Thread Number: 97819
/ Tag: Modern Automatic Washers
Speed Queen Home 2025 |
[Down to Last] | ![]() |
![]() |
Post# 1227695 , Reply# 2   3/30/2025 at 16:42 by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
They'll add a dual action agitator. |
Post# 1227813 , Reply# 3   4/1/2025 at 12:33 by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 4    
Your hysterical Jerome. Speed queen would ever do that, guaranteed. |
Post# 1227838 , Reply# 4   4/1/2025 at 21:46 by Combo52 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 3    
![]() |
Post# 1227843 , Reply# 6   4/2/2025 at 02:59 by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
![]() |
Post# 1227846 , Reply# 7   4/2/2025 at 04:31 by agiflow (Toms River)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
Who's complaining about the wash action in SQ ? I never had a problem with the flex-vane. |
Post# 1227847 , Reply# 8   4/2/2025 at 04:58 by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() |
Post# 1227848 , Reply# 9   4/2/2025 at 05:42 by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
I'm sure they're considering increasing their agitation speed to help the dual action agitator perform better. Look at Whirlpool, Maytag, and even GE. |
Post# 1227849 , Reply# 10   4/2/2025 at 06:45 by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
![]() |
Post# 1227855 , Reply# 11   4/2/2025 at 10:25 by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
You got me thinking. I'd love to see this take place. What if they increased the OPM to about 150 while changing the arc to 140 degrees arc. It would be nice to keep it at 68 OPM while agitating at 210 degrees arc. |
Post# 1227863 , Reply# 12   4/2/2025 at 12:27 by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() |
Post# 1227866 , Reply# 13   4/2/2025 at 13:41 by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
I think What Speed Queen should do is to make their agitator fins really smooth to increase water turbulence, but reduce wear and tear while agitating at 68 OPM and 210 degrees arc with the dual action agitator. I think Frigidaire did something similar with their 74 OPM agitation with the dual action agitator. |
Post# 1227871 , Reply# 14   4/2/2025 at 15:40 by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() Jerome, I remember you telling me about those in your dorm! Stupid indeed. I'm leaving my reply here not to de-rail an existing thread since it fits here better.
These machines had 31, 30 second increments after the wash. Meaning these machines were perfect candidates for an HE rinse without tearing apart clothes or having to fill 1/3 the way full of water.
Something like:
Drain 2 minutes
Spin 2 minutes
spray 30 seconds
spin 1 minute
spray 30 seconds
spin 1 minute
spray 30 seconds
spin 1 minute
spray 30 seconds
spin 6 minutes
Would fit perfectly where the existing drains, spins and low water rinsing is.
You could also do:
2 minute drain
30 second spray and spin -cool down / suds kill-
Spin 1 minute 30 seconds
Proceed as normal for permanent press fabrics.
|
Post# 1227923 , Reply# 15   4/3/2025 at 11:56 by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
I agree with combo 52 on the dual action agitator. This would help the clothes load go under. I hope they keep the same agitation arc and speed. Not to say that there's anything wrong with the flex vane agitator. Their dual action agitator could be more gentle on clothes while increasing turnover rate. This post was last edited 04/03/2025 at 14:00 |
Post# 1227927 , Reply# 17   4/3/2025 at 12:35 by johnb300m (Chicago)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
![]() |
Post# 1227946 , Reply# 19   4/3/2025 at 17:48 by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 2    
![]() @Maytaga806: Jerome uses Speed Queens at his local laundromat. There current agitators have no trouble turning over load when reasonably load yes, however, in theory, a Dual Action agitator would be able to handle even larger loads increasing both the capacity and efficiency of any Speed Queen washer. In a commercial environment this could be a huge plus. Customers can wash larger loads while the owner saves on water. |
Post# 1227952 , Reply# 21   4/3/2025 at 18:43 by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() Well, that would be ignoring the monster smash success of Kenmore and Whirlpool. Who become world leaders in laundry in part because of dual action agitator. To my knowledge Whirlpool and Kenmore never suffered increased motor, coupler or transmission burn outs from the DA agitators. Instead of dragging on clothes, the corkscrew gently pushes them downward.
Honest question, why did you abandon your AWN432? |
Post# 1227953 , Reply# 22   4/3/2025 at 18:43 by johnb300m (Chicago)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() |
Post# 1227965 , Reply# 24   4/3/2025 at 19:39 by Chetlaham ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]() I can empathize, hindsight really is 20/20. 15 years ago I let go of a new Power Clean dishwasher. I regret it every day, but at the time I just didn't know what I now know today.
Pat I understand what you're saying. However, IMHO a DA in a Speed Queen can get another few pounds of clothes in the basket without sacrificing cleaning. Speed Queen would have a bragging point and sell more.
The only way things will get better would be an increase in market share. Whirlpool, Eletrolux, Samsung, Bosch, GE and the like all survive and thrive off one thing: a lack of competition. People choose one or the other settling on merde because they have no choice. If Speed Queen took a major chunk of competitor sales the only way Whirlpool and others could bring customers back would be dropping the fake fragile nonsense and start selling durable washers. |
Post# 1227987 , Reply# 25   4/3/2025 at 23:27 by GELaundry4ever ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
You literally took the words out of my mouth. |