|
Thread Number: 97919
/ Tag: Modern Automatic Washers
Newer Whirlpool washers known for control board failures? |
[Down to Last] |  |
|
Post# 1228742 , Reply# 1 4/13/2025 at 20:54 by murando531  (Augusta, Georgia - US) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 1228744 , Reply# 2 4/13/2025 at 21:10 by agiflow (Toms River) | ||
|
It's relevant is it not ? | ||
|
Post# 1228745 , Reply# 3 4/13/2025 at 21:15 by Carolina128 (NC) |
||
|
Yes it’s relevant, but there’s something like four different threads discussing this same issue. | ||
| Post# 1228746 , Reply# 4 4/13/2025 at 21:19 by agiflow (Toms River) | ||
|
Yes I pointed that out to this poster | ||
|
Post# 1228799 , Reply# 6 4/14/2025 at 12:36 by Chetlaham (United States) |
||
What Whirlpool's Controls Ought To Look Like This is what people should be demanding and voting on from any appliance maker, in a metal Eaton or metal MTS style timer.
Perhaps contacts 12T and 14T would better suffice as drop on and lift off instead of drop off and lift on due to the motor making inrush, but that is an easy swap. 30 second increments btw- though 1 minute at 48 7.5 degree steps would be a better timer alternative.
From MTS's website:
Before anyone jumps on me for the spin or wash being to short, this is just one timer meant for a very BOL machine. The idea is to demonstrate the sheer amount of simplicity that could be built into a washing machine while being complemented with very over engineered parts and numerous overlapping fail safes. | ||
| Post# 1229005 , Reply# 7 4/16/2025 at 14:27 by mark_wpduet (Lexington KY) | ||
 | ||
| Forum Index: |
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
