|
Thread Number: 64146
/ Tag: Classified Ad Finds
Vintage antique washer/dryer combo mini - $450 (Warren) |
[Down to Last] |  |
Post# 867424 2/16/2016 at 10:13 (2,990 days old) by ovrphil  (N.Atlanta / Georgia ) |
||
a bit reaching on price, wouldn't you agree? I turned the far right photo on side to get a closer view.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO ovrphil's LINK on Detroit Craigslist
View Full Size
| ||
|
|
Post# 867448 , Reply# 1 2/16/2016 at 11:49 (2,990 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD) |
||
|
Tim is having a cow right now. | ||
|
Post# 867468 , Reply# 2 2/16/2016 at 13:16 (2,989 days old) by RevvinKevin (Tinseltown - Shakey Town - La-La Land) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 868087 , Reply# 3 2/20/2016 at 22:17 (2,985 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage) |
||
Often think 
Providing one has the room a Maytag or other conventional washer and separate spin dryer would be a better option. Speaking from a point of capacity, finding spares, and so forth. However in terms of portability and or space savings the Super-Twin would win I suppose.
These sellers asking $$$ for twin tub or conventional washers must assume there is some sort of strong local market. You'd think such sellers would at least put the things on fleaPay and or state they are open to working with out of area buyers in hopes of remotely getting their price. I don't think members here paid nearly $500 for their SQ ST washer/spinner units even when NIB. Am I right? | ||
|
Post# 868096 , Reply# 4 2/20/2016 at 23:01 (2,985 days old) by wayupnorth (On a lake between Bangor and Bar Harbor, Maine) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 868150 , Reply# 5 2/21/2016 at 08:24 (2,985 days old) by gansky1 (Omaha, The Home of the TV Dinner!) |
||
 | ||
|
Post# 868403 , Reply# 7 2/22/2016 at 16:36 (2,983 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage) |
||
|
Think the problem with SQ "Super-Twin" | ||
|
Post# 868568 , Reply# 8 2/23/2016 at 12:02 (2,983 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield, East Midlands, UK) |
||
Whirlpool
Laundress
Gotta say I have to agree with you about a fully automatic portable. But were they as easily moved as the ad makes out? I think you used to have one didn't you? The ironic thing is that, at least in the UK Supertwin version, its by far the easiest and smoothest twin tub to move although bigger and heavier than both the Hoovermatic and HP Supermatic. | ||
|
Post# 868643 , Reply# 9 2/23/2016 at 17:28 (2,982 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage) |
||
|
Cannot speak for all
But yes, my older WP portable/convertible was very easy to shift about. More so than my Hoover TT. Then again the latter needed new casters (the originals were not only worn but marking up my floors), and the replacements are not Hoover.
With all portable laundry appliances must say in terms of shifting it really does come down to the casters, IMHO. If they are worn or dodgy then moving things about probably won't be easy. | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
