Thread Number: 97819  /  Tag: Modern Automatic Washers
Speed Queen Home 2025
[Down to Last]
Post# 1227657   3/30/2025 at 08:26 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        

Hey guys, what's new for 2025 for Speed Queen Home? I disagree with some of his points, like fabric softener use. If you use it properly, it will take care of you. I prefer filling the softener dispenser halfway with softener, then topping it off with warm water. I also prefer to use the recommended amount of detergent. Bleach if washing whites. All as directed. Of course, I clean the dispensers as needed. No issues.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO GELaundry4ever's LINK





Post# 1227693 , Reply# 1   3/30/2025 at 16:03 by Carolina128 (NC)        

Speed Queen has mostly been content to make minor tweaks to their lineup these past couple years. The big introduction last year was…a black TC5. The exact same machine, but black.

I expect a similarly muted 2025. Maybe they’ll add a glass top option to their top loaders or something like that.


Post# 1227695 , Reply# 2   3/30/2025 at 16:42 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
Or maybe...

They'll add a dual action agitator.

Post# 1227813 , Reply# 3   4/1/2025 at 12:33 by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)        

Your hysterical Jerome. Speed queen would ever do that, guaranteed.

Post# 1227838 , Reply# 4   4/1/2025 at 21:46 by Combo52 (50 Year Repair Tech Beltsville,Md)        
Speed Queen TC washers with dual action agitator

combo52's profile picture
Actually, Speed Queen has been considering doing that as it would increase the usable capacity a lot

Our sales rep confirmed that they have been considering this. Why would that be ridiculous Sean?

John L


Post# 1227839 , Reply# 5   4/1/2025 at 22:48 by agiflow (Toms River)        

Narrower tubs yes, but not the shorter wider tubs of the Speed Queen. Why MUST every maker go with that DAA ? Maybe 1 extra shirt ? Or a pair of pants ? I hope SQ leaves well enough alone. Single action agitators are more reliable and their well-designed one has no need of a ratchet.

Post# 1227843 , Reply# 6   4/2/2025 at 02:59 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

I am all for Speed Queen coming out with a heavy duty dual action agitator. I think that will win cusotmers over. Even Whirlpools most basic Amana/Roper models have come with a dual action agitator for some time now. Consumers know DAs work.


Post# 1227846 , Reply# 7   4/2/2025 at 04:31 by agiflow (Toms River)        

Who's complaining about the wash action in SQ ? I never had a problem with the flex-vane.

Post# 1227847 , Reply# 8   4/2/2025 at 04:58 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Not so much complaining as not buying. The difference in agitator between a BOL Whirlpool and TC5 can be used as selling point for any customer thinking about capacity. 


Post# 1227848 , Reply# 9   4/2/2025 at 05:42 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
agitation speed

I'm sure they're considering increasing their agitation speed to help the dual action agitator perform better. Look at Whirlpool, Maytag, and even GE.

Post# 1227849 , Reply# 10   4/2/2025 at 06:45 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

The thing about a DA agitator is that it works with the speed and stroke it is driven at. Speed Queen can keep the same arc and OPM while getting increased performance on packed loads over a standard vane agitator.


Post# 1227855 , Reply# 11   4/2/2025 at 10:25 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
chetlaham

You got me thinking. I'd love to see this take place. What if they increased the OPM to about 150 while changing the arc to 140 degrees arc. It would be nice to keep it at 68 OPM while agitating at 210 degrees arc.

Post# 1227863 , Reply# 12   4/2/2025 at 12:27 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

I'd think you'd have more clothing wear. Long, slower arcs are IMO better.


Post# 1227866 , Reply# 13   4/2/2025 at 13:41 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
speed queen agitator design

I think What Speed Queen should do is to make their agitator fins really smooth to increase water turbulence, but reduce wear and tear while agitating at 68 OPM and 210 degrees arc with the dual action agitator. I think Frigidaire did something similar with their 74 OPM agitation with the dual action agitator.

Post# 1227871 , Reply# 14   4/2/2025 at 15:40 by Chetlaham (United States)        
MAT15MNAWW

chetlaham's profile picture

Jerome, I remember you telling me about those in your dorm! Stupid indeed. I'm leaving my reply here not to de-rail an existing thread since it fits here better. 

 

 

These machines had 31, 30 second increments after the wash. Meaning these machines were perfect candidates for an HE rinse without tearing apart clothes or having to fill 1/3 the way full of water.

 

 

Something like:

 

 

Drain 2 minutes

 

Spin 2 minutes

 

spray 30 seconds

 

spin 1 minute

 

spray 30 seconds

 

spin 1 minute

 

spray 30 seconds

 

spin 1 minute

 

spray 30 seconds

 

spin 6 minutes

 

Would fit perfectly where the existing drains, spins and low water rinsing is.

 

You could also do:

 

2 minute drain

 

30 second spray and spin -cool down / suds kill-

 

Spin 1 minute 30 seconds

 

Proceed as normal for permanent press fabrics.

 

 

 

 


Post# 1227923 , Reply# 15   4/3/2025 at 11:56 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
combo52

I agree with combo 52 on the dual action agitator. This would help the clothes load go under. I hope they keep the same agitation arc and speed. Not to say that there's anything wrong with the flex vane agitator. Their dual action agitator could be more gentle on clothes while increasing turnover rate.



This post was last edited 04/03/2025 at 14:00
Post# 1227925 , Reply# 16   4/3/2025 at 12:05 by maytaga806 (Howell, Michigan)        

There is absolutely no problems with the current flexvane they have been making for decades now, I don’t know why you talk about machines you don’t even own Jerome? So what would you know. With all the videos you watch about speed queens it should come without question at this point that they don’t struggle at all to turn anything over.

Post# 1227927 , Reply# 17   4/3/2025 at 12:35 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
I’m pretty sure SQ hasn’t has flex vanes in decades, maybe forever.
Their vanes all look very rigid. One piece with the agitator bell.


Post# 1227929 , Reply# 18   4/3/2025 at 13:51 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
dual action agitators

I've had washers with dual action agitators and they have turned over packed loads. If Speed Queen Home considers making them, they should make them second to none. Don't say "never", because Speed Queen may introduce a dual action agitator sooner or later. There's no telling when. They may consider doing it like combo52 said.



This post was last edited 04/03/2025 at 15:31
Post# 1227946 , Reply# 19   4/3/2025 at 17:48 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

@Maytaga806: Jerome uses Speed Queens at his local laundromat. There current agitators have no trouble turning over load when reasonably load yes, however, in theory, a Dual Action agitator would be able to handle even larger loads increasing both the capacity and efficiency of any Speed Queen washer. In a commercial environment this could be a huge plus. Customers can wash larger loads while the owner saves on water.  


Post# 1227948 , Reply# 20   4/3/2025 at 18:09 by agiflow (Toms River)        

How many more clothes do you need to pack into a washer ? I loaded my speed Queen awn 432 right to the very top and I always got rollover. You folks are talking about forcing more into the load and then putting more of a strain on the whole mechanism.

Dual action agitators are fine but not in a speed Queen tub.They don't need it and neither did ANY large capacity washer.

Must every washer manufacturer become the BORG ? ..."Resistance is futile...you will all be dual action"..(insert crazy laughter) !


Post# 1227952 , Reply# 21   4/3/2025 at 18:43 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

Well, that would be ignoring the monster smash success of Kenmore and Whirlpool. Who become world leaders in laundry in part because of dual action agitator. To my knowledge Whirlpool and Kenmore never suffered increased motor, coupler or transmission burn outs from the DA agitators. Instead of dragging on clothes, the corkscrew gently pushes them downward. 

 

 

Honest question, why did you abandon your AWN432?


Post# 1227953 , Reply# 22   4/3/2025 at 18:43 by johnb300m (Chicago)        

johnb300m's profile picture
I would argue the DD large tubs needed dual action. The tubs were so deep and skinny there was no way a single action agitator would turn over a load of towels or jeans.

Post# 1227957 , Reply# 23   4/3/2025 at 18:54 by agiflow (Toms River)        

Well I didn't actually abandon it. I was moving into a new home with new machines in place already. The Speed Queen and the Whirlpool WFW6620 went to a collector whom I forget now, but hindsight is 20/20 and I would probably have kept the Speed Queen in storage.

Btw, whirlpool and Kenmore were hugely successful before the introduction of the Dual Action agitator.

I'm not totally against the dual action agitator and it has its place.

I was using a 1974 Kenmore 70 series for 2 months before giving it a break again and that Penta Swirl agitator would have been fine if they had stuck with that.

I know I'm in the minority on that here, but I have loaded that machine up like I did my Whirlpool and I got good turn over.

There has to be free enough movement for clothes to roll over.

At this point I really don't even care. Speed Queen will do what they will do and if they add DAA, so be it 🤷


Post# 1227965 , Reply# 24   4/3/2025 at 19:39 by Chetlaham (United States)        

chetlaham's profile picture

I can empathize, hindsight really is 20/20. 15 years ago I let go of a new Power Clean dishwasher. I regret it every day, but at the time I just didn't know what I now know today.

 

 

Pat I understand what you're saying. However, IMHO a DA in a Speed Queen can get another few pounds of clothes in the basket without sacrificing cleaning. Speed Queen would have a bragging point and sell more. 

 

The only way things will get better would be an increase in market share. Whirlpool, Eletrolux, Samsung, Bosch, GE and the like all survive and thrive off one thing: a lack of competition. People choose one or the other settling on merde because they have no choice. If Speed Queen took a major chunk of competitor sales the only way Whirlpool and others could bring customers back would be dropping the fake fragile nonsense and start selling durable washers. 


Post# 1227987 , Reply# 25   4/3/2025 at 23:27 by GELaundry4ever (Nacogdoches, TX, USA (considering moving to Temple, Texas))        
chetlaham...

You literally took the words out of my mouth.

Post# 1228043 , Reply# 26   4/5/2025 at 07:58 by PinkPower4 (USA)        
My opinion after using both MT575 and SQTC5

As a home user who utilizes both models every week, here's my take on them.

I believe the Maytag (MT) has an edge when it comes to cleaning performance due to its dual-action agitator. It effectively moves clothes through the water, ensuring they get thoroughly cleaned. My MT is approaching seven years old this summer, and the only part I've had to replace is the agitator dogs—a simple and inexpensive part (less than $5) that allows the top and bottom of the agitator to move in opposite directions. For the first five years, it endured heavy, "family-style" use. The clothes come out clean, and the wash cycles are short and efficient, allowing me to do multiple loads in a day. This is especially helpful for families who may need to do a load after work or dedicate a single day for laundry. The addition of a water level switch in newer models was the only feature I felt was missing in mine. I rarely experience out-of-balance loads—just balance like items together. For example, balancing a small pet bed with a towel usually resolves it. I expect a typical family might get 8 to 10 years out of this washer before a major repair (like the gear case or control board) leads them to replace it instead of repair. However, I expect one will have more inexpensive repairs due to the part that allows the tub to spin or not spin, a plastic part under the agitator, and possibly the agitator itself. This washer's design would be less forgiving to misuse. Not that it really matters, but I prefer the clean look of one color and not the harsh black/white color combo.

On the other hand, the Speed Queen TC5 stands out for overall durability. It has a real transmission and a superior suspension system (the metal outer tub is secured to the base with springs for added stability). My favorite feature is the eco cycle, which, when combined with the heavy soil option, turns into a super cycle with an extended wash time and customizable water temperature. The spray rinse works efficiently, and I use a spin dryer afterward to remove any remaining residue. If needed, I can run another eco cycle without the half-tub rinse option. The only improvements I would suggest are at least water level switch. A dual action agitator would be beneficial too. When it comes to bulky and large items, this is where I really see difference that DU can make. Apart from replacing the belt, this washer should last an average family about 12 to 15 years, while a single person or couple could likely get the full 20 to 25 years advertised. The only potential issue would be with the control board, though these seem to be more affordable to replace than those on the Maytag. The bearings wearing out is the most likely reason I'd replace it.

Keep in mind, I am a homeowner and would have to pay someone else the full cost of parts and labor for anything other than a minor repair. For those who can get parts for less and can repair them yourself, the life expectancy of especially the Speed Queen would be a lot more.

In my opinion, both models perform well, but the Speed Queen will probably outlast the Maytag. This is where price comes into play. For those seeking a matching set, there's not much justification I can find for the higher price of the SQ dryer. Many people report that simpler models from Maytag or Whirlpool actually perform as well, if not better, at a lower price. Maytag's decision to add the water level switch was a smart one, as it might prevent some people from looking beyond that feature and going out of their way to purchase elsewhere. I can honestly say, I'd been happy with the new Maytag with water-level control set. True it won't last as long, but I didn't pay as much either.

That being said, I did see a Whirlpool set priced just over $1K. The washer had the dual-action agitator, and the dryer featured the top-pull vent (which I recall some of you preferred). I will say that front-load dryers tend to let more lint escape compared to top-pull ones. If I had to buy a set today, this would definitely be on my list especially if budget is a concern. I'm not so sure I could justify the Maytag commercial over this. Making sure it is used properly is key. May not last as long, but laundry mats are expensive, inconvenient, and you don't know what's been used in those washers that could ruin your clothes.

The cost of Speed Queen washer and dryers top load sets have gotten so high, that people willing to pay or who have space that may also opt for what will be a better front load in that price range. One of my kids really likes her GE front load washer. It was enough that I would at least consider front load again.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy