Thread Number: 33029
Admiral! |
[Down to Last] | ![]() |
Post# 497275   2/17/2011 at 22:40 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497276 , Reply# 1   2/17/2011 at 22:41 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497277 , Reply# 2   2/17/2011 at 22:42 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497278 , Reply# 3   2/17/2011 at 22:43 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497279 , Reply# 4   2/17/2011 at 22:44 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497280 , Reply# 5   2/17/2011 at 22:44 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497282 , Reply# 6   2/17/2011 at 22:45 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497283 , Reply# 7   2/17/2011 at 22:46 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497284 , Reply# 8   2/17/2011 at 22:47 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497285 , Reply# 9   2/17/2011 at 22:48 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497286 , Reply# 10   2/17/2011 at 22:49 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497287 , Reply# 11   2/17/2011 at 22:49 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497288 , Reply# 12   2/17/2011 at 22:50 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497289 , Reply# 13   2/17/2011 at 22:51 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497290 , Reply# 14   2/17/2011 at 22:51 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497291 , Reply# 15   2/17/2011 at 22:52 (4,677 days old) by peteski50 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497292 , Reply# 16   2/17/2011 at 23:00 (4,677 days old) by appnut ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() Everytime I see an example like this it just makes me cringe, helps perpetuate peoples' poor laundry and sorting habits. I cannot imagine putting htose white t-shirts in with some of those dark colored towels; cannot imagine putting those dress shirts in with those towels; or any of those whites with those dark colors. Just makes me cringe!!! Yuck!! As far as I'm concerned, that lot should have been sorted into 4 different wash loads at least!!!
And thanks Peter, it's been a whille since I've seen these washers. |
Post# 497451 , Reply# 17   2/18/2011 at 15:33 (4,677 days old) by laundromat (Hilo, Hawaii)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497460 , Reply# 19   2/18/2011 at 15:57 (4,677 days old) by coldspot66 ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
The Admiral "name" is owned by Whirlpool...therefore the Admiral washer sold at HD is a direct drive Whirlpool washer.....best design for the $$$$ since the belt drive Whirlpools stopped production. |
Post# 497471 , Reply# 21   2/18/2011 at 17:02 (4,677 days old) by 3beltwesty ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Behind the dryer is a Whirlpool Ultimate Care II that has a slight leak CLICK HERE TO GO TO 3beltwesty's LINK ![]() |
Post# 497484 , Reply# 22   2/18/2011 at 18:16 (4,677 days old) by dadoes ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 497831 , Reply# 23   2/20/2011 at 00:30 (4,675 days old) by gmmcnair (Portland, OR)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
...is pretty much identical to the BOL Kenmore, Roper, Estate, Inglis washers. I have one sitting in my kitchen because Home Depot gave me a better deal than the other places. It's actually a very respectable machine. Good capacity, cleans the clothes well (and I'm picky), and it's been trouble free for me. I miss true HOT water for whites, but I could have done a whole lot worse for 300 bucks (all I could spare at the time when my other machine went belly up). I prefer it to the TOL Whirlpool it replaced; that machine was fussier, and I didn't use the extra cycle options that often anyway.
|
Post# 498650 , Reply# 25   2/22/2011 at 21:31 (4,672 days old) by dnastrau (Lords Valley, PA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
That brings back memories... We bought our first house in 1995 and almost bought a pair of the 1995 20 lb Admirals. The previous owner of the house decided to sell us their 1991 GE Filter Flo set instead (cheap.) I sometimes wonder how we would have liked those Admirals. |
Post# 498657 , Reply# 26   2/22/2011 at 22:13 (4,672 days old) by CircleW ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
A Norge by any other name is still a Norge! |
Post# 498771 , Reply# 28   2/23/2011 at 14:21 (4,672 days old) by franksdad (Greenville, South Carolina)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
I'm not falimiar with Admiral appliances but Santa brought me an Admiral record player in 1968. It was a good record player. We had an Admiral TOL color television in the late 60's thru 1973 when it was replaced with a Magnavox. The Admiral was a great television with a beautifully clear and sharp picture on it. Mama and my dad wanted to replace the Admiral television with another Admiral but decided on Magnavox.
|