Thread Number: 241
Another Tawny Gold Lady Kenmore SET! |
[Down to Last] | ![]() |
Post# 46597   10/9/2004 at 16:03 (7,230 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
Todd and I spent most of the morning (and part of the afternoon) hitting the thrift store circuit here in Phoenix. Wouldn't you know it, the last store we went to (Goodwill) offered up this beautiful matching set (Model #110.72490610). We just got them home and don't even know if they run yet, but they're just so darn pretty to look at! Luckily we happened in on a half-off sale and got both for $70.00!!! The dispenser lid on the washer is cracked and the lint handle is broken off the screen but cosmetically in pretty good shape. Too bad the dryer is 220V. We can't test it as our house doesn't have the proper outlet. Will have to call electrician on Monday!
CLICK HERE TO GO TO pumper's LINK |
![]() |
Post# 46598 , Reply# 1   10/9/2004 at 16:34 (7,230 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
After filling the washer, it spins & agitates at the same time. I saw another post regarding a Hotpoint washer doing the same thing. I know on my other Lady, there is a round disk that is supposed to pop up and engage the tub to spin. This one must be stuck in the up position. Does this sound right (and easy to fix?).
|
Post# 46599 , Reply# 2   10/9/2004 at 17:32 (7,230 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 46602 , Reply# 3   10/9/2004 at 18:36 (7,230 days old) by goatfarmer ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 46603 , Reply# 4   10/9/2004 at 19:09 (7,230 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
here is the problem. the thingy that rides back and forth on the bar i noticed was loose and rocking to and fro, unlike the other one. so loose that when the solenoid activates, it doesn't catch onto the bar (is that called a cam bar?) i jiggled it a few times and it popped off the plunger. it is bent at the top where it connected. it does seem like the bar is a little tight when trying to move it back and forth. lubed it up with wd40.
![]() |
Post# 46606 , Reply# 6   10/9/2004 at 20:02 (7,230 days old) by fixerman ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
I agree. Makes sense to me. Couldn't have said it better myself. |
Post# 46611 , Reply# 8   10/10/2004 at 01:16 (7,229 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 46618 , Reply# 9   10/10/2004 at 07:34 (7,229 days old) by goatfarmer ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 46630 , Reply# 12   10/10/2004 at 12:36 (7,229 days old) by powerfin64 (Yakima, Washington)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 46647 , Reply# 13   10/10/2004 at 19:20 (7,229 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 46687 , Reply# 14   10/10/2004 at 21:27 (7,229 days old) by fixerman ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
I just sold a suds saver machine I believe was large capacity. Model 110.73983120 |
Post# 46763 , Reply# 17   10/11/2004 at 20:51 (7,228 days old) by chaskelljr2 (Washington, D. C.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Yes..... Kenmore did have sud savers featured in their large capacity machines as well. My mom bought one back in 1978 after our 1967 single speed gave out. She replaced the 1967 single speed BOL Kenmore with a 1978 Large Capacity model with a Sud Saver. --Charles-- |
Post# 46777 , Reply# 18   10/11/2004 at 22:50 (7,228 days old) by powerfin64 (Yakima, Washington)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 46778 , Reply# 19   10/11/2004 at 22:52 (7,228 days old) by bpetersxx (laf in on the banks of the Wabash River)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 46784 , Reply# 21   10/11/2004 at 23:45 (7,228 days old) by fixerman ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Sorry I may have misunderstood what a Primer is. What an air head I am. I thought you meant how it works, then it occurred to me you meant something else. |
Post# 46792 , Reply# 22   10/12/2004 at 05:56 (7,227 days old) by bpetersxx (laf in on the banks of the Wabash River)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 47214 , Reply# 23   10/17/2004 at 11:26 (7,222 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 47225 , Reply# 24   10/17/2004 at 15:03 (7,222 days old) by gansky1 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
What are the first three numbers after the source code? (110. is Whirlpool) Sometime in the later 60's or early 70's they changed the model numbering system and the year of manufacture changed to the first and third numbers of the model. These look from about '73-74-75. I have the '74 catalog with these. Sometime in this period was the first large capacity Lady Kenmore washer, with the Penta-Swirl agitator. The machine in my catalog has the Penta-Vane, but it's the same otherwise. |
Post# 47275 , Reply# 25   10/18/2004 at 00:12 (7,222 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 48678 , Reply# 26   11/5/2004 at 22:25 (7,203 days old) by kreftgr ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
To find the exact date of manufacture, the serial number is better than the model #. It will tell you the week of the year that it was made, talking Whirlool made machines. Glen. |
Post# 48694 , Reply# 28   11/6/2004 at 01:56 (7,202 days old) by pumper (SE Wisconsin)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |