend to move the laundry away the centre before reaching the bottom.

The modified agitator would reduce the shedding effect on laundry and increase the turn-over by allowing the laundry to move down near the centre.






Post# 109085 , Reply# 1   2/11/2006 at 11:46 (6,620 days old) by the7 ()        

Maytay TL


Post# 109086 , Reply# 2   2/11/2006 at 11:51 (6,620 days old) by the7 ()        
Huebsch LTZ85

My recently added new toy.

Now I have both worlds TL and FL!


Post# 109140 , Reply# 3   2/11/2006 at 18:16 (6,620 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
Is 'Huebsch' how they spell Speed Queen in your country, LOL?

Thanks for pix!


Post# 109166 , Reply# 4   2/11/2006 at 20:30 (6,620 days old) by appnut (TX)        

appnut's profile picture
Deos the front lader have a heater in it? Looks like the ill-fated Amana frontloader introduced back in 1996 or 1997. Naturally, of course. I loved what ya did to the power-fin 12. Must have taken quite a bit of time to cut the angel wings off and also smooth the remaining edge. My mom had the LAT9624 in the DC line from 1995. It sounded sooo "Maytag" except for that dang ol' "swish-swish" the angel wings made with the water. Drove me nuts.

Post# 109168 , Reply# 5   2/11/2006 at 20:35 (6,620 days old) by cvillewasherbo ()        

Changing the agitator, upping the agitation speed and shortening the arc was the WORST thing that Maytag ever did that I can remember. I still wish I had my 1987 pair before these changes were made.

My Mom has the smaller tub of the above and that's all you hear is the swish, swish, swish, swish. UGH


Post# 109171 , Reply# 6   2/11/2006 at 20:43 (6,620 days old) by peterh770 (Marietta, GA)        

peterh770's profile picture
Huebsch is a division of Alliance Laundry Systems. Huebsch used to be known as the primier commercial dryer company, along with Cissell, ADC and IDC. In the merger, they started offering washers and are kinda known as the "budget" line for commercial coin-op owners.

The washer pictured is the 3rd generation of these washers. The first generation was pulled from the market VERY quickly. The second generation was significantly better. The 3rd generation has that funky door pull. This should be a very good machine to own, despite what CR says.

I have been doing a lot of observing on my Maytag coin-ops. They are actually quite good, albiet a bit rough. As these are standard capacity machines, the turn over is quite good and they do hold quite a bit. I won't be clipping their wings though!


Post# 109183 , Reply# 7   2/11/2006 at 22:22 (6,620 days old) by brettsomers ()        

i feel like a video of the washing action is in order, now that the agitator is changed. my brother bought one of those short-stroke maytags when the old avocado model (1974-1995 appox) died. i HATED those fins up the centerpost and the sound they made. i suspect there IS a consumer who believes the machine is working better if there is more splash in the water. pls, make a video. David

Post# 109235 , Reply# 8   2/12/2006 at 05:42 (6,619 days old) by designgeek ()        

More splash keeps the suds sudsy for longer. Americans tend to like suds, but modern detergents used in proper dosages (i.e. low enough to come out in at most two rinses in a TL or three in a FL) don't make much suds. I'll bet that the psychology of suds had something to do with that agitator design.

So, how does the unit perform with the modifications?





Post# 109370 , Reply# 9   2/12/2006 at 18:48 (6,619 days old) by the7 ()        
Some Observations

The construction of original agitator is consisted the upper portion and lower portion.
The lower portion has 4 semi-flexible fins, that work like a vane pump, to drive water from centre towards the side near the bottom, along the side and up to the top.
Then water at the top moves towards centre.
Then water at centre moves from top to bottom to the centre of the fins.
The water moves in a circulation and the laundry in the tub will be circulated as the flow of water.

The upper portion of the fin has 4 Angel wings and 8 small fins (ridges).
The 8 samll fins will rub against the laundry near the centre (a rubbing action to clean the laundry).
The 4 Angel wings would also provide a more powerful rubbing action which may shred/tear the laundry. They also form a pumping action to drive the water/laundry away from the centre. Apparently they interfer the down circulation of the laundry near the centre.

