Thread Number: 90664  /  Tag: Other Home Products or Autos
Number PULEAZE! Part Six:
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 1151745   6/19/2022 at 18:24 (675 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Mfe lily tomlin laugh in GIF - Find on GIFER

 

All about vintage telephones up to 1989. Advertisements, humor, history, collections, equipment, restoration/repair, technical questions, resources or just plain memories, it's all here. While emphasis is placed on American telephones, vintage telephones from around the world are also most welcomed.

 

"Hello central???"

 

Part One:

http://www.automaticwasher.org/c...

 

Part Two:

http://www.automaticwasher.org/c...

 

Part Three:

https://www.automaticwasher.org/cgi-bin/TD/TD-VIEWTHREAD.cgi?79508

 

Part Four:

https://www.automaticwasher.org/cgi-bin/TD/TD-VIEWTHREAD.cgi?81652

 

Part Five:

https://www.automaticwasher.org/cgi-bin/TD/TD-VIEWTHREAD.cgi?86772





Post# 1151747 , Reply# 1   6/19/2022 at 18:25 (675 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1928

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1928

 

 


Post# 1151749 , Reply# 2   6/19/2022 at 18:27 (675 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1956

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1956


Post# 1151750 , Reply# 3   6/19/2022 at 18:28 (675 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1976

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1976


Post# 1151752 , Reply# 4   6/19/2022 at 18:30 (675 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
General Telephone System 1957

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

General Telephone System 1957


Post# 1151753 , Reply# 5   6/19/2022 at 18:30 (675 days old) by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        
Re: Reply #1

ea56's profile picture
Coast to Coast long distance calls for only $9.00! Holy mackerel, in 1927 the average worker probably only made about $35.00 a week, $9.00 was more than a days wages!

My how times have changed when today you can talk on the phone coast to coast for almost free. Back then to make a coast to coast call for $9.00 it would have had be to a life or death emergency or you’d had to have been VERY well off.

Eddie


Post# 1151754 , Reply# 6   6/19/2022 at 18:31 (675 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1961


Post# 1152149 , Reply# 7   6/23/2022 at 11:49 (671 days old) by iej (.... )        

There still are some astronomical charges in the telecommunications industry. When you look at the price of data roaming when you go out side your free-to-roam areas i.e. in the US or in the EU for me, the costs suddenly go from so cheap you don't need to think give it a second thought  to ... "you might need to remortgage the house if you accidentally open Spotify!"

 

It was very new technology back then and capacity on those long routes was extremely limited, and they knew how to charge for them.

 

It's not all that long ago when you'd really think before making international calls, whereas now you wouldn't bat an eyelid in most cases or can just use FaceTime, Skype, WhatsApp, Signal .. and umpteen other over the top free VoIP services that provide way better audio than a phone and video, can send photos, files etc etc.

 

It's amazing though when you look at how fast the technology is moving though. While VoIP may have been around for a long time at this stage, it's come of age and turned telephony into an app on IP networks and nothing more. What were telephone exchanges / central offices are living on as aggregation nodes housing routers and switches for fibre networks carrying internet data.

 

I think though we also sometimes forget just how old switched voice technology is. TDM switches have been with us since the late 1970s and early 80s. Many of them are 40 years old (with upgrades). In some cases probably far older than the crossbars they replaced.

 

I know in the network here in Ireland, a lot of the Ericsson ARF and ITT Pentaconta crossbars dated from the 1960s and 70s and were out of service by the 1990s so maybe 25-30 years old. Some of the digital exchanges that replaced them went into service in 1980/81, at least in their first iteration, so retired having given in some cases more than a decade more service than the old electromechanical technology they replaced! Yet for some reason because they were digital, we seem to not appreciate just how old that TDM technology is. It won't be entirely cleared out of our network until 2023.


Post# 1154459 , Reply# 8   7/16/2022 at 18:32 (648 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
American Telephone and Telegraph 1912

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

American Telephone and Telegraph 1912


Post# 1154460 , Reply# 9   7/16/2022 at 18:33 (648 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1955

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1955


Post# 1154461 , Reply# 10   7/16/2022 at 18:34 (648 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1961


Post# 1154462 , Reply# 11   7/16/2022 at 18:35 (648 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
GTE 1979

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

GTE 1979


Post# 1154463 , Reply# 12   7/16/2022 at 18:36 (648 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1961


Post# 1154913 , Reply# 13   7/21/2022 at 19:51 (643 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Adding a new feature: News

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

The FCC is cracking down on ‘auto warranty’ robocalls

 



CLICK HERE TO GO TO Ultramatic's LINK

Post# 1154916 , Reply# 14   7/21/2022 at 20:28 (643 days old) by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        

ea56's profile picture
Its about time!

Eddie


Post# 1160825 , Reply# 15   10/1/2022 at 17:36 (571 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1965

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1965


Post# 1160826 , Reply# 16   10/1/2022 at 17:37 (571 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1979

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1979


Post# 1160827 , Reply# 17   10/1/2022 at 17:39 (571 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company 1948

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company 1948


Post# 1160828 , Reply# 18   10/1/2022 at 17:40 (571 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1909

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1909


Post# 1160829 , Reply# 19   10/1/2022 at 17:41 (571 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Illinois Bell 1984

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Illinois Bell 1984


Post# 1169628 , Reply# 20   1/15/2023 at 20:43 (465 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
AT&T 1994

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

AT&T 1994


Post# 1169629 , Reply# 21   1/15/2023 at 20:45 (465 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Ericofon 1960

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Ericofon 1960


Post# 1169630 , Reply# 22   1/15/2023 at 20:47 (465 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1955

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1955


Post# 1169631 , Reply# 23   1/15/2023 at 20:49 (465 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Radio Shack 1979

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Radio Shack 1979


Post# 1169711 , Reply# 24   1/16/2023 at 13:23 (464 days old) by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        
Re:#22

ea56's profile picture
I love the wording of this ad! It really hits the nail on the head about how people thought about their telephones then. For many having an extension phone was a luxury! Each extra phone cost extra money every month too. And a color phone cost extra as well, also a coiled handset cord was and additional monthly fee too.

So for the “breadwinner” to approve these extra expenditures was a sign of a well off family. The “little women” didn’t have carte blanc in most homes to just order up an extension phone, she needed to get buy in from hubby. That was life in the 50’s.

The base monthly charge for having a telephone service included ONLY 1 Black desk set with a straight handset cord (which would soon become a tangled mess with regular use). When I got my first telephone in ‘70 the charge was $10 per mo. for a two party line and one black phone.

Eddie


Post# 1169721 , Reply# 25   1/16/2023 at 16:20 (464 days old) by 2packs4sure (houston)        
Radio Shack 1979

I remember staring at my Radio Shack catalog and LUSTING after that damn cordless phone... lol

Post# 1171643 , Reply# 26   2/8/2023 at 18:56 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1964

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1964


Post# 1171644 , Reply# 27   2/8/2023 at 18:57 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
The Bell Phone Center 1982

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

The Bell Phone Center 1982


Post# 1171645 , Reply# 28   2/8/2023 at 18:59 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1961


Post# 1171646 , Reply# 29   2/8/2023 at 19:00 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Panasonic 1984

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Panasonic 1984


Post# 1171647 , Reply# 30   2/8/2023 at 19:01 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1962

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1962


Post# 1171648 , Reply# 31   2/8/2023 at 19:03 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
American Telephone and Telegraph Company 1911

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

American Telephone and Telegraph Company 1911


Post# 1171649 , Reply# 32   2/8/2023 at 19:04 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1965

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1965


Post# 1171650 , Reply# 33   2/8/2023 at 19:06 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
F.W. Dodge Corporation 1951

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

F.W. Dodge Corporation 1951


Post# 1171651 , Reply# 34   2/8/2023 at 19:08 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1951

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1951


Post# 1171652 , Reply# 35   2/8/2023 at 19:09 (441 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1938

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1938


Post# 1171726 , Reply# 36   2/9/2023 at 21:32 (440 days old) by jamiel (Detroit, Michigan and Palm Springs, CA)        

jamiel's profile picture
#35...aah network effects! Working on the standards side of telephony for the last 25 or so years it's interesting to see what hath Alexander Graham Bell wrought. The Bell System driving things was one way to push technology forward (the independent companies weren't laggards, certainly, but were not quite as macro thinking as AT&T).

Post# 1173325 , Reply# 37   2/27/2023 at 20:49 (422 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
American Telephone and Telegraph Company 1910

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

American Telephone and Telegraph Company 1910


Post# 1173326 , Reply# 38   2/27/2023 at 20:51 (422 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell, The Telephone And How We Use It 1951

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell, The Telephone And How We Use It 1951


Post# 1173327 , Reply# 39   2/27/2023 at 20:52 (422 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
General Telephone & Electronics 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

General Telephone & Electronics 1961


Post# 1173328 , Reply# 40   2/27/2023 at 20:54 (422 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1983

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1983


Post# 1174135 , Reply# 41   3/8/2023 at 20:35 (413 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1979

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1979


Post# 1174137 , Reply# 42   3/8/2023 at 20:37 (413 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1961


Post# 1174138 , Reply# 43   3/8/2023 at 20:40 (413 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
AT&T 1968

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

AT&T 1968


Post# 1174139 , Reply# 44   3/8/2023 at 20:44 (413 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Phone Center 1982

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Phone Center 1982


Post# 1174140 , Reply# 45   3/8/2023 at 20:46 (413 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
The Bell System 1960

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

The Bell System 1960


Post# 1174143 , Reply# 46   3/8/2023 at 20:56 (413 days old) by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        
#41 thru 45

ea56's profile picture
My how the telephone has changed thru the past 60 years! I’ve never seen the Phone Thing for calculating LD charges and least expensive times to call. People now can’t conceive of having to think about the best time to call someone at a distance. Long distance calls used to be expensive. I live only 45 miles from my family home, but before VOIP and cell phones I used to pay 45 cents for the first 3 mins to call home and then about 12 cents for each additional min.

And #45’s advertisement for the handiness of an extension phone is something else we now take for granted. That used to cost about $5.00 more per mo. per extension, a luxury when min wage was $1.50 per hr.

Thanks Louis, I always enjoy these threads.

Eddie


Post# 1174165 , Reply# 47   3/9/2023 at 03:44 (413 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Always a pleasure Eddie! Enjoy!


Post# 1174183 , Reply# 48   3/9/2023 at 14:09 (412 days old) by chachp (North Little Rock, AR)        
Sound level...

chachp's profile picture

 

Well she may be able to visit while she is making that cake but I bet she can not while that dishwasher is running!!  HAHA.  Love this ad and I remember the GE mixer too.  Never saw a blue one.


Post# 1174810 , Reply# 49   3/15/2023 at 15:08 (406 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1932

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1932


Post# 1174811 , Reply# 50   3/15/2023 at 15:10 (406 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
AT&T 1988

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

AT&T 1988


Post# 1174813 , Reply# 51   3/15/2023 at 15:12 (406 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1962

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1962


Post# 1174814 , Reply# 52   3/15/2023 at 15:13 (406 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Telco 1969

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Telco 1969


Post# 1174815 , Reply# 53   3/15/2023 at 15:15 (406 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
North Ericofon 1960

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

North Ericofon 1960


Post# 1174928 , Reply# 54   3/16/2023 at 18:18 (405 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Press 1 for more anger: Americans are fed up with customer service

 



CLICK HERE TO GO TO Ultramatic's LINK

Post# 1174936 , Reply# 55   3/16/2023 at 19:00 (405 days old) by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        
Press 1 for Anger!

ea56's profile picture
You said it Louie! I’m so sick and tired for telephone trees, with press this or that and listening to endless crap before you can reach an agent. Then when you finally do get a live human being 9 times out of 10 they are in another country and English is their second language. This is meant as no disrespect for our foreign neighbors, but many times its very difficult to understand them and I really try my best to be patient and polite to them.

I’ve reached the point that many times when I encounter one of these endless telephone tree recordings I just start to press “0” over and over again until I finally get a live wire. It works pretty well most of the time.

But whats worse that the Press 1 for anger lines is that now many companies want you to do an online “Chat” rather than speak with an agent. I say hell to the NO on this! Not once have any of these “chats” brought a resolution to the problem I’m calling about.

Face it, most of corporate America couldn’t care less about customer service anymore. Back in the old days customer service agent jobs were jobs that people with no specialized education could fill and make a living at. Now these jobs have either gone overseas or to automation.

Eddie


Post# 1175445 , Reply# 56   3/21/2023 at 16:07 (400 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1965

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1965


Post# 1175446 , Reply# 57   3/21/2023 at 16:08 (400 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1961


Post# 1175447 , Reply# 58   3/21/2023 at 16:10 (400 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1932

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1932


Post# 1175448 , Reply# 59   3/21/2023 at 16:12 (400 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bates 1958

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bates 1958


Post# 1175449 , Reply# 60   3/21/2023 at 16:13 (400 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Code-A-Phone 1982

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Code-A-Phone 1982


Post# 1175469 , Reply# 61   3/21/2023 at 17:54 (400 days old) by MattL (Flushing, MI)        
#57 Bell Intercom

When our house was built in '65 Bell came out and ran MASSIVE amounts of bundled wire.  12-15 pair and it was a continuous loop throughout the house.  They put a loop adjacent to every power outlet as well as by each exterior door.  I'm sure it was with the intention of setting up an intercom. Great in theory but when they were hooking up the phone outlets they  found that someone someplace nailed through the bundle and many of the pairs were shorted out.  They did find a workable pair and years later found a second pair to light the dials in the trimline phones. We always had a slight hum on the line must have been a ground issue.


Post# 1175493 , Reply# 62   3/21/2023 at 19:46 (400 days old) by CircleW (NE Cincinnati OH area)        
Bell Home Interphone

My Aunt Doris had that in their Long Beach, MS house that they lived in from 1961 through mid 1963. I always thought it was a neat idea. The next house in Jackson they had two outside lines, plus intercom. That required a 1a2 system, like in an office.

Matt, it's too bad they hadn't ran the cabling through conduit to keep nails from being put through it.


Post# 1175527 , Reply# 63   3/21/2023 at 23:45 (400 days old) by hobbyapocalypse (Northeast Pennsylvania)        
The Interphone ad

hobbyapocalypse's profile picture
reminded me of what we used to do back around the 1970's. If we picked up one house phone and dialed a 3 number code (something like 3-1-1 but I forget what it was) and immediately put the receiver back on the hook, all the phones would ring with a different ring than usual. When the ringing stopped you knew someone picked up so you could pick up and talk to that person. It was a convenient way to call between the house and the garage for example.

Post# 1178130 , Reply# 64   4/14/2023 at 16:00 (376 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1965

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1965


Post# 1178131 , Reply# 65   4/14/2023 at 16:02 (376 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
American Telephone and Telegraph Company 1912

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

American Telephone and Telegraph Company 1912


Post# 1178133 , Reply# 66   4/14/2023 at 16:03 (376 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Ericofon 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Ericofon 1961


Post# 1178134 , Reply# 67   4/14/2023 at 16:04 (376 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Grandcom 1973

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Grandcom 1973

 

 


Post# 1178140 , Reply# 68   4/14/2023 at 16:44 (376 days old) by jamiel (Detroit, Michigan and Palm Springs, CA)        

jamiel's profile picture
That Ericofon--about 20 years ago I toured the Telecom museum in Stockholm. Very interesting museum. TBH Ericsson had roughly the same capabilities over the years as AT&T (they just didn't actually operate the networks---in most countries that was nationalized to the Post Office (PTT---Post Telephone Telegraph). US and Canada were similar in that they were privatized (there are a few municipal phone companies; SaskTel is provincially owned) but nowhere else was there the dual (private, either AT&T or independent) system that prevailed in North America.

It's why so many of our systems work here in the US the way they do---that structure caused things to become "fixed" over the years. For a lot of concepts, the rest of the world "way of doing things" is/was perfectly valid within their paradigm, but switching paradigms breaks things!


Post# 1178635 , Reply# 69   4/20/2023 at 18:20 (370 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1957

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1957


Post# 1178636 , Reply# 70   4/20/2023 at 18:21 (370 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
American Telephone and Telegraph Company 1927

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

American Telephone and Telegraph Company 1927


Post# 1178637 , Reply# 71   4/20/2023 at 18:22 (370 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1960

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1960


Post# 1178638 , Reply# 72   4/20/2023 at 18:24 (370 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1964

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1964


Post# 1178640 , Reply# 73   4/20/2023 at 18:27 (370 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
AT&T 1988

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

AT&T 1988


Post# 1179878 , Reply# 74   5/5/2023 at 01:24 (356 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1961


Post# 1179879 , Reply# 75   5/5/2023 at 01:25 (356 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1956

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1956


Post# 1179880 , Reply# 76   5/5/2023 at 01:28 (356 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1952

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1952


Post# 1179881 , Reply# 77   5/5/2023 at 01:29 (356 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1962

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1962


Post# 1179882 , Reply# 78   5/5/2023 at 01:32 (356 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1962

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1962


Post# 1180780 , Reply# 79   5/16/2023 at 20:13 (344 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1957

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1957


Post# 1180781 , Reply# 80   5/16/2023 at 20:15 (344 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1959

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1959


Post# 1180782 , Reply# 81   5/16/2023 at 20:16 (344 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
North Ericofon 1960

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

North Ericofon 1960


Post# 1180783 , Reply# 82   5/16/2023 at 20:17 (344 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1966

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1966


Post# 1180784 , Reply# 83   5/16/2023 at 20:19 (344 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell System 1929

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell System 1929


Post# 1187766 , Reply# 84   8/16/2023 at 17:26 (252 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1957

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1957


Post# 1187767 , Reply# 85   8/16/2023 at 17:29 (252 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1950

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1950


Post# 1187768 , Reply# 86   8/16/2023 at 17:30 (252 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Western Electric 1962

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Western Electric 1962


Post# 1187769 , Reply# 87   8/16/2023 at 17:32 (252 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1957

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1957


Post# 1187795 , Reply# 88   8/16/2023 at 20:03 (252 days old) by jamiel (Detroit, Michigan and Palm Springs, CA)        

jamiel's profile picture
Just watched an interesting documentary on the rise and fall of Nokia. I remember early in my career in cellular (1992-5 ish) Nokia were the slightly weird slightly off-brand phones (there were weirder, certainly, but not the normal Motorola of the day) which we used when we couldn't get Motorola. (The weirdest were a shipment of Mitsubishi bagphones we got when Motorola couldn't fulfill their order due to a problem with the...bags).

Found out from the documentary the history of the NMT (Nordic Mobile Telephone) standard which was the early precursor of GSM (and was how Nokia got it's start). It extended my understanding of the cooperation within Europe was able to get the EU interoperability under a different path than we had in North America.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO jamiel's LINK


Post# 1189865 , Reply# 89   9/12/2023 at 16:30 (225 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1959

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1959


Post# 1189866 , Reply# 90   9/12/2023 at 16:31 (225 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1963

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1963


Post# 1189873 , Reply# 91   9/12/2023 at 18:25 (225 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
General Telephone & Electronics 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

General Telephone & Electronics 1961


Post# 1189874 , Reply# 92   9/12/2023 at 18:27 (225 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone System 1961

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone System 1961


Post# 1189875 , Reply# 93   9/12/2023 at 18:29 (225 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
Bell Telephone 1983

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Bell Telephone 1983


Post# 1189878 , Reply# 94   9/12/2023 at 18:42 (225 days old) by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        
Re:#92

ea56's profile picture
Remember when there used to be really nice, spacious telephone booths with a comfortable seat and some even had fans to keep the booth from being stuffy? These “Deluxe” phone booths were usually located in office building lobby's, hotels, better restaurants, airports, bars and telephone company office buildings.

When I first left home at 19 in ‘70 I couldn’t afford a telephone of my own for the first year. I used to call home every week from the pay phone located outside the Pacific Telephone building on Liberty St. in Petaluma, Calif. They had two nice quiet booths in front of the building with seats, a fan and doors that closed tightly for privacy and quiet. The call home used to cost 45 cents for 3 mins., and this was a call that was only 45 miles away. We’ve become spoiled these days when almost every call is toll free with VOIP or cell phones. Back in the old days long distance calls cost plenty!

When I was an Operator for PT&T in the mid 70’s these pay phone calls used to keep operators VERY busy at our cord switchboards. Now phone booths and pay phones are as scarce as hens teeth.

Eddie


Post# 1198298 , Reply# 95   1/30/2024 at 16:03 by Novum (Ireland)        
Beetie Bellmann (BT) - London Area Code Change Snobbery

I'm sure she's featured on this thread before, but this is Beatrice (Beetie) Bellman, a fictional character played by Maureen Lipman, who represented BT (British Telecom) in the 1980s and 90s.

 

She's accompanied by the one and only Miriam Margolyes.
 
Here's a rather Hyacinth Bucket like advert, where she gets rather put out by having an 'Outer London' number after the area code split from (01) to 071 (Inner) and 081 (Outer) London  
 






 

London Area codes went through several changes in quite quick succession in the 1990s:

 

1958-1990: London was simply (01) + 7 digital local numbers.

1990-1995: Split into (071) 'Central' and (081) 'Outer'

1995-2000: Changed to (0171) and (0818)

2000: Changed to (020) with 8-digit local numbers.

 


Post# 1198496 , Reply# 96   2/3/2024 at 12:43 by Ultramatic (New York City)        

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

FCC Seeks to Make AI Robocalls Illegal

The agency worries AI-powered voice cloning could supercharge phone scams and misinformation.

 



CLICK HERE TO GO TO Ultramatic's LINK

Post# 1198499 , Reply# 97   2/3/2024 at 13:04 by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        
AT&T Request that CPUC Allow Elimination of Landlines

ea56's profile picture
Last night on the news there was a story about AT&T’s request to the CPUC that they be released from the obligation to provide landline service in California.

This is a terrible blow for anyone living in the many rural areas of California that don’t have any cell phone service. In Sonoma Co. where I grew up on the Northern Coast there are many areas that are dead zones for cell phone service. The home that I grew up in doesn’t receive a reliable signal for cell phone service. As far as I know there is no cable TV service where I grew up and I suspect that most of the areas affected by this proposed change are also without cable TV service, so VOIP isn’t going to be an option either. Just what are these folks supposed to do in an emergency? As far as AT&Tis concerned they can eat excrement and die. And you can bet your bottom dollar that just like every other request that the CPUC receives from AT&T or any other utility company this is already a done deal before they even have a hearing or vote about the request.

When I worked for PT&T in the mid 70’s the customer was king, not anymore.

Eddie


CLICK HERE TO GO TO ea56's LINK


Post# 1198523 , Reply# 98   2/3/2024 at 20:48 by Novum (Ireland)        

If the don’t adequately regulate it, rural customers will end up being cut off. I don’t know why politicians seem to imagine commercial operators are going to provide loss making services.

Either you regulate it ensure it happens and the costs get spread, or you subsidise it.
If you do neither, you end up with areas with no telecommunication services, which in 2024 is as seeious as having areas without electricity. It’s really going to make those communities unviable.


Post# 1199090 , Reply# 99   2/11/2024 at 20:40 by Ultramatic (New York City)        

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

Part Seven:

www.automaticwasher.org/c...



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy