Thread Number: 85683  /  Tag: Modern Dishwashers
Trump administration sued over dishwasher efficiency
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 1102459   12/29/2020 at 21:32 (1,207 days old) by Joe_in_philly (Philadelphia, PA, USA)        

joe_in_philly's profile picture
Trump administration sued over plans to make dishwashers less efficient

I will be surprised if dishwashers are allowed to become less efficient.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO Joe_in_philly's LINK




This post was last edited 12/29/2020 at 21:56



Post# 1102472 , Reply# 1   12/29/2020 at 23:54 (1,207 days old) by thomasortega (El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora de Los Angeles de Porciúncula)        

This post has been removed by the member who posted it.



Post# 1102473 , Reply# 2   12/29/2020 at 23:57 (1,207 days old) by thomasortega (El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora de Los Angeles de Porciúncula)        

I posted something but better remain silent, I forgot this is AWO and not all opinions are welcome.

By the way, as it's political, shouldn't this thread be in a different category?


Post# 1102478 , Reply# 3   12/30/2020 at 00:25 (1,207 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
"I will be surprised if dishwashers are allowed to become less efficient."

Agreed, I don't see it happening. Even if it passed, all efficient dishwashers wouldn't magically disappear and become unavailable for purchase. There will always be a market for them.


Post# 1102483 , Reply# 4   12/30/2020 at 06:29 (1,207 days old) by foraloysius (Leeuwarden, Friesland, the Netherlands)        
Reply# 2

foraloysius's profile picture
Yes, political threads don't belong in this forum. You can ask Robert to move the thread to the right forum.

Post# 1102492 , Reply# 5   12/30/2020 at 10:36 (1,206 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
It’s a real grey area posting political things in the Imperial, Deluxe, Super, and Shoppers Square forum indexes..

Post# 1102505 , Reply# 6   12/30/2020 at 12:04 (1,206 days old) by vacerator (Macomb, Michigan)        
Well, it's appliance

crucial though! Maybe the efficiency experts will be pardoned before Jan. 20! Haha!
Joke, because we need to, not that we havn't witnessed one forst hand since 2017.
All the hype over bringing manufacturing back to the USA, etc. and America first is B.S. It's too late. Nixon opened China to diplomacy after they got nukes. Their program began in 1964, and the first bomb test was in the 70's.
Further more, our corporations no longer wanted to pay high wages and benefits in manufacturing. They used our congress, and China, Mexico, etc. to break unions. The labor force union membership is less than half as in 1977.
Karma is a bitch aint it?


Post# 1102510 , Reply# 7   12/30/2020 at 12:46 (1,206 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
If I EVER were to post anything political in the Imperial, Deluxe, Super, and Shoppers Square forum indexes I would be in hot water.

Post# 1102521 , Reply# 8   12/30/2020 at 13:51 (1,206 days old) by lakewebsterkid (Dayton, Ohio)        
10%

Just allowing for 10% more energy consumption will allow for slightly higher wash temperatures again, and will make a big difference. There are far more worse concerns that we should have at this point than allowing 10% more energy consumption.

Post# 1102522 , Reply# 9   12/30/2020 at 14:03 (1,206 days old) by vacerator (Macomb, Michigan)        
"A big difference"?

we do have more important things to be concerned with, and 10% hotter water won't kill one of them. Utility providers are hiking rates too, unless the ecomomy resets
to lower prices because of the pandemic. We'll have to see how actuaries come up with the numbers. I wouldn't hold my breath, but you can't collect blood from stones. I guess homeless people don't need utilities.


Post# 1102536 , Reply# 10   12/30/2020 at 15:50 (1,206 days old) by Dustin92 (Jackson, MI)        

I don't consider this full blown politics, appliances are involved! Not interested in sharing my political views here, but if machines could use 25% more energy/water on a designated cycle, we would have some awesome cleaning machines- keep the energy efficient "normal" cycle for the people that just jam the normal button and walk away, but add a designated "Power clean" cycle that would do an admirable job in an hour or so..

Post# 1102585 , Reply# 11   12/30/2020 at 20:39 (1,206 days old) by sfh074 ( )        
Isn't this why .....

we love and gravitate towards older DW's .... say for instance the KA-18 thru 20 something that people here are always talking about?

More water, more power??

Cleaner dishes in way less time???

A huge bob load and still does a great job????

Just sayin ...


Post# 1102626 , Reply# 12   12/31/2020 at 07:34 (1,206 days old) by Pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)        
just my 2 cents here

pierreandreply4's profile picture
just adding my 2 cents here most newer dishwasher today requires running hot water from the tap first before running the dishwasher but with the kitchenaid kdefe204kps because of the high temp wash option or sensor wash(prowash) i do not have to do that since i also use sani rinse but what would you do if during 2021 you find in mint condition vintage dishwashers like these? credit to members whopic i saved and using

  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 5         View Full Size
Post# 1102632 , Reply# 13   12/31/2020 at 10:28 (1,205 days old) by Jerrod_Six (Eastern Pennsylvania, USA)        

I don't mind the efficiency of mine as it is 2.7 gallons for the normal cycle, 3.6 gallons for pots and pans and everything gets clean in 2 to 2 1/2 hours. I don't need to run the faucet first either; so I don't see anything wrong with the regulations. I wouldn't want them any tighter though.

Post# 1102634 , Reply# 14   12/31/2020 at 10:33 (1,205 days old) by vacerator (Macomb, Michigan)        
Every dishwasher user guide since

I can recall, like in 1975 said to run hot water at the tap before starting the cycle.

Post# 1102650 , Reply# 15   12/31/2020 at 11:56 (1,205 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        
Tap purge

dadoes's profile picture
 
Mine circa 2003 doesn't say that.


Post# 1102664 , Reply# 16   12/31/2020 at 14:20 (1,205 days old) by Jerrod_Six (Eastern Pennsylvania, USA)        

My manual gives time estimates for 120F and 50F so I don't bother running the hot before I start it. If it's already hot that's good, if it is cold it doesn't seem to bother it.

Post# 1102689 , Reply# 17   12/31/2020 at 18:16 (1,205 days old) by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
The only reference my user manual has to water supply temperature is on the cycle description page with an advisory that cycle time can vary per various factors such as incoming water temperature, ambient conditions, type of load, and whether the machine is opened during the cycle.  Wash times are only APPROXIMATE on the Electronic Display and based on 120°F incoming water.

The installation instructions say that maximum supply temperature is (should not exceed) 140°F.


Post# 1102727 , Reply# 18   1/1/2021 at 09:15 (1,204 days old) by PinkPower4 (USA)        
Hmmm.

I have a Frigidaire model that is between 5 and 10 years old that replaced an old Maytag from the 90s with the mechanical dial—I wished I know then what I know now.

For the longest time, I couldn’t figure out why this appliance was not working well. My mother has an older Frigidaire that works well, and she never “washed” the dishes before they went in. Something called energy guidelines happened in that span of years.

Part of the reason seems to be that phosphates were removed from dishwashing detergent as Cascade Boil Out definitely has made a difference! I still use a lot of water rinsing the dishes to get all the residue off before putting in the machine. I then choose the hottest water temp and drying cycles available. It does a respectable job now with this method.

These energy regulations have caused many of us to use more chemicals, more loads, more time, and more energy to do the same thing in less time with less resources. The landfills are filling up at alarming rates when you consider this new thinking that also involves a less expensive up front and buy more often affects printers, tires, car batteries, sealed electronics, appliances, and lots more.


Post# 1102775 , Reply# 19   1/1/2021 at 15:24 (1,204 days old) by perc-o-prince (Southboro, Mass)        
It's all a joke.

IIRC government efficiency ratings are done on certain cycles whether it be washing machines, dishwashers, etc. The manufacturers tailor those cycles to the regulations so they can claim the efficiency rating, and the other cycles aren't bothered by it by and large from what I remember. 

 

Interesting that Miele d/ws are recommended to be connected to the cold water tap, not that I would ever do that! We have a TOL G6987 that was used in the live kitchen in the now-defunct Miele showroom in the downstairs (daily driver) kitchen. I use the Quick Intensive program with the option of extra dry almost exclusively. It's maybe an hour-and-a-quarter instead of almost 2-and-a-half for the normal cycle. 

 

Games.

 

Chuck


Post# 1102779 , Reply# 20   1/1/2021 at 15:47 (1,204 days old) by Jerrod_Six (Eastern Pennsylvania, USA)        
Perc-o-prince

This is the DW I have. What do you think of the Sensor Wash vs Normal or Pots and Pans?

Post# 1102799 , Reply# 21   1/1/2021 at 18:19 (1,204 days old) by Good-Shepherd (New Jersey)        

Here is a radical idea.

Manufacturers sell both types of DW's and let the market decide.



Post# 1102811 , Reply# 22   1/1/2021 at 19:47 (1,204 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
Amount of money saved by average household over lifespan of newest and most energy efficient dishwashers isn't great. Much will depend upon local utility and water rates average consumer pays, but still it isn't as if machines come anywhere near repaying even 1/3 of cost.

Larger issue isn't consumers but society. Dishwashers like washing machines have gone from a luxury to pretty much standard mod con in most households. Thus energy used effects not just individual households, but governments overall as new power plants or other sources of energy must be created to run these appliances and of course heat water used. Factor into this the push to reduce carbon emissions and you can see where things are going.

appliance-standards.org/product/...


CLICK HERE TO GO TO Launderess's LINK


Post# 1102812 , Reply# 23   1/1/2021 at 19:50 (1,204 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
For those that like a good read....

www.fsec.ucf.edu/en/publi...


Post# 1102876 , Reply# 24   1/2/2021 at 09:33 (1,203 days old) by perc-o-prince (Southboro, Mass)        
What do you think

Hi Jerrod,

 

There are a LOT of bells and whistles on that machine that most people, myself included, would never use. Had it not been for getting it for $300 because it was "used," I wouldn't own it. It's not worth +/- $2600 to me. It killed me to get rid of the Miele G863 that I had fixed (a customer bought a new one so I hauled that one away- to our house instead of the scrapper) but the racks were showing too much wear and I didn't feel like shelling out the big $$ for new ones. I do like the flexibility of the racking system, but most Miele d/ws have some amount of that.

 

Pots and pans should be used only for pots and pans, or heavily soiled bakeware, etc. It adds a bit more force to the lower spray arm to help blast bits away. I've never needed to use it. Inversely, china and crystal should only be used with china and crystal as it dials the force down a bit as well as the temperature of the water.

 

Sensor vs. normal- in sensor, a turbidity sensor is used to determine if another wash or rinse is needed. However, normal also uses this so...

 

As I said before, I use the quick intense with 95% of our loads, though I found it didn't dry as well, hence adding the more dry option. In fact, I made a standing rib roast last night and the roasting/broiling pans are in there on that cycle as we speak. Of course I usually let things like that soak overnight, or at least for an hour or so with a dab of dishwasher powder and hot water, but... 

 

Feel free to contact me if you have other questions! Overall it's a great machine, even if it IS a bit full of itself! LOL!

 

Chuck


Post# 1102878 , Reply# 25   1/2/2021 at 10:03 (1,203 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        
Efficent appliances

Buying new machines for efficency and saving money if the old one runs isn't really a thing unless the old one is 30+ years old.



Biggest differences are for refrigaration (a 30 year old can cut usage in half) or for switches from TL to FL.

Over here a heatpumpe dryer makes sense a good 75% of time by now.




But dishwashers really don't make sense to replace for efficency.





Now, though, I think makeing new machines as efficent as possible should just be a smart and logical thing to understand.

If I have to replace anyway, make it efficent.


As long as it works.



I have one of the most efficent DW in my kitchen, a Miele G7000 series model.

They have a model upper in that series that saves another couple of watts.

But I can run a weeks worth of dishes for 1 person in 1 load with 12l and 1kwh perfectly clean and dry every time.
On cold water.

"Last gen" that would have been 12-15l and 1.2-1.5kWh.
And last gen is 15y ago.

That is like at most a saving of 0.2€ per load.

Even at 5 loads a week that is 50€ a year. or 20y to recoupe buying a new DW just for efficency sake.



Now, replacing, the difference between a bottom of the line DW and a more efficent DW is an upgrade for same features of like 100-200€.

That recoupes in 2-4 years.
Much more reasonable.





Now if you factor that up to all sold DW in a year.

We sell about 2.2Mio in 2020 in germany as a projection.

Each DW runs lets say 200 cycles a year on average.
And each DW saves about 0.2kWh over the model it replaces per cycle.

That is 88Mio kWh.
Or 35200t of CO2.

Or about 27.5Mio km traveld by car saved.

Or about 14000 times the amount of CO2 I emmit by driving an entire year.




For you, yes, buying new for efficency dosen't make any sense.

Buying efficent when buying new makes sense for you and everybody else.











Now on dryers, well that is more complicated.

I do think for the US buying a gas vented dryer is still more economical for another decade or 2.



Over here we really don't have household gas dryers.


And seeing heatpump is only like 100€ more for HALF the usage, buying new for efficency can make sense quite fast.

The easiest calculation I use for that to explain this to people.

Here are some rough, easy to calculate numbers for a dryer.

According to labels, an 8kg dryer uses about 500kWh.
To make it easier to calculate and allow for some leaway, I assume an A++ heatpump 8kg model is rated at 250kWh (though 220kWh is actually what they use).

That is 250kWh saved a year.
That is 75€ a year.




Or

A HP dryer uses about 750W an hour.
That is 22 cents.

A condenser dryer uses about 1.5-2kWh in a hour.
Or about 44-60 cents.

So it saves 20 cents an hour at worst.
That is about 500h of operation.



Event the cheapest dryers last 2000h per design.








So get back to the headline:

Yes, I would agree to sue them.

Makeing DW use more just makes manufacturers bottom lines betters and yours worse.

They can sell cheaper machines for more money with less reasearch and you pay for it in electricity and water.


Post# 1102879 , Reply# 26   1/2/2021 at 10:54 (1,203 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
“Energy efficient” appliances to me translates to half-way cleaning performance (especially in washers and dishwashers) and customer dissatisfaction. They may save energy, but one thing they don’t save is TIME.

Post# 1102898 , Reply# 27   1/2/2021 at 14:53 (1,203 days old) by perc-o-prince (Southboro, Mass)        
And last gen is 15y ago.

Henrik,

 

The "Gen 6" dishwashers (previous generation to the new G7xxx) came out in about 2013, didn't they? At least over here. Before that, it was the 2000 series. The 4xxx were kind of a cross-over but considered the low-end Gen 6 models.

 

You are spot on with regard to efficiency. If your only goal is to have the most efficient machine today to save a few gallons and kWhs here and there, then by all means have at it. If money/savings is the consideration, don't bother unless your current machine is "that bad." But, with less water and money-saving pumps, you get longer run times as the trade-off.

 

Just like the low consumption toilets... they may use much less water per flush, but how many times do they require a 2nd flush?

 

Chuck


Post# 1102911 , Reply# 28   1/2/2021 at 17:02 (1,203 days old) by Jerrod_Six (Eastern Pennsylvania, USA)        
Questions

Thanks, Chuck. I do have some things I want to compare, so I'll send an E-mail.

Post# 1102956 , Reply# 29   1/2/2021 at 22:20 (1,203 days old) by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA)        
I hope they do the same thing

with washers and dryers.

Post# 1102957 , Reply# 30   1/2/2021 at 22:21 (1,203 days old) by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA)        
It would be cool

if GE brought back the filter-flos.

Post# 1102970 , Reply# 31   1/3/2021 at 01:23 (1,203 days old) by warmsecondrinse (Fort Lee, NJ)        

One thing to remember is that simply being here means we're not the average consumers. When someone talks about "carbon footprint" or "saving energy" we all see things like replacement cost of new unit, disposal of old, resources saved (or not), etc. Most people just see the yellow sticker and catch phrases like "23% more efficient" and think that's the whole story.

Reality is rather more complicated and most people just don't want to hear that. Like if their new dishwasher saves 2 gallons of water but now to get clean dishes they have to purge a gallon of cold water from the hot water line first... Well, good luck getting them to understand they are saving 1 gallon and not 2.


Post# 1102980 , Reply# 32   1/3/2021 at 06:28 (1,203 days old) by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        
@perc-o-prince

While the G7000 is a considerable redesign, it really isn't that much more efficient.
You can get the same efficiency when using the extra economy option on a G6000 basically.


The G4000 wasn't that inefficient either.

The G2000/G1000 series however did use some more, around what I stated.




On the Bosch/BSH Side the "current" wash platform (EcoSilenceDrive, Zeolith) came out in 2007 or so I think.

Has been reworked some since, but efficiency wise not much changed.

Pump, sump, filter and cycles stayed the same pretty much and they were significantly more efficient compared to the previous range, especially in terms of sensor cycles.


Post# 1102981 , Reply# 33   1/3/2021 at 06:58 (1,203 days old) by Pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)        
2021 how would you see a washer dryer like this?

pierreandreply4's profile picture
in 2021 but more modern but with the vintage look and charm and easiness with true wash rinse temp no atc or automatic sensor where you set the wash time mechanical timers manuel water level ect ge filter flo kenmore with all vintage agitator including rotoswirl classic whirlpool inglis with classic surgilator ect pic is a canadien vintage eaton viking but they are made by ge

  View Full Size
Post# 1102991 , Reply# 34   1/3/2021 at 10:18 (1,202 days old) by perc-o-prince (Southboro, Mass)        
@Henrik

Amen! How do you like the G7? I saw a sample of it maybe 1.5 years ago before it was launched in the US. I (and others) thought the plastic racks abominable and a real step down in perceived quality for the brand. I believe the one we were viewing was a production model but can't be sure.

 

Yeah, the 2000s definitely used more water, and the waterproof systems on them seemed to have an issue in that they failed more often than the others. Now take a look at the 800s! Definitely more water use and awesome drying thanks to the glowing element in the bottom of the tub, but cleaning like no other! The one we had here came out of a customer's house because it needed a circ pump repair which would have run the customer >$800 at the time. I got the pump for $125 my cost and installed it. We ran that unit for 4 years without issue and had it not been for the racks giving up, I'd have fought to keep it. The local showroom closed just in time so I was able to get that Diamond cheaply!

 

Chuck


Post# 1103088 , Reply# 35   1/4/2021 at 00:57 (1,202 days old) by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY)        

mark_wpduet's profile picture
I agree. Make them only energy efficient on the "NORMAL" cycles, which most people would use anyway. But people who sometimes need the washers/dishwashers to use lots of water or higher temps, it's there to use if needed. Or, make them less energy efficient, build them to last longer so it will save resources which will cancel out the xtra energy it uses. Probably won't happen. The companies have been cheapening things every year and will probably continue to..Besides, people seem to want to upgrade every few years anyway.

Not me. I used to love the thought of getting a new washer/dryer. Not anymore. I want what I have to last and so far, my Duet will be SIXTEEN years old this April


Post# 1103099 , Reply# 36   1/4/2021 at 06:18 (1,202 days old) by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)        

maytaga806's profile picture
All they need to do is force Whirlpool to go back to the power clean style dishwasher, the most powerful dishwasher that was ever sold on the market and is most importantly RELIABLE. These new dishwashers aren’t very powerful anymore.

Post# 1103100 , Reply# 37   1/4/2021 at 06:20 (1,202 days old) by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)        

maytaga806's profile picture
As much as I stand with him, I think he should be more concerned about HE washers and how much time energy and water they waste. That’s a bigger concern than dishwashers as far as I’m concerned. Dishwashers haven’t been corrupted the same way washers were when the HE came around many many years ago....

Post# 1103107 , Reply# 38   1/4/2021 at 09:42 (1,201 days old) by warmsecondrinse (Fort Lee, NJ)        

#35

"Or, make them less energy efficient, build them to last longer so it will save resources which will cancel out the xtra energy it uses."

Exactly. The sticking point is that while WE understand this concept as will most geeks/enthusiasts of home-related technology, most people do not. They've been led to believe that the carbon footprint/resource equation of an appliance (or whatever) consists only of the item itself, as if it were in a vacuum.

A member brought up a simple example in another thread. His neighbor spent beaucoup $$$ to replace his inefficient windows with super efficient ones. While this undoubtedly did reduce his heating bill, it likely would have been more effective to spend half that amount to insulate the house better.

#37

Good point. In my limited experience the 'corruption' of modern dishwashers can usually be worked around by using longer cycles with water heating turned on. Doing the same in an HE TL (especially the older ones) doesn't yield nearly as much performance improvement.


Post# 1103112 , Reply# 39   1/4/2021 at 10:51 (1,201 days old) by vacerator (Macomb, Michigan)        
Mark, Jim, They " whom ever they are

won't force Whirlpool to do anything. The bean counters don't like "build them to last longer". Whirlpool also buys recycled steel, formerly worn out appliances. No doubt from a relative of an executive. Do the math! Money talks.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy