Thread Number: 97556  /  Tag: Modern Automatic Washers
EPA Reversals
[Down to Last]
Post# 1224407   2/14/2025 at 23:05 by IIIJohnnyMacIII (North Carolina)        

iiijohnnymaciii's profile picture
Looks like dishwasher will be getting the green light to use more water.

www.washingtonexaminer.co...


CLICK HERE TO GO TO IIIJohnnyMacIII's LINK





Post# 1224409 , Reply# 1   2/14/2025 at 23:27 by Egress (Oregon)        

this wont change anything if manufacturers still want to be competitive on a global scale. Especially since it will likely change back in 4 years. I find it really funny that he claims to be promoting innovation when he's doing the opposite...

Post# 1224413 , Reply# 2   2/15/2025 at 00:28 by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
Exactly!

People need to make up their minds that bulk of American populace along with Europeans and others elsewhere in world (who may or may not have a choice) are moving towards energy saving appliances.


Post# 1224433 , Reply# 3   2/15/2025 at 12:29 by William8 (Michigan)        

william8's profile picture
Why would anyone want incandescent bulbs brought back? LED's are the easiest way to save energy, and they have come a long way.

I haven't replaced all of mine yet, because I have some lights that aren't used more than 10 minutes a year, or at all. But any bulb that's on every day has been changed. This guy just want's to move us back to 1900, minus the democracy part.


Post# 1224438 , Reply# 4   2/15/2025 at 14:49 by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY)        

mark_wpduet's profile picture
I remember reading something about LED's being blue light....which isn't good for humans...but incandescent being (I can't remember) red light or white light or something like that...a much healthier light...

I don't think it's about energy more than it is about health.

Apparently light has detrimental or can be beneficial... I do know there's a red light therapy that seems to be going crazy


Post# 1224442 , Reply# 5   2/15/2025 at 15:11 by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
I'd be surprised if this makes any difference at all. Those seeking to use less water/electricity will continue buying those products. It's not like hoards of consumers will be rushing out to purchase incandescent lights bulbs again. LED's are now cheap to purchase and CRI ratings are getting accurate enough to where the likelihood of switching back to filament lighting is no longer temping anymore.

Dishwashers using more water? I doubt manufactures are going to retool again to meet those looser standards.

Will front loaders raise the water level a bit? Probably not but if it reduced overall cycle times, maybe that would reduce electricity costs (and provide better cleaning results).

Speed Queen TC5 allow more control of water levels and cycle times instead of being fixed? Nope.

Are toilets going back to using more than 1.6 GPF? Nope!


Post# 1224467 , Reply# 6   2/15/2025 at 19:00 by MattL (Flushing, MI)        

Sure - let's all use more energy , more water, more gas.  More, more, more so the cronies can make more money.  No thanks.


Post# 1224481 , Reply# 7   2/15/2025 at 21:08 by gizmo (Victoria, Australia)        

LEDs can have any light colour you want. They are not inherently blue.

 

I don't know about in the USA but here in Australia, LED lights are marked with their intensity (in lumens) and their colour temperature (In degrees Kelvin.) Most decent brands have a choice of Cool White (stark white with a hint of blue-ish about it) and Warm White (Which is approximately the same as an incandescent.) I always choose warm white.

 

Some very cheap bulbs are only sold as Cool White, I suspect that the cool white may be cheaper to manufacture by a few fractions of a cent.

 

I guess some people have bought Cool White LED lights by mistake and now think that LEDs have a harsh blue light?


Post# 1224500 , Reply# 8   2/16/2025 at 08:33 by me (Essex, UK)        

There's some light spectrum graphs for different bulb technologies here:- neiloseman.com/know-your-lights-...

Cool white LEDs emit a lot of blue light, but warm white LEDs do not.

I mostly have warm LED filament bulbs in my house, I prefer their light to incandescents, I think it looks slightly less orange. They use a fraction of the power for the same amount of light, and don't get hot enough to damage the light fittings, they even look pretty much like an incandescent bulb.

White LEDs are actually a blue/UV LED emitter coated in phosphors that produces desired colour.


Post# 1224512 , Reply# 9   2/16/2025 at 10:43 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Switching back to incandescent lightbulbs

combo52's profile picture
I really doubt this will happen, and if it started to happen, hopefully home insurance companies would get into the act incandescent lightbulbs caused thousands of fires every year in homes and a lot of people that are younger now don’t even realize lightbulbs used to get hot enough to burn you and start fires.

Many modern light fixtures are not designed to take the heat of an incandescent ball either any longer.

Rolling back energy regulations will do a lot of harm, even though few manufacturers will go back to Oldschool machines because you wouldn’t be able to sell them anywhere else in the world and only a small profess percentage of people would buy something that used a huge amount of energy today. Unfortunately, we won’t make the progress. We should make this will set back things quite a bit with the drive to reduce pollution and improve people’s health with better air quality, and water quality.

But this fool has just fired so many nuclear workers that the risk of nuclear war is it an all-time high much of the world could be destroyed in just a matter of a day or so, so we may not have to worry too much about climate change.

John L


Post# 1224516 , Reply# 10   2/16/2025 at 11:28 by me (Essex, UK)        
Incandescent

I've a theory why he wants incandescent light bulbs back, perhaps he finds the higher amount of orange and red frequencies in their spectra make his orange makeup/bronzer look more natural. :o)


There's a review of 4 brands of led bulb comparing their different spectra here: www.thesmarthomehookup.co...

The Philips UHD and Dicuno bulbs have a particularly low amount of blue.


Post# 1224538 , Reply# 11   2/16/2025 at 15:36 by Speedwagon (New Jersey)        
EPA Reversals

I believe the president just wants EPA rules to be more realistic. No one wants to return to incandescent bulbs, unless it is for reading since the 60 hertz flashing fatigues the eyes.
It would be nice to create a design for washers that is frugal enough with water usage, but not so frugal as it is now which adds an incredible amount of time to a wash cycle whether it is a clothes washer or dishwasher.
What to you think about outdoor grill regulations, and future banning of gas stoves, and the constant changing of coolants for HVAC and refrigerators.
The coolant issue is a racket brought on buy government regulators, the HVAC manufacturers, and the coolant producers. Lot's of money to be made there with constant changes.
R12 is heavier than the atmosphere. When it leaks out it settles along the ground/floor. On a job site men suffocated to death due to a leak in the building's HVAC system, while working in the lowest point in the building, the elevator pit.


Post# 1224550 , Reply# 12   2/16/2025 at 17:32 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        

combo52's profile picture
If our 12 is heavier than air, why did it destroy the ozone layer, ??

John L


Post# 1224595 , Reply# 13   2/17/2025 at 07:22 by gizmo (Victoria, Australia)        
The coolant issue is a racket...

 Oh, for goodness sake. One of the best "new" refrigerants is either butane, or a propane/butane mix, I think it's R600a??

It is incredibly cheap, much cheaper than the patented alternatives. And its not really "new" at all.

 

Why is it that every time someone creates a better product that does a good job with less energy, some people see the need to discredit it as some giant green conspiracy??

 

Back in the 1980s (?) when the ozone depleting characteristics of r12 were hitting the news, Choice consumer magazine in Australia looked around the world for alternative refrigeration technologies that were already in production that could be better than R12. They found that an East German manufacturer, Foron, made small fridges that used an LP gas blend (I think it was 50/50 propane and butane??) as its refrigerant gas. They brought a sample to Australia and tested it against local products, and it was good. That stimulated local interest and within a year or two, Email (a local company, now its brands are owned by Electrolux) started production of Australian Westinghouse fridges with the same gas - I think it was called the Aurora range??

 

The amount of the gas required for a fridge is tiny, so although it is a flammable gas, the risk is minuscule.

 

The damage to the ozone layer caused largely by older refrigerant gases was/is not evenly distributed around the world, in fact the thinning of the ozone layer was concentrated in the Southern hemisphere, largely over Australia and New Zealand. Partly as a consequence (there are other reasons too) we in both countries have the world's highest incidence of skin cancers. Fortunately since the worst refrigerants were banned, or at least safer handling of them was mandated around the world, the "hole" (more of a thinning) of the ozone layer is slowly repairing itself and UV levels over Southern Australia and New Zealand have reduced.

 

Some environmental technology is actually a good thing...


Post# 1224609 , Reply# 14   2/17/2025 at 11:40 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
I usually don’t like to comment on “political” threads anymore but I’ll put it this way, we’ve all lived through many administrations over the years, some more than others, yet, we are all still here years and decades later living and breathing, no one is going anywhere despite the media hysteria.

Come to think of it, everything is all relative to the era. You have to look back at history, in major cities like New York and other cities around the world around the same time and before, there were major issues with horse manure pollution to the point where it was waist high, some people probably said “We’ll be drowning in manure”. Literally thousands of tons of manure being put onto the streets everyday. As soon as the automobile came along, that problem went away. Fast forward to the 1960’s, air pollution was beginning to become a problem, people probably said “We’ll be choking to death on air pollution and smog”. Started to crack down on emissions, first step was getting rid of the road draft crankcase ventilation system and replacing it with a PCV valve, a couple years later smog pumps were beginning to be added, a few years later hardened valve seats were added so engines could run on regular gas without a problem, a few years after that, catalytic converters became mandatory. Then, people were beginning to be concerned about a new ‘ice age’ in the 1970’s, never came to fruition. In the 90’s and 2000’s, there were more hysterias about things that were going to happen, never came to fruition.

I think the biggest threat to humanity is AI, time will tell.

Everything is all relative at the end of the day to the time and era.


Post# 1224616 , Reply# 15   2/17/2025 at 13:03 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Reply number 14

combo52's profile picture
So what’s your point Sean most of the problems you site were corrected by Democrats trying to save lives and make lives better with emission controls, etc.

If it were up to you, everybody would be driving a 1966 Ford and we would be choking on our exhaust as the people all through California did for decades.

John L


Post# 1224621 , Reply# 16   2/17/2025 at 13:50 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
I’m just trying to be amicable, but everyone seems to put words in my mouth.



Post# 1224645 , Reply# 17   2/17/2025 at 19:08 by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
Topics that touch on pollyticks are not to be in the pink, blue, or yellow sections.

Folks that have plenty fundage for extra water and electric usage need to pony-out $12/yearly for access to the proper section for the topic ... kinda like paying for the extra water and electric.

IMO.


Post# 1224735 , Reply# 18   2/18/2025 at 17:39 by IIIJohnnyMacIII (North Carolina)        
Reply #17

iiijohnnymaciii's profile picture
Ok. I see now this should have been posted in the Dirty Laundry section. EPA regulations are political and I see now that Dirty Laundry is for political posts.

My Apologies.

However, I noted it more so on the future of machine engineering. With everyone’s love for the PowerClean machine and such.

I would pay for the $12/month subscription, but my Speed Queen TL put me out on the streets…


Post# 1224740 , Reply# 19   2/18/2025 at 20:27 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
The reason nothing will change with dishwashers is because they don't need to.
Years of R&D have already gone into washing dishes with just a couple gallons of water.
All the cycle programming has already been created.
The supply chains are already established with various motor manufacturers from China etc.
Very little vertical integration is left, all the components are outsourced, and even then some, are even designed outright at the suppliers.
I think LG or Samsung might be the most vertically integrated, making their own parts because they're still the old conglomerate layout (like old GE). But them too, even not a lot, with many parts outsourced.

To go back to using more water is a non-starter, also because modern dishwashers themselves, still will use lots of water when not set to Normal wash, or if their sensors tell them to.
Various Heavy cycles will still use north of 6 or 8 gallons of water!

Not to mention, the huuuuuuge driving factor for the mass market is QUIETNESS.
Whirlpool and maybe Bosch, still have some of the largest dishwasher motors for sale, around the 1/5hp range (wattage equivalent) yet their still quiet enough.
Not many customers outside of those who need apartment machines or are strictly base-model shoppers, will put up with anything these days that was as loud as a PowerClean.
And why would they when it's highly unlikely, any of the competitors would be willing to put larger, louder motors in their machines either.
Dishwashers are global commodities now with global sources.
Because the United States had decided to backslide, does not mean the rest of the world will. Which means that major motor companies today, like Nidec, or Johnson, or Askoll, will still make the same wet rotor motors the vast majority of the OEM customers demand.
As far as I know, GE and Emerson are OUT of the big appliance motor bizz.

To revert back to classic designs would mean, firstly, going back to "standard tub" height machines.
That's a non-starter. Those smaller interiors and customers will reject them.
Which means sales will be less, which will piss off shareholders.
Reverting back to older designs would mean retooling and resourcing all these components to work with bigger pumps which, A)might not exist, so they'd have to be made in-house. B) would be low volume specialty parts now, at other outside suppliers, because no other international dishwasher OEM would be requiring parts or motors like that. Specialty parts come with way higher prices.
That's also a no-go, because that would jack up sales costs and manufacturing costs to retool and source those.
That's another huuuuuge non-starter for shareholders. And their word is "law."

So no, dishwashers won't be changing.

That really applies to any appliance really.
The cast has been set by out place in time.


Post# 1224759 , Reply# 20   2/18/2025 at 23:37 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
GE!

I hope GE makes the filter-flos and other real washers again due to the EPA reversals. They need to stay out of our laundry rooms!



This post was last edited 02/18/2025 at 23:53
Post# 1224764 , Reply# 21   2/19/2025 at 01:08 by johnb300m (Chicago)        
Here we go again

johnb300m's profile picture


  View Full Size
Post# 1225037 , Reply# 22   2/21/2025 at 12:07 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
incandescent lightbulbs

The incandescent lightbulbs just plain worked, unlike these Chinese CFL ones. And as for johnb300m, how am I delusional? The older GE filter-flos just plain old worked. They just got the job done, unlike these new ones that leave lint all over your clothes. There are countless complaints about lint issues. Sorry not sorry!

Post# 1225041 , Reply# 23   2/21/2025 at 13:23 by Agiflow (Toms River)        

The thing that is disheartening is that the last full line U.S. appliance maker doesn’t seem to care about the products they make anymore. Maytag just “updated their control panels and they STILL use those wash plates with a fake DAA. WHY ? If the “commercial” Maytag is built on the same platform then why don’t they make more models that are “Heavy Duty” or commercial then ? I don’t get that. it’s like they know they have a fan base for the traditional type washers, but they refuse to make them anymore……. Now they are regulated to niche products or consumer reports says they don’t clean well….. When a little over 25 years ago traditions agitation cleaned very well.

Yes, I admit I am a major whirlpool fanboy and it’s a crying shame to see what is happening to that company. Hard to believe SQ is the only maker left offering a machine like the TC5…. Even that machine is a compromise.


Post# 1225049 , Reply# 24   2/21/2025 at 14:12 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)        
I agree

panasonicvac's profile picture
As much as I love Whirlpool, I think it's impossible to bring back the products they once made like my Kenmore 90 Series. I'm just happy that SQ is still around making a old school top loader. If only they'd bring back at least the 2017 models like the AWN432SP113TW04 with the mechanical dial and water selector knob, I'd certainly buy that over the TC5 because I find the rinse & spin cycle is better and they appear to be more reliable.

Post# 1225051 , Reply# 25   2/21/2025 at 14:44 by Agiflow (Toms River)        

Purchased an awn 432 back in March of 2013 before they switched the normal cycle to normal/eco and had that machine seven trouble free years. When my pop died I wound up selling the house and left the machine with a collector. I'm sure that machine is probably still going.
If I had sprung for the 50 bucks more at the time I could have gotten the 542. Oh well.... It was a good machine nonetheless.


Post# 1225064 , Reply# 26   2/21/2025 at 17:05 by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)        

Jerome are you out of your mind? You think they’re just gonna suddenly start making a washer exactly how they did 30 years ago?

Exactly John, delusional.


Post# 1225070 , Reply# 27   2/21/2025 at 18:30 by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
IIRC General Electric's "Filter-Flow" washers were some of the most water hungry about in their day.

Apparently space between suds container and outer tub was rather vast and it had to be filled water.

From the archives:

Kenmore 71 wrote...

"The water usage issue regarding the Filter-Flo design is that GE never redesigned the outer tub and the balance mechanism when they went from a solid tub to a perforated tub. With the solid tub the water usage was similar to other solid tub machines of "the day" such as the Speed Queens and the Frigidaires (pre 1-18). When GE introduced the perforated tub they left it "floating" in the larger outer tub with the same cable suspension system that had been used with the solid tub. This meant that for a perforated tub that held 12-14 lbs. of dry clothes there would be a fill of upwards of 22 gallons of water. Contrast that with Frigidaire's 1-18 machine which could genuinely turn over 18 lbs. of clothes with just shy of 20 gallons and the Kenmore & WP large capacity machines that DID use 25 gallons of water but could easily handle 18 lbs of dry clothes."

www.automaticwasher.org/c...

See also:

www.automaticwasher.org/c...

Will say one thing for you GELaundry4ever, you are consistent.

www.automaticwasher.org/c...


Post# 1225074 , Reply# 28   2/21/2025 at 18:39 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
Agiflow I partly agree with you.
It sort of seems like Whirlpool is a very siloed business now.
Their dishwashers they have now, which came out a few years ago, are on an excellent platform.
It's a larger tub, with a lot of refinement from the Global Wash platform.
Reviews and quality still seem very high.

But then yeah, there's the laundry group, which over the past several years, really does seem "meh."
Seems like they're just barely staying competitive, on paper.
Plastic washer windows on the front loaders still? You kidding me? Even though they still put glass on the top loaders? Very weird.
I don't know who their program and product managers are over there, but they're really beta.
The rest of the lines seem pretty good still, but yeah maybe not quite as rock solid as they used to be.
They still put good resources into KitchenAid, thank goodness.
But the Whirlpool line really does feel like a basic Chevy sometimes.

And then Jerome.
I know this is exceedingly pointless to try to explain, so I guess it'll be more appreciated by everyone else.
Why....WHY would GE/Haier bring back a dinosaur of a platform like the Filterflo?
Nobody wants that.
You clearly don't know anything about business, nor pay your own utilities I bet.
Filterflos were stinky, and horribly small for the stupid amounts of water they used, with their huge stationary outer tub.
No matter how much you want them, they're not returning.
Besides, the modern GE washers can be optioned to fill up all the way to the top.
Guess what? That uses MORE water than a pig like a Filterflo used anyway.


Post# 1225084 , Reply# 29   2/21/2025 at 19:35 by Agiflow (Toms River)        

Yes I do like the newer platform Whirlpool dishwashers. They Still do that well I assume. Time will tell . I have an Amana self cleaning gas range that is whirlpool made and a 20 ft.³ top freezer refrigerator by Whirlpool that I bought about two years ago and they’re both doing what they’re supposed to be.. At least on the new front loaders, they finally got the door and the detergent dispenser not to collide anymore. I had the WFW6620 in 2019 with the new plastic door and while it’s a shame they did that, it’s just part of what many now say we “just have to accept”…. Let’s see how long it will be before other manufacturers start doing the same thing. WP has six years on everybody…lol



Post# 1225087 , Reply# 30   2/21/2025 at 19:50 by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY)        

mark_wpduet's profile picture
Whirlpool laundry feels kind of like a basic chevy..

YES! LOL

Their dishwashers are really good...but what's up with their washers? I do love their dryers.. I prefer them to any other brand.. but not their washers at all... To be fair, I have no clue how the new FL whirlpools operate. I don't know if any changes were made. I keep waiting for a youtube video of someone showing theirs off videoing some cycles. I do like the way the new FL washers look (aside from the plastic door instead of glass)


Post# 1225088 , Reply# 31   2/21/2025 at 20:30 by Agiflow (Toms River)        

Hey hey now.... Nothing wrong with Chevy. I've had two malibus in the last 12 years and they've both been great cars.

Post# 1225135 , Reply# 32   2/22/2025 at 14:32 by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)        

You’re absolutely right Seana806. I’m sure nobody ever heard about this incident that happened in recent years, I heard this from a highly credible journalist who’s been studying a range of phenomenons for over fifty years now and she was personally informed about this incident that happened. At a lab in Japan where AI Robots were being created, 29 lab employees were killed by the robots and when the surviving lab employees turned these robots on to self destruct mode they began to rebuild themselves “stronger than ever before”. They could not be controlled. You will not be told about this by the general media, they have been told NOT to cover this story. This would shake humanity too much with the force of advancing AI direction in this world. I believe this happened around 2019 or 2020.

When or if someday in the future we have AI Robots replacing human jobs, let’s say for example at an airport and we’re being checked at security by AI Robots, who’s to say the same thing that happened in that Japan lab won’t happen to regular people? AI is a major threat to humanity and it’s already proven that.

Anyway, I’m very happy about this article! Now it would be nice to see manufacturers follow this and allow dishwashers and washers to use more water but as many said that probably won’t happen since they “have it figured out”. The new Whirlpool top loaders are all complete and utter garbage, such weak poor wash action, and terribly built. Not a fan of the upper line whirlpool machines including Maytag and KA. Would never buy or recommend them they aren’t very reliable but nowadays nothing is! After now having a dishwasher that has a diverter motor I find it very annoying, there’s no reason for that. A dishwasher should be able to use enough water and a large enough motor to just run each arm simultaneously and it’s much more simple and less to have to replace someday. This is why I love the 2019 Maytag so much, it’s a simple machine yet modern and sleek with a large enough motor and no ridiculous unnecessary steps in each cycle, although the cycles can still be a bit long and over thorough for my taste.


Post# 1225148 , Reply# 33   2/22/2025 at 17:53 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
direct drives

The Whirlpool direct drives, much like their GE filter-flo rivals, just plain got the job done. I've been doing laundry for years since I was age 7 and I know what a washer should and shouldn't do.

Post# 1225149 , Reply# 34   2/22/2025 at 18:02 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
to agiflow

Didn't Whirlpool change their entire dishwasher line or just some of them. When I look in some of their dishwashers, it looks like the global wash system. I wish GE would've made refinements to their filter-flo because it filtered out lint and hair. I've had experience with one and it got anything clean, even to the filthiest heavy duty cottons and linens. The washers that GE came out with after that were a disaster. shaky cabinets, flimsy suspension, and noisy operation and cheap feeling were an example. I don't think GE's laundry machines have gotten better.

Post# 1225154 , Reply# 35   2/22/2025 at 19:23 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
Post# 1225164 , Reply# 36   2/23/2025 at 00:30 by William8 (Michigan)        
CFL bulbs?

william8's profile picture
GE, why would you use CFL bulbs? LED's just work, and use less than half the energy of CFL's.

I haven't seen anyone buy CFL's in years.


Post# 1225166 , Reply# 37   2/23/2025 at 01:02 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        
Reply #32

maytag85's profile picture
Here’s another thing, AI requires quite a bit of energy to operate. If things continue going down the path at the rate they are, we’ll soon find ourselves in a situation like in the 2008 Pixar Film WALL-E (sort of like 2001 A Space Odyssey from 1968), aggressive marketing and AI algorithms convinced people to consume to the point where earth became uninhabitable. Even though I was 9 years old at the time in 2008, was horrified after realizing what can happen when you let technology get ‘too powerful’, have to stop being the enabler. No one seems to listen until it’s too late.

Post# 1225168 , Reply# 38   2/23/2025 at 01:14 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
EPA and laundry

The EPA needs to stay out of our laundry rooms. They're the cause of clothes still being dirty after washing. So tell me, who's delusional? This is why I advocate for the GE filter-flos and other real washers because they used plenty of water and agitation just to get the job done right the first time. Now, we have washers that use 2 cups of water. They barely even agitate anyway. They're just toys in comparison to what was built years ago. Today's consumers want a real washer and that's why they flock to Speed Queen Classic or the used markets. This is so stupid! I don't have any water bills to pay so I'm not worried! Water isn't going anywhere. The water shortage is just a lie to shove HE washers down our throats. I'm sick and tired of it.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO GELaundry4ever's LINK


Post# 1225169 , Reply# 39   2/23/2025 at 01:51 by William8 (Michigan)        
I don't have any water bills to pay so I'm not worri

william8's profile picture
You don't own any appliances either, yet constantly complain about reliability.

I can't figure out why you have such a hard time getting your clothes clean. I have a Speed Queen, but I've used many others when visiting relatives, or going to the family cottage. They all get my clothes clean.


Post# 1225170 , Reply# 40   2/23/2025 at 02:14 by appnut (TX)        

appnut's profile picture
I have no cleaning issues with my LG Turbowash front load, uses plenty of water and I get a range of temperatures from 90F to 165F to 170F, all cycles needed, spins very fast and shortens time in the dryer In fact, I've had frontloaders since 2006 when I kicked the Lady Shredmore out of my laundry room to the garage. And it sat there until 2024. The last top loader I liked was our 1970 Kenmore 800.

Post# 1225171 , Reply# 41   2/23/2025 at 03:02 by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY)        

mark_wpduet's profile picture
Do you ever feel like everything is upside down? Make it make sense... Have any of you ever heard of TEMU? People are buying craploads of stuff on there and filling their homes with things they don't need.... Tiktoker's will have trends/content creators wasting massive amounts of products to create content. It's like one aspect of life has to be environmentally friendly.... completely ignoring other aspects.. This youtuber highlights some of that...

CLICK HERE TO GO TO mark_wpduet's LINK


Post# 1225188 , Reply# 42   2/23/2025 at 08:57 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Reply number 32 total BS

combo52's profile picture
“A highly respected journalist knows about this story, what total BS she’s sitting on the story of the decade and she’s not gonna tell because there’s absolutely no evidence. This is not true at all, Dan, you should not repeat BS like this. It makes you look like a fool.

New dishwashers, the new whirlpool KitchenAid and Maytag dishwashers are doing beautifully. I get no complaints about cleaning from customers. The quality and reliability seems to be much better than it was 10 and 20 years ago while I like the Maytag dishwasher you have that does not alternate arms. The new ones are working much better than that design they still use the same heavy duty motor your machine has

New whirlpool laundry appliances are giving very few problems. The quality is at an all-time high and warranty calls are down to about nothing. I can’t remember when we sold a new whirlpool or Maytag laundry appliance that had a problem in the last decade.

It’s really a shame Dan for somebody your age to be so negative. I sure wouldn’t wanna have to live my life that way

John L


Post# 1225201 , Reply# 43   2/23/2025 at 10:23 by Agiflow (Toms River)        
Reply #42

Hello John, I'm curious about the Maytag MVWP586GW that came out 2 years ago. Would you know if they made any revisions to that washer ?

I purchased one back in November 2023 and only used it a couple of months.

It seemed to have a glitch where if you open the lid during the rinse fill it would only fill up to the low water level even if say you had it set to deep fill.

One of the posters said they have been having several problems with that machine.

I was on maytag's website and they don't display it anymore on their lineup.

The last time I saw it on there it said it was temporarily out of stock.


Do you know of any revision changes to that machine or if they're going to continue it or not?

If anybody would know you would.Thanks for any light you can shed.


Post# 1225213 , Reply# 44   2/23/2025 at 13:19 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
to william8

First of all, I don't have any problem with the Speed Queens at my apartment. Second of all, I don't need to own any of them, let alone any of the mainstream garbage that's out there to know that there's a problem with most washers to know that their performance is stupidly flawed. The GE hydrowave I used in a college dorm back in 2014 was the stupidest piece of stupid crap I have ever used. This is just a prime example! No! The clothes NEVER moved in that machine despite it being on normal/fast! That agitation was way too weak! Whatever was on top still remained on top! NO! It NEVER did a deep rinse either! I had to pay another $0.50 just so I can run it again to rinse the clothes! The dryers were just as bad or maybe even worse! They never got the clothes dry despite being on cottons/high! That Speed Queen Classic or its commercial counterparts would've turned that load over 2000 times the world over! So no, I don't need to own any of them! All I need to do is just use any machine to tell! Does it matter? Does it matter whether I own them or not? NO!!!! Oh yeah, and that GE hydrowave in my community college dorm slammed the cabinet when it went into the final spin. I've even seen one that was about to fall apart. Meanwhile, the washers my family used just got the job done right. I've used Whirlpool DD's in a dorm at texas school for the blind and they just plain old worked! None of this stupid crappy load sensing and measuring for water level! Those were real washers! And their matching Classic or commercial variant of the same dryer would've gotten the clothes dried in 1 swoop! Again! I don't need to own any of them! I've used them several times in my life! Maybe even once is too many! That's enough to form my own opinion! For the last time!



This post was last edited 02/23/2025 at 14:25
Post# 1225215 , Reply# 45   2/23/2025 at 14:38 by wayupnorth (On a lake between Bangor and Bar Harbor, Maine)        

wayupnorth's profile picture
Last time...right!

Post# 1225216 , Reply# 46   2/23/2025 at 15:07 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Nobody is being negative and nobody is being delusional because the other side is being fundamentally disingenuous.  

 

 

Older water using appliances did cycles in less time and cleaned just as well if not better.  (Even quick wash on tall tubs tends to use more water and energy) No error codes, no stinky filters, no exploding washing machines. Warranty calls are down sure, as are both longevity and durability.  

 

 

If anything those throwing stones are the ones pontificating hot air. Here we have a repair tech let it slip to poor cleaning, stinky filters, food bits being left behind, poor drying, and a myriad of other problems involving HE tall tubs- such that he went back to using non HE standard tubs:

 

 

 

Reply #7:

 

http://www.automaticwasher.org/c...

 

Reply #1:

 

http://www.automaticwasher.org/c...

 

 

He then proceeds to invalidate anyone who says they've had the exact same problems. I am glad he has been saying such, because he has now opened my eyes to a profound truth.


Post# 1225217 , Reply# 47   2/23/2025 at 15:13 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
chetlaham

You go chetlaham! All these people are doing are proving my point! I don't care what anybody says! I have years of experience using these machines! No! They don't need to be every brand or model to know! Just one model of each brand is enough!

Post# 1225218 , Reply# 48   2/23/2025 at 15:18 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Jerome, what these people are saying does not reflect their lived experiences in any way, shape or form. They had and are having the same experiences as us and as most Americans. The difference between them and us is that they lie and then proceed to attack anyone who speaks the truth. I can acknowledge the truth no matter how painful it is, they can't.    


Post# 1225219 , Reply# 49   2/23/2025 at 15:27 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
truth

For the umpteenth time, I'd rather be offended by the truth than comforted by a sweet lie. Like I need to actually own an appliance to base my experience. No! I don't! Just using it alone is enough!

Post# 1225221 , Reply# 50   2/23/2025 at 15:34 by wayupnorth (On a lake between Bangor and Bar Harbor, Maine)        

wayupnorth's profile picture
Everyone is sick and tired of you 2 just repeating the same rants over and over and over. We at AW all know these things so you need to rant to them, not us, constantly

Post# 1225222 , Reply# 51   2/23/2025 at 15:38 by William8 (Michigan)        
Last time...right!

william8's profile picture
I wish.

Post# 1225223 , Reply# 52   2/23/2025 at 15:41 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Same could be said about the same lies being repeated over and over.

 

 

 

"We at AW all know these things so you need to rant to them, not us, constantly "

 

 

I want to say thank you for being honest here. Everyone knows modern HE appliances are either mediocre or short lived. The difference being some are more honest about it than others. Hence the so called "rants" pointing out that misinformation. 


Post# 1225224 , Reply# 53   2/23/2025 at 15:45 by William8 (Michigan)        
chetlaham

william8's profile picture
I'm lying because I claim to not have all these problems GE has? That my clothes come clean with all the washers I use each year?

The language I would like to use to respond that is probably not allowed here.

I did buy a Speed Queen for reliability, but I don't tell everyone they MUST also buy one, and they MUST use only one cycle. It's bull...t.


Post# 1225226 , Reply# 54   2/23/2025 at 15:49 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

William, I don't have you in mind.

 

I have the example used in Reply #46 in mind.

 

Whenever someone says they are getting poor results from HE appliances, or that they break down prematurely, they are gaslit by a small contingent of this site. 

 

 

You choose Speed Queen because you knew it would last and last unlike a modern GE.


Post# 1225227 , Reply# 55   2/23/2025 at 16:27 by luxflairguy (Wilmington NC)        

Chet! this is WHY people block yoou!

Post# 1225228 , Reply# 56   2/23/2025 at 16:32 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
once again...

I've already told you my experience! FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME!!!! I will repeat it until you get it or until I turn blue in the face! No! I'm not the only one who feels this way! Many consumers do! Chet does too!
What about the GE model t's that shook violently during agitation? What about when they slam the cabinet during spin? I'm lucky mine didn't but still! That GE felt and sounded cheap and flimsy. The Speed Queen Classic/Commercial is much more smooth than GE model T will ever be! GE could easily make a filter-flo again if they wanted to. They just don't care! And NO! I'm not alone in feeling this way!




This post was last edited 02/23/2025 at 18:06
Post# 1225229 , Reply# 57   2/23/2025 at 16:33 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Because they can not handle the truth.

 

Blocking users speaks more about the person doing the blocking than it does for those pointing out blatant contradictions. 

 

 

EPA reversals shift discretion to where it belongs: the customer.


Post# 1225230 , Reply# 58   2/23/2025 at 16:43 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Jerome, millions of Americans feel the way you do. Millions have experienced stinky water using appliances, appliances that don't clean, throw error, break down prematurely, are not economical to fix, wear out clothes, require pre washing/pre treatment, and the list goes on. 

 

All because of energy regs trying to do what can not be done in the first place. 

 

The whole goal of democracy is discretion, power and education resting in the average in person. The average person is at the top, the average person is the ruling class unlike most societies which have existed beforehand. Government overreach goes against everything which gave rise to the advancements and achievements of modern civilization. The whole purpose of government is to uphold and defend freedom and human rights. Not to take such away from people.


Post# 1225233 , Reply# 59   2/23/2025 at 18:12 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
EPA and DOE

The EPA and DOE need to stay out of our lives! Stay out of it! Today's washers, dryers, and dishwashers waste time and are always taking up space. And on top of that, these struggle to do anything. When "working properly", they sound like an animal dying! and, they fail to dry properly and the dishwashers just mist the dishes "clean". Do they think we're stupid? And you have to clean a stupid filter.
Again, how is that saving water and energy when you have to do clean washer and dishwasher cycles and run the dryers multiple times? It doesn't work like that. High Efficiency has proven to be nothing but a huge scam! I bet the GE filter-flos were more of a high efficiency washer than these "new and improved" models are. Seriously! Thousands upon thousands of complaints come in every year! Oh, and the dryers take forever to dry. What more do I need to add? You can't wash clothes with 2 cups of water, dry clothes at 80 degrees fahrenheit, and wash dishes with just a trickle of water and inferior detergents. I want phosphates in my detergents and everything to work properly. Many consumers have noticed this.




This post was last edited 02/23/2025 at 23:30
Post# 1225238 , Reply# 60   2/23/2025 at 18:46 by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        
RE: #58

ea56's profile picture
“The whole purpose of government is to uphold and defend freedom and human rights. Not to take such away from people.”

I would agree with you 100% on this statement.

However, there is a great deal of difference between actual freedom and human rights and the regulation of how much water and electricity a washing machine can use!

The purpose for governmental regulation of appliances is to help save our natural resources and try to reverse Climate Change.

This has NOTHING to do with actual human rights and freedoms.

BTW, political statements are meant for the DL forum only.

Eddie


Post# 1225239 , Reply# 61   2/23/2025 at 18:47 by Egress (Oregon)        

Every single time this topic or something similar comes up its always you two complaining. It's tiring and its the same stuff every time too. I wish that the sites team would come and moderate for once, this has gone too far time and time again. By and large those issues you claim happen to everyone are a result of lazy washing habits or misuse, and claiming efficiency is a scam despite decades of evidence to the contrary is amusing at best if not straight up disappointing. DO better. I hope to not see one of these pointless rants take over another thread.

Post# 1225240 , Reply# 62   2/23/2025 at 18:56 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        
Reply #55

maytag85's profile picture
People block you, too. You have repeatedly jumped down people’s throat for “lacking maturity”, meanwhile, that’s a lack of maturity in of and itself. Can’t claim to be the mature one when you don’t act like it. I guess when the fountain of youth runs out, you revert back to a 12 year old.

When one gets angry when someone tells them the truth, just more proof what kind of person they are, going by opinions with little to no continuity and not facts just to inflate one’s ego even more.

Go ahead, jump down my throat and make a fool of yourself, will screenshot your comments/remarks and post them publicly to YouTube in the community posts section.


Post# 1225242 , Reply# 63   2/23/2025 at 19:31 by Chetlaham (United States)        
Reply 61

chetlaham's profile picture

So your Saying Combo52 (John) is being lazy with his washing habits and/or misusing his dishwasher?  

 

And the 3 up-voters (thus far) agree with your postulate?  

 

Thank you for adding this to the record.


Post# 1225247 , Reply# 64   2/23/2025 at 20:38 by DaveAMKrayoGuy (Oak Park, MI)        

daveamkrayoguy's profile picture
With the political policies involved and from that first post, are we just overdue for a Brown Forum discussion on this?

There, although plenty of other pow-wows of activities of "other stuff" of general nature and for those of us Upgraded, maybe we need to have a thread such as this there...

That's a place to rant, use obscene language, and complain to all our heart's content about excess energy usage, crappy performance and the idea that you throw out a once-repairable but hopelessly broken machine in a matter of a few short years, adding more to economic woes and environmental concerns...

There: talk about worldly things and tell some dirty jokes, but please don't start these kinds of arguments amongst one another that are put-downs or express excessive dislike towards one another, yes, be gentlemen!



-- Dave


Post# 1225255 , Reply# 65   2/23/2025 at 23:26 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
ranting

If I am ranting, it is very well deserved. Many consumers feel the same way as I do.

Post# 1225261 , Reply# 66   2/24/2025 at 01:05 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        
Reply #65

maytag85's profile picture
Many people out there feel the way you do, Jerome, but people continue to complain and be the enabler, changing absolutely nothing.

Oh well, I let one’s foolishness just feed me more wisdom and making me smarter.


Post# 1225267 , Reply# 67   2/24/2025 at 05:34 by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
I aim for products that are more efficient, less-costly to run than the market minimum at the time of the purchase.  Hybrid car.  Step-up heat pump model.  Etc.


Post# 1225270 , Reply# 68   2/24/2025 at 06:57 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
You too need to get out in the real world

combo52's profile picture
Chet and Jerome, you get on here just ranting and raving, but new dishwashers and new appliances don’t work because of government regulations and yet you both own new energy star dishwashers and you don’t seem to have any complaints with them.

I work on several dishwashers every week customers are not complaining in general. That new dishwashers aren’t working well and that their old dishwashers worked better that’s just not the reality. Look at all the examples on this site of people that are thrilled with their current dishwashers whether their Bosch KitchenAid GE even some Samsung and LG owners here that are very happy.

And you two don’t seem to even complain about your own modern dishwashers Lol

The number one complaint about the good old Hobart KitchenAid dishwashers from the 6070s 80s was they don’t clean well. This was the number one service call, things to go wrong with new dishwashers too that caused them not to clean well at times and they need repair.

There is no evidence that new appliances are lasting any less time than older ones. You can always find an example of one that didn’t last, but many of the appliances being sold today will be going strong in 30 years.

Chet I never said that I had a stinky tall tub dishwasher. The only dishwasher I ever complained about that I had in my home that got stinky was my KDSS 20, because the other dishwasher I had was a power clean I was used to putting things in so dirty that the food that would lay in the bottom of the KitchenAid would get stinky. It also had a much less effective drying system so it tended to be moist and stinky inside at times.

There is no right in this country to harm other people that’s why you’re not allowed to smoke an airplanes and grocery stores, strong majority of Americans want energy consumption reduced so that we have a fighting chance to survive a couple more generations so our kids and grandkids can enjoy this earth.

John L


Post# 1225280 , Reply# 69   2/24/2025 at 09:58 by johnb300m (Chicago)        
Reply #44

johnb300m's profile picture
Narrator: “it wasn’t the last time.”

Post# 1225283 , Reply# 70   2/24/2025 at 10:59 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
I'll tell you what...

It won't be the last time. It will be the umpteenth time.

Post# 1225285 , Reply# 71   2/24/2025 at 11:13 by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)        

Combo aren’t you in your 70s? 80s? Shouldn’t you be in a nursing home or at the senior center? I wasn’t asking if you believe it or not. You would have absolutely no idea, your just inserting your immediate opinion without doing any investigating which for your age is quite immature but that’s not the first time you’ve been called that here. Typical denier. Your not an investigative journalist who has the ability to speak to others in different professions that you wouldn’t outside of being one and you also don’t have people coming to report things to you that you won’t hear elsewhere your an applaince “tech” so stay in your lane you honestly have no idea and it’s ironic you call me a fool about that when your inserting your immediate uneducated opinion and as said for your age that’s really embarrassing and I know I’m really gonna strike that ego a bit. The ego you have on a washing machine website is so peculiar and cringeworthy, and imma just say it nobody really cares to hear what you have to say after the way you harass and demean other members, I can’t even give the number of how many people on here have called you out in the past year alone. This is why people have left this website, cause of toxic negative and rude people like yourself who think everything they say is the truth without a shadow of a doubt when it’s not and none of it has any basis or evidence to support it’s just your opinion. You think your god of automaticwasher.org and your inappropriate comments and rudeness to members here is astounding.

As for the appliance related BS you mentioned that was all complete nonsense. New Whirlpool top load washers receive some of the most backlash from current consumers, and it’s not a mystery as to why but you’re far too narrow minded to see the obvious high on that ego. Your mistaking negativity for someone talking about the truth and what consumers feel after purchasing a new whirlpool top load or dishwasher, the amount of electrical problems with Whirlpools new dishwashers from the last five years up until now is insurmountable. I’m not sure how much whirlpool is paying you to keep the truth away, but your remarks are very embarrassing for someone who apparently works on applainces daily. You couldn’t even figure out the problem with my whirlpool PC that I needed assistance with, I kept saying over and over again I suspect the nozzle cap is worn and not able to give pressure it once did 20 years ago and I was able to order a brand new old stock nozzle cap last week off eBay that came up and it just came in the mail Saturday. Can you guess what the result was? This top rack spray arm is blasting like new again. So in other words, you don’t always know what your talking about and there’s always room for improvement so kick that ego to the side and start being more respectful of others and maybe you’ll live a happier more productive life.

“but many of the appliances being sold today will be going strong in 30 years” that was your most laughable statement of this thread. So much for being an applaince expert 🤣 NOTHING made today lasts more than ten years John pull your head out of your ass already.





Post# 1225286 , Reply# 72   2/24/2025 at 11:16 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
Jerome. Who are you trying to convince?
What is the point of all the ranting and raving?
Why do you not have a podcast or a YouTube channel if you’re the self-proclaimed laundry messiah?

And why is it so unacceptable to you that because you had a bad experience with ONE machine, but many others have good experiences with them, you deny their experience.
I won’t deny your experiences, but let’s be realistic. You’re using a lot of public machines that people abuse and don’t care about.
Others are using well cared for private machines.


Post# 1225291 , Reply# 73   2/24/2025 at 11:56 by volvoman (West Windsor, NJ)        
For the love of all things big and small, Jerome....

...shut the **** up already.

Post# 1225329 , Reply# 74   2/24/2025 at 21:03 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

"Chet and Jerome, you get on here just ranting and raving, but new dishwashers and new appliances don’t work because of government regulations and yet you both own new energy star dishwashers and you don’t seem to have any complaints with them. "

 

Oh, I've got complaints about my energy star appliances. Hence my passion. My less than 10 year old dishwasher's wheel pins are falling out and ending up burning up around the heating element. The dispenser fills with water to the point the pre-wash water gets sudsy. I can't stack things on top of one another as I would in my Power Clean. Backed on egg pans leave egg bits around the sump grates that otherwise get pulled into the PC sump. That means extra prep and pre-rinsing. Cycle times take two hours. 

 

My dryer lacks a real, realistic timed dry cycle where as my previous Kenmore 70-90 series dryers offered a full 90 minute timed dry or a long auto dry. No silly shortened sensor dry with wrinkle guard that you can't turn off.

 

The front burner on my Stove just went out. The membrane broke two years ago. My over the range microwave cooks and splatters food so evenly I was celebrating when the interlocks gave out finally having an excuse to buy a real microwave. Which you said would never cook evenly because of the lack of turn table which is so far away from my lived reality. Food comes out looking and tasting like food with the only difference being the just right temperature.   

 

 

The old school Speed Queen on the other hand has given me zero problems except an easy water valve change out. No off balance issues, no major failures, no error codes. Perfectly clean clothing washed in hot or warm water all done in 30 minutes. 

 

 

 


"I work on several dishwashers every week customers are not complaining in general. That new dishwashers aren’t working well and that their old dishwashers worked better that’s just not the reality. Look at all the examples on this site of people that are thrilled with their current dishwashers whether their Bosch KitchenAid GE even some Samsung and LG owners here that are very happy."

 

 

Only because customers are already pre-rinsing their dishes.



"And you two don’t seem to even complain about your own modern dishwashers Lol"

 

 

Because I'd rather have a Power Clean. 

 



''The number one complaint about the good old Hobart KitchenAid dishwashers from the 6070s 80s was they don’t clean well. This was the number one service call, things to go wrong with new dishwashers too that caused them not to clean well at times and they need repair.''

 

Right, they had too short main wash and relatively uneven water distribution. Power Clean versions resolved this and other imperfections.

 

 



"There is no evidence that new appliances are lasting any less time than older ones. You can always find an example of one that didn’t last, but many of the appliances being sold today will be going strong in 30 years."

 

 

If you mean scientifically controlled and certified studies yes there aren't many that I know of. I'll give you that. The real world says otherwise, however.

 



"Chet I never said that I had a stinky tall tub dishwasher. The only dishwasher I ever complained about that I had in my home that got stinky was my KDSS 20, because the other dishwasher I had was a power clean I was used to putting things in so dirty that the food that would lay in the bottom of the KitchenAid would get stinky. It also had a much less effective drying system so it tended to be moist and stinky inside at times."

 

 

By 2011 all new TOL GEs were tall tubs. 2000 you installed a free TT Kitchen-Aid, a year latter you tried a tall tub GE. That puts us around 2001 assuming you installed the TT KA very early in the year 2000. Then came a standard tub GE. Assuming you kept it for only a few months, you used the KUDSS-20 for 10 years. So that puts as at minimum around mid 2011. Most probability with all said and done around 2013.     

 

Ok, lets assume by NEW you meant a new old stock standard tub dishwasher. Or a new MOL electronic model that could've past as TOL at first glance.  

 

 


 

That doesn't change the fact you directly admitted to being dissatisfied with two tall tub dishwashers. One where you explicitly stated "poor performance" and the other "...that is about all I can say good about it" 

 

 

 

 

 

Any reasonable person would at minimum assume that your tall tubs did a poor job of removing soil from dishes. Which you repeatedly stated was not an issue with tall tubs.

 

Given that GLD5600VBB was already being sold on the market in mid 2010 while the tall tub platform was working its way down the GE DW line, it is not a stretch to assume your NEW TOL GE dishwasher was a tall tub which you explicitly stated "it always smelled bad".  

 

 

 

 

There is no right in this country to harm other people that’s why you’re not allowed to smoke an airplanes and grocery stores, strong majority of Americans want energy consumption reduced so that we have a fighting chance to survive a couple more generations so our kids and grandkids can enjoy this earth.

John L

 

 

It is not about how the energy is used, rather how said energy is produced. 

 

The US is based on a free, open market where people can choose what they buy. 




This post was last edited 02/24/2025 at 21:24
Post# 1225338 , Reply# 75   2/24/2025 at 22:58 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
modern dishwashers

Even if I didn't have a problem with my modern dishwasher, that doesn't negate the fact they don't last. I wish it had a real heat dry but I overcome that by using dry assist and rinse aid. I would like to see phosphates return to detergents! No wonder why I have to buy the highest end of detergent for laundry and automatic dishwashing!

Post# 1225340 , Reply# 76   2/24/2025 at 23:47 by Chetlaham (United States)        
Longevity

chetlaham's profile picture

That is probably the biggest issue for myself. In 1985 you could buy a Pot-scrubber that would last 40 years and have a very low probability of a warranty call. 

 

Today, not so much. Water restrictions force complexity that increases the probability of failure, make repair more difficult or down right impractical, and electronics which have a finite life expectancy. An analog mechanism can last 100 years and does not age when not in use. An electrolytic capacitor on the other hand ages by just being plugged in and lasts about 30 years on the optimistic end. 

 

 

Replacing an appliance every 5-10 years produces more waste long term. 


Post# 1225343 , Reply# 77   2/25/2025 at 01:30 by DaveAMKrayoGuy (Oak Park, MI)        

daveamkrayoguy's profile picture

Yes, simply put what Chetlatham just explained--and to me a good end of story...

 

Appliances should not be just thrown out, that will create much more waste & toxic our environment much more then hanging onto and investing much more life in, and maybe somehow reinventing its own energy efficiency, if not at least the efficiency of more years of it working properly...!

 

 

 

-- Dave


Post# 1225352 , Reply# 78   2/25/2025 at 06:47 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Reply number 74 and on and on

combo52's profile picture
Wow, what a waste of time Chet I doubt anyone, including myself even read all that nonsense, this is why you can’t do anything in life because you’re worried about s..t instead of actually going out and helping people by getting a job you could actually buy a power clean dishwasher. If you didn’t have to rely on your parents all the time.

90s GE dishwasher lasting 40 years. That’s not very likely and you know it. No dishwasher has ever lasted 40 years consistently. If it was used every day the closest thing that ever came to lasting that long were the old Hobart built KitchenAid.

Both you and Jerome just make up stuff at Will without any proof to back it up, you’re the two most blocked people on the site.

John L


Post# 1225358 , Reply# 79   2/25/2025 at 07:44 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

85 dishwasher John. Not 90.

 

 

 

 

Have a look at reply #71.

 

This is what we mean when we say you twist and/or misquote people's words then resort to childish attacks when called out on it.


Post# 1225364 , Reply# 80   2/25/2025 at 08:57 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
Naw. I’ll second what John is saying. I know I might be considered just a kid here, but I was a little kid in the late 80s. I remember relatives and friends having 70s and 80s appliances repaired ALL THE TIME! And then the grandparents would say “they don’t make em like they used to!”
And they’re referring to PowerCleans and and BD Whirlpools.
I will concede the older appliances were a bit easier to fix. But they were also like 5x more expensive so I think people were more willing to repair. But that’s the point. That ‘85 GE lasted 40yrs due to periodic repairs and maintenance.
My parents had our Newton Maytag 511 repaired probably a dozen times in my life.
But after a while it gets to be not worth it.

Yeah I’m driving two old KitchenAid DWs but they both needed rebuilding when I got them.

Heck, maybe we need tariffs and should go back to $3000 washers and dishwashers.
Repairs will be worth it again. Less throw away.
Start saving up!


Post# 1225366 , Reply# 81   2/25/2025 at 09:20 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Appliances were more expensive because they had more raw material in them. If you take the cost of a $1,500 TC Speed Queen which has comparable build quality to a vintage washer and adjust for the cost of inflation it would be $508 in 1985. $508 is about what an average 2 speed 5 cycle extra large capacity washer would cost in 1985. I say about because yes you will find + or - 50 dollar deviations.

 

 

As raw material prices have gone up manufacturers have gradually cheapened machines to keep sale prices from rising as fast as inflation.

 

 

I don't deny your lived experience or what you witnessed. However if you take a look at rental properties and condos where GE appliances were installed by the hundreds of thousands if not millions across the US and Canada it is very much the norm for 80s GE appliances to last 30 years with minimal repairs. There are still basic Potscrubbers from 1983-1989 going to this day. 80s washers,  dryers and stoves. Half the time they are replaced not because they are broken, rather outdated in the eyes of today's tenants. Not to mention all the OPL and laundromat machines that have gone 15-20 years with daily use.

 

 

I don't consider you as a little kid. You were able to articulate a constructive on topic reply without resorting to personal attacks, name calling or unfounded rumors.


Post# 1225367 , Reply# 82   2/25/2025 at 09:46 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
No. Nope. Nada. Nein. Nyet. Non.
I’ve lived in a dozen apartments over the years. None of them had any 80s GEs. They were all early 90s at the latest.
And yes many of my apartments were old.

I stand corrected. I toured one apartment that has late 80s WP pre- power clean dishwasher.
But that was the demo unit. No other actual units had 80s machines.


Post# 1225369 , Reply# 83   2/25/2025 at 10:07 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

It depends on when they were renovated, and what was installed at the time of build. If the Apartments were built any time before 1983/1984, ~50/50 chance they would've had a Plastisol dishwashers in them. Given that plastisol tubs rust in about 10 years, by the late 80s/early 90s the replacements would've been commencing. 

 

In fact GE knew very well they had some of the shortest lasting dishwashers in the 1970s. Around that time GE became serious and began planning, engineering and finally gradually phasing their Permatuff line which was completely re-engineered from the ground up. Their serious attempt resulted in some of the longest lasting dishwashers ever made and longevity went up in general across their entire appliance lineup. 

 

By the time the early 90s came around, GE began to slowly reverse their efforts and what came in the late 90s/early 2000s set the stage for them selling to Haier.    


Post# 1225373 , Reply# 84   2/25/2025 at 11:01 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Redesigned GE dishwashers

combo52's profile picture
Reply number 83 as usual total BS.

G E didn’t do a total redesign of their dishwashers until about 2011 when everything changed. The last major redesign was 1967 when they went to that awful pump.

The GE dishwashers in the 90s were quite good except for the pump and lack luster performance. Their early tall tub models were actually quite reliable. They just weren’t great performers, but they were well built and they got away from the awful drain valve system in the cheaper models.

The 1980s plastic tub dishwasher used a lot of the same parts as the plastisol ones most of all they use that awful motor and drain valve assembly pump by far the worst pump in any dishwasher that was mass produced in the US ever, the only good thing about that pump is we make a lot of money replacing them I’ve replaced two in the last two weeks.

John L


Post# 1225376 , Reply# 85   2/25/2025 at 11:15 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
Honestly, I think it’s time to put this thread out to pasture.

Post# 1225381 , Reply# 86   2/25/2025 at 11:58 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

The handful of parts that are physically interchangeable between plastisol and permatuff minus the water valve, door latch, upper rack guide, and screws; had engineering, design or build modifications done to them. Such as the pump bodies being re-shaped to have less carry over water, the pop-up tower water distribution slots changed, number of wash arm holes consolidated, drain solenoid encapsulation and drain bracket design changed, lower rack wheels, ect. Beyond these changes the rest was a totally new design.

 

Just about every single part was re-examined, reconsidered, recalculated, re-tested and modified as needed to fulfill GE's new goals. Some engineering changes were relatively minor like the spray arm hub, while others were a completely new design like the permatuff tub and door, detergent cams, detergent cups, vent system, heater, timer, sump boot, sump grates, fascia molding, door hinges, motor mount, float, wire harness, cycle sequence, and the list goes on. 

 

Just because a handful of parts are interchangeable between permatuff and plastisol, doesn't mean they have not been re-engineered in some way. In fact the same pump and motor assembly between 1967 and 2007 has probably endured at least four dozen engineering revisions everywhere from the motor bearings to the size of the drain port to the macerator to the seals to the motor's protector to the drain flapper, ect despite the fact said pumps are physically interchangeable between so many models.  

 

 

GE dishwashers peaked between 1983 and 1991. After that the decline began. 


Post# 1225383 , Reply# 87   2/25/2025 at 12:37 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
to chetlaham

Now we only have tall tub GE dishwashers. My dad has one in his house in Houston which is a builder grade GE. While it does get the dishes coean, it feels like a cheap toy compared to their previous models. Their laundry line is no better. If it was better, they would've had a filter-flo, minibasket, a full size stainless steel wash basket, and a stainless steel outer tub all while being "energy efficient". You need water to clean and filter out lint. Many consumers including myself or anybody who has simply used a filter-flo alone wants one back. For the umpteenth time! I want my laundry and dishes done right the first time! What do these people not understand? Do they think we're stupid?

Post# 1225385 , Reply# 88   2/25/2025 at 13:11 by Agiflow (Toms River)        

Jerome. If you could have a GE Filter-Flo washer, do you have a place for it at home?

Post# 1225386 , Reply# 89   2/25/2025 at 13:16 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
energy star Kenmore/Bosch

There's nothing wrong with my energy star Kenmore/Bosch. I just wish the spray was constantly at full pressure. That's why I investigate everything, even open the door during a cycle sometimes just so I'm sure the spray arms are traveling even at low pressure. I even went as far as taking both arms off the racks and bottom so I'm sure water is being forced through at all speeds and pressure levels. That's why I have a pet peeve about these new dishwashers. I want water to shoot everywhere. It should be shooting everywhere to insure that no nook or cranny is missed and every single dish is hit with jets of water. I'm sure chetlaham would agree.

Post# 1225390 , Reply# 90   2/25/2025 at 13:23 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
Why don’t you start a podcast Jerome?

My favorite engineering quote is from a programmer;
“Programming today is a race between software engineers building bigger and better idiot-proof programs. And the universe trying to build bigger and better idiots.
So far the universe is winning.

And how do you know ANY of this Chet?
Did you work for GE?
Did staff members divulge secrets of their design/development processes?
Or are you such a geek you have created an entire database of their part number and revision changes over the decades?
What parts are changed and why is confidential internal engineering information.


Post# 1225391 , Reply# 91   2/25/2025 at 13:26 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
Uhhh I’m sure the Bosch engineers know what they’re doing with the spray patterns.
Your feelings about water spray do not matter in sound design or sales decisions.
Thank goodness for that.


Post# 1225395 , Reply# 92   2/25/2025 at 15:11 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
engineer

Do I need to be an engineer? No! Does it matter? No! When you wash dishes with a weak spray and for 3 hours, you're just spreading the dirt around. Consumers are waking up each and every day!

Post# 1225396 , Reply# 93   2/25/2025 at 15:37 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
You’re a liar Jerome.
So you’re telling me your Kenmore Bosch is just smearing dirt and grease around your dishes?
How can you eat off that?
Why don’t you go out and get a vintage dishwasher like many of us here?
You’re all talk and no action.


Post# 1225398 , Reply# 94   2/25/2025 at 16:51 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
smearing dirt

No, it is not smearing dirt! It does clean the dishes! For the umpteenth time! I prefer the sprays to blast the dishes constantly like older models did! The older machines just got right down to business instead of trickling them with water! GEEZ!!!! I'm sure chetlaham would agree! If there's one thing, it does leave food in the filter despite the dishes being clean! I just sit there and observe! For the umpteenth time!

Post# 1225399 , Reply# 95   2/25/2025 at 17:23 by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        

ea56's profile picture
Jesus, Mary and Joseph, ENOUGH already!

For cryin’ out loud you guys keep beatin’ a horse that died a long time ago.

If you don’t like new dishwashers, DON’T use one! Problem solved!

There are WAY more important things to be concerned about in February of 2025, and the spray pattern of dishwashers is the last thing to be concerned about with the state that our nation and the world are in right this very minute.

Get a life!

Eddie




This post was last edited 02/25/2025 at 17:39
Post# 1225400 , Reply# 96   2/25/2025 at 18:03 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
to e56

Does it matter? When a dishwasher produces weak spray and doesn't get the dishes clean, you're damn right I'm livid about it! Every item in the dishwasher be hit anc cleaned. I am serious! And washers that don't clean properly cause health problems too! For the millionth time. Water is what cleans dishes and powerful jets! Nobody has time for cycles that last 3 hours! Screw the EPA, and screw the DOE!!!! They're the reasons why people are having health problems!



This post was last edited 02/25/2025 at 20:11
Post# 1225401 , Reply# 97   2/25/2025 at 18:24 by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        

ea56's profile picture

Jerome,
I have been washing our dishes by hand since April 2018 and I and my husband NEVER get sick! The last time I had the flu was over 20 years ago when I was still working and exposed to sick people on a daily basis.

Using a dishwasher be it a 1960’s water hog or a new model is no guarantee for avoidance of illness.

The reasons that people have health problems is because many people are PIGS with utter disregard for proper sanitation in all phases of their lives! Plus they fail to get vaccinated against preventable illnesses due to their warped view points on recommended preventative health.

If this is all you have to worry about you’re not paying attention to the world around you.

No one wants to be subjected to your endless rants about things you have no control over. I stand by my recommendation that you get a life, you’ll be much happier and live longer without the needless stress you’re subjecting yourself to.

Eddie


Post# 1225402 , Reply# 98   2/25/2025 at 18:26 by simpsomatic (Palm Springs, CA)        
Bedtime

Jerome and Chet.....it is way past your bedtime. Goodnight and don't let the bed bugs bite.

Post# 1225405 , Reply# 99   2/25/2025 at 19:42 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        
Reply #98

maytag85's profile picture
It’s your bedtime, too. You’ve made snide remarks and comments to me and others on the site over the years. It seems as though you are just here to stir the pot, noting else.

Post# 1225406 , Reply# 100   2/25/2025 at 20:09 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
bedtime

What do you mean it's past our bedtime? I'm not stupid. I'm an adult.

Post# 1225413 , Reply# 101   2/25/2025 at 21:09 by simpsomatic (Palm Springs, CA)        
Really....

It's time like you all acted like one.

Post# 1225431 , Reply# 102   2/26/2025 at 11:40 by RyneR1988 (Indianapolis)        

ryner1988's profile picture
Whoa holy hell! I haven't been on here in a week or so, last time I saw this thread it had like 30 responses. This escalated quickly.

Post# 1225434 , Reply# 103   2/26/2025 at 12:03 by RyneR1988 (Indianapolis)        

ryner1988's profile picture
I'll just say this. For years I felt a lot like certain members on here, although I wasn't as vocal about it I will say that much. Kept buying top load washers, even used ones, because I couldn't wrap my head around an FL that worked, only heard the horror stories and didn't listen to what they can actually do for people. When the control board died on my previous Whirlpool TL I bought an LG WM4000 front load washer and I'm never going back to a TL. If you throw on an extra rinse or two, it actually rinses better than any top load washer I've ever owned. My wife has super sensitive skin and she used to itch constantly, even switched to free and clear detergents and she was still itchy. I'm using regular Tide powder with downy now in the FL and what do ya know? She doesn't itch at all anymore. Clothes generally smell better, feel better, and I imagine look better. And I've been able to cut down to about 1-2 loads of laundry a week instead of the previous 3 or so I used to do owning TL's. I still have a standard Whirlpool dryer and the LG washer spins clothes so dry that the WP dryer makes work of them in no time. I love my FL and am so glad I gave it a chance. That's the thing, people think something is great in its time, i.e., water-hungry TL washers, but then innovation happens. Washers use less water, dishwashers use less water, and both are much quieter and can handle much more laundry and dishes. Wouldn't it actually be kind of a problem if things were exactly as they were 30 years ago? Stagnation is the enemy of progress, and this is coming from someone who struggles with change, I have emotional regulation issues and change really throws me off-track. But I also know that change is the only constant in life.

Post# 1225437 , Reply# 104   2/26/2025 at 13:03 by Agiflow (Toms River)        

I heard this story from a lot of people on here. "Went to a front loader and never looked back".

Bought my first front loader back in June 2019. Whirlpool WTW6620HW.

While liked the capacity it had, I really didn't find my clothes appreciably cleaner.

Maybe because I don't get them ground in dirty these days.

At the time, had a Speed Queen top loader also.
I washed clothes for a friend and the load smelled like damp stale cigarettes.


Even after a heavy duty cycle they still smelled.

When I did them in the Speed Queen top loader, no more smell of nasty cigarettes. Proper dilution with enough water.

While I liked the front loader, it never swayed me to leave top load washing.

It isn't for me the magic bullet it seems to be for soo many other people.

People are acting like front load washing is this new thing that we have been so deprived of in the USA.

Hey, if it works for you, more power to you. Different strokes for different folks.



Post# 1225442 , Reply# 105   2/26/2025 at 14:15 by Chetlaham (United States)        
Implementation is Key

chetlaham's profile picture

The downfall of US front loaders are the lack of heated cycles. All front load cycles should heat the water to a target temperature based on the fabric type with detergent working in stages. This has been the key to FL success throughout most of the world. 

 

I actually considered buying a Speed Queen front load in 2012-2013 however what put me off was the lack of onboard heater. A heater with each cycle heating to a wash temp of say 20*C for colors, 30*C for handwash, 40*C for delicate, 50*C for Casuals, 60*C for normal, 70*C towels, 80*C Heavy, 90*C whites, 100*C sanitize I think would have been ideal. 

 

Or a separate temperature knob labeled like this:

 

 

 

Infographic: Washing Machine Temperature Guide


Post# 1225443 , Reply# 106   2/26/2025 at 14:17 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)        

panasonicvac's profile picture
I love both front loaders and top loaders, in fact my favorite washer of all time is a top loader. But if I had to choose between the two, front loaders is a no brainer. Even my mom who's on her fourth washer says that she's never going back to top loaders in her house. Her first two were GE top loaders, one of them was a Filter-Flo. The last washer she had was a Maytag Neptune front loader, I honestly missed that one more than the two top loaders. For my next house hopefully I'd love to have two washers and dryers, one top loader and one front loader. Still though, the front loader would be my go to machine. This is one of those energy efficient products that I'm super happy came into existence cause I found nothing better than a front loader. My mom who also owns a energy efficient dishwasher says that it's the best dishwasher she's ever owned and I agree. My point here is I have no problem with buying energy efficient that can clean just as well if not better, why would I need something that uses so much energy and water? Doesn't really make sense to me.

Post# 1225444 , Reply# 107   2/26/2025 at 15:10 by Mrstickball (Ohio, USA)        

@Chetlaham -

The sad part is that since all American washers run on 120VAC, the heating element is a bit limited I fear. I would imagine that given that the circut we all use are 120v/15AC that there may not be enough room for a proper heater like what the Europeans have.

Inversely, Asko does sell a 220v washer in the US that piggybacks the power from the dryer to the washer. I wonder if that would be a good way to solve the issue potentially. I wonder if stacked units like, say, LG's WashTower or Electrolux's laundry center could utilize such a system and offer a vastly superior experience.


Post# 1225445 , Reply# 108   2/26/2025 at 15:38 by Agiflow (Toms River)        

I don't know what your energy rates are out in Utah, but my water bill is very manageable and when I have my thermostat set down to about 65° it drops my heating bill significantly.


I have gas heat and I've noticed in the last 4 years my bills have gone exponentially higher like everything else has.

I was considering getting one of the new Whirlpool front loaders. I would like to give it a shot again. Only for the fact that I don't have to drag a queen size comforter to the laundromat every month.


If front loaders are the way we must go, then I hope under this administration that they take the water restrictions off the water amounts they can use and start being a little more generous with an already inherently efficient design.

Is that really asking too much ?




Post# 1225462 , Reply# 109   2/26/2025 at 21:34 by volvoman (West Windsor, NJ)        
Reply 100....

...The jury is still out on that one.

Post# 1225490 , Reply# 110   2/27/2025 at 08:27 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
disposable appliances

I've heard that appliances are disposable due to the EPA. This is especially true when they don't last long. It's like they solve a problem and create another at the same time.

Post# 1225497 , Reply# 111   2/27/2025 at 11:39 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
Honestly, I’d put the blame on consumers and corporations who don’t care. Oblivious consumers are the enabler which essentially tells companies “It’s okay to keep on making inferior junk”, hence why things are the way they are. If you want to send a message, got to stop blinding consuming things.



Post# 1225506 , Reply# 112   2/27/2025 at 14:28 by Mrstickball (Ohio, USA)        

I actually had a conversation with an engineer with one of the major companies about why modern machines are so poorly made. He was very honest with me.

He said that quite literally, the corporate guys put a # of years that they want the design to last for. That's literally it.

They could, tomorrow, make a washing machine last 20 years and meet any and all guidelines to make it happen. Easily.

The problem is that 20 year washing machine won't be cheap. And the problem is that consumers are very, very enamored with cheap, low-end units that get the clothes washed and pretty much nothing else. There was a race to the bottom on price (walmart effect) that all appliances have been caught up in, and the corporations can't release a unit that is extremely reliable with all of the issues it gets caught up in, which is cost.

I remember reading some of the old literature from when HE machines were coming on the market. The argument that some of the consumer advocacy groups made about it wasn't that HE's were unreliable, its that they were expensive... Citing the costs for machines like Neptunes, Duets, Calypsos and others in the early 00s as they were 2x more expensive than basic ones. Their argument was the prices would go up. They never did. But what happened is prices stayed stagnant while they reduced quality which has been on a decline since the 1980s when each company kept iterating cheaper designs to keep washers around the $500 price point. Now the corps are afraid to do a 15 or 20 year design because it WILL cost more money like you see out of a GE or Maytag commercial, or what Speed Queen has, and not everyone wants a "Buy it for life" washer it seems.


Post# 1225507 , Reply# 113   2/27/2025 at 14:41 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
To simplify it, planned obsolescence.

Post# 1225509 , Reply# 114   2/27/2025 at 15:45 by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
And who is blame?  Exactly as the stated above ... the large consumer-base that won't pay the cost for more robust construction.

NOT THE MANUFACTURERS OR THE EPA.


Post# 1225519 , Reply# 115   2/27/2025 at 18:24 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

@MrStickball: What I've been saying in 4,130 post, you just said it much more eloquently and summed up in one post.  

 

 

There is an engineer on here (Thomas Ortega) who said nearly the exact same thing backing up your statement. 

 

 

Companies force engineers to build ultra cheap machines, and consumers essentially demand them. 

 

 

The only thing that will change anything is a mass shift in thinking.

 

 

@DaDoEs: If consumers demanded that energy restrictions went away, they would. The people are the other side of the government having the final say.


Post# 1225520 , Reply# 116   2/27/2025 at 18:41 by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
They aren't in sufficient numbers for it to happen ...


Post# 1225523 , Reply# 117   2/27/2025 at 19:13 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Right, hence why I used the word "mass". At least tens of millions of people would have to start asking for more durable appliances and/or start buying the remaining few like Speed Queen for competitors to follow suite. It is a dream of mine. What that will take will be a revolution, and perhaps a new generation, but I sometimes have my doubts. I feel like things will stagnate and the universe will pass away in a slow heat death. 


Post# 1225526 , Reply# 118   2/27/2025 at 19:32 by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
"the large consumer-base that won't pay the cost for more robust construction."

Not sure about that. I see plenty of reviews on other sites with people livid about their $3K Kitchen Aid and $4K Bosch refrigerators dying months into ownership. The companies are also dodging buyers on repairs, making them wait months to fix legitimate problems if not longer. A $4K refrigerator is NOT cheap, even by todays standards.

There's definitely a market for expensive appliances but they have NOT proven themselves to be reliable. Today, more expensive appliances are actually less reliable in most cases. The days of getting better quality for more money was already starting to dwindle with the 1980's. Companies also need to step up to the plate and fix problems in a timely manner that are under warranty and not play bullshit games. They should also be R&D'ing their junk before shipping it out so it doesn't bite them in the ass later down the road. Let engineers have more say and build a quality product they're proud of instead of forcing them to cheapen the hell out of the design that they're deeply embarrassed of signing their name on.


Post# 1225527 , Reply# 119   2/27/2025 at 19:50 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

There are two types of expensive: One that buys material durability, the other that buys features and cycles. People mistakenly believe features and cycles that they'll never use are signs of progress. Its a marketing ploy to get people to hand over money while getting nothing practical in return.   

 

 


Post# 1225530 , Reply# 120   2/27/2025 at 20:14 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Expensive high-end appliances

combo52's profile picture
Have always been more troublesome, just like if you bought a 1966 Cadillac and compared it to a 1966 Plymouth valiant. The Cadillac was gonna have a lot more breakdowns and going to cost a lot more to keep on the road.

I remember one of our customers that bought a Levet home in 1966. It came with all middle of the line general electric appliances. She said nearly 10 years of living there she only had three service calls between all the appliances. Her husband did very well and they built a custom home in around 1976 they put top-of-the-line Maytag washer and dryer KitchenAid dishwasher, KitchenAid trash, compactor, subzero refrigerator and every one of them needed service in the first year. The worst was the halo of heat dryer that literally caught fire and we had to ship it back to May tag.

People often are willing to pay more for quality products. Look at the great success. Speed Queen is having with washers and dryers for example.

The real problem on this thread Chet and Jerome is that neither one of you have 1 ounce of credibility because you’ve chosen to remain completely anonymous. Neither one of you have anything to do with the appliance industry or anything related to it apparently so your opinions really don’t count for much.

I don’t block anybody, but I seldom read your rants. They just don’t make any sense and they change from day-to-day. I still remember all that BS about that $79 Chinese microwave being the best thing ever made in microwave ovens, lol.

John L


Post# 1225535 , Reply# 121   2/27/2025 at 21:25 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

John- you, me and Jerome both know what you're really trying to accomplish when you use anonymous and credibility in the same sentence.  

 

 

I am a United States Citizen, a consumer and a user of home appliances. I am very much entitled to my lived experience.

 

 

John is wrong again in front of the blocked contingent- my Microwave was made Thailand, not China.

 

 

 

 

 

If you read the reviews there are many using strong language in favor of the even cooking, performance and reasonable build quality for the listed price. Customers, including myself, truly feel like they got a bang for the buck.      

 

 https://shorturl.at/NVIQn

 

 

https://shorturl.at/Olaxu

 

 Ie, the "Microwave of the Gods"

 

 

 

 

 Better than any turntable, can defrost on full power:

 

 

 

 

If you want to make an account and tell over 110 users that they've wrong in feeling so elated, go right ahead.

 

 

However, if anything, this shows that you believe reasonable performance can not come at a reasonable price. Or tolerate others being happy.

 




This post was last edited 02/27/2025 at 21:45
Post# 1225536 , Reply# 122   2/27/2025 at 21:31 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
The more complex something is, the higher probability of things breaking down, just how it goes. If you want something to be reliable, got to keep it as basic as much as possible.

Post# 1225541 , Reply# 123   2/28/2025 at 00:20 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
chetlaham and stickball

My sentiments exactly. Consumers are waking up, but it's not enough.

Post# 1225544 , Reply# 124   2/28/2025 at 01:12 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
“Consumers are waking up, but it’s not enough”

I’ve woken up a long, long time ago, so have others on the site who have been stashing away vintage machines are appliances for good while now.


Post# 1225561 , Reply# 125   2/28/2025 at 10:08 by me (Essex, UK)        

The thing about appliances like a front load washing machines, is they are a bit of a black box, well typically they're white, but the consumer shopping for one really doesn't know what they are getting for their money, what lies beneath the case. You can compare superficial stuff like max spin speed and the look and feel of the controls and the programme options, and compare the wash rating and energy usage rating on the energy labels and the length of the warranty, but is the more expensive machine actually built to last longer, or is the manufacturer just charging a premium for their brand name and a few gimmicky features.

I suspect if consumers saw the components inside, they'd walk away from some of the cheapest models and spend a little more.

When I chose my current machine, I couldn't even find out if it didn't have a sealed tub, so I didn't know if I'd be able to change the bearings when they failed, or if it would require an expensive new tub assembly and probably not be worth repairing. And as I've never had the bearings in a washing machine last more than about 10 years, not even a premium machine, it resulted in me buying a slightly cheaper, lower spec model than I might have done.



Post# 1226661 , Reply# 126   3/16/2025 at 21:12 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
brand

I think the premium brand is charging more.



This post was last edited 03/16/2025 at 21:27
Post# 1226666 , Reply# 127   3/16/2025 at 22:10 by wayupnorth (On a lake between Bangor and Bar Harbor, Maine)        

wayupnorth's profile picture
Ya, right, Premium Brand has always cost more, what else is new.

Post# 1227145 , Reply# 128   3/24/2025 at 16:26 by givemehotwater (US)        

Reading the replies here, I can physically feel myself developing frown lines. I honestly can't believe how many people will cut off their nose to spite their face—or in this case, advocate for literal garbage—just because the person who proposed it doesn’t align with their political views.

That’s a discussion for another time. I refuse to associate myself with any political party; I’ve always been an independent. But I can’t believe how many people have turned their entire lives into political statements. Does anyone have hobbies anymore? Interests beyond politics? I remember when it was considered impolite to discuss politics, and people could simply agree to disagree. What happened?

Don’t even answer that — I don’t want to hear it.

Here’s the bottom line: Have any of you actually used a newer front-loader? They are absolutely terrible at rinsing out soap. Unless someone pre-soaks their clothes to trick the machine into using more water, the clothes are left saturated with detergent unless only a few teaspoons of soap are used—which simply isn’t enough to properly clean and suspend soil.

I've personally used front-loaders made between 2019 and 2023 from LG, GE/Haier, Bosch, Miele, and Maytag, and none of them rinsed effectively. The only one that had a fighting chance was, oddly enough, the GE—but only when using the "Bulky" cycle.

To make matters worse, I recently found out that Whirlpool has removed water level selectors from their conventional top-load machines, and their "deep fill" option only fills the drum halfway. What’s even the point of that? Outside of a few states with water shortages—where consumers already pay sky-high prices for water—most people have plenty of it.

I live in the Tri-State Area of the East Coast, and there’s zero concern about water running out. These restrictions are not only unnecessary but harmful to human health if they leave clothes full of detergent. And from what I’ve seen, these so-called efficient machines don’t clean mud or garden soil nearly as well as those that use just a few more gallons of water per cycle.

Honestly, most of the comments in this thread seem politically motivated. Almost no one is actually discussing the issue at hand—besides a few posts. And that, to me, is incredibly sad. We should be able to have a real conversation about the subpar appliances being sold today.



Post# 1227147 , Reply# 129   3/24/2025 at 16:41 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
If your front loader is not rinsing well, then you’re using too much soap.

Politically, I try to refrain from it on forums like this. Usually is no point. You won’t convince anyone online.

But I draw the line when peoples’ political “opinions” or political actions put into jeopardy my life and family, which seems more frequent these days.


Post# 1227148 , Reply# 130   3/24/2025 at 16:53 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Rinsing in modern high-efficiency washers

combo52's profile picture
I did seven loads of laundry yesterday three in my KitchenAid proline front load washer, two in my three year-old Speed Queen front load washer and two in my 20 year-old Speed Queen front load washer which uses more water than the two others.

The two newer ones do a better job Although the old speed Queen does fine. It just doesn’t clean as well because of the shorter wash cycle.

I can’t imagine what you’re doing wrong I dose pretty heavily with detergent. I use regular scented detergent I put the full measure of liquid chlorine bleach in the dispenser when I’m washing, light colored towels, bedding sheets, etc. and when the clothing comes out of the machine, I can’t smell the detergent or the bleach and I certainly don’t have any allergies to detergent. Most people don’t anyway.

This is not the place to discuss politics, but politics is one of the oldest and most noble of pursuits and I’d love discussing politics I live in breathe politics, I have no use for useless things like professional sports, which makes absolutely no difference in anybody’s life except the athletes I suppose, lol

I live in Maryland and while we are not threatened with running out of water except during summer periods, when we have a drought almost every year, the cost of water here is fairly high. The cost of treating it is high and I do like the idea that the Chesapeake Bay is getting better and not worse. I don’t know how you avoid those real concerns but water is not unlimited anywhere on the Earth. there are always costs.

Thanks for your thoughts, John L


Post# 1227154 , Reply# 131   3/24/2025 at 17:08 by ea56 (Cotati, Calif.)        

ea56's profile picture
There’s absolutely nothing “political” about recognizing Climate Change and the reality of the Earths limited natural resources. But there certainly seems to be one side of the political spectrum that wants to make this political.

Just because some folks feel that it’s their God given right to destroy the Earth and waste natural resources because that’s what makes them feel better about life doesn’t make it right.

Wasting the Earths natural resources is no different than wasting anything else. It’s WRONG!

Eddie


Post# 1227156 , Reply# 132   3/24/2025 at 17:20 by Ultramatic (New York City)        

ultramatic's profile picture

 

 

And now a musical interlude...

 




?si=vd4O72edH0AKAR4Y


Post# 1227157 , Reply# 133   3/24/2025 at 17:28 by givemehotwater (US)        

Eddie, since you’re in California, I completely understand your concerns about water usage. Your state has faced severe shortages (or at least it did, from what I recall), and water isn’t as abundant in your area.

I truly sympathize with your concerns about water conservation, but calling it a matter of “resources” feels like a stretch. These machines aren’t consuming oil or some scarce, harmful material—they’re just using water.

For most people on the East Coast—in fact, probably everyone—water is plentiful. Whether I use a high-efficiency (HE) machine or a conventional top-loader isn’t going to make any meaningful environmental impact. In fact, any extra water use might be offset by lower electricity consumption.


Post# 1227158 , Reply# 134   3/24/2025 at 17:33 by givemehotwater (US)        

John & John, I’m being completely honest with both of you—I am not overdosing on detergent, nor am I trying to recreate a Brady Bunch soap suds disaster. I’ve been telling friends and others to use minimal amounts of detergent—literally between 1.5 to 2 tablespoons—and rinsing is still an issue.

NYC, in particular, has extremely soft water, often around 1 GPG or less. Even with a double rinse, these machines still leave small amounts of soap suds on the rubber gasket at the end of the cycle.

I shudder to think about the people who don’t even notice this—especially those using laundry pods.

So what’s the solution? Besides telling people to use just two teaspoons of detergent, are we really expected to sit around running five extra rinse and spin cycles manually?

This isn’t user error. These machines are objectively terrible at rinsing out all detergents like Persil, All, and Tide.


Post# 1227171 , Reply# 135   3/24/2025 at 18:35 by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
"Eddie, since you’re in California, I completely understand your concerns about water usage. Your state has faced severe shortages (or at least it did, from what I recall), and water isn’t as abundant in your area."

California doesn't have a water shortage problem most of the time, they have a political problem. Annually flushing trillions of gallons of fresh water into the ocean instead of filling up reservoirs IS the problem. Reservoirs are also purposely over released, causing shortages.

It reminds me of Enron shutting off powerplants to price gouge 25 years ago but the water problem has been going on for at least 40 years.






Post# 1227178 , Reply# 136   3/24/2025 at 19:19 by qsd-dan (West)        

qsd-dan's profile picture
I'm strictly a top load user but if you're still having issues rinsing out detergent, keep scaling back until it's not a problem.

Post# 1227195 , Reply# 137   3/24/2025 at 23:41 by Whirlpool862 (Columbus, OH)        

I’m strictly a top load user, I don’t like front loaders and I never have. The seals are prone to getting stinky and they tend to have more problems.

I have a Whirlpool WTW4900BW0 top load high efficiency washer, and a matching WED4850BW0 electro dryer. Washer has a bad bearing but the dryer works great and has no issues. Both otherwise work fine, washer is just really loud on the spin cycle.

As for the light bulbs part, LEDs are better than incandescents, they last longer and are better for the environment.I NEVER liked the CFL bulbs, tho. I’ve changed some failed LED bulbs but they are sure more reliable than incandescent.

The LG fridges seem to be prone to having bad compressors, not liking them, I have a 2015 Frigidaire top freezer that still works great, nothing fancy about it.

My brother has a 2007 Whirlpool side-by-side that also works great, I think his washer is an LG, but it still works.

My sister has a new GE washer that she bought to replace an old GE HydroWave that failed.


Post# 1227197 , Reply# 138   3/25/2025 at 00:15 by johnb300m (Chicago)        
Givemehotwater

johnb300m's profile picture
Maybe you’re still using too much.
Tide and Persil are horrible rinsers.
I had issues with them too in my old Maytag front load, and I had soft water too.
What did I do? I used no more than a tablespoon for an average medium load.
For very dirty and full loads, I used 2tbsp max. And did extra rinse. That way was ok.

Now I have an Electrolux front load, and I’ve been going back and forth between Grove and Tide Pure Clean.
My water is moderately hard at 9-12gpg.
Tonight I did a Normal load of 2 jeans and 4 flannels.
This is how much soap I used.
About 10mls.
All clean! No rinsing issues.


  View Full Size
Post# 1227198 , Reply# 139   3/25/2025 at 00:19 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
I just want to add, I think Tide used to rinse BETTER maybe 10yrs ago vs today.
Whatever low sudsing agents they used to use, seems like they removed them.
But P&G keeps £¥¢@ing with their formulas.
Even Cascade is stupid foamy today!


Post# 1227204 , Reply# 140   3/25/2025 at 00:37 by givemehotwater (US)        

Everyone, I assure you—I’m not overusing detergent. With these new machines, I’ve used no more than two tablespoons, sometimes as little as half a tablespoon. If you keep cutting the dose further, nothing will come out properly clean. A mere splash of detergent isn’t enough to wash everything away.

My most recent testing involved a GE GFW148SSMWW at a friend’s place and I was equally unimpressed with the Miele W1’s rinsing performance. Both machines run on NYC tap water (~1 GPG) and struggle with proper rinsing, leading to stiff towels—something I believe is due to inadequate rinsing.

I'm fortunate to own an old set of Whirlpool Direct Drive washers, which I purchased when I bought my home in 2004. I've never had a problem getting a clean rinse in them.



Post# 1227206 , Reply# 141   3/25/2025 at 01:10 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
You are a unicorn then.
IDK.
Lots of people don’t have this issue.

Are you worried about a few little bubbles on the boot?
I’ll be honest, I’ve had lots of top loaders too, and even when those do all their deep rinsing, that rinse water is NOT crystal clear. There were soap suds remnants ( not much, but still visible!) in there too.


If the slight soap residue is really an issue you’ll want to find a special hypoallergenic detergent product.


Post# 1227209 , Reply# 142   3/25/2025 at 01:51 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
softener

Have you tried softener to knock down the suds? I don't have a problem in the Speed Queen Commercials. I always use heavy soil to get a deep rinse anyway.

Post# 1227211 , Reply# 143   3/25/2025 at 02:41 by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        

I usually no longer chime into this kind of thread on here - but I'm already in a "picking fights" mood (even at work - rightfully so though), so what...


"Water running out isn't an issue here" really encapsulates the issue with such discussions.
It's not bad here, so how can it be a problem at all???

Gee I wonder how a state consistently hotter, more densly populated, more agriculturally important and dryer could have more water issues than one literally wetter than most of Germany...



And why do they regulate a whole country? How could they?
No, they should regulate every person individually - but wait that would be overregulation, wouldn't it?




And I mean, how could they ask for something the EU has been doing for *checks watch* decades? Without issues?

*clutches pearls* *grabs pitchfork*


Post# 1227215 , Reply# 144   3/25/2025 at 07:24 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Rinsing performance

combo52's profile picture
Hi, GHW,

You’re probably always going to see a few bubbles even if you don’t even use detergent in the soft water you have in the New York area, you could put a tiny bit of fabric softener in the rinse if you’re concerned about this.

Bear in mind that it doesn’t hurt anything to leave some detergent in your clothing in fact, it’s actually good for the machine and for your clothing you should not use so little detergent that things don’t get clean.

We’ve been able to demonstrate over the years that people that over rinse things tend to destroy the seals in the washers and cause early severe failures. This is worse, of course in harder water areas.

Running out of water it’s not really the problem. It’s the amount of energy. It takes to pump it and treat it. Large amounts of natural gas and oil are being burned every day to pump and treat water. It just doesn’t fall out of the sky fall into your washing machine and disappear so the large amounts of water you’re using to run an old top load Washer are very significant you’re easily using four times the amount of water necessary to have clean clothing.

John L


Post# 1227307 , Reply# 145   3/26/2025 at 00:31 by MattL (Flushing, MI)        

I live in MI, a state surrounded by water. Yet I a single occupant with newer efficient equipment and 3 out of 4 toilets being lowflow pay $80+/m for water.  Well over a decade since I've used my underground sprinklers, same for my neighbors. I love my FL machines, really helped with the bills.


Post# 1227375 , Reply# 146   3/26/2025 at 21:32 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Large amounts of natural gas and oil are being burned every day because wind, solar and hydro are not viable, practical, economical, or manageable. And probably never will be. Solar panels on your roof don't count for the actual amount of energy society uses. 

 

 

Let alone the fact modern appliances actually waste energy as just on example of being sent to landfills every 5-10 years when the technology exists to build them running 60+ years.

 

 

 


Post# 1227434 , Reply# 147   3/27/2025 at 12:52 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        
Reply #146

maytag85's profile picture
Even when sitting there idle, today’s appliances still pull power and sure it may not be much, but adds up quickly over time.

Post# 1227458 , Reply# 148   3/27/2025 at 17:28 by me (Essex, UK)        
# 146

Wind, solar hydro not viable etc...

Last year wind turbines provided the UK's national grid with 83 terawatt-hours, around 25% of Britain's electricity and second only to gas. It's the cheapest source of electricity generation in the UK.

It's a shame we don't have more locations for hydro based storage.


www.bbc.co.uk/news/articl...



Post# 1227462 , Reply# 149   3/27/2025 at 18:40 by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        

launderess's profile picture
"Even when sitting there idle, today’s appliances still pull power and sure it may not be much, but adds up quickly over time."

They do say for that reason it's best to unplug appliances or electronics of all sorts when they are not being used.

Televisions, audio and so forth, anything with a "standby" mode or something simple as a clock/electronic display all pull power even when "off".


Post# 1227463 , Reply# 150   3/27/2025 at 18:44 by me (Essex, UK)        
Standby power.

There are so call Zero Standby power devices, which use less than 5mW in standby.

Someone even developed a zero power remote control system, where the receiver generates enough power to turn itself on from the light from a laser in the remote control.

I tend to switch most appliances like my washer off at the socket when not in use, saves wear and tear on the electronics and PSU.


Post# 1227492 , Reply# 151   3/28/2025 at 02:42 by henene4 (Heidenheim a.d. Brenz (Germany))        

Let's assume your washer or DW pulls 1W standby power.

So 1000h is 1kWh.
That's almost 6 weeks.

A typical DW load uses just about 1kWh.
Tell me ANY appliance that is plugged in constantly and only used once or twice in 6 weeks.
Standby usage is real - but damn are you grasping at straws if that dollar a year is your argument against saving 30 times that EASILY just in power.


Post# 1227513 , Reply# 152   3/28/2025 at 10:56 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
The brain drain in the USA is real.

Post# 1227516 , Reply# 153   3/28/2025 at 11:42 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
chetlaham

I agree with your statement. They also don't perform adequately compared to their older counterparts. Just ask any farmer, mechanic, or any typical family that gets dirty about what they think of their modern appliances. They can tell you they don't clean clothes in just 6 inches of water.

Post# 1227519 , Reply# 154   3/28/2025 at 11:50 by Maytag85 (Sean A806)        

maytag85's profile picture
“The brain drain in the USA is real”

I think a common sense drain is more accurate.


Post# 1227766 , Reply# 155   3/31/2025 at 17:54 by Tolivac (greenville nc)        

Most water delivery to you is done by gravity,from the water towers in your area. Only time energy is used to run the pump that fills the tower. This varies on how much water is used-high use the fill pumps runs more and stops when the tower tank is full.

Post# 1227792 , Reply# 156   4/1/2025 at 02:29 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
tolivac...

Very well said!

Post# 1227797 , Reply# 157   4/1/2025 at 06:08 by me (Essex, UK)        

Over here, water towers have mostly been made redundant by modern pumps. Many have been demolished and others converted/developed into unusual homes.

Post# 1227808 , Reply# 158   4/1/2025 at 11:17 by Tolivac (greenville nc)        

There are two water towers in my neighborhood area.

Post# 1227809 , Reply# 159   4/1/2025 at 11:21 by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
My private well is not gravity-fed, the storage tank is at ground level.  It runs the pump to keep the tank filled which also maintains pressure.  Two consecutive flushes of a low-water toilet* is sufficient usage to trigger the pump and involve electricity.

The aerobic septic system also involves electricity to run the aerator and the discharge pump, and the timers that operate them.

I've spent a little over $10,000 in maintenance and repairs in 20 years, huge majority of which is on the septic, plus the electricity to run them.

*The toilets are rated at 1.6 gal for a flush but there have been flapper and/or fill valve repairs on all of them so I can't say if they're still accurate on that point.


Post# 1227812 , Reply# 160   4/1/2025 at 11:34 by William8 (Michigan)        
Reply #159

william8's profile picture
Have you checked the bladder on your storage tank? Ours is a 22 gallon tank, which is misleading, it releases 8.25 gallons before triggering the pump. Two toilet flushes should NOT require the pump to run. That's just over 3 gallons.

Bladder in our original tank (Well-X-Trol) lasted about 35 years. Cheaper brands last about 10. When it failed, it acted just like yours does, once the bladder fails, it can't hold pressure, and it takes less water to trigger the pump.


Post# 1227814 , Reply# 161   4/1/2025 at 12:33 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
Agreed with William.
When the bladders go out, they can lose elasticity or rupture. Which diminishes how much pressure they can create per fill.
That’s how my aunts’ tank failed also. Started short cycling.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO johnb300m's LINK


Post# 1227992 , Reply# 162   4/4/2025 at 00:56 by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        
Off-Topic - Water Well

dadoes's profile picture
 
Thanks for the suggestion.  I don't have much knowledge/experience on water wells/tanks.  The only (obvious) trouble thus far in 20+ yrs was a bad capacitor in April 2019.  I recall the servicer did some adjustment on both the tank pressure and the switch pressures at that time but I don't know/recall to what targets.

I've checked the pressures after a bit of educational research.  The cut-in/out was off-spec and the base/empty pressure was 6.5 low for (28)30/50.  I adjusted the cut-in to 30 after correcting the base charge but can't get the differential more than 13 to 14.  I left it at 31.5/45 this afternoon.  I checked it tonight after several hours, cut-in 31, cut-out 44.5, then it settled to 43.5 a couple mins after the pump shut off.  Is all this an indication of an aged pressure switch, a bladder leak, or both?  What's a workable method to determine a bladder leak?  The tank model is Goulds V140.


Post# 1228005 , Reply# 163   4/4/2025 at 11:58 by William8 (Michigan)        

william8's profile picture
You have to empty the tank to check the air pressure. Should be 28psi in your case.
That is a big tank, and has a draw down of 13.9 at the 30/50 setting. Are you saying it was 6.1 lbs. low on tank air pressure? Set it to 28, and recheck in a week or two.
If you see any water come out when you check the pressure, the bladder is shot. Also tap on the tank, towards the top it should "ring" and sound hollow. If it sounds solid, it's waterlogged.

aquascience.net/goulds-v140-45-g...

You can find youtube videos on adjusting the high and low of the pressure switch. The range you have is too low. There is a high and low setting.




Post# 1228007 , Reply# 164   4/4/2025 at 12:11 by William8 (Michigan)        
BTW

william8's profile picture
Do you have an above ground pump, or submersible?
There's no capacitor on a well tank or switch. Submersible are generally not replaced, you get a new pump.


Post# 1228026 , Reply# 165   4/4/2025 at 21:57 by DADoES (TX, U.S. of A.)        

dadoes's profile picture
 
I stated above that I checked the base pressure an an otherwise empty tank.  There's no spigot/drain at the tank.  Ran a bathtub faucet to no flow.  Confirmed via an outdoor faucet on the feed-in or outflow line (whichever is it) to the tank, and a lavatory faucet in the garage.  Empty pressure was 21.5, I corrected it to 28 PSI.

No water flow from the air valve stem at any time during the checking/adjusting.

I viewed a few videos regards to adjusting pressure.  The pressure switch is a Square D 9013FSQ 2M1.

There's no capacitor on a well tank or switch.
Surely not.  I didn't explicitly state that the bad capacitor was on the Pump Control Box.  I assumed that would be understood.  The Pump Control Box was replaced.  Well (LOL), the servicer provided a complete Pump Control Box assembly but the original wall box/enclosure was left in place, I suppose to avoid swapping the wires.  The plug-in cover/module from the new assembly was installed onto the existing box.

The pump is a submersible.  The well is at the front west corner of the property (red box).  The tank and Pump Control Box are in the detached garage (blue arrow), maybe a little further toward the back but not fully to the back, there's a small half-bath at the rear corner.  Feed-in and feed-out lines and wiring to the pump are underground and through the side wall of the garage.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 4         View Full Size
Post# 1228161 , Reply# 166   4/6/2025 at 11:32 by William8 (Michigan)        

william8's profile picture
OK, I've never seen a control box around here. Just submersibles with built in capacitors, so you can't replace just the cap, and no control box.

If you can't get the pressure switch to get to 30/50, the switch or pressure gauge is bad. Both are pretty cheap, easy DIY. When I got a new tank, my gauge was off as well.

For the tank pressure, did it improve cycling at all?

Mine had a pinhole leak in the bladder (we think). It would be fine for months if I pumped it back up. I never saw where you stated the tank was empty, so I was just clarifying.

Good Luck.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy