Thread Number: 65668  /  Tag: Vintage Automatic Washers
WP Wash Timers With Fill Period
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 882475   5/28/2016 at 09:34 (2,882 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

In the POD for 5-27-16, even though the washer has three water level selections, the wash portion of the timer has a "FILL" period marked. I can understand that with the basic machine from 1960 that was the POD earlier this week as that was the only way to have a partial wash fill. Were all of the timers made like this so that it was possible to achieve a lower water level for the wash, even on machines with no water level setting? I remember my mom's waterfall front KM from ca. 52 with "FILL" marked from about 15 minutes to about 8 or 10 minutes on the timer dial. I think newer WP machines would agitate dry in the last two minutes of the wash portion of the timer, at least on the Normal Cycle. If you primed the drain hose and added some length to it, it was possible to suck suds back into the tub by setting the timer at that point.




Post# 882480 , Reply# 1   5/28/2016 at 10:44 (2,882 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
FILL marking on early WP!

peteski50's profile picture
Being I had a time fill hotpoint when I was a tot - it confused me to see a washer with a fill marking that didnt move when filling! I have friends that had a time line whirlpool from 58 and it had the fill marking down to about 5 minutes. I remembered the timer had markings for 12 8 4 and they explained the fill marking was only a starting range. And they also said you can do a 14 minute wash if you started it at the beginning line before the 12 marking. As I remember all whirlpools had the fill markings on the dial plus some had the word Rinse Fill for rinse. I think it would have been better to label the word Start and Deep Rinse that might have made more sense! Regardless I loved the Imperal Timeline and all whirlpools from that era. I remember they used the Fill marking on all timers as I remember until about 63! I dont recall the kenmores having the fill markings!
Peter



Post# 882507 , Reply# 2   5/28/2016 at 14:49 (2,882 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
Tom, our 1962 LJA320 with 3 water levels had a designated "Fill" range on the timer (both on the Normal and Gentle cycles, IIRC) but it didn't function as such, the machine would fill at any wash time position.  Remains a mystery why the cycle legends had the marking.  The unmarked Suds period leading in to Normal would function as a dry-agitate.


Post# 882520 , Reply# 3   5/28/2016 at 15:56 (2,881 days old) by akronman (Akron/Cleveland Ohio)        
just a guess

akronman's profile picture
I bet that anywhere beyond "FILL" was where the timer no longer allowed filling, you'd accidentally get a dry agitation or no action at all. It was likley a simple designation that you could start a cycle anywhere from the beginning to the end of FILL depending upon how much wash time you wanted.

Post# 882531 , Reply# 4   5/28/2016 at 18:19 (2,881 days old) by luxflairguy (Wilmington NC)        
May I point out...

That today's POD (5-28) also has a fill period as well as 3 water levels. Perhaps an older way of saying "start." Just saying.

Post# 882533 , Reply# 5   5/28/2016 at 18:46 (2,881 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
Mayhaps

launderess's profile picture
Has something to do with accommodating households with low water pressure. That is the "Fill" portion of timer would allow for intake of water without restrictions upon timer, and or more generous allowance.

Seem to recall when reading CR reviews of "automatic" washing machines from the 1950's they made mention if a washer had a timed fill or whatever. Timed filling to certain water levels is only good if the pressure switch can be satisfied within the given period allotted on timer. Otherwise machine will start agitating once it times out regardless, am I wrong?



Post# 882545 , Reply# 6   5/28/2016 at 19:40 (2,881 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
The timer has no relevance in Whirlpool machines with fill level controlled by a pressure switch (unless there's something about older machines of which I'm unaware, which certainly is possible).  The pressure switch is in control, and the timer remains off until the pressure switch is satisfied.

The only exception of which I'm aware is that some older timers had the timer motor run for ONE increment of the rinse fill.  If water mains flow rate is high enough that (typically on the lowest fill level) the pressure switch is satisfied before the increment runs out, then there's a brief pause until the timer advances and agitation begins.  Otherwise, the timer advances to the next increment and stops while fill continues until the pressure switch is satisfied, at which moment rinse agitation begins immediately.


Post# 882616 , Reply# 7   5/29/2016 at 07:50 (2,881 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)        

You definitely could get a partial fill by setting the timer in the "FILL" zone until the desired water level was reached then pulling the timer dial out and advancing it out of the "FILL" zone and restarting it so that it would start agitating. Our 52 Kenmore had a float in a chamber near the top of the outer tub so there was no possibility of a pressure switch allowing for partial fills. Mom would start her machine filling at the 15 minute mark then, when agitation started, would stop it and advance it to 10 minutes. I asked her why she did that, but it was obvious that the concept of just starting it at 10 minutes was way over her head. She saw "FILL" in big letters at the start and probably did not notice the line that arced across the numbers to 10.

Post# 882624 , Reply# 8   5/29/2016 at 08:45 (2,881 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
Right ... float-fill is, of course, a different animal than pressure-fill.


Post# 882627 , Reply# 9   5/29/2016 at 08:55 (2,881 days old) by DaveAMKrayoGuy (Oak Park, MI)        
It's a case of Meter-Fill vs. Time-Fill:

daveamkrayoguy's profile picture

I really like that washer & to think back then out could automatically sense how high to fill its water--to the point where I would gladly would have bought a machine with only a timer & temperature (that Sears was pushing in its Kenmore line) according to the weight of how much had been put in it...

 

Usually in that case, where the timer was set, would determine how much water would go into the tub, causing the knob to be reset accordingly, depending on how much water was actually required & the time needed to do the wash-load...  --So, I would rather have the extra knob for the Water Level, really or get the rare Timer & One Knob Combo, where the Timer could determine temperature & the outside knob will do the "Low" to "High" for water usage...

 

 

-- Dave


Post# 882632 , Reply# 10   5/29/2016 at 09:30 (2,881 days old) by RE563 (Fort Worth, Texas)        

re563's profile picture
My Mom had the model above the one that was featured. It had two cycles, Normal and gentle, (single speed). And yes, as someone already pointed out, it was so that you could start it anywhere in the arch of "Fill" for shorter washes and/or for partial fills. If doing a partial fill you would pull the timer out at the desired water level and advance the timer outside of the arch to start agitation. The only draw back with this was when it got to deep rinse, the washer would fill full unless you were right there and when it got to the water level you wanted, you would turn it back to the wash cycle to agitate the clothes.

Post# 882663 , Reply# 11   5/29/2016 at 11:58 (2,881 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label!

peteski50's profile picture
I have a few photos 1st a 55 supreme and imperial

  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 882667 , Reply# 12   5/29/2016 at 12:17 (2,881 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label

peteski50's profile picture
1956 model

  View Full Size
Post# 882668 , Reply# 13   5/29/2016 at 12:21 (2,881 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label!

peteski50's profile picture
1958 Timeline Imperial - this one was almost like the one these old friends had as I described earlier but that one only had the numbers 12 8 4 and did not have the word Fill in the Rinse portion - I think this was a later version?


  View Full Size
Post# 882670 , Reply# 14   5/29/2016 at 12:23 (2,881 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label

peteski50's profile picture
1959 - I picked up from here and I wish I could have gotten a better closeup of the timer!



  View Full Size
Post# 882671 , Reply# 15   5/29/2016 at 12:24 (2,881 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label

peteski50's profile picture
1959 TOL model

  View Full Size
Post# 882672 , Reply# 16   5/29/2016 at 12:25 (2,881 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label!

peteski50's profile picture
I think 1961 with a shorter wash time


  View Full Size
Post# 882673 , Reply# 17   5/29/2016 at 12:27 (2,881 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label

peteski50's profile picture
from a 1961 instruction booklet



  View Full Size
Post# 882674 , Reply# 18   5/29/2016 at 12:28 (2,881 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label

peteski50's profile picture
And finally I think 1962 - if anyone has more please post!
Thanks
Peter



  View Full Size
Post# 882733 , Reply# 19   5/29/2016 at 21:35 (2,880 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
Referencing the instruction card of Reply 17 ... our 1962 had a timer like the 2nd example.

The fill designation may have been used on machines with one water level (full), even if a pressure switch was involved?  Advancing the timer outside the range would override the pressure switch and start agitation immediately, providing a way to run a lower fill.


Post# 882834 , Reply# 20   5/30/2016 at 12:52 (2,880 days old) by PhilR (Quebec Canada)        

philr's profile picture

On Whirlpool washers, the "Fill" section of the wash period is where the timer can be set so the washer fills. On my 1964 it fills on the complete wash portion of the wash cycles except for the last two minutes of the "Normal" wash. 

 

Unlike some time-filled machines that have a preset fill time that could be shortened to get a lower water level.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 3         View Full Size
Post# 882916 , Reply# 21   5/30/2016 at 22:47 (2,879 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label

peteski50's profile picture
Phil - Thank you for posting this is a really great closeup! I hope more people will post more timers! I had thought by 64 they stopped using the Fill label!!


Post# 882936 , Reply# 22   5/31/2016 at 02:03 (2,879 days old) by PhilR (Quebec Canada)        

philr's profile picture

My 1965 Inglis still has that Fill label  (so I assume Whitlpool also had them). On this one, the "Fill" stops at 6 minutes of the normal wash.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 3         View Full Size
Post# 882994 , Reply# 23   5/31/2016 at 10:29 (2,879 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
WP Wash Timers With Fill Label

peteski50's profile picture
Thanks for posting that is just like the WP model except by 1965 they had already stopped the Fill label at least on WP - that is a real nice machine what does the inside look like!
Peter



Post# 883016 , Reply# 24   5/31/2016 at 13:04 (2,879 days old) by Yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
that's a dream machine for me Phil, it was the first Whirlpool I ever got to use.....it also had the magic mix dispenser filter.....what a fun machine to operate.....

was thinking it had just Normal, Gentle and PermPress cycles.....


Post# 883031 , Reply# 25   5/31/2016 at 15:13 (2,879 days old) by PhilR (Quebec Canada)        

philr's profile picture

This Inglis is a single speed machine, and even the 1964 RCA Whirlpool 5 cycle was a single speed (I converted it to two speeds as the single speed motor was very noisy!).

 

I thought having 5 cycles and a single speed didn't make much sense! The timer was really meant to operate a two-speed machine and it was very easy to rewire. I kept all the original terminals so if I ever want to make it a single speed again, it could be done in a few minutes!


Post# 883535 , Reply# 26   6/4/2016 at 22:49 (2,874 days old) by cornutt (Huntsville, AL USA)        

DADoES, my step-mom had an early '70s Kenmore and it behaved the way you described. When we moved to a neighborhood where the water pressure was high, on the rinse fill, after the water shut off it sat for about 20 seconds until the timer advanced and the rinse agitation started. It was kind of a weird thing to see since all the Kenmores I had ever seen had no pauses anywhere in the cycle.

Post# 885945 , Reply# 27   6/18/2016 at 22:41 (2,860 days old) by peteski50 (New York)        
1955 Whirlpool!

peteski50's profile picture
another just put on ebay with such a beautiful console and a 20 minute wash and the FILL embedded in the timer!


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 3         View Full Size

Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy