Thread Number: 85592
/ Tag: Classified Ad Finds
Older WP Dryer |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 1101392   12/20/2020 at 17:22 (1,220 days old) by goatfarmer (South Bend, home of Champions)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
|
Post# 1101398 , Reply# 1   12/20/2020 at 17:30 (1,220 days old) by akronman (Akron/Cleveland Ohio)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
|
Post# 1101407 , Reply# 2   12/20/2020 at 18:17 (1,220 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 1101420 , Reply# 3   12/20/2020 at 19:21 (1,220 days old) by Tomturbomatic (Beltsville, MD)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Inefficient perforated drum back so good to use on cheaper Pacific Northwest Power. It would be fun to use that control panel on a modern 29 inch machine. |
Post# 1101434 , Reply# 4   12/20/2020 at 21:10 (1,220 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Inefficient perforated drum back?!?! Since I have a 1963 RCA Whirlpool Imperial dryer with the perforated drum back, never had issues with slow drying times plus the glass window on the door gets HOT to the touch when on high heat setting. I can see them being slower if it were to be heavily loaded but those dryers were only meant to be paired up with the smaller capacity belt drive washers.
|
Post# 1101450 , Reply# 5   12/20/2020 at 23:00 (1,220 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Hi Sean, Yes I have to tell that these WP 29" dryers were not great performers in terms of speed or energy efficiency. { and most of you know I love older Whirlpool Appliances ]
They were never rated highly for performance by groups like CRs, the only ones that were rated well for performance were the 9000 watt 50 amp models and the gas 37,000 BTU machines.
WP 29" dryers before 1966 wasted about 25% of the heat whether you are drying a big load or small, probably the reason you are so impressed with your WP Imperials performance is you are comparing it to normally slow MT HOH dryers. Your WP has a 5600 watt element compared to MTs 4800 watt element.
These early WP dryers were sturdy machines that could last a long time and were easy to repair, they were not as quiet as reliable as the 1966 and on dryers however.
About the only better about these early WP dryers was because they wasted so much heat the exhaust temperature was hotter from the beginning of drying cycles so you did not get the condensation and lint build-up in the exhaust duct-work.
John L. |
Post# 1101464 , Reply# 6   12/21/2020 at 00:17 (1,220 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
One thing I will say about my 1963 RCA Whirlpool Imperial dryer is there’s hardly any lint on the lint screen when it’s done drying and that could be because it has the speed bump style of baffles instead like the ones that screw onto the drum like most dryers these days.
I can see some of the incoming air bypassing the drum but the glass window on my 1963 Whirlpool Imperial dryer gets quite hot to the touch, and when I tried it out for the first time back in August the surface of the drum was quite hot and yes the lint screen was clean and wasn’t hooked up to a vent at all when I was testing it out for the first time. I suspect mine performs better since it has the older style of heating element plenum since the ones in 1964 and 1965 have the circular heating element plenum like the one on my friend Richard’s dryer from 1964 compared to my ‘63 Whirlpool, and the air flow is probably different with the older style of heating element plenum. |
Post# 1101479 , Reply# 7   12/21/2020 at 07:26 (1,220 days old) by combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 1101531 , Reply# 9   12/21/2020 at 17:00 (1,219 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|