Modified Agitator as shown. The 4 Angel wings were cut to form 4 extra small fins(ridges) for rubbing purpose only. There will be less intrference for down circulation near the centre.
Thus it will reduce the shredding effect and inrcease the turn-over the laundry.
I think it would behave similar to an earlier version (without Angel wings)

Results.
Lesser lint deposited on the lint filter of the dryer.
lesser lint (or light color residue) marks on the dark color laundry.

The attached photo shows a home-made lint filter for the modified agitator. The filter is made of stainless steel screen and will be placed inside the centre pole. Water will enter the holes and down the pole due to pumping action of the 4 bottom fins. It works and collect some shredded lint from the laundry.






Post# 109393 , Reply# 10   2/12/2006 at 20:32 (6,619 days old) by appnut (TX)        

appnut's profile picture
Your home made lint filter looks extremely similar to the optional lint filter Fisher & Paykel sells for their washers. In fact, it goes down to the bottom of the agitator.

Post# 109396 , Reply# 11   2/12/2006 at 20:50 (6,619 days old) by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
interesting, why did Maytag remove the center lint filter in the first place?
We have a 1984 almond Maytag washer with the turqoise agitator and fake wood console. It works well and just won't die. The matching dryer however, did die, and we replaced with a 2003 Neptune dryer, which has been working flawlessly for 3 years now. Sensor dry is awesome!


Post# 109399 , Reply# 12   2/12/2006 at 21:05 (6,619 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
Thanks for all the pics and agitator info, The7. Love your homemade lint filter! But you DO realize you've done the agitator equivalent of de-clawing a cat, don't you, LOL?

:)


Post# 109435 , Reply# 13   2/13/2006 at 01:13 (6,618 days old) by the7 ()        
How to post Video?

Had made a video file for washing of Maytag with modified agitator.
How to post this video?



Post# 109449 , Reply# 14   2/13/2006 at 07:01 (6,618 days old) by the7 ()        

woodsbronx2rt asked,
"How did you manage to cut and modify the 4 angel winged (vanes)?"

There is one small screw on the center pole near the bottom.
Unscrew this screw and lift up the whole agitator.
Use a hacksaw to cut the angel wings.
Use sand paper to sand and round off the cut edges.
Put the agitator back.
Put back and tighten the screw.
It is all DONE.


Post# 109466 , Reply# 15   2/13/2006 at 07:53 (6,618 days old) by designgeek ()        


I would suggest that people wishing to try this, use a paper template and mark off the cut-line with pencil, so you get uniform results.

So, does anyone have any idea why Maytag put those wings on the agitator in the first place? Suds? Swishing noise? Something else?


Post# 109469 , Reply# 16   2/13/2006 at 07:56 (6,618 days old) by the7 ()        
Present SQ/Huebsch FL of 4th generation?

PeterH770 said my Huebsch LTZ85 is the 3rd generation.

So far I am satisfied with this FL and it reminds me of my first 197X Zannusi FL.
From poor memory, Zannusi FL had a small capacity (5 kg?), a low spin speed (500 rpm?), no electronics. Had a single phase drive motor with special winding construction that would run at spin and tumble speed. One could see the water level above the door opening, unlike most of the present FL


Models 2000-2003?:
Speed Queen LTS85 = Huebsch LTZ85 (with heater)
Speed Queen LTS80 = Huebsch LTZ80 (without heater)

Present Models:
Speed Queen LTS95 (with heater) - No equivalent from Huebsch?
Speed Queen LTS90 = Huebsch LTZ90 (without heater)

Do the present models belong to 4th generation?


Post# 109500 , Reply# 17   2/13/2006 at 12:39 (6,618 days old) by cvillewasherbo ()        
maytag agitators

any reason why an older turquoise maytag agitator wouldn't work on the newer washers like the one that started this thread?
c'villewasherboy


Post# 110081 , Reply# 18   2/16/2006 at 08:35 (6,615 days old) by the7 ()        
Video Ready

Maytag TL with modified agitator.

