Thread Number: 4990
Reliability of US FL?
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 109615   2/13/2006 at 21:09 (6,617 days old) by bradlyl ()        

We've been trying to make a decision on a FL here in the US. There seems to be problems w/every model, but overall, is there on model that seems to have a better realiability history than any other? Thanks in advance for any advice you can offer!!




Post# 109618 , Reply# 1   2/13/2006 at 21:23 (6,617 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
CR rated the old GE front loader (built by Electrolux) as good in terms of reliablity. What was different between that brand and others made by the same company (Kenmore and Frigidaire) is anyone's guess. Some report good sucess with early Frigidaire models, others had machines that barely made it past five years before the rear bearings gave out.

Personally, I suggest looking into a Miele front loader. They are built like tanks and you will probably grow bored with the unit long before anything major happens. If short cycle times do not bother you,look at the Speed Queen "Homestyle" front loaders. These basically are commercial laundromat washers in a cabinet designed for home use. Rugged, no frills washers that will get your laundry clean with little fuss.

Front loading washing machines have always been expensive to desgin and produce due to the nature of their construction. Supporting eleven or more pounds of wet laundry/water and then spinning it at high spin speeds safely day in and day out is no easy design feat. What seems to be happening is in the rush to market, many appliance makers are cutting corners to keep prices down.

L.


Post# 109626 , Reply# 2   2/13/2006 at 21:35 (6,617 days old) by mayken4now (Panama City, Florida)        

mayken4now's profile picture
Have the Kenmore HE3T's and overall, good.



Post# 109651 , Reply# 3   2/13/2006 at 22:38 (6,617 days old) by magic clean ()        
Too much information--analysis paralysis??

With all the information both good and questionable, my .02 cents worth is, buy what model has the features and price that suits your requirements. Then make sure it is installed correctly, thoroughly familiarize yourself with the machines features, use with care and enjoy.



Post# 109653 , Reply# 4   2/13/2006 at 22:43 (6,617 days old) by frontloadfan (Wellfleet, Ma.)        
Consumer Reports Stats

Regarding this issue, I just checked Consumer Reports online. They just came out with a March 2006 report/rating for washing machines.

Regarding front load reliability, they surveyed 93,995 washing machine owners and they came out the with following stats for front load washers. The higher the percentage, the more percentage of machines needing repair.

Whirlpool 9%
Kenmore 10%
GE 12%
Frigidaire 13%
Maytag 21%

These stats are close enough, other than for Maytag, there isn't that much difference in them. I wonder with these stats if the first generation Electrolux front loaders (branded under Frigidaire/GE/Kenmore) are now water under the bridge. I bought my Frigidaire front loader in 1998 and its bearing went out last year. It seemed to be so common that the bearing on these machines went out.

Maybe the new Elctrolux machines don't have the bearing problem.

In my opinion, you would be wise to get the extended warranty if you are going to spend over $1,000 for a front loader. Most places offer 4 years warranty for around $100.


Post# 109654 , Reply# 5   2/13/2006 at 22:51 (6,617 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
I have a Frigidaire and like it a lot. No problems after 3 years at about 7 or 8 loads per week.

While I'm glad to see Speed Queen back in the domestic washer market, be forewarned that Consumer Report"s latest tests showed the SQ's cycle was so short (35 minutes, with a maximum 9-minute wash, about half that of most FL'ers) it didn't clean a heavily-soiled load well. It has been reported that SQ is releasing a redesigned machine in 2007 with reconfigured cycles. Having said that, someone around here owns one of these SQ's and he's happy with it, although he stated he rarely washes heavily-soiled loads.

My recommendations for front-loaders: Kenmore, Whirlpool, Frigidaire. These machines clean well and have good reliability track records. Good luck with your new purchase and please let us know which machine you decide to purchase.


Post# 109722 , Reply# 6   2/14/2006 at 08:30 (6,616 days old) by the7 ()        
Some Fast FL groups

SQ is not alone for Fast wash, many other NA washers tend to shorten the time of wash phase to 9-15 min for Normal Soiled cycle.

As noted from various source for the total time of REGULAR (Normal Soiled) cycle of some H-axis washers:

Speed Queen/Huebsch FL = 30 min ( 9 min wash + 2 rinses + 1 spin)
Staber = 32 min (about 10-15 min wash + 2 rinses + 1 spin)
HE3t = 45 min (15 min wash + 2 R +1 S)
Frigidaire ATF6000 = ? min ( 15 min wash + 2R + 1S)

Perhaps SQ should add a "Heavy Soiled" option (a longer time option) in their next version.
In fact SQ/Huebsch had such option in their FL prior 2003 (e.g. SQ LTS8* and Huebsch LTZ8*). It is a shame that SQ removes this option in the existing version.







Post# 109736 , Reply# 7   2/14/2006 at 09:32 (6,616 days old) by designgeek ()        


Also, if you're new to using a given type of machine, assume you're going to have a learning curve of 1 - 2 months.

With FLs, one of the things to get used to is, reducing your dosage of detergent so you get good cleaning results and yet all of it comes out in the rinse. Another is the length of the cycle, which in some cases (e.g. sanitary wash) can take 1-1/2 hours or longer. There are others; but the summation of all this is, for the first month or two assume you're going to be experimenting with the unit to find the best cycles & settings for your purposes.

And of course, when done doing laundry, leave the door of the machine open so it dries out internally, which prevents mould growing. This also applies to TLs though not as strenuously.


Post# 109756 , Reply# 8   2/14/2006 at 11:38 (6,616 days old) by the7 ()        

Is US FL less reliabble?

Yes, when compared with TL.
More complex machines. Inexperience in usage, maintenance and handling.

Yes, when compared with Euro FL.
Less experience/history in manufacturing of full-size FL. Large size would introduce more vibration/noise problem.


Post# 109873 , Reply# 9   2/14/2006 at 22:55 (6,616 days old) by frontloadfan (Wellfleet, Ma.)        
Large Euro FL???

I am curious how much experience european companies have in making large size front loaders? Other than commerical models, haven't the european front loaders for the home typically been even smaller than the smaller Frigidaire? I know when I have had friends from Europe at my home and they viewed my Frigidaire, they commented how "big" it was.

It is interesting too that so many "American" front loaders are derived from European models. When I got my first front loader (the Frigidaire), it came with a video that commented how the company had researched so many front load machines in Italy and Switzerland to come up with the model. The big whirlpools/kenmores/kitchenaids are made in Germany. The Seimans/Bosch front loaders are made in the U.S., but are surely of German design.

About the only front loader you can point at and say totally American is the old Maytag Neptune and we know how well that turned out!


Post# 109881 , Reply# 10   2/15/2006 at 00:46 (6,616 days old) by jimmyb (Texas Y’all)        
My Speed Queen

I have the SQ front loader and as frigilux stated I am very happy with it, and he is also right that my laundry is not heavily soiled. Of course that is also not my only machine and do have an older Maytag that I use as well. A longer cycle on the SQ would be nice for those who need it and I think they are addressing that in the future. As far as the quality of the machine it is built to last, unlike many other thing these days.

Post# 109889 , Reply# 11   2/15/2006 at 05:12 (6,616 days old) by chestermikeuk (Rainhill *Home of the RailwayTrials* Merseyside,UK)        
Suspensions

chestermikeuk's profile picture
Of all the new front loader machines on the market do they all have 2 or 4 shock absorbers??

I wonder if in our European 24 inch wide cabinets with an average of 5kg washload, that the drum ratio of weighted wet clothes , spin speed and solid floors is a perfect washing/spinning action.

Anything bigger, i.e. larger drum, more inertia on spin, 2 shocks, possible wooden floors, sensitive speed controllers is just gonna cause problems etc..

All our front loaders up until the 80`s never had spin balancing, after the wash rinse the drum started revolving at distribution speed pinning the clothes against the sides of the drum, the pump was on to pump water out and then it went straight into its optimum spin, and up to its top speed without stopping.

My new MaytAso FL does this now, no wishy washy distribution spin, just straight up to 800, them 1200, 1400 & finally 1600 without stopping inbetween all over 9 minutes.

Just done a 60d quick wash, 4 rinses, high water level, 1600 spin in 48 mins.

Cheers, Mike


Post# 109898 , Reply# 12   2/15/2006 at 06:33 (6,616 days old) by appnut (TX)        

appnut's profile picture
the7, you were a bit misleading about the HE3T's normal cycle being 45 minutes. That cycle is confusingly labeled as normal/casual. That cycle is actually the permanent press/wrinkle free cycle. Whitest Whites with wash temp set to warm or hot has a 60 minute cycle time. And BTW Leslie, I was very pleased to see the Oasis' cycles have one specifically for casual/wrinkle free and one designated as Normal. Far more accurate in helping the uninformed owner who doesn't erally read their manuals lol.

Post# 109907 , Reply# 13   2/15/2006 at 07:12 (6,615 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
Ooooh, those Maytags are sharp-looking! Very nice; thanks for the picture.

Two things stop me from replacing my current Frigidaire:

1) I like having a mechanical cycle dial to easily add more wash time, skip an unneeded rinse, etc.

2) I don't want a machine that takes forever to distribute a load before the spin. Adding 10 or 15 minutes to a cycle for that would drive me crazy.


Post# 109965 , Reply# 14   2/15/2006 at 11:59 (6,615 days old) by hoovermatic (UK)        

A quick wash in 48 mins!!!! I want one of those then 'cos my 'quick' wash takes longer in my new machine (90 mins) than a full boil wash in my old one!!!

Post# 109967 , Reply# 15   2/15/2006 at 12:21 (6,615 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)        

frigilux's profile picture
A 90-minute quick wash? Good God! What kind of washer do you have? The quick wash cycle on my Frigidaire is 30 minutes (6 min. wash, 2 rinses, 10 min. spin).

Post# 109968 , Reply# 16   2/15/2006 at 12:44 (6,615 days old) by lavamat_jon (UK)        

OMG!! 90 minutes? That's too long! My Miele can do a Quick Wash at cold-40*C in 30 mins - 10 min wash, 2 rinses and a 1600rpm spin., or a 10 min wash, 3 rinses and a 1600rpm spin in 34 or 35 mins IIRC.

The standard cycles aren't too bad on my Miele though either... 51 minutes for minimum iron 40*C, 54 minutes for 40*C cottons, and 1.00 or so for 60*C cottons. Not bad especially this time of year when the water being heated up is particularly cold! (Have noticed that cycles get considerably shorter in summer due to the warmer incoming water supply).

The AEG, on the other hand, has a 168 minute wash time for the 95*C boilwash as standard, reduceable to 135 and then 111 minutes. Standard 40*C wash is 133 mins, can be reduced to "quick" at 103 mins, and the quickest 40*C wash can be done in 60 minutes or so, but still the cycles drag on for longer than the Miele, and also it can take an age to balance so often the 60 minute cycle can end up taking 75 minutes or so! The Miele on the other hand gets laundry distributed & balanced straight away 95% of the time (unlike a lot of other frontloaders, Miele's distribution is a slow tumble getting progressively faster until it reachs distribution speed, then after a couple of seconds at distribution speed it goes into spin) and within a minute of draining the rinse water it can have profiled up to the 1000rpm interim spin. The final spin does a couple of bursts to prevent excessive creasing, but still the final spin can be done in 8 minutes (1-3 bursts, without out of balance load detection (good as theres no point in it for a measly burst), depending on how much water the load sheds, and then 15 seconds each at 400, 600, & 900, then 4 minutes at 1200 and a further 2 minutes at 1600), versus the 14 minutes my AEG takes to do a final spin - tumble, burst, tumble, burst, tumble, burst, tumble, 800rpm 1 min, slow down, then a 5 minute spin where it goes up through 800/1000/1200/1400 - no set times at speeds as it seems to adjust how long it spins at each speed for according to the load - i.e. lighter loads will get less time at 1600 whereas heavier loads such as towels will sometimes go straight to 1600 without profiling speeds. Another annoying thign about the AEG is that it insists on being perfectly balanced for every single burst, unlike the Miele where it bursts regardless of how balanced the load is, so the AEG's 14 minute spin cycle can often become more like 20 minutes!

BTW my Bosch doesn't dilly dally about either - the quickest Easy Cares cycle takes 45 minutes, quickest Cottons 40*C cycle takes 53 minutes, and it just gets straight into the spin without any silly bursts. But neither the Bosch or the AEG offer quick wash cycles like the Miele does - i.e. the 30 minute Quick Wash and 43 minute Automatic washes I have.

But, of course, I'll have a totally new (well, new old) machine to take notes off this weekend. Everybody say bye bye, Lavamat, for now at least :-)

Jon


Post# 109986 , Reply# 17   2/15/2006 at 15:26 (6,615 days old) by the7 ()        

Mike,
Great machine pair. They made by Asko. Asko FL has one of the best suspension as far as I know. But eariler version of Asko in NA seemed to have some motor problem.

FL in 70s and 80s are maily slow speed spin (say 600rpm or less) machines. So load balanciing is not a problem.


Your MayAsk, like most other FL, has a "load balance" technique by ramming up in steps.

Unfornatunally, some FL manufacturers design very complicate "load balance" technique and think their technique will work even for the poor suspension (using 2 springs and 2 dampers) which could be OK for slow spin. It seems LG has 2 springs and 2 dampers.
Some may add 1 more spring. Other may add 1 or 2 more dampers.

I think the best suspension system should has 4 springs and 4 dampers. Asko, SQ and Staber have 4 shocks (damper with internal spring). Miele has 4 springs and 2 hydraulic dampers.






Post# 109991 , Reply# 18   2/15/2006 at 16:17 (6,615 days old) by lavamat_jon (UK)        

The7,

Actually there were machines with 1100rpm spins on the European market as far back as the 1970s. My nana's old Hoover washer dating from the late 70s had a spin speed of 1100rpm, which my nana said was the fastest available at the time. Whilst a lot of cheaper washers still spun at below 1000rpm, there were indeed a number of machines that had reached the 1000rpm mark and over.

Jon


Post# 109993 , Reply# 19   2/15/2006 at 16:50 (6,615 days old) by brisnat81 (Brisbane Australia)        
My 1980 Miele Model W423

Spins at either 900 or 1100RPM.

At the end of the wash it pauses and drains with the pump running.

Once the machine is empty, it starts tumbling backwards and forwards with the pump running.

Finally it goes into a clockwise tumble and keeps going, its not as fast as the distribution on my new Miele, but the clothes stop tumbling and start to move to the outside of the drum.

Then Click and woosh and its up to 900RPM in seconds. It seems to only get up to 1100RPM in the final spin increment, all other spins seem to be a 900RPM.

Out of almost 20 loads now, its never gone OOB or shown excessive vibration. It has 4 springs and two shock absorbers. It doesn have OOB sensors on the machine, but I've yet to see them triggered.


Post# 110000 , Reply# 20   2/15/2006 at 18:24 (6,615 days old) by the7 ()        
Huebsch LTZ85

Tumble speed: 50 rpm (reversible)
Tumble Low speed: 41 rpm (reversible)
Distribution speed: 80 rpm (clockwise only)
Pulse Spin : accelerate from distribution speed (80) to a high speed (sound like 500 - 650 rpm), slow down back to 80 rpm; repeat.
Low speed:500 rpm
Medium speed:650 rpm
Fast speed: 1000 rpm.

For Regular Cycle
At the end of the last Rinse:
Distribution speed for 1 min (Pump On to start drain)
Pulse spin for 1 min (Pump On)
Medium spin for 5 min (Pump On)
Fast spin for 1 min (Pump On)
Fluff at low tumble speed for 1 min.

So far, for few testing (no laundry) final spins and several normal loads, LTZ85 is found to be working satisfactory.
LTZ85 has 4 shocks (damper with internal spring).


Post# 110007 , Reply# 21   2/15/2006 at 20:48 (6,615 days old) by bingwsguy (Binghamton NY)        
the7

You are right about both. The ASKO has absolutely the most vibration free spin of anything I have seen even with jeans and sweatshitrs at 1600 rpm thanks to it's 4 shock suspension. The ASKO machines did have a ton of motor problems in the mid 90's as mine, my Mom's and friends of ours all had that problem. Me being the only laundry "nut" of the bunch hung in there through 3 motor replacements and finally a replacement machine from ASKO. I will say that ASKO USA was really great to deal with...I never had to demand anything, they just kept fixing and finally offered the replacement to me. That washer, when it worked, was the best machine I have ever used...my white laundry was the whitest ever! But when the replacement machine burned it's motor out on the 3 year mark (which was the warranty period for parts and labor), I had it fixed and gave up the fight finally, selling the pair for a ridiculous low price. I went looking and really thought the Miele was a nice machine, but for the price of the washer alone, I was able to get a Bosch Axxis pair. The Bosch is a nice machine, but the ASKO was a much better performer over all. On the other hand, my Bosch dishwasher is a better performer than the ASKO dishwasher....go figure :)

Post# 110046 , Reply# 22   2/16/2006 at 01:54 (6,615 days old) by norgeman ()        
What FL to buy?

Well if it was up to me I would not hesitate one minute to buy Frigidaire the 3.1 or the 3.5, either one of these models. Why? You ask well that is easy because of Firgidaires assosiation with White-Westinghouse which made front loaders from as far back as I can remember. Which was in 1938 when they came out with the first washer that did not have to be bolted to the floor. Westinghouse was never really famous for their top loaders but always made a good front loader. Chestermikeuk love the Maytags front loaders. My question is why can't we get these same models over here in the U.S.?

CLICK HERE TO GO TO norgeman's LINK


Post# 110057 , Reply# 23   2/16/2006 at 05:51 (6,615 days old) by vivalalavatrice ()        
Time...

I wonder...
If you had to hand-wash your laundry, you would be right to complain to the "time" taken to do washing...
BUT IT IS THE WAHSHING MACHINE THAT DOES IT ALL FOR YOU!!!
I wonder why American dislike so much long cycle in their wahsers...

In our European washer in the past, 2 hours was a "normal" time for a whitest whites cycle... reasonable for a cycle with pre wash (45°C), main wash (90°C) of 1h 30 min, 5 rinses with a inter spin and the final 10 min spin... (my grandma's washer worked like that, she took all the morning!!!)

Now they have shorted the cycle, this thanks to the tecnology that has allowed to heat water (always with built-in heater), to wash with lowest temp(60°/70°C, some has heavy-duty at 40°C!with A class energy), thanks to the more efficiency of the tumble-action, in less time, because in older washer the heating time was with the drum stopped, while now this time is used to tumble-soaking

Now some washers producers have heavy-cycle in 1h! While those who haven't heavy short cycle, add "Rapido" cycle in the list of the possible cycle you can select on your washer, which can last from 30 min to 60 min,

I honestly think that it's not a "tragedy" if you have to put your clothes in the washer and come back to her after 1h or 1h 30 min with more probability to find them cleaner than in a shorter cycle...

SURELY IN THE MEAN TIME YOUR WAHSERS DON'T EAT LADUNRY!!! LOL :-)))

Good Bye!
Diomede

PS: I happy American are "converting" to FL... how awful amount fo water use yor agi-TL!!!!!


Post# 110076 , Reply# 24   2/16/2006 at 07:49 (6,614 days old) by kenmorepeter5a ()        
New FL Maytag Washer in UK

Hello Mike, how are you doing? I'm deaf...my name is Peter. I'm best friend!

Is that newest Maytag FL washer....is that same as ASKO? right?

Have the Maytag's business address or website??

-- Peter (kenmorepeter5a)


Post# 110090 , Reply# 25   2/16/2006 at 09:39 (6,614 days old) by chestermikeuk (Rainhill *Home of the RailwayTrials* Merseyside,UK)        
MaytAsko

chestermikeuk's profile picture
Hello Peter

The Maytags are made by Asko and I have had them nearly 4 yrs now, how time flys.

I love them and wouldnt be without them, I have always admired the ASko (ASEA) machines having sold them over 20 yrs ago, along with Miele, AEG, Kuppersbuch and De Detrich, names that where relatively unknown in UK and very expensive then.

The Maytag UK Website is very sparse but does have a pdf at the bottom of the page giving all the specifications etc.

I mainly use the 4 memory buttons which I have programmed to do:

1 = 95d Whites Extra Long wash
2 = 60d Towel medium wash
3 = 40d Short Wash
4 = Rinse & Spin

I mostly use the Memory 3 programme, which gives me a 40d short wash, 4 rinses, high water level and a 9min spin at 1600rpm all in 48 mins. I use this wash with higher temps as well 60/70d.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO chestermikeuk's LINK


Post# 110380 , Reply# 26   2/18/2006 at 03:41 (6,613 days old) by sudsmaster (SF Bay Area, California)        
If you had to hand-wash your laundry, you would be right to

sudsmaster's profile picture
Very good point, Diomede!

I guess some Americans can't "multi-task". Of course, many here have stuck their washer/dryers in the basement or in the garage, so they may object to spending any more time in those places than absolutely necessary. Unlike many Euro washer installations which are under counter in the kitchen or bath, easier to access when one is tending to other chores. And we may have gotten into the habit of expecting the wash to be done in 30 minutes or less, and even though a longer wash is really not an issue, a schedule may have been devised, for example, "do all the week's wash on Saturday morning, then go shopping" or some such thing.

I understand Europeans tend to run their washers every day, instead of once a week, so this makes the longer cycles less of an issue.

My Neptune pair is centrally located in my home, in an open area of kitchen/family room, so it's really no problem (other than noise) to run washes while working on the computer or cooking. The only hitch for me is that I like to line dry whenever it's not raining, so I tend to time the washing for early mornings so that there is time to dry the clothes outdoors. If I use the dryer then I can wash/dry pretty much any time of day (although with the old plumbing here, I prefer not to have the washer running when I'm taking a shower).



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy