Thread Number: 12422
Frigies in the house—not pleased |
[Down to Last] |
|
Post# 217823 , Reply# 1   6/23/2007 at 19:28 (6,151 days old) by pulsator (Saint Joseph, MI)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Many American FL washers these days won't do a real spin between the wash and each of the rinses. My dad's Whirlpool Duet washer will distribute and take off to about 300 RPM for 4 or 5 seconds then start filling for the rinse. I've begun to use the soak cycle to wash and then set it to the drain and spin cycle for a full 900 RPM spin then reset to another soak for rinse then another 900 RPM spin and call it done!
|
Post# 217826 , Reply# 2   6/23/2007 at 19:35 (6,151 days old) by cny4 (Central New York)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
My Affinity does the same thing, I believe this is normal. How are your clothes coming out? Mine are cleaner than ever with this machine. |
Post# 217831 , Reply# 3   6/23/2007 at 19:57 (6,151 days old) by passatdoc (Orange County, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
It seems to spin at low speed (i am guessing 300 rpm) for about a minute between the rinses. But as cny4 reported, the clothes come out very clean. I guess it's supposed to work like that. How are your clothes coming out? |
Post# 217849 , Reply# 5   6/23/2007 at 21:12 (6,151 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
My vintage Miele for "Cottons" rinse, does two deep rinses (fill, tumble, drain) then a quick 30 second low spin, another deep rinse, then a final rinse before the final spin sequence. This is on top of adding heaps of cold water at the end of the wash cycle. Rinsing is process of dilution, thus one does not need to nor should spin too fast between rinses as it can lead to muck being forced back into the wash. Also depending upon wash temperature and how the machine cools down the water temperature, spinning too fast too soon can cause creases that will take ages of ironing (if then), to remove. You can see this if one takes laundry hot from a twin tub and puts it right into the spinner for a spin without cooling it down first. L. |
Post# 217850 , Reply# 6   6/23/2007 at 21:20 (6,151 days old) by passatdoc (Orange County, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Launderess, your description of the rinse process fits my machine to a t. You described exactly what I see going on in my machine, though I usually select the Extra Rinse option, so that there are at least three rinses. |
Post# 217878 , Reply# 7   6/23/2007 at 23:11 (6,151 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
my 2140 does the same thing, and that's why it has been replaced by a toploader. it is unable to balance the load 90% of the time regardless of how much or little is in the drum and ends up spinning only after the final rinse, and that's only because it keeps trying until it's satisfied. a test wash of my whites with no detergent was still getting suds out after 4 full wash cycles. i've seen that drum ramping up to spin with absolutely no wobble, then it will stop as if it were off balance.
|
Post# 217913 , Reply# 8   6/24/2007 at 02:17 (6,151 days old) by panthera (Rocky Mountains)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The logic in some units only monitors current speed and compares this to desired speed, if increasing voltage to the motor does not result in a steady speed up, it assumes something is wrong and reacts. Just how it reacts depends on the programming as well as whether other things are being monitored. These machines are much more sensitive to level floors than TLs are. Enormously so. They also have trouble dealing with the resonances which come up in wooden floors. If your machine is having trouble setting up the spins - especially the final spin, then you can help it a lot by: 1) Leveling the machine, setting the spirit level against the front and sides of the cabinet as well as on top. It has to be level side to side as well as front to back. 2) Try putting the machine in a corner of the room, corners are stronger and resonate less. 3) Put a very dense panel under it. 3/4 inch pressboard or marine HDF; or similar. This will span the floor boards and distribute the weight better. I have seen this trick done so often, incredible how much it helps (not all European floors are reinforced concrete). Laundress is right, you don't want too much spin between rinses - (remember, these spins speeds are much higher than most TLs so more efficient) (even allowing for the greater diameter of the TL-Tubs, we are so not going there again...). All the current Stiftung Warentest results I have read continue to give these machines good ratings for people with allergies. Of course, we have seen European machines dumbed-down for the US market before... |
Post# 217914 , Reply# 9   6/24/2007 at 02:22 (6,151 days old) by panthera (Rocky Mountains)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
One thing which caught me off-guard when I first came to Europe was the way FLs pump water out. In the US, TLs use "timed drain". The timer motor runs for a length of time equal to what the designers think the tub needs to drain completely plus a safety factor. FLs monitor the water level in the outer tub. Once all the water has been pumped out, that's it. It only takes as long as needed. Don't forget - you aren't pumping out zillions of gallons here, just a few, so it is also going to go much faster. A really unlikely possibility, but I've made this mistake before...were absolutely all the packaging and transport nuts, bolts, materials, etc. removed? |
Post# 217944 , Reply# 10   6/24/2007 at 09:42 (6,150 days old) by dadoes (TX, U.S. of A.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
In the US, TLs use "timed drain". The timer motor runs for a length of time equal to what the designers think the tub needs to drain completely plus a safety factor.Panthera, it's dangerous to make blanket statements like that. :-) TLs with mechanical timers have fixed-time drains. Some with electronic controls do have variable drain periods. The first Whirlpool electronic TL (LFA9800 in 1977/1978) timed the drain as double the time required for water level pressure switch to reset + 30 seconds. My F&Ps are variable based on water level pressure readings, and I'm thinking the Oasis/Cabrio/Bravos siblings are as well. (True, F&P is of NZ origin, but they're now being produced at a facility in Clyde, OH.) My Calypso appears to have mostly timed drains, but it does monitor water level as part of the process for purpose of detecting pump failures ("Long Drain" error codes). |
Post# 217946 , Reply# 11   6/24/2007 at 09:55 (6,150 days old) by launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 217975 , Reply# 15   6/24/2007 at 13:48 (6,150 days old) by panthera (Rocky Mountains)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I am glad you are back. Certainly, there are some US TL machines - what, 0.01% of those in use? - which use logic to monitor the drain cycle. But we are talking about experiences with the first FL here, so I permitted myself the luxury of not discussing every possible exception. There has got to be some room for generalizations or we will all get bogged down in absurd discussions. |
Post# 218007 , Reply# 16   6/24/2007 at 19:15 (6,150 days old) by appnut (TX)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Bruce, I have a 1st genreation Frigidaire Front Loader and I love the machine. At best it does 2 short burst spins between the wash, first rinse, and 2nd rinse, and before the final 4th rinse. I have no complaints and in fact, it rinses better than my 1986 DD Lady Kenmore. Front loaders are a totally different process, even rinsing. One bear to another, walk away form the machine if the intricaciesa bug ya to death. If the clothes are coming out fine, that's the key!! And yes, glad you found out using lower drying temps improves softness. Why, becuse less moisture is in the dryer for a shorterr period of time and less of a "steam" effect.
|
Post# 218185 , Reply# 18   6/25/2007 at 15:01 (6,149 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Jay, my full size Duet washer does the same thing, it appears to be balanced nearly perfectly and yet it still feels the need to redistribute. This is the most annoying thing about FL machines IMO, as it's frustrating to see the machine's drum rotating so smoothly only to have it slow down and redistribute to be more off balance. Why these machines don't quit while they're ahead of the balancing game I don't know, but it's definitely a weak point in the design and engineering. Bruce, my machine doesn't do a very high speed spin for the rinse either but my laundry doesn't come out smelling like detergent, so the clothes are definitely getting a thorough rinsing. The big test was towels. They always smelled like detergent after my old TL was done with them. Now they have no detergent smell at all after running them through my Duet. I still find myself watching my Duet in action sometimes, but trust me, the novelty level will wear off from what it is for you right now. In the meantime, enjoy the show! Ralph |
Post# 218198 , Reply# 19   6/25/2007 at 15:58 (6,149 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 218202 , Reply# 20   6/25/2007 at 16:39 (6,149 days old) by panthera (Rocky Mountains)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I find the number of complaints about machines balancing and rebalancing their loads from the folks in the US interesting. Sure, my LG every so often will get upset and rebalance stuff. Once in a blue moon, it will go through an extra rinse cycle and once, in seven years, it stopped after several attempts and played a melody while the display flashed an "out-of-balance, spin not possible, do something!" at me. My last Miele was just the same. Are the US machines set to be more sensitive? Are the folks UNDERloading them - the biggest cause of out-of-balance is just one heaving item? Or is it just that we are so used to the 45+ minute rinse and spin cycles that we don't notice it anymore? |
Post# 218204 , Reply# 21   6/25/2007 at 16:56 (6,149 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I do think under-loading can be a contributing factor and likely the cause for some of my Duet's balancing issues. But why it wants to re-balance a load that is rotating very smoothly even at low speed makes no sense to me. Without fail, when it does that it only makes the balance worse, since it couldn't have been better balanced before it decided to quit and redistribute. That's my main complaint about my Duet. The "minutes remaining" readout can stay stuck on "6" for a good 15 or 20 as it continues to redistribute over and over. It seems that once it gets down to about 4 minutes remaining it will just spin as best it can and get the cycle overwith, though. A waste of time, energy and wear and tear on the clothes and the machine. I still love my machine but this one quirk is truly annoying.
|
Post# 218244 , Reply# 23   6/25/2007 at 19:21 (6,149 days old) by appnut (TX)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Sounds like the loads are pretty full, although it depends upon your garment sizes too. I'm a front load engineering designers dream when it comes to laundry. My loads are pretty much full and pretty much consist of like items. I'll wash 6-8 pairs of kakhis together. 13-20 poly/cotton shirts. 2 sets of quenn size sheets (although that's really pushing it for my 3.1 cu. ft. Fridgemore). 6-8 bath towels and wash clothes and a few hand towels. 24-28 pairs of jockeys & t-shirts, a couple pairs of white sox, and a few kitchen towels and ish clothes. Yup, my loads are pretty much BobLoads and are all uniform in weight. I don't have too much balancing issues. 8-10 golf shirts & t-shirts are somewhat a challenge because of balancing sometimes but it's cuz the load isn't full. As proven by my BobLoad of towels at Glenn's, the F&P holds more towels in a load than my Fridgemore does. In the winter, maybe 4-6 pair (sets) of sweats. 16 PermPress long-sleeve shirts.
|
Post# 218249 , Reply# 24   6/25/2007 at 19:42 (6,149 days old) by washabear (Maryland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Sixteen shirts at a time? Geez! I would do no more than six because they get wrinkled after that. I will not iron. I haven't owned an iron since 1987, and I plan on keeping it that way! |
Post# 218284 , Reply# 25   6/25/2007 at 21:54 (6,149 days old) by appnut (TX)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 218307 , Reply# 26   6/25/2007 at 23:06 (6,149 days old) by dadoes (TX, U.S. of A.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 220866 , Reply# 27   7/5/2007 at 13:57 (6,139 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 220875 , Reply# 28   7/5/2007 at 14:38 (6,139 days old) by frigilux (The Minnesota Prairie)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Like Bob, I'll wash a big load of shirts, but since the Frigidaire dryer has a smallish drum, I usually only dry 5 shirts at a time. They dry quickly, so it doesn't take all that long to get through them all. I hate to iron. I'm drying all my short sleeve work shirts on the clothesline this summer. If there's a good breeze (and there usually is in this part of the country), even the all-cotton models barely need a quick touch-up with the iron.
|
Post# 224719 , Reply# 30   7/23/2007 at 17:10 (6,121 days old) by toggleswitch (New York City, NY)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|