Thread Number: 36955
in the 8 years i have had my duet set |
[Down to Last] | ![]() |
Post# 549622   10/15/2011 at 18:53 (4,439 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
Hello everyone (*please note that i do not went this to turn into a debate) in the 8 years i have had my duet set i have nothing wrong to say about the dryer but in the 8 years since 2004 that i have wash my clothe in my duet washer i can say that about the washer since i got it in 2004 i have not been satisfied with it i am toughting it until it breaks because when it breaks i am replacing both the washer dryer with a rebadge estate brand whirlpool washer top load with matching dryer.
What i am not satisfied on my duet washer is for 1 thing it leaves my clothes full of wrinkles second i do not like the long washtime third the fact that on the gentle cycle and hand wash cycle they skip the first spin to rinse directly forth the fact that i have to sit down to load unload the washer and here the advantages why i am going back to a top load washer. Top-loading washers • Removes more dirt on average in a normal cycle front load washer. • Met generally less time to complete a normal cycle that front-loading washer. • Rise in average a little more than a gentle cycle front load washer. • Is generally less noise than a front-loading washer. • is more ergonomic, due primarily to the position of openness and lack of clean seal. • Takes up less space generally a deep front-loading washer. In short ... Overall, the efficient top-loading washers that Protect You have tested provided better performance than the front-loading machines. They are the best choice if you are not or little delicate cycle. and its very rare that i use the delicate gentle cycle i only use this cycle for washing curtains for me a 10 minute wash is more than engough ![]() |
Post# 549623 , Reply# 1   10/15/2011 at 18:55 (4,439 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 549650 , Reply# 3   10/15/2011 at 20:19 (4,439 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 549652 , Reply# 4   10/15/2011 at 20:24 (4,439 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 549664 , Reply# 5   10/15/2011 at 21:00 (4,439 days old) by mrb627 (Buford, GA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 549669 , Reply# 6   10/15/2011 at 21:30 (4,439 days old) by pierreandreply4 (St-Bruno de montarville (province of quebec) canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 549684 , Reply# 7   10/15/2011 at 23:37 (4,438 days old) by DirectDriveDave ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
As long as the used market is around, standard TLs will be anything but a thing of the past. We have a 1990 Whirlpool Direct Drive (hence my name) and we have never had any problems with noise. |