MaytagLowWash shows that the upper portion of the agitator is not used at all for the low water level washing.

MaytagHighWash shows that the laundry tends to move towards the centre and down. The angel wings, if not cut, would move the laundry away and prevent the laundry to move along the centre.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO the7's LINK


Post# 110525 , Reply# 19   2/19/2006 at 00:15 (6,612 days old) by tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

I did the same thing to that agitator years ago when I tried it out in one of my 'Tags. Maytag needed something on the upper agitator barrel to pull clothes to the bottom to help with circulation, but those 4 insipid fins were not the answer.

And as to why they eliminated the lint filter in the agitator: The no phosphate detergents did not buffer the water as well as the "real" detergents that preceded them. Everyone was having mineral buildup and the lint filter was where Maytag owners saw it first. It was easier to remove it from the agitator and put those two little mesh covered openings under the agitator to catch lint because nobody would notice when they became blocked with minerals. Truth be told, much more lint is removed & caught by the dryer anyway.


Post# 110539 , Reply# 20   2/19/2006 at 01:28 (6,612 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc)        

I had a Maytag washer that had an agitator similar to the one modified-I had to "modify" mine-but in a different way-the base vanes-on the bottom-they were SHARP-I filed and sanded off those cutting edges-my clothes thanked me too-If I still had that machine-would have tried the "Impeller" mod shown in another thread.I sold the machine with one of the houses I used to have.

Post# 110558 , Reply# 21   2/19/2006 at 04:47 (6,612 days old) by designgeek ()        


Good videos; that machine has a very fast agitator and very fast rollover. It would be interesting to see comparison videos with the unmodified agitator. Maybe the point of those pesky wings was to slow down the rollover (for who-knows-what reason)?


Post# 110641 , Reply# 22   2/19/2006 at 15:17 (6,612 days old) by tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

Those wings were a stand-in until Maytag could have their own dual action agitator when WP's patent expired. If anything, they should have been curved vanes, instead of wings, like on some of the WP agitators without the auger. That way the vanes would have been more effective at pulling the load down on the forward stroke in the direction of the curve of the vanes, but would not have pushed the clothes away on the reverse stroke, maybe. The fact is that the Maytag design was very outdated by this time and it was not up to handling the large loads of most of its competitors. Then, instead of designing a washer with a bigger tub, they made the top opening bigger. When they rode that cheap trick to the end of the road, they put their name on Norges, rather than design a new machine.

Companies that refuse to update and innovate will eventually be left behind. KitchenAid took a beating the last time the 14 series was tested. They came out with the 15 that put them at the top of the ratings for a while, but were very late in having a dedicated source of water under the upper rack (1977).

Maytag dropped the Amana freezers it sold right after WWII and the very well made gas ranges, again bought from another manufacturer that made a great product. They decided to concentrate on home laundry. But when they sought to expand the line, instead of going for quality, they decided to pick up the weakest appliance lines that were already in trouble because the were not innovators: Hardwick, Admiral and Magic Chef. Magic Chef had not introduced anything since the "Red Wheel" oven thermostat on their gas stoves some time in the 1920s or 30s. The refrigerators that Admiral made for Maytag were such POC that the doors would not align on the side-by-sides. Maytag stupidly thought that by putting their name on this stuff, people would be blinded to the faults by the Maytag name and Maytag would not have to spend money to make the stuff better, but could sell a lot of stuff and reward the stockholders and pay big bucks to the CEO and directors. They got away with it for awhile. The same thing has been happening in almost every industry that historically, at least, made things here. What people in this country do not realize is that a significant portion of the money that they pay for things that are not made here just leaves the country, except for the small amount that goes to the people who sell the stuff and a larger amount for the fat cats who decide what else can be moved offshore to avoid paying wages and taxes here.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy