Thread Number: 90670  /  Tag: Vintage Automatic Washers
Modern makes of vintage Washers and Dryers
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 1151798   6/20/2022 at 11:39 (674 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture
With China making imitations and knock offs of everything, including entire EU and US cities, do you think someone will ever make a copy of the filter flo, WP belt drive, WP direct drive, Newton Maytag or even a Frigidaire?


I mean at some point someone must have at least tried?







Post# 1151802 , Reply# 1   6/20/2022 at 12:32 (674 days old) by ryner1988 (Indianapolis)        

ryner1988's profile picture
You know, I've wondered this very thing many times. You'd think with all the dissatisfaction out there with modern products, some manufacturer would try to duplicate what worked for many years, even if it isn't a US company. Come to think of it, it would almost have to be foreign-made if this was ever attempted, because the regulations here are now so strict that Whirlpool and other such companies aren't permitted to try anything like that. It's a cool idea though.

Post# 1151803 , Reply# 2   6/20/2022 at 12:35 (674 days old) by ryner1988 (Indianapolis)        

ryner1988's profile picture
Adding to that, let's say China produced a duplicate of the GE filter flow. That machine uses a ton of water, so while it's a great performer, they probably wouldn't be allowed to sell it here legally. Once again with the regulations keeping that from happening.

It's not to say I wouldn't love to see machines like that around again. The Department of Energy has ensured though that we have to make machines differently now.


Post# 1151812 , Reply# 3   6/20/2022 at 13:44 (674 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture
Sadly I have to agree. Energy regulations are ultimately the barrier to sales in the US.

I would imagine the cost of over seas shipping would play a role too. FFs were one the heaviest washers ever made, so I guess that would add significant cost to the price tag.

Regarding the patents and rights to these designs, how do they stand in the US?


I am tempted to think that if a Chinese company successfully began selling BDs or DD in the US Whirlpool would come out and say "hey, thats our design"


However, now that Haier owns GE appliances, there is some hope that FFs could be sold in at least some parts of the world.


Post# 1151880 , Reply# 4   6/21/2022 at 07:14 (673 days old) by potatochips ( )        

No, these old styles of washers will never come back. We have to stop speculating if they will, because they won't. I bet it has nothing to do with regulatory reasons or patent validity as to why, and has everything to do with the cost to make these machines. The margins on old machines would not make financial sense at all. The materials used to make a helical drive Maytag, the thickness of the cabinet, the gauge of the wiring, the motor, pump, transmission materials, etc these would eat in to any margin at an astronomical rate. It's not worth it, and that's without even considering the cost to make and maintain the factories to build these materials. 

 

And while it is sad new machines are disposable goods now, no one is in the streets protesting outside WP or LGs headquarters to make better machines, and no one is emailing their political reps to legislate quality. 


Post# 1151889 , Reply# 5   6/21/2022 at 08:35 (673 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        
Wire Guage

chetlaham's profile picture
18 AWG and 16 AWG was and is used extensively in both modern and vintage appliances.

If anything in modern appliances you've got a separate neutral from each component going back up to the control board, vs one neutral wire going down the harness jumping from each component in older machines.




Post# 1151897 , Reply# 6   6/21/2022 at 09:36 (673 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
The only way to make appliances like they did many years would be to have full automation of the stamping process of various panels and such and possibly assembly. That’s what they do with cars to make them more affordable for the consumer. It’s usually the stamping process of various panels and the labor it takes to put them together more so than anything else.

Reply #4, I think if the Maytag helical washers were to be made today it wouldn’t cost much more than a Speed Queen since they both have a similar-ish design in terms of how they wash and spin. Frankly, if Speed Queen were to use Maytag’s design they literally used from 1956 to 2006, probably would cost about the same maybe even a little less since Maytag’s design was simpler than Speed Queen’s current top load design despite both having a removable front access panel. Definitely would get Speed Queen a better reputation since they would be more reliable, and for sure easier to work on if you had to replace the belts, pump, or any other minor part if Speed Queen were to use Maytag’s design from many years ago.


Post# 1151900 , Reply# 7   6/21/2022 at 09:56 (673 days old) by Adam-aussie-vac (Canberra ACT)        
Makes me wonder, has anybody converted a modern style drive

Washing machine, such as going from an inverter drive to a multispeed motor drive, the kind found in older style laundromat washing machines as well as some Hoover branded machinesWhere it’s literally just for speeds, 🦊Back and where it’s literally just for speeds, back and forth, distribute and spin, although you could add a fifth speed for delicate but 800 rpm should be good enough for everything,

Post# 1151905 , Reply# 8   6/21/2022 at 10:44 (673 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        
Reply #6 - Agree

chetlaham's profile picture
100% agree. Newton style Maytags were made until 2006 and at the time did not cost all that much when compared to DDs. Newtons are simpler than Speed Queens, and use roughly, if not slightly less, the same amount of and type of of raw material.

If Whirlpool wanted to, they could have mass produced the Newtons (a dream come true) but chose not to in part because of the reduced capacity and they did not want to overhaul the Maytag factory. That and I think they knew DD production would cease in 5 years for their splutch drive designs.

The fact Reply #4 has already received 3 like I think speaks to the overall pessimistic view of how vintage appliances are viewed on this forum and the optimistic faith placed in modern appliances.

But, I think we can both agree on this: Most people today don't care or want to care about how modern appliances are made. They just approve of anything that has gangster bling-bling attached to it, appears featured, cheap and can do 2 weeks worth of laundry at once vs something simple and durable.


Ultimately its not so much the corporations, but the people's apathy and aloofness.

However, I hope to think that on the international level someone, somewhere would be yearning for an old fashioned North American machine.





Post# 1151938 , Reply# 9   6/21/2022 at 19:00 (673 days old) by angus (Fairfield, CT.)        

I think the other truth here is that while it is believed people are not happy with today's quality, outside of people on this forum and few others, most don't really care about laundry appliances, only price. In fact, I am continually surprised at how many people don't even remember what brand of laundry appliances they have. They know their cooktops, ranges, ovens, refrigerators and dishwashers but it is like it is almost taboo to know too much about your own laundry...

Post# 1151947 , Reply# 10   6/21/2022 at 19:54 (673 days old) by Adam-aussie-vac (Canberra ACT)        
I know for a reference point, my mum doesn’t really care

As long as it actually does what she wants it to do, Even if something older does a better job, because I’ve shown her with my ringer washer that has a Center post agitatorWhenever I ask her to come and have a look at the water she’s quite surprised but yet she won’t admit that my machine the ringer washer does a better job compare to her thousand dollar LG Toploader

Post# 1151951 , Reply# 11   6/21/2022 at 20:40 (673 days old) by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
There are ways around the system. If parts could be reproduced, then they could be legally sold anywhere. Sort of like building a 60's Mustang or Model A from the frame up suing aftermarket parts. Whole machines probably wouldn't fly under the radar except in the black market but even then, one could sell them locally as a "used" appliance even if it isn't. I think the "system" has bigger issues to deal with than cracking down on a small handful of people wanting to purchase and use an old school type appliance. Last time I checked, nobody goes to jail for owning, buying, selling, or using a wringer washer or even dumping the wash water in their own yard.

The biggest obstacle is quality and durability of materials and parts.

Trust me, I ponder about things like this a bit too much these days. If there wasn't a huge backlog of materials due to COVID, I'd be working on reproducing some Maytag parts right now.


Post# 1151954 , Reply# 12   6/21/2022 at 21:34 (673 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
No, modern incarnations of vintage laundry appliances

launderess's profile picture
Are not coming back, at least not to previous standard of quality or whatever anytime soon.

There were many good reasons why GM and others saw writing on wall and got out of laundry appliance business by 1980's or so.

Huge pent up demand for laundry and other white goods began evaporating by 1970's as post war boom began to fizzle. Nearly all those who wanted a washing machine had one, and thus market became more and more reliant upon new home sales. Something that still holds true today.

Keep in mind that was all when USA white good manufacturers had nearly total captive market. By 1970's onwards arrival of cheaper foreign imports put pressure on prices. Makers found they couldn't build (including R&D and other associated costs) appliances and charge whatever they liked because same was with automobiles, Americans began looking at cheaper imports which put lid on prices.

But this is true for European appliance makers as well. My older Miele W1070 like many other washers of same vintage is built like a tank. Newer offerings are still up there, but Miele has been taking money out of their products for past few years now. If that's happening at top end, imagine what's going on at MOL and BOL.

Consumers at least in North America and Europe just won't pay adjusted prices for appliances built like vintage.


Post# 1151961 , Reply# 13   6/21/2022 at 22:15 (673 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture
Qsd-Dan, you're not pondering it to much these days my friend. You're heart, soul and mind are in the right place. With 3-D printed technology becoming accessible for everyone perhaps one day any one of us can build a vintage appliance from the ground up. You've got developing nations churning out semi descent washers from sheet metal presses, a signal that anyone can build a complete washer.


We already have the blueprints. All that is required is to scan each individual part, convert it to CAD, then either print it or print the molds that will cast it.




Post# 1151966 , Reply# 14   6/21/2022 at 22:47 (673 days old) by bazzybtec (Churchill Queensland Australia)        

I think largely The idea of building an appliance that will last 50+ years stifles future sales. if you build a junk washer that lasts the bare minimum you will end up having to sell another one down the track.

Having said that i have wondered about the 3d printing parts option. that will likely work for the likes of agitators and lint filters etc however metal parts such as basket drive assemblies are going to be harder.

I doubt it would be impossible however. Why don't we set up a section on the forum where cad blueprints can be placed for components that are no longer available so they can be fabricated?


Post# 1151969 , Reply# 15   6/21/2022 at 23:41 (673 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
Sea change for North American domestic laundry (and some OPL along with coin-op) has been move to H-axis washing machines.

Now that North America has joined most of civilized and industrialized western world, there's no going back. Indeed federal government has virtually made this so; that is by "vintage" laundry appliances one means top loaders, they are going way of Dodo.

Have said this before, and am doing so again; there are many reasons why commercial/industrial laundries went with h-axis washing machines from the start, and now general public is catching on.

As Angus and other posters have mentioned we here in the group are sort of special. Average American consumer just wants clean laundry without tons of bother, but he or she also is mindful (to various degrees) of energy and other costs.

Vintage top loaders like GE Filter Flow used ungodly amounts of water. If that was heated water in any way for washing (warm or hot) things only got better or worse depending upon one's view.










All but youngest members were around when major appliances meant just that; serious bit of kit that was meant to last ten or twenty years. For prices charged things had better last or companies heard about it.

Interestingly, but something those in industry likely know, prices for laundry and other major appliances actually have paced *below* inflation since 1970's.

www.in2013dollars.com/Lau...

By taking some of the money out of major appliances they became more affordable to larger share of households. Prices for washing machines in USA have ticked up lately largely due to introduction of front loaders which always cost more than top loading machines with central beaters.


Post# 1151973 , Reply# 16   6/22/2022 at 00:01 (672 days old) by bazzybtec (Churchill Queensland Australia)        

I would happily pay more for one of these BD whirlpools new. I also would argue at least the ones i own seem to actually use less water to my daily driver. My daily driver is an LG top loader. its only 12 months old and i am already noticing issues.
for example i have come to it and it has had quarter of a tub of water in it when it is off. (this will be a fault) however when it is running it fills the tub up washes for ages then drains spins fills up again then runs drains spins then fills up again then drains and spins. it uses way more water.

it takes an hour and 20 min to do a standard wash and it doesn't do as good a job in my opinion.

I have had a front loader washing machine again by LG and it only lasted 3 years before the board failed and i was told it was not worth fixing. it was also not a cheap one. ironically that machine was bought for me by mum because she felt bad that the washer i had at the time was grandmas Malleys whirlpool that seemingly had a faulty wig wag coil. a fault that i have since fixed when the LG died


Post# 1151992 , Reply# 17   6/22/2022 at 05:36 (672 days old) by ozzie908 (Lincoln UK)        
Watching that filter Flo video

ozzie908's profile picture
Until I noticed he was washing sheets in cold water...... GROSS

Post# 1152046 , Reply# 18   6/22/2022 at 16:29 (672 days old) by Chetlaham (United States)        
Resource Saver

chetlaham's profile picture
Perhaps a resource saver system would may modern belt drives more feasible? I can believe you on the BD being better than the LG.


Remember that modern Speed Queens show that a residential market does exist for quality machines.


Post# 1152057 , Reply# 19   6/22/2022 at 17:52 (672 days old) by kenwashesmonday (Carlstadt, NJ)        

There was a time when consumers expected 2 or more decades out of a major appliance.

 

Today's consumer shops by price, and that changes everything.


Post# 1152059 , Reply# 20   6/22/2022 at 18:14 (672 days old) by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
Consumers are too cheap to pay for quality these days since they have to have it NOW and can’t wait until they have the means to save up for appliances that will last for decades. There is the saying “the customer/consumer is always right”, NOT in my book since they are complaining about the very problems they created in a way and make it more difficult for those who want decades of trouble free service.

Post# 1152063 , Reply# 21   6/22/2022 at 21:07 (672 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
Speed Queen domestic washing machines both top and front loading are not far from OPL or otherwise commercial use. Thus Alliance can spread costs along a much wider array of offerings.

If Alliance only offered domestic washing machines and dryers they'd be up against WP and rest, thus you'd likely not see same sort of build quality and so forth they have today.

Alliance/SQ does brisk business with US military (units installed on bases all over USA), well as route multi-family housing (those washers and dryers found in apartment building laundry rooms). So again they have a much wider reach to spread things around.


Post# 1152259 , Reply# 22   6/24/2022 at 07:38 (670 days old) by potatochips ( )        

I've purchased and picked up lots of free old appliances and I can safely say in my experience, I never found wiring on a WP, MT, or GE machine that was thinner than  14 wiring. The WP world washer uses nice and thin wiring throughout. Does that mean it's junk? No, because these washers aren't burning houses down, but rather it's a clear indication of cost savings interest. There is an exponential cost savings going from 14 to 16 AWG if you're producing hundreds of thousands of machines per year. 

 

You have to understand that the cost to produce a helical drive or DD machine is insane compared to the modern machine. The transmissions alone in these machines are packed full of thick, heavy metal and the cost to buy, machine, and install that metal is not cheap. While the DD and helical machines look like theyre not expensive to produce when you compare them together, they are expensive to produce when you compare them with modern designs. It's like comparing the BD to a FF, probably not very much production cost difference. But the reality is these older machines are not cheap to make, and production costs are above all else because it either eats up, or makes profit margins per machine. 

 

The exterior, changeable door panel on my belt drive reverse rack Maytag dishwasher is thicker than the whole tank of a modern dishwasher on sale today. 

 

Sure, it may seem like one dishwasher with thinner spray arms that are shorter, thin gauge tanks, thin gauge wiring, 1/8 inch less insulation, and thinner racks can't possibly lower production costs, but when you make 100,000 plus of these a year, it adds up. Look at airlines, the cost and drive to save one pound of weight on one flight seems stupid, but when you fly seven hundred flights per day, every day of the year, it adds up. Quick. And appliance production is no different. 

 

WP canned the helical drive production because why would they make the DD and helical drive next to each other? It's called internal competition. Plus there is union labour savings, the labour costs on a helical drive were different than that of the DD. Plus the helical drive was not a cheap machine to make. WP bought MT, a poorly ran company with bad finances, so instead of being drug down to MTs financial ineptitude, WP had to cut things that don't make money. 

 

Laundress is right. The market for SQ quality washers today is there, but its so so so so so small, but the vast bulk of their business if commercial. Thats where SQ is making its money, commercial, not resi. Resi for them, is a nice to have, and it certainly wont ruin the company if they stopped selling to resi markets. 

 

"the overall pessimistic view of how vintage appliances are view on this forum", that is not true. Everyone is here for one reason, we all love appliances. But no one in the Imperial forum is "pessimistic" of old machines. We love them. If you start playing the "what if" game and creating posts asking if "they" will "bring back" old designs, you lose sight on how fun older machines were, you become distracted. Those designs are long gone, and for understandable reasons. Deal with it, and start enjoying what they were, and enjoying that its a way we used to do things, and that because the design is gone, it becomes that more valuable. 


Post# 1152260 , Reply# 23   6/24/2022 at 07:43 (670 days old) by Pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)        
i wonder how a modern 2023 version of this set would look?

pierreandreply4's profile picture
I wonder how in 2023 a modern version of this vintage set would look like wuth out the vmw tech and fancy electronic but still keeping the classic look and style? inglis whirlpool

  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size

Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy