Thread Number: 37329
Color TV brand popularity - 1960's
[Down to Last]

automaticwasher.org's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate automaticwasher.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 554990   11/8/2011 at 04:54 (4,575 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Back in the mid 60's when everyone it seemed was buying their first color TV and the networks started full time color programming what brands of television were most common in your area?
I was living in the suburbs of Chicago at the time and based on what I saw my friends parents and relatives had was as follows:

1. RCA or Zenith. Almost an even split. Lots of those around.
2. Admiral - Lots of those too.
3. Magnavox - Not nearly as common as the other brands, but there were a few of
them about. My aunt had one which caught fire one night about a year
after they bought it!
4. Motorola - a few around, not very common.
5. GE - Only knew one family with one of these. You didn't really see a lot of them
in the appliance stores either. But in the late 60's a lot of people
bought the GE Porta-Color sets. Could low sales of GE Color television be
due to the radiation scare GE had with their sets around 1966 or so?

And that was about it.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK





Post# 554995 , Reply# 1   11/8/2011 at 05:51 (4,574 days old) by retro-man (- boston,ma)        

Our 1st color tv was a 25inch Sylvania console. Had automatic color button, the picture was great along with the colors. We had an antenna with a rotor and could recieve quite a few stations. Back in the 60's we were a testing city for cable tv. we got that about a year after the tv, so that was probably like 1966 or 68.
What I thought was really strange is that the cabinet was made out of metal to look like wood. Never saw another set like it since then.
Jon


Post# 555002 , Reply# 2   11/8/2011 at 06:21 (4,574 days old) by MikeS ()        
What About Sears?

I think Sears should be included in that group. Like many Americans, my parents had a Sears charge card, and they purchased a 23-inch Silvertone color console in 1965. We were the first on the block to have a color set, and my sister and I suddenly became the most popular kids on the block. I suspect many Sears card households followed suit. You can't do better than Sears.

Post# 555004 , Reply# 3   11/8/2011 at 06:38 (4,574 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Seeing as Sears was based in the Chicago area you think you would have seen more.
But I never encountered a Silvertone color set anywhere besides the store. Were the Sears sets rebadged RCA's?

I remember around 1980 I wanted to buy a Sylvania set. A few people told me that they were very good. But I could not find ONE dealer in the Houston area. They still made sets at the time, but I can't remember if at that time is was the real Sylvania making their sets or some successor company?


Post# 555013 , Reply# 4   11/8/2011 at 07:32 (4,574 days old) by norgeway (mocksville n c )        
Motorola!

In the fall of 1963, Motorola sprang something on the competetion that they were NOT expecting, revolutionizing the color tv industry,,Unbeknownst to the color giant RCA, who made ALL the color tubes up until that time, Motorola had secretly developed the first rectangular color tube, remember, before then, all color tubes were 21 inch round tubes, all made by RCA for the other companys, or under liscense from RCA, Motorolas 23 inch rectangular tube was a great breakthrough, then in 1968 the solid state Quasar by motorola was introduced, the first full sized solid state set, again , setting the pace for all others. The first Quasars had the "Works in a drawer" making the tv serviceable from the front.

Post# 555018 , Reply# 5   11/8/2011 at 08:13 (4,574 days old) by Blackstone (Springfield, Massachusetts)        

blackstone's profile picture
Yes, Motorola rectangular tubes were a big seller in the 1960s. The works in a drawer were a big advancement, making the servicing easier, and more likely done in the customer's home. It was a lot easier to replace circuit boards, rather than carry a console TV back to the store. The first models still had a few vacuum tubes on the replacement boards, later changing to all solid state.

The screen on the inside of the picture tube had a black background, through which the red, blue, and green guns projected. Improved contrast and detail on these Motorolas. Then, Sony had the vertical in-line screens, also with a sharper picture.

I also remember that in the 1960s, as TV programs switched to color, the most difficult color to broadcast was yellow. I think that the show "Hazel" had her in a yellow uniform.




Post# 555030 , Reply# 6   11/8/2011 at 09:11 (4,574 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
our first color set was a GE, but with a twist

By 1967 we were still a B&W family. I suppose our family could be characterized as upper middle class, my father was a dentist, etc. About half the families in the neighborhood had color by then (the USA hit 50% color ownership in the early 1970s). A 19 inch set cost about $500 back then, so it would be analogous to buying a $3000-5000 set today. My parents probably could afford it, but their priorities were that they themselves watched little TV (other than the news and "To Tell The Truth") and they encouraged us to spend time on homework, not tv.

As Allen/whirlcool suggested, the predominant color brands were RCA and Zenith. Some neighbors had a 21 or 23 inch Zenith cabinet model (with the round tube) and a Space Command remote that controlled not only volume and channels, but also color quality such as tint and intensity.

Our first color set was by accident. For years, Dad had been a not-so-active member of the Lions Club. I think he joined idealistically in the beginning and then became bored with it. Part of the problem may have been that he joined a chapter near his office, not near where we lived, so that the activities were benefiting the area around his office, but not his neighborhood. Anyway, he'd do the minimum service time needed per year to remain active, which usually meant working the club's Christmas tree lot each December (translation: PassatDoc worked the Christmas tree lot....).

Every year the chapter had a raffle. I'm guessing Dad bought $20 of tickets (probably his share of tickets to sell, but it was easier to buy his own share than to hawk them to others) and promptly forgot about it. He and I went to a minor league hockey game (San Diego Gulls) and when we return, mom said "We won a color tv!!"

Dad and I were incredulous and thought she was joking, like "who on earth would give US a color tv??" so she said, "go out to the garage and see for yourself." We went down (house built on a hill, garage at street level, 27 steps up the slope from street level to house, very common arrangement in hilly parts of San Diego) to the garage and peeked inside mom's Buick Sportwagon 400, and lo and behold, there was a tv AND matching cart. A 19" color table model GE set with a cart. The cart was nice because our den had built in bookcases that accommodated our existing 19" B&W set, but the color set was too deep to fit in the bookcase, so the cart avoided a furniture purchase.

We set it up and the first image I remember was the red and white checkerboard tablecloth of a Mrs Butterworth's Syrup ad. The set had an Automatic Color button but I found manual adjustments gave a better picture. The set didn't work well and had to be repaired several times. Finally in 1972 my parents bought a 19" or 21" inch table top Hitachi set (the first one they ever BOUGHT) for a reasonable $320 at a local discount store (the late, great Fedco) and the GE went to the dump.

The Hitachi, despite being mostly solid state, didn't hold out that much longer, by 1979 the picture was shot and we replaced it with a 19" MGA (as Mitsubishi was then known) which lasted until c. 1995-6. The replacement was a 25" Magnavox set (by now, tv's were square rather than rectangular) which just barely fit in the built-in wall cabinet (not the same house as the first tv and not the same bookcases). Anything larger would not have fit the cabinet, and even then we had to go shopping with a tape measure, as only some of the 25" models would fit.

This year, the Magnavox began making strange noises when turned OFF (but plugged in) so off it went to the e-waste county recycling program, and in its place now stands a 32" Vizio HDTV with WiFi, thank you Costco: only $350 on sale. I tried to find them a 37" set, but none of them had low enough vertical clearance to fit the cabinet. They love the set and are now using my Netflix account to watch movies, documentaries, etc.

So in 44 years, they've had five sets: 19" GE, 19" Hitachi, 19" MGA/Mitsubishi, 25" Magnavox, and now a 32" Vizio.

Allen, I do remember the GE PortaColor being a major price break, I believe it retailed for $199.98---the first color set under $200. When most other sets were $400+.


Post# 555034 , Reply# 7   11/8/2011 at 09:25 (4,574 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
color programming before the mid-1960s...

....was limited. Sponsors didn't want to pony up the extra money required to reach a small segment of the market. Color ownership in the USA did not hit 50% of households until about 1972.

One notable exception was The Lucy Show, 1962-68. The first season was filmed in black and white. What was interesting was that seasons two and three were filmed in color, but broadcast in black and white, because CBS' prime time lineup was still in B&W. But Desilu recognized the future value of having reruns in color. As a result, those who saw the original 1963-65 broadcasts saw them in B&W, even on a color set. Those who later saw the syndicated reruns saw them in color, as they were originally filmed. I believe CBS went all-color in prime time in 1965, with ABC following a year later.

Because shows flipped from B&W to color and then back, most of the networks had some sort of identifier (e.g. NBC peacock) to alert viewers if the following program was in color---if not, people didn't call into their local stations to ask what was wrong.

NBC:




 

CBS:




 

ABC:





Post# 555035 , Reply# 8   11/8/2011 at 09:29 (4,574 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
scarier peacock

This is the original 1957 peacock. NBC was first with color (not counting CBS valiant but ill-fated attempt earlier in the decade) and needed a color identifier first. I don't remember this version (not quite old enough to watch prime time before 1962) but it sounds terrifying. I'm glad they switched to the gentler/kinder peacock by the time I was old enough to stay up for prime time.
 
 






Post# 555040 , Reply# 9   11/8/2011 at 10:00 (4,574 days old) by alr2903 (TN)        

We had an RCA new vista first, then ughh a Truetone from western auto, worst ever, the truetone was one of the "instant" on sets that had tubes glowing even when off, visilibe from the back panel it think these were the ones that started several fires.  That was the folks last bargain buy tv,  We stayed with RCA after that.   By the late 60's early 70's there was a great bally hoo about a percent of solid state like 60 %  SS.  40 %tube.  In reality it was cheaper to replace a tube than to tackle solid state problems the  techs especially rural areas did not like to fool with the solid state situation. I think electronics of this era led to our disposable attitude for electronics,  It  most often  was cheaper to get new that have a "tube guy" fool with the set and then need him back.  cannot remember that last time I had a console tv worked on at home.long before the consoles fell into obsolesence.

 

 


Post# 555050 , Reply# 10   11/8/2011 at 10:53 (4,574 days old) by LordKenmore (The Laundry Room)        
I believe CBS went all-color in prime time in 1965

lordkenmore's profile picture
They must have gone fully color later on. PERRY MASON ran until Spring, 1966, and it was entirely black and white except for one episode. My understanding is that one color episode was a test to see what the show would look in color had it survived into the "all color" era.

Post# 555052 , Reply# 11   11/8/2011 at 11:04 (4,574 days old) by laundromat (Hilo, Hawaii)        

laundromat's profile picture
we had a 25" Zenith "Space Command" color tv with remote control and a revolving tv antana.

Post# 555062 , Reply# 12   11/8/2011 at 11:43 (4,574 days old) by ptcruiser51 (Boynton Beach, FL)        
Interesting Thread

ptcruiser51's profile picture
My OM's excuse was "it's not perfected yet!". I won a 16" Zenith portable in a Church raffle in 1970. What a PITA to tune, every time you changed a channel you had to re-adjust the color and tint. We put it inside my parents' 1948 RCA cabinet as the set had gone kaput by that time but the cabinet was still beautiful. The OM was right, I guess, the set went on the blink ONE WEEK after the warranty expired. I vowed I'd never buy another Zenith product again. It was back to B&W for awhile. They had a fairly new B&W Magnavox Home Entertainment Center in the living room (TV, AM/FM, Stereo). When I got married in 1971 we saved-up for awhile and bought a Magnavox color table model, again manual adjustment but the color held from one channel to another. My parents' 25th anniversary was in 1972, so I bought them a 19" Sylvania table model. Automatic tuning! It was great! Back into the '48 cabinet it went for a good 15 years or so. My Magnavox lasted well into the 1980s and I replaced it with another. My aunt had the Motorola Quasar with the "instant on". My sister was dating a TV repairman, he disconnected the feature - said it was too dangerous; besides pulling current all the time was a waste.

Living in the NY/NJ Metro area we had color early. One of the neighbors when we lived in the 'hood worked at the RCA plant in Harrison, NJ. He built a color set (probably from filched parts) and put it in a packing crate for a cabinet. We kids used to go over to watch cartoons which was pretty much all that was on in color at the time. I do remember that ABC's "The Jetsons" was their first network program in color. Crazy what you recall. We kids were watching comedian George Gobel's show when it went to color. He said, "This is for the people with B&W" and pulled up his pant legs. His garters for his socks had the straps labeled "red" "blue" "green" "orange". Pretty funny.


Post# 555066 , Reply# 13   11/8/2011 at 11:53 (4,574 days old) by dirtybuck (Springfield, MO)        

Although we didn't get our first color TV until 1972 when we moved into our new house (RCA XL 100...biggest piece of crap), our neighbors across the street had a set from White's Auto and Home store (competitor to Western Auto). The man of the house was an assistant manager. I believe it was in 1966 when he first brought it home. And, to make everyone on the block extremely "jealous", it also had..REMOTE CONTROL! The first show I saw on that set was "Lost In Space".

And, speaking of promos, since Liz didn't want anyone to forget...:) (I like the way she says "color")


CLICK HERE TO GO TO dirtybuck's LINK


Post# 555069 , Reply# 14   11/8/2011 at 12:11 (4,574 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        
The Last NBC Peacock Holdout

rp2813's profile picture

I believe it was the "Tonight" show with Johnny Carson.  They continued to open the broadcast with the peacock sequence many years after NBC and the other two networks were filming/taping everything in color and had long since dropped their color presentation announcements.  I stopped watching Carson on a regular basis well before he retired, but his production company may have required inclusion of the peacock up until his last show.

 

 


Post# 555070 , Reply# 15   11/8/2011 at 12:16 (4,574 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Thanks for that tidbit about the Motorola square CRT's, I never knew that! Learn something new all the time. Come to think of it, I have never seen a Motorola "fish bowl" television before.

Our first set was in late 1964. It was one of the first Zenith rectangular screens on the market. It was a wider set with speakers on both sides of the screen and tone controls on the lower right hand side of the set below the main controls.

One thing I did notice about broadcast color television. Some shows had better colors than others. Later I looked at the credits of the show to see who did the color processing. It seemed that Technicolor was the best, followed by Pathe, then Metrocolor, and finally DeLuxe. It seemed that DeLuxe was the worst. Many of the colors were overexposed, most of time the blacks were crushed. Shadowing on faces was terrible. No matter how you adjusted your set, shows by DeLuxe had terrible color most of the time.

So when you switched channels you often had to readjust the colors on the set. Most everyone I knew adjusted the color by how the clothing and backround looked on the sets. What I would do was kill the color completely, then adjust brightness and contrast for a good B&W picture, then add color and when I was satisfied with that I went to the tint control for a nice flesh tone. Little did I know, but that is how most television studios adjusted their color cameras before being used for a broadcast!

I think Magnavox would have had higher sales in our area if they made the sets available through major retailers. But most of the time Magnavox was sold through small to medium size dealer/repair shops. We bought our first Zenith from the shop a few blocks away. It cost $600.00, with $50 for delivery and set up.

My first color set was a early 70's Motorola 21 inch table model that was given to me by one of my aunts in 1975. Before that I had a Zenith 12" B&W portable that I was given as a gift in 1969. I still have that set today and it still works! But the CRT is getting weak, and I think it needs a tube brightener on it. My first purchased color set was a 1982 Zenith 21 inch System 3 table model with a wood cabinet and that phone option built in. It even had a remote control! It was not the most reliable set either. It lasted until 1988 or so when I got tired of having it repaired (it couldn't keep power supplies in it) and we bought a JVC 25 inche unit. Then we moved that into the bedroom and bought one of the early Samsung built Zenith sets. It was problematic and eventually caught fire one night while we were sleeping. Fortunately one of our dogs woke us up to warn us. I just unplugged it and the fire went out. We called the fire dept, and they put the set out in the back yard for us. In 2004 then bought a 36 inch Sony Wega set that we have to this day. It has been rock solid since.



Post# 555074 , Reply# 16   11/8/2011 at 12:29 (4,574 days old) by yogitunes (New Jersey)        

yogitunes's profile picture
we had an Olympic 25" inch color TV/Stereo combination console, seemed like for years, but the TV only lasted from 1965 to 1975, I mis units like this, plenty of big speakers for the TV and Stereo.......we would play records for hours.....

by the time the tubes began to fail, they weren't readily available for service, we had a few 19 inch color sets for a while.......the next color console TV we got by Magnavox, had the instant on, and the magic EYE to adjust color and contrast to the rooms light, which was a joke, it never worked right.......

1988 we went to Sears and got an RCA 26 console with remote, got about 15 years out of that before it went belly up.....then in keeping with RCA's, went to the 32 inch on a cabinet to house the Cable box, vcr, and component stereo system......

Irenes storm this past summer jolted that one......replaced by another RCA....this time 36 inch, with built in cabinet.......same remote as not to confuse Mother....

but true about buying anything that is the first model out there......it is the demo, with all the issues and problems.....give them a few years to perfect anything that is made....never buy the prototype!


Post# 555075 , Reply# 17   11/8/2011 at 12:29 (4,574 days old) by kenwashesmonday (Carlstadt, NJ)        

We didn't get a color set untill 1972, it was a GE 19" portable.  Portable, well, it had a handle, but it was very heavy to move.  That set worked flawlessly untill about 1988, not bad considering it often ran all night while someone fell asleep on the sofa.

 

Ken D.


Post# 555080 , Reply# 18   11/8/2011 at 12:55 (4,574 days old) by MikeS ()        
Color TV Programming

CBS held out on color in part because of its running feud with RCA (NBC's parent at the time). I wrote this article in 2004 for Teletronic, a sister site to the UK-based Television Heaven. It's a condensed history of color television in America.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO MikeS's LINK


Post# 555091 , Reply# 19   11/8/2011 at 13:28 (4,574 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

My parent had a Olympic B&W television, radio & photograph. They bought it in 1958. I had never heard of the brand before and never saw another one again. I remember when they bought it. It came in several styles, including Chinese. Black lacquer with a chinese motif painting on the front doors. We opted for the mahogany set. I believe it was a 21 inch television. It lasted until they upgraded to color and a separate Zenith console stereo in 1964. I don't think the Olympic gave them any trouble at all. A reliable set. I always thought that Olympic may be more popular in the northeast than in the midwest.

This was one of the reasons I started this thread. To find out if there were any regional popularity differences in television brands.


Post# 555093 , Reply# 20   11/8/2011 at 13:36 (4,574 days old) by drewz (Alexandria, Virginia)        

drewz's profile picture

While we had all brands at some point and being a RCA Victor fan and collector I must admit some of those works in drawer Motorola color sets had the best deep rich colors and great contrast.

 

But don't you think how RCA & Zenith both got to be staples was because of all their "Trade In Days At Your Dealer" promotions always keeping people trading up like cars with the latest and greatest?


Post# 555095 , Reply# 21   11/8/2011 at 13:43 (4,574 days old) by Ultramatic (New York City)        
DuMont Color TV

ultramatic's profile picture

We had a 25" DuMont color console. I think it arrived around 1966. It was out first color set. To be honest I have not seen ANY DuMonts of that era. Even advertising for ANY DuMont color sets are very rare. When the DuMont died due to the NYC blackout of 1977, my parents got a RCA color console. The bedrooms had 19" Magnavox color sets. Those were strippers, no remote control, rotary channel knobs.


Post# 555096 , Reply# 22   11/8/2011 at 13:44 (4,574 days old) by cfz2882 (Belle Fourche,SD)        
color TV

first color TV my parents bought was a small(probaly 13")RCA around 1972-i remember
watching "watergate"stuff on it LOL They sold this TV about 1974 at a rummage sale.
About 1977,they bought a big 1968 RCA console at the salvation army-this worked
quite well as i recall untill about 1980 when i started to go on the blink every
month or so;different problem every time-usually a tube or a bad connection was the
problem.After about the 5th repair parents"threw in the towel"on this RCA and
bought a little 13"taiwanese"bohsei"color TV...I stripped this TV-finding a big
resistor under the chassis that was burnt out-and used the parts for electronic
projects(still have a couple parts,they show '68 date codes)This old RCA had a
round PX behind a rectangle opening and 6x9"speakers on either side.


Post# 555126 , Reply# 23   11/8/2011 at 16:17 (4,574 days old) by Davey7 (Chicago)        

My family didn't get TV until 1980 - my mom did have a TV in the 50's, probably a portable, for watching baseball while ironing - and we went right to the land of a 19" Trinitron from Sony (from Marshall Field's mother ship on State Street no less, rather than Polk Brothers or Sears where everything else came from). I'd still have that TV (which even lived in Detroit with my grandmother for a few years) but my best friend gifted me his Sharp when his mother in law left them her stereo tv (I only watch movies now, but that TV couldn't handle all our on air channels in Chicago even when new with it's limited station pre-sets).

I remember all kinds of stories about the "consultants" for early color - Technicolor especially. TV converted to color pretty quickly, though Italy didn't go until nearly 1980, so we miss all those variety shows from the 60's being truly psychedelic in BW.


Post# 555157 , Reply# 24   11/8/2011 at 17:26 (4,574 days old) by ptcruiser51 (Boynton Beach, FL)        
OK, Allen

ptcruiser51's profile picture
Back to your original query. You are right that most early color sets I remember were either RCA or Zenith, with Admiral close behind. We lived in an early 60's development so all the neighbors had pretty much homogenized tastes. Same kind of appliances and TV's because all the houses were identical split-levels. Only the cars in the driveway differed!

Because DuMont's were manufactured here in NJ, some people had them (you weren't alone, Louie!) My relatives in Pennsylvania had Olympics. The first people on our street in the 'burbs to have color were the Andersons who lived down the block, a 1961 RCA Console. They were a little upscale for our development, the first family to have two cars (his was an MG convertible). Also the first ones with an above-ground pool.

We kids got shuttled around a lot for babysitting. Maybe I was more attentive than most, I paid attention to things like appliances. Most were RCA/Zenith/Admiral/Philco. Diagonally across the street from us was a childless couple, he was an engineer for Bell Labs and built a color TV from "Heathkit" (anyone remember THEM?). This was about 1964.

The late 1950s saw appliances go "big" with warehouse TV and appliance stores. We had them lining our highways here in Jersey to serve the flight to the suburbs: Prince Range, Brick Church Appliance, Davega's, many others. Lots of families bought their appliances/TV's at department stores where they had charge accounts: Bamberger's/Macy*s, Abraham and Strauss, Stern's, Gimbels' because they were so expensive time payments were a plus. A good amount still went to neighborhood independents that featured one or two brands at most. People were still afraid of the color technology (like my OM) and nearby "service" was an important consideration.

The only major manufacturer of color TV's that I never saw anywhere was Westinghouse. This is odd because W'house had a big factory here in Newark, NJ. A TV Guide issue of the late 1960's listed manufacturers of TV's that gave up the ghost in the face of competition. Three that I remember were Westinghouse, Hoffman, and DuMont. They followed scads of others that abandoned the field when B&W was still "king": Hallicrafters, Stromberg-Carlson, Air King, Andrea, Capehart. How Emerson survived I'll never know!

My cousin in Scranton, PA was the only one I recall that had a Silvertone 12" portable. Lousy picture, worse reception. He bought it, again, because of his Sears charge. Older aw.o members will know that at one time Sears carried only its own house brand. Silvertone electronics, Coldspot refrigeration, and Kenmore everything else! I think it was in the 1980s that they finally went "global" with other major manufacturers.

Hope my "rememberies" entertained you all. My head is ready to explode!


Post# 555177 , Reply# 25   11/8/2011 at 17:51 (4,574 days old) by Maytagbear (N.E. Ohio)        
Our first color set

was a 25 inch Sylvania console, in "Early American." We got it in 1967. We were not the first on our street with color, but we were among the first. It had a great picture, and decent sound, when it worked right. It needed an adjustment or something every 6 months or so, but we kept it through the early 80s. Ma bought it because a local service shop sold them.


Then, we had a Sharp built, but Montgomery Wards labeled 19 incher, with a primitive remote control. It was quite reliable, and would probably still be running, if a lightning strike hadn't gotten it.


My current tv, which I only use as a DVD monitor, is a 13 inch Sanyo.



Lawrence/Maytagbear


Post# 555186 , Reply# 26   11/8/2011 at 18:06 (4,574 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Yes, I find this thread very interesting.

I have seen DuMont B&W sets, but never a color set. Maybe another east coast brand? Also there was Setchell-Carlson out of MSP that made B&W sets. They gave up the ghost well before color TV hit the market.

On my various travels for my job usually most hotels had RCA sets.





Post# 555190 , Reply# 27   11/8/2011 at 18:32 (4,574 days old) by polkanut (Wausau, WI )        

polkanut's profile picture

The majority of our family all had Zenith sets because of Jerry's Music here in Wausau.  Jerry Goetsch, the owner, was my Grandma Baumann's 2nd cousin, and the store had a very liberal time payment plan.  My parents received 1967 19" b&w Zenith as a wedding gift from Grandpa & Grandma Baumann, then they bought their 25" Zenith color console in 1972.  It lasted until about 1983 when we got another Zenith console model.  About 1990 or so my dad won a SONY 25" from a local grocery store.  When my mom told him he'd won, he thought she was pulling his leg.  That set lasted  until about 2001 when they bought their current Durabrand set from Wal-Mart.


Post# 555209 , Reply# 28   11/8/2011 at 19:08 (4,574 days old) by petek (Ontari ari ari O )        

petek's profile picture
Oh the agony of being the last on the street, in the neighborhood, in the world to get a color tv.. I lived that nightmare LOL

But to answer the question first.. the vast vast majority of people in my little world back then (60's) bought RCA color tv's. I only recollect one of our neighbors having a Zenith and nobody having a Silvertone, although we had a Silvertone b/w set.

My dad staunchley refused to get a color set and yes he used as someone above said, the excuse "they haven't perfected it yet" and the "if I wanted to get a color set I go on over to Sears right now and buy 10 of them for cash, not on a credit card if I wanted" Which he could have btw. I don't really know why he was so against it. Maybe because neither of my folks watched much tv and he thought most of it was garbage but then again as my mom said they were the first people in the whole subdivision to get a tv back in the late 40's and she had the first automatic washer (a Kenmore) before anyone else as well. For him if it wasn't practical it wasn't worth it I suppose. Anyways, they didn't get a color set until sometime in the early 70's, a crappy RCA which never had a good picture.


Post# 555215 , Reply# 29   11/8/2011 at 19:26 (4,574 days old) by cfz2882 (Belle Fourche,SD)        
westy color TVs

I only saw a '60s westy color TV once and it was just the tube,chassis and controls
-found in a dumpster around 1976.Amoung the parts i kept were the knobs as they
were pretty-they had prismatic inserts that would reflect rainbow colors much like
that prismatic tape you could buy in car accesory stores in the '70s and '80s...
I do have a westy B/W tv;'65 "jet-set"(not in working order,a project for someday)


Post# 555278 , Reply# 30   11/9/2011 at 01:09 (4,574 days old) by LordKenmore (The Laundry Room)        

lordkenmore's profile picture
"Oh the agony of being the last on the street, in the neighborhood, in the world to get a color tv."

Well my family probably was the last to have color. Early 70s for the first color set? Ha! Try not even by 1990! My family's first TV was a small GE black and white that my parents bought in the early years of their marriage. It gave up the ghost in the early 80s someplace, and it got replaced by another small black and white TV. I never heard the reasons for only getting another black and white TV. We weren't heavy TV watchers, so getting a high end TV would not have been a priority. But the timing may have been an influence--the new TV was bought right after Christmas. At that time, it may have been desirable for the family finances to keep the price as low as possible. I remember going to Fred Meyer with my mother to get the new TV. They were on sale, and she grumbled all the way home about that fact. Not that we'd saved a few dollars, but her view that it was to hook teenagers who had some Christmas gift cash, and get them to buy a TV for their room. She did not approve of that idea in the least. She had a low opinion of TV...and that opinion did nothing but sink as the years went by.

There was some talk about getting color about the time we got a VCR. But that was a "someday" type of thing. Someday became "never." Meanwhile, we were probably the only family in America who did NOT have color, but DID have a VCR.

Surprisingly, perhaps, I was never bothered by black and white. It was what I was used to. Plus at times it didn't really matter. For a while in the 80s, most of the TV shows we watched were old 60s reruns aired by a Seattle station specializing in classic TV. Many if not all of these were black and white, anyway.

My own first color TV--and still the current one--is a Magnavox. Probably about 20". It was something abandoned when someone I know moved on to bigger and better things. It isn't the best set, but it works OK for now. I don't actually watch TV, just library DVDs, and thrift store VHS tapes.


Post# 555305 , Reply# 31   11/9/2011 at 05:19 (4,573 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Oh, and besides Kenmore, Silvertone Sears also had the "Homart" brand. I think I saw that brand once on a Sears central air unit and maybe some outdoor lawn equipment sometime. I think it faded away in the mid 60's when they started to brand these items as just Sears.

I remember the MGA brand before it became Mitsubishi. A smaller television only store in the mall sold those. Usually they were large screen projection televisions.
I only knew one person with one. A guy I used to fly with. We were talking about televisions one day and he said he bought an MGA because he felt it was a good deal for what you got.

A guy that lived down the street from my uncle had a Heathkit Color TV. He built it as part of a electronics night school he was taking. He had it installed in the wall in his den. My uncle said it had a fantastic picture on it, but I never got to see it. I kept asking if we could go down there to see it but my aunt said you can't go visit people just to see their television set. Why the people would think I am strange or something. Later Zenith was bought by Goldstar, not Samsung as I mentioned earlier. Zenith also bought out Heathkit and closed them down.

Zenith also was the company that developed MTS stereo broadcasting for television as well as the HDTV standard for broadcasting in the U.S. before LG acquired them.

My sister told me my parents bought a VCR shortly before they both passed. She said that they unboxed it and put it on top of the television but could never
figure out how to connect it or use it. I was married at the time living across the country from them and didn't get home very often. Had I known, I probably would have made the trip to hook it up for them.

I started seeing Sony sets in the late 70's and early 80's. They did get a great picture. I do remember someone having a 19" Sony color set and the screen was somewhat of a cylindrical shape. I thought that was odd.

Does anyone remember those far out looking ultra modern Zenith and RCA sets that came out in the early 80's? Both were full sized consoles that looked like something out of the future? The Zenith sat on a pedestal and was silver and somewhat crescent shaped.

Here is a photo of an RCA 2000 set from 1969. Notice how those black bars stick out quite a way between the screen and the speakers? I wonder why they did that?


Post# 555311 , Reply# 32   11/9/2011 at 05:44 (4,573 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Does anyone know anyone who has ever had a Curtes-Mathis television? I remember them advertising in the early 80's with the tag line "The most expensive television made, and darned well worth it". They were pretty well made with supposedly a bunch of them still in use today. They were made in Texas.

The link leads to a Curtes Mathis website. They show some of their models and one even turned on. Looks like a pretty nice picture.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK


Post# 555313 , Reply# 33   11/9/2011 at 05:50 (4,573 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

And here is a photo of that Zenith futuristic television I was talking about. A friend of our family had one. They said that they recently got cable and asked if I could hook the box up for them. The picture was quite dim. The reason was that the entire television was encased in brown smoke residue from the people that lived there smoking! One time when we were there I took a bottle of windex and cleaned the set up. The people who lived there couldn't figure out why I wanted to do that and my parents were horrified. But the set looked like new again! I must have gone through and entire roll of paper towels!

Post# 555314 , Reply# 34   11/9/2011 at 05:54 (4,573 days old) by LordKenmore (The Laundry Room)        

lordkenmore's profile picture
I remember the Homart name. The house I grew up in was partly updated in the 60s, and the people who lived there then were evidently Sears addicts. It appeared everything they bought was Sears. I can't remember what products had that name--it's been so long--but I do remember seeing it.

I think Silvertone was used for musical instruments in addition to TV and radio.


Post# 555320 , Reply# 35   11/9/2011 at 06:36 (4,573 days old) by drewz (Alexandria, Virginia)        

drewz's profile picture

Allen,

 

Here is a photo of an RCA 2000 set from 1969. Notice how those black bars stick out quite a way between the screen and the speakers? I wonder why they did that?

 

Those two black bars were closing panels which when closed made the entire front of the set black, ultra modern, model 2000, only 2000 made a collectors item now I guess?  This set was part of a big promotion for RCA, if I am correct they also cost $$$


Post# 555326 , Reply# 36   11/9/2011 at 06:47 (4,573 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
@whirlcool/allen

When my parents replaced the Hitachi with the Mitsubishi, I was in charge of the purchase. My parents had to go out of town, so they left me with the credit card and said to buy whatever I felt was best (hey, I was a second year medical student by then, I guess that qualified me to select a tv----NOT!). The store from which I ultimately purchased was a dealer for both Mitsubishi (then, a rare brand) and also Curtes Mathis. The latter were significantly more expensive than Mitsubishi, which itself was priced higher than Sony or Panasonic or Zenith or RCA. My parents' budget was more or less "under $500" which I followed by selecting the 19" Mitsubishi. The 21" model was like two hundred dollars more. Supposedly at the time, Mitsubishi was the most expensive mass-produced tv in the USA at the time, with Curtes Mathis being a high end, limited-production model.

Post# 555329 , Reply# 37   11/9/2011 at 07:13 (4,573 days old) by 112561 (River Park, in Port St. Lucie, Florida)        

112561's profile picture
Zenith had the Avanti, which was an all white cabinet on its own sculpted base, and the fancy curved tv they had showed up in the community church thrift store in Jensen Beach months ago! I couldn't get it for some stupid reason.

We moved in here with a '52 Philco, on a hideous swivel table. Then Daddy got a Philco console with twin speakers and Cool Chassis, no UHF on it until he bought a top of set converter. Then we could see CBS! Next one was a GE console in an attractive Danish style cabinet. I walked into the house one day in '78, and the tv had a color picture! It was a new Zenith in a metal cabinet, on a plastic Danish modern base. Next was the '84 Space Command, which would only come on a few years later when it felt like it. Daddy was gone by '87, the tv lasted until '96 when Mom got tired of waiting for the Zenith to come on. She got a new RCA stereo Colortrak XS console with quite a few features for a modestly priced set. Convergeance went out on it, and it sits awaiting its fate. A 1971 Total Automatic Color Magnavox armoire sits in its place, I bought it for the Astro-Sonic, and I watch tv on a nine inch Zenith in a Vanilla cabinet. Have many little color and b&w sets now.

Briefly, I actually owned the first color set in this house, a metal table RCA, from the owner of the gay bar in Fort Pierce, about two years before the living room Zenith. After I sold that, I got a swell Zenith 19 inch Space Command with the mechanical tuning. It had a hideous pic in the store, and I tuned it in before I took it. The guy would have charged more than $50 for it if HE had figured out how to get the picture fixed. Then, the '87 13 inch Zenith remote, and much later, an '87 19 inch table Zenith stereo. Then, the ultra modern '79 System 3 table set. On and on......

(not the Avanti, curved Zenith on base)


Post# 555330 , Reply# 38   11/9/2011 at 07:18 (4,573 days old) by norgeway (mocksville n c )        
Du Mont Color

I had a beautiful DuMont color set that I let a friend talk me out of, Ive kicked myself ever since, It was a 21 inch round tube with 4 speaker Hi Fi sound, It uses a RCA tube and chassis, as did a lot of the older color sets.

Post# 555334 , Reply# 39   11/9/2011 at 07:55 (4,573 days old) by cadman (Cedar Falls, IA)        
I know we have some TV collectors on the forum...

cadman's profile picture
Who I'll probably bore, but thought I'd throw my 2 cents in.

The RCA 2000 certainly IS a collector's item. It was RCA's first all solid state set, but also the first that I'm aware of to have digital memory for VHF stations, brightness, color, etc. An amazingly complicated feat...for $2000 in 1969!

For those who don't know, Dumont was the Cadillac of televisions. I'm fortunate to own one and it's built like the proverbial tank. When set prices started to come down and manufacturers found new ways to cut corners, Dumont fell on hard times. Emerson bought them out in the late 50's and you can tell a distinct difference in Emerson made Dumonts by appearance alone. When I was a kid, a local thrift store had a round-screen color Dumont radio/phono combo that was every bit of 8' long. 5 bucks was the price. Try as we might, there was no way that my mom, the clerk and I could even get one end off the ground! I got the money handed back to me and told to take what I wanted off it. If you think that's a shame, you should hear the time I had to gut a mint condition Zenith black-laquer chinese cabinet color Hi-Fi Space Command set because a lady had just bought it for the cabinet half an hour prior at that same store for 50 bucks and was going to have the insides "smashed up". The CRT and all came home intact with me that time.

There were still a couple companies making consoles and large screen B&W sets in the early 80's, but not many. I have a 23" Zenith table model from that era in a steel w/woodgrain cabinet. An odd duck. I read recently that Sylvania had at least one console from that period. -Cory


Post# 555342 , Reply# 40   11/9/2011 at 09:13 (4,573 days old) by bwoods ()        

Wow, what memeories!

My family's first color TV what bought in November, 1964. It was a beautiful Italian walnut wood console (which was a work of art in itself), with speakers on both sides and a gold gallery rail on the top, back of the cabinet. It has a UHF channel selector on it, our previous BW Admiral did not have UHF. Although it did not matter as we had no UHF stations in town, at that time.

The first show we watched on it was Hanna-Barbera's, "Johnny Quest." Beautiful color picture...crystal clear. Some of you, who are as old as I, may remember that Sylvania was advertising its color picture tube with "rare earth red phosphors."

Remember the ad? It was in many magazines and showed a photograph of a picture of a Red Delicious Apple on a competitor's color TV and a picture of the apple of the Sylvania. The Sylvania's apple was bright, natural red. The competitiors looked a darker, more muddy type red.

The set always had a wonderful, detailed picture, when it worked. It was frequented with almost continual problems. We didn't have it quite a year. Tubes burnt out, on-off switch went bad, etc. My dad gave the dealer such a hard time, they gave us an allowance on a brand new 1966 model Sylvania, with rectangular picture tube, which had just come into the showroom. They had just introduced the 1966 models and this was Sylvanias firt rectangular tube set. I believe Motorola had just introduced theirs about a year earlier.

This second Sylvania, also in a beautiful double speaker cabinet, lasted two years and the main transformer windings overheated, scorched and smoked out living room.

My Parents replaced it with a gigantic Magnavox Home Theatre, with a built instereo phonograph and AM/FM radio. (First FM radio we ever had). It was still a tube set. But proved reliable, and lasted until 1983, when my parents replaced it with a GE console. This lasted 11 years, and was still working, but the picture tube had visibly dimmed over 11 years and they finally replaced it, instead of putting a new CRT in (unfortunately).

Below is a picture of my GE stereo TV, which I purchased in 1985. It still is my daily driver and has never been repaired. A testimony to the longevity of GE electronics (just like in my 25 year old GSD2800 dishwasher.)

The picture looks a little washed out, but doesn't look that way in person. It is the flash from the camera.


Post# 555351 , Reply# 41   11/9/2011 at 10:02 (4,573 days old) by cycla-fabric (New Jersey (Northern))        

cycla-fabric's profile picture
I can remember when we got our first color tv, it was a 1966 Motorola color set with the rectangular tube and 21" screen. I remember my parents liked the set as the tube offered a larger viewing area than the round picture tubes of the other sets. That was a good set and had good color picture. That set lasted until 1975 it was needing a lot of repairs near the end. Our next set was an RCA XL-100 with the 25" screen and it was on a swivel base with a black glass top, it was a smart looking set. But the picture on it wasn't the best, lacked sharpness to it. I was trying to steer my folks to get a Philco instead as the picture on it was better. The RCA lasted until 1991 and it just died. The next and current color tv which is still going strong is an RCA 27" Colortrack TOL series which for some reason the model was only made for 1 year and then discontinued for some reason. Oh well the set performs well as it is used daily. I am sure when this goes, a flat screen will be the next step. This was a good topic, loved looking at the old ads, as it brings back memories.

Doug


Post# 555396 , Reply# 42   11/9/2011 at 13:34 (4,573 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

In 1964 both Zenith and RCA had "select" models with rectangular screens. I believe they were 25 inches. They still offered the oval screen sets too.

I saw a few Philco tv's for sale, usually at larger appliance stores. But while I had seen some homes with Philco B&W sets, I never saw anyone with a Philco color set.

And what I REALLY remember was the partitioned off special "viewing rooms" for color TV's in larger appliance stores. They were like a room within a store. Very low level lighting with the color sets they were selling inside and turned on. When you opened the doors to enter you were hit with all the ozone smell from the operating sets inside. The salespeople made sure all the sets were properly adjusted. I could have spent hours in there. I think most of these rooms were gone by 1973 or so.

Wasn't it 64' or 65' when the FCC mandated television sets come with a UHF tuner?
I remember my mom won a 19" B&W GE portable TV around 1963 and it didn't have a UHF tuner. At the time the only UHF station in Chicago was channel 26 and what they ran on the air most of the time was bull fighting from Mexico. When I installed our first rooftop antenna when the first Zenith set came along we could then get channel 22, the CBS affiliate from South Bend, IN.


Post# 555414 , Reply# 43   11/9/2011 at 14:39 (4,573 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        

@Allen/whirlcool: I remember seeing ads for tv's in early to mid-60s boasting "82 channel reception", as if this were a major selling point/extra bonus. I.e. until mid-60s, people didn't take 82 channels for granted, it was a selling point on sets so equipped.

We had a 13" inch Admiral portable B&W, must have been bought c. 1963, and it had 82 channels with UHF. Our school lacked a tv, and when there was an important tv broadcast (say, a space launch), I would often lug the tv to school so our class could watch. It couldn't have weighed that much if a second grader could lug it three blocks to school and back.

Our White Front department store (discount retailer mainly on the west coast, went belly up early 1970s) had a viewing room like you described, but it was not enclosed. There were walls on three sides, but this was a huge warehouse style building and the walls didn't reach all the way to the ceiling, they were simply tall enough to block light from lateral sources. As an "open air" viewing room, there was no ozone odor.


Post# 555447 , Reply# 44   11/9/2011 at 17:40 (4,573 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

The rooms I am describing were two sides in a corner of a room and two dark glass tinted walls towards the sales floor with a glass door for access. The room also had a ceiling covering it that was lower than the ceiling of the store. It was very dim in there with the only light source being rather dim wall washing lights. Usually there was an air vent bringing in fresh air in the back of the room, but the heat from the tube television sets still made it rather hot in there.

I assume the room was dark to bring out the color on the screens. "Look dear, look how BRIGHT RED her dress is!".

I also saw one of these viewing rooms in the back of the store. They cut out the wall and walled in a section of the back room so you had a flat glass wall facing the showroom.

Another thing, the tv manufacturers really worked on the cabinetry of those sets. They were real wood (in most cases) and carefully finished. I wonder how many people made their purchase decision on how good the cabinet of the set was?


Post# 555466 , Reply# 45   11/9/2011 at 19:30 (4,573 days old) by paulg (My sweet home... Chicago)        
Totally agree with Whirlcool

paulg's profile picture
He nailed Chicago's popularity list.
Our first color TV was a 1967 Motorola rectangular. We got it in 1975 only because friends knew I liked fixing TVs. It didn't work.
I couldn't fix it so we had it fixed. After that I fixed it many times but it generally had a pretty crappy pix.
After that I fixed up whatever I could find. We were not a wealthy family. We had RCA, Packard-Bell, Zenith. I'd put a tube in them, get them going for a few years than dump it when something better came along.
I went through two Westinghouse colors. Hard to find. Worked well though.

Sears color TVs in the 1960s were made by WARWICK in Chicago. I knew a bunch of people who had them. Later Sanyo. Warwick (a relative of Pacific-Mercury) was also known for making Thomas Organs (again Sears).
Montgomery Ward TVs were generally made by Hoffman aka Cortron. When Admiral bought Cortron/Hoffman in about 1970, the TVs were sourced by them.
In Chicago I came across a surprising amount of Olympics. They were decent, basic sets.

Yes, B-Woods' GE TV is one of those never-fail designs. Love it. I think the only thing I ever saw go bad on those sets (PC chassis?) was a capacitor in the vertical output (pix shrinks). Other than that they run and run and run and run.


Post# 555491 , Reply# 46   11/9/2011 at 20:23 (4,573 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

The Olympic set my parents had came from Polk Bros.

For those outside of Chicago Polk Bros was a quasi appliance store that was large (on N.Central Ave they bought up a bunch of car dealerships and turned the dealer show rooms into appliance show rooms, one building held kitchen appliances, another building furniture, another building washer/dryers, laundry equipment, etc.) they were a forerunner of discounted selling. They bought goods from the manufacturers usually directly by the tens of truckloads thereby passing the distributor (& ticking them off too) and passing the savings onto the customer. Polk Bros lasted all the way up to 1992. They carried just about every major brand appliance you could think of(except Magnavox).

They saw Circuit City & Best Buy coming and wondered how they could compete. So after a fire that burned most of their inventory records they shut down and took the $382 million dollars that they had and set up the Polk Bros foundation which helps inner city kids with educational pursuits.

By 1960 over 80% of the Chicago population had at least one item they purchased at Polk Bros from 1935 to 1960. An amazing feat.

As a footnote they did build a computer center in the middle of their distribution center store. A modern IBM 370 System, I think it was a 168 model. It was in a glass room in the middle of the sales floor. But the owners of the chain (always family held) only put employee payroll on the system and for inventory control of the 17 store chain still used the old tub & index card system.
The family really didn't trust computers that much and when the fire burned down the distribution center (not that old anyway) the computer and all inventory records were destroyed as well. As much as their insurance company tried to help them out recovering their losses, they just could not come up with the proper amount of inventory that was in the warehouse at the time. The loss due to this was around $30 million dollars or so.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK


Post# 555509 , Reply# 47   11/9/2011 at 20:43 (4,573 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

This post has been removed by the member who posted it.



Post# 555510 , Reply# 48   11/9/2011 at 20:43 (4,573 days old) by PhilR (Quebec Canada)        

philr's profile picture
Joe, the RCA 2000 did also cost 2000$!
I'd kill to get one of these! (OK, maybe I'd kill a fly or something like that!)

Seriously,
I've been wanting one like this since I saw it in an ad in an old LIFE magazine (I collected them when I was a kid, the ads in these LIFE magazines probably caused my addiction to Frigidaire appliances too!)


In the last few days I have been searching (again) for an early RCA TV set with a remote control. There's an old 19" RCA color TV in a local ad but it's a portable set without a remote, and it's priced above what I want to pay for a portable tube TV.

Open the link to see one with the doors closed!


CLICK HERE TO GO TO PhilR's LINK


Post# 555526 , Reply# 49   11/9/2011 at 22:30 (4,573 days old) by nanook (Seattle)        
Great Memories and Info from All

nanook's profile picture
There was no question that Zenith made the best (mechanical) TV tuner. Their Super Gold Video Guard Tuner could run circles around the competition. And Zenith's reputation for reliablity was well-deserved. But for all the hoopla surrounding "hand wired chassis" vs. printed circuit boards, hand wiring had their set of issues too and as pcb technology matured along with transistors, was able to beat hand wiring for reliablity, etc. An unfortunate mistake Zenith made was deciding to design their own color demodulation circuit, rather than licensing one from RCA - as other manufacturers did. And as such the color redition of Zenith color TV's was always inferior to almost all others. Too bad, as in other respects their sets were quite nice.

Post# 555570 , Reply# 50   11/10/2011 at 01:02 (4,573 days old) by jetcone (Schenectady-Home of Calrods,Monitor Tops,Toroid Transformers)        
Wow

jetcone's profile picture

I remember seeing that RCA 2000 come out and thinking it was so futuristic! Like out of "2001 A Space Odyssey" all white design.

I wished we could have owned one too. We had just bought our first color set in 1968, an RCA and it had the best color I have ever seen, even to this day. Vivid. The Tonight Show was the most colorful program I remember from back then.

 

Our neighbors had the first color set in the neighborhood,it was a Zenith. In our area it was Zenith, RCA, and then neck and neck was Sears and GE since we lived in a GE town. Mom didn't like the sound on either the GE or the Sears,to tinny she would say. So we got an RCA for the sound. That set lasted until I went off to college and then they got one with remote controls.

I still have the cabinet, Dad turned it into a storage cabinet when it died.

 


Post# 555575 , Reply# 51   11/10/2011 at 01:33 (4,573 days old) by DaveAMKrayoGuy (Oak Park, MI)        
DaveAMKrayoGuy's G&G's A/V:

daveamkrayoguy's profile picture
I think one of the last TV sets I remember seeing my grandparents own was a fairly large-screen Panasonic, though it was a table top model complete w/ the rabbit ears & it was a Black & White, replacing a much smaller B&W, which might have been an Admiral or a Zenith!

Naturally, they were very much a lot more used to TV being black & white as opposed to color more than the rest of us, and this was in the late '70's so I don't think they have ever owned another television set since...!

There was even a jack on the side of the set for an ear-plug, which they let me try w/ a plug normally used for their transistor radio; an AM-only, no less! Although Gramps listened to some multi-band one-speaker "boom-box" of its time, capable of Police (maybe like a police scanner) & even short-wave broadcasts, along w/ the standard AM & FM settings, and a few more I'm probably forgetting; it ran on "D" Batteries as well as AC & probably also featured a jack for that ear-piece, too!


-- Dave


Post# 555577 , Reply# 52   11/10/2011 at 01:39 (4,573 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc)        

When I look at the advertisements for these TV's I also think of the TRANSMITTERS that broadcast to them-that is my work.RCA was the biggest maker of VHF and UHF TV transmitters and radio transmiiters as well.Next is Harris-Gates-Now its primarily Harris.RCA has gone goodby.DuMont built transmitters in their earlier days-never worked on a DuMont transmitter.Used to have one of their BW TV's-great set.In a TV transmitter site-you hear the roar of the transmitter blowers.Visual stages in a TV transmitter run VERY HOT so high speed blowers needed to cool the tubes and their cavitys.You smell faint hot metal-again the hot transmitter parts.And in the winter-some of that transmitter heat is used to heat the building-feels so good on very cold days or nights!Now--solid state stages in transmitters replace tubes-they run cooler-but you still have the blowers to keep them cool.Just not as loud.Digital transmitters still have some tubes--Klystrodes.These are hybrids-a tetrode tube and a Klystron.They are very efficient-but expensive-and they require X-Ray sheilding because of the high voltages.37Kv!I do have some old RCA,Gates and Harris supply catalogs-same with other manufactuerews of broadcast gear.And a collection of transmitting tubes.A few of these tubes came from TV transmitters and their radiators show evidence of the heat.When you watch the meters on a visual stage of an analog transmitter-they go high when the transmitter is sending a dark or black picture-max modulation and power.Its especially entertaining with transmitters running on lo band channels(analog)they used internal anode glass tubes-the anode would glow bright red or orange during the dark scenes-you could tell right away by lookimng at the transmitter! and some had mercury vapor rectifiers for the power supplies-the rectifiers glowed bright blue-white during dark picture-miss those days!

Post# 555628 , Reply# 53   11/10/2011 at 08:54 (4,572 days old) by bwoods ()        

Those are nice (and cool) memories, Rex. That would be exciting work!

Speaking of X-rays, remember in 1966/67 when it was discovered that General Electric TV's were giving off X-rays? If I recall, it was a misaligned anode in GE's high voltage rectifier tube (before the days of solid state rectifiers being commonly used in home tvs.)

It caused quite a stir among the public. It was the first time most people realized that, even properly operating color TV's, produced "soft" x-rays from the face of the CRT. This knowlege was a by-product of the news about GE tv actually producing a stream pf hard rays from the side of the set where the high voltage rectifier was.

Even my seven grade teacher was talking to my class about this. I don't remember the purpose of her talk, but she was probably warning us not to sit too close to the tv.



Post# 555657 , Reply# 54   11/10/2011 at 11:55 (4,572 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

The link at the bottom of reply #1 of this thread takes you to an article where GE color tv sales dropped after the radiation scare and the government made the manufacturers put in a circuit that would blank the screen & sound if the voltage got too high. That was to prevent this from happening again.

I always liked the Zenith pictures. I thought the colors were "cooler" than the RCA sets which had "warmer" color rendition.

There is a guy in Villa Park, IL (a western suburb of Chicago) that has been selling console televisions on Ebay for quite some time. These sets are usually in primo condition and go for rather low prices. Plus some of his proceeds go to a local animal shelter.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK on eBay


Post# 555671 , Reply# 55   11/10/2011 at 12:50 (4,572 days old) by ptcruiser51 (Boynton Beach, FL)        
RCA 2000

ptcruiser51's profile picture
A neighbor of mine had one of these. He said the black bars on either side of the screen were for window glare or too much lighting in the room. Come to think of it, most people had the lights shut off when watching TV. Even back in the 50s with the dim picture tubes. Hence the invention of "TV Lamps". Don't get me started, I still have and use one!

Post# 555681 , Reply# 56   11/10/2011 at 13:40 (4,572 days old) by westie2 ()        

Our area it was RCA's then Zenith from early on.  We had a Hoffman black and white set from 1952 that was going strong when in 1957 we got our first color RCA.  We had a cousin that had appliance store that my folks got the Hoffman from and the RCA.  We had a tall outside tower with the rotor on it installed when we got eh first tv as our closest stations were 90 to 150 miles away.  Since we were about the first in the area to have color we always had  a housefull over when a color program came on.  The RCA had to be degaussed every month or so and sometimes for the snow conditions of the screen we had just black and white instead of color.  The Hoffman went to my mothers mother.  I got a Sweet 16 RCA on a stand in 1962 for Christmas.  The RCA color set was replaced in 1966 with a Zenith set and the color was great on it that set died about 1994 and was replaced by another RCA.  My folks also got a couple of RCAs for the kithen and their bedroom at that time.  These are still working.  After we moved my mother here I got her a Sony tube flat screen to fit in the space in her livingroom.

 

Myfirst color was a old Sylvania my wife and I got free from a lady she taught with in Houston in 1973 up until them used the Sweet 16.  In early 1978 the color set went out and we went to Foley's warehouse on Gulf Freeway really looking for the Sony  19 inch tricon sets but the salesman showed us the Sharp and also the guts of each tv to show us that they both had the 3 gun tube and thqt at that time Sharp made both tubes and the sharp was 1/2 the price of the Sony.  That set lasted us until 1995 and about 6 family moves.  We bougth another Sharp 30 inch and it is still working.  Last year our kids got us a 47 inch Vizio flat panel.  10 years ago we bought a 19' Westinghouse for our bedroom and still going strong.


Post# 555705 , Reply# 57   11/10/2011 at 14:37 (4,572 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

How many people had to upgrade their antenna system when they got their first color tv? The antenna on our house got a great B&W signal but it was woefully inadequate for color. Lots of snow, ghosting,etc. Finally we had a perfect picture. Our house was slightly lower than the adjoining houses and the TV signal used to bounce from both of them before hitting our antenna.

I learned a lot about antenna design then. I learned what each kind of element does, ghost rejection, reflectivity, frequency length etc.




This post was last edited 11/10/2011 at 15:14
Post# 555708 , Reply# 58   11/10/2011 at 14:55 (4,572 days old) by westie2 ()        

Yes we had to get a super good antenna with the RCA and then a bigger better one for the Zenith one they got.  Right after that time I was married and had moved to town and had cable we got 9 stations then Oklahoma City 3 stations, Lawton 1 station, Witchita Falla 2 station and Amarillo, TX 2 stations.  All were ABC, CBS, NBC just different news and weather and on Friday nights late different programs same onSundays. 


Post# 555709 , Reply# 59   11/10/2011 at 15:03 (4,572 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        

rp2813's profile picture

One of our neighbors had a mid-60's Curtis Mathes console and I was not at all impressed.  In the mid-80's I was living in a household with a CM set of later vintage and it was a hot mess, with a quivering tilted picture that was irritating to watch.

 

Our first color set was a cheap Webcor 13" from White Front, purchased around 1969 or 1970 when my dad had finished converting our attached garage and workshop into a family room/laundry room/bathroom complex.  The Webcor was stolen, along with a smaller GE Porta-Color that I won in a raffle, over Labor Day weekend 1972 when our house was burglarized.  The Webcor was replaced by a Sanyo of the same size.  It rendered a fairly crisp picture and good color.  All of those sets got their signal from an early TV-era VHF-only "Double Yaggi" stacked antenna.  Eventually I talked my dad into buying a new "color TV" antenna with UHF capability from Radio Shack.  It's still up on the roof today.

 

In 1977 I splurged (because my parents never did) and bought a 17" Sony Trinitron.  It displaced the Sanyo, which had tuner issues that became annoying.  My mom had the Sony running almost all day long for many years and it later followed me from place to place, lasting almost 30 years before it started turning everything pink but the resolution, brightness and high contrast were still excellent up until then.

 

 


Post# 555737 , Reply# 60   11/10/2011 at 15:55 (4,572 days old) by goatfarmer (South Bend, home of Champions)        

goatfarmer's profile picture

Our first color TV was a brand I haven't seen mentioned, a MUNTZ console. It was the early 70's, and my dad bought it, he was always getting "deals" on something. It lasted into the 80's, not bad for 4 kids spinning the tuner quickly.

 

I still have a Curtis Mathes, it has a great picture.


Post# 555743 , Reply# 61   11/10/2011 at 16:29 (4,572 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

When I was a kid I remember seeing Muntz B&W televisions, I wasn't aware that they made a color tv.
Muntz, headed by used car salesman Madman Muntz was a crazy character. He specialized in crazy television commericals for car dealerships. He even owned his own car company for awhile in the early 50's.
In Chicago in the late 50's there was a company that had pay TV. The way it worked was you "bought" a receiver from this company (a Muntz TV) and on the back of the set there was a coin box. When you wanted to watch TV, you dropped a coin in the set and it turned on for a specified amount of time. Want more? You dropped in more coins. This was the way you paid for your set. Eventually the guy who came by to pick up the "payments" would take the box off of your set and tell you that you have finished paying for it.
The way Muntz worked, he would buy a name brand television and look at the insides of how it was built. Then he would reverse engineer the set using cheaper components and usually streamlining the circuitry so it would be cheaper to produce.
According to people of the era, he was quite something else!


Post# 555749 , Reply# 62   11/10/2011 at 17:18 (4,572 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        
Muntz

rp2813's profile picture

I've seen pictures of a Muntz TV chassis and compared to their contemporaries, there is almost nothing to them.  To say Muntz streamlined the circuitry is quite an understatement!


Post# 555752 , Reply# 63   11/10/2011 at 17:26 (4,572 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        

There was an initiative on the 1964 California ballot to ban pay television. I don't know if it was sponsored by retailers or what not, but the initiative passed and pay tv disappeared from California. I do remember seeing pay tv in a few motel rooms as a very young child when we went on road trips.

I remember the brand name Muntz. Never knew anyone who had one, but it was heavily advertized in the newspapers. Thanks for the interesting histories.




Post# 555756 , Reply# 64   11/10/2011 at 18:12 (4,572 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

I saw this today, from around 1970-1 or so. It looked interesting, has anyone actually seen one in operation? It certainly would end the running to the set to adjust the color or tint. For the past 20 years or so once you adjust the color, it's set for years!



Post# 555757 , Reply# 65   11/10/2011 at 18:13 (4,572 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        
and....

I had never heard of it before.... Did any other manufacturer use it?

Post# 555758 , Reply# 66   11/10/2011 at 18:24 (4,572 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        

I do remember the ads for VIR or "broadcaster controlled color". Never actually saw such a tv in operation.

Post# 555759 , Reply# 67   11/10/2011 at 18:24 (4,572 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

This post has been removed by the member who posted it.



Post# 555760 , Reply# 68   11/10/2011 at 18:29 (4,572 days old) by westie2 ()        

Yes saw this in Dallas at Tichies Department store at North Park Mall.  We were visiting my sister and she was looking for a color set at that time.  The salesman did a manual adjustment and turned the auto thing on it took a few seconds and bam! great color.  She bought a 25" in early american to match her living room funiture.  It wan't to long until all the major companies had this VIR or as it is now autoset.


Post# 555764 , Reply# 69   11/10/2011 at 19:01 (4,572 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Or you could do as Motorola did in 1964, scare your customers into buying your set.



Post# 555771 , Reply# 70   11/10/2011 at 19:33 (4,572 days old) by jetcone (Schenectady-Home of Calrods,Monitor Tops,Toroid Transformers)        
Wow sparked a memory

jetcone's profile picture

I forgot about the GE radiation scare!

 

But when we got our 1968 RCAfrom Two Guys, Dad went up into the attic and installed a big antenna we bought along with it ! I helped him snake it down thru the basement and up to the wall behind the new RCA!  And Mom helped align the thing from downstairs watching the set, while we turned the antenna in the attic!!

 

!! Forgotten all about that!


We watched the Moon Landings live on that TV!

 

 


Post# 555795 , Reply# 71   11/10/2011 at 22:09 (4,572 days old) by bwoods ()        

Allen,

My GE console, picture in a post above has VIR II. I have had several GE's that had it. It was GE patent.

The wa I understand it, networks sent out a signal "hidden" between frames of the broadcast picture, that allowed local stations to adjust their equipment with proper color saturation, hueing, etc. GE's locked into this signal and adjust its own controls (internally)so the color value (and I think a few others) of the picture matched the broadcasts studio's values. There is a switch on the set to turn the VIR on and off.

When it came out, in the late seventies, there was an article, in one of the science magazines (might have been Popular Science) on the new system. In demonstrating the TV for the author, a GE engineer had a normal picture on the screen. He then went over to the set and randomly turned all the dials on the front and created an unwatchable picture.

After he did this, he then pushed the VIR button. The author said for a moment the set looked like it was figting with itself as the pictured, rolled, flutter and changed color as the set "read" the VIR signal and adjusted its own controls. In a couple of seconds he said a beautiful, perfect color picture then appeared on the screen.

The only problem. Not all broadcast have VIR signals. Stations showing local originated broadcast are not using VIR signals, so the set reverts back to the front panel controls and whatever you have them set for. Mine has a red light on the control panel that tells when the set has sensed a VIR signal.

As far as the Muntz TV, the story I have heard is that Muntz got started by taking an RCA chassis and taking out each component that the set would work without, literally piece by piece. So you got a set with the absolute bare bones circuity.

I only saw one Muntz TV. My neighbors had it, and it was a color console with the round picture tube ("roundie"). I remember watching it once, it has an unstable picture that jumped and I could hear faint crackling sound every time the picture jumped and bloomed in brightness.

I remember seeing Muntz ads, but I don't recall them ever having one with a rectangular color picture tube. This was in the late sixties and that's probably about the time they got out of the business. I guess Muntz quality (or lack of) was common knowledge back then, as my dad always said they were a piece of junk.


Post# 555821 , Reply# 72   11/10/2011 at 23:34 (4,572 days old) by nanook (Seattle)        
Muntz Wasn't the Only One...

nanook's profile picture

That sounds like something Earl Muntz would do. LOL.  But in actuality that story is usually attributed to RCA.  The engineers would design "proper" circuits and then the "bean counters" would force them to remove components until the level of picture degredation was such that someone would finally declare it "enough".  I'm sure that practice was hardly limited to RCA or Muntz.  After all, when there're profits to be made and you're selling millions of units...


Post# 555834 , Reply# 73   11/11/2011 at 00:47 (4,572 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc)        

X-Rays and TVs-the X-Rays from the screen on the pix tube are to little to worry about-even if you were close to the set or screen.The screenplates of modern color tubes-even old "round jugs" were made of leaded glass-this blocked the X-Rays.The sides or bell of the tube may not be leaded glass-so minor concern there.Yes-the major X-Ray emittors were the HV rectifier tube and the HV shunt regulator tube.these ran at the 18-27KV HV supply for the pix tube anode.So you could get X-Rays from these tubes.They were usually located in a lead foil sheilded HV "Cage"and some of those tubes had lead foil wrapped around the tube body.It was a good precaution not to be sitting against the side of the set where the HV supply tubes were.
At work face X-Ray hazards at work.One of our transmitters has a modulator tube that has 30Kv DC at 10Amp on it.So you stay away from the modulator cabinet when the transmitter is on.Some of the vacuum capacitors can generate X-Rays from the HV DC and RF voltages on them.I am not glowing in the dark yet-I know the possible X-Ray sources here and stay away from them.UHF TV transmitters that use Klystron and Klystrode tubes are considered X-Ray hazards-US made transmitters have to have X-Ray certification labels on them showing the X-Ray emitting areas and X-Ray sheilding.One type of 50Kw AM transmitter had this certification,too.Generally any power tube used in transmitters that operates with a plate voltage of 15Kv and above-take the X-Ray precautions.Put the cabinet panels and all sheilding back in place before operation.And the cabinet veiwing windows are leaded glass or plexiglass to block the X-Rays.
"VITS" was used by TV stations starting in like the early 70's to monitor their signal and equipment-essentually replaced the test patterns.And since the VITS were transmitted-Vertical Interval Test Signal-the users set could use these signals to self adjust the set's colors.You can see the VITS in those days if you rolled the picture using the vert hold to see the frame "bar" the VITS were inside this.That was a good way to see if a station was using them.


Post# 555885 , Reply# 74   11/11/2011 at 08:08 (4,571 days old) by cadman (Cedar Falls, IA)        
Muntz

cadman's profile picture
I've got an interesting round-screen B&W Muntz console that showed up recently but I haven't opened it up to see what tricks were employed. It's kind of unusal to see any Muntz sets outside of large metro areas because part of the 'cost reduction' process was also to eliminate IF stages. All fine and good if you're in a big city near the transmitters, but go rural and suddenly you can't pick up squat.

Post# 555895 , Reply# 75   11/11/2011 at 09:44 (4,571 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

And as early as 1967 we started to see the beginning of color television imports from Japan as evidenced by this 1967 Panasonic ad. This ad addressed peoples fear about the reliability of color tv. At the time, nobody even considered Japan as an economic threat.



Post# 555896 , Reply# 76   11/11/2011 at 09:50 (4,571 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        
and for the even more nervous (1967)

you have this advert. BTW the writing in this ad seriously reminds me of the type of language used in 1960's VW adverts. I wonder if it was the same ad agency?)

Post# 555897 , Reply# 77   11/11/2011 at 10:03 (4,571 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        
Going back to VIR signals....

Is this something that was only exclusive to GE sets or did other manufacturers adopt it too? On the later GE sets I don't see any mention of VIR. But I did find this, perfect to your western wear.
I know on our later Zenith sets there was an AutoColor button. The manual for the set said when pressed, it would return the television settings back to the factory settings. Usually when I pressed it, very little happened.


Post# 555898 , Reply# 78   11/11/2011 at 10:07 (4,571 days old) by bwoods ()        

No, as Rex said, x-ray emissions from color tv (with CRT's) certainly pose no health risk. Most all of the studies I have read indicate a typical individual receives only 1 millirem (now called millisieverts) a year. Much less than background radiation.

Alpha and beta radiation are stopped by small thicknesses of most materials. The leaded glass in a Cathode Ray Tube would indeed be opaque to them. What is being pr9oduced in a CRT are actually radiation, and if you have solid lead or extremely thick glass in the tube, yes the X-Ray radiation (which behave in a similar manner to very low evergy gamma radiation)can penetrate glass envelope and the bonded glass front of a crt in a measurable amount. However, the radiation is greatly attentuated and the X-rays are considered "soft" and are absorbed into the air within a few inches of the tube face.

So there is certainly nothing to worry about, like Rex says. A coast to coast flight in an airplane gives about 4 times that amount. Radon gas from basements, crawlspace is a far greater threat. Living withing a few miles of a coal fired power plan can give several times that amount due the the naturally occuring radon gas (trapped in the coal) that is released from the power plant when combustion of the coal occurs.

So I would not worry one bit about radiation, for those of you still using a CRT televsion, . To the best of my knowledge, ther are no x-ray emissions for LCD/LED sets as you are not flinging high velocity electrons at a metal shadow mask.


Post# 555907 , Reply# 79   11/11/2011 at 10:55 (4,571 days old) by cornutt (Huntsville, AL USA)        

Wow, I can't resist chiming in on this...

I was born into an engineering town. Around here in the early '60s, a lot of people had Philco sets as Philco was semi-big in the aerospace industry at the time. The set my parents had when I was born was a 19-inch Philco. But my dad decided he liked Zenith better and in '62 or '63 he bought a Zenith 21-inch and gave the Philco to his father. I remember watching the Philco at my grandparents' house and it had lousy contrast (even by the standards of the day), with medium-gray "blacks". Every time I watched it I wanted to turn the contrast all the way up, but if my dad was there he wouldn't let me, as he was under the impression that this was bad for the set somehow. (And maybe he was right... he's the engineer that was raised on tubes, not me!)

The Zenith had UHF, which was necessary here since the FCC would not license any VHF stations in this area. Actually, it had become mandatory for TVs to have UHF by 1962, but there was a trick that makers used for several years since a lot of people in major metro areas had no use for UHF at the time and didn't want to pay the extra cost. The trick was that when the factory shipped the TV, they shipped the UHF tuner in a separate box. If the TV went to a market that had UHF stations, the dealer would install the UHF tuner when the set arrived. If not, the dealer would give the purchaser the option of omitting the UHF tuner in exchange for a rebate, and if the customer took that, the dealer sent the UHF tuner back to the factory for a credit. I think the FCC finally put a stop to this in 1965.

The UHF tuner on our Zenith was a radio-type continuous turning tuner, with a gear and clutch deal. If you just turned it, it moved rapidly. If you pushed it in, it turned slowly, so you could zero in on the channel. People today don't realize that watching TV involved a certain amount of work back then. In addition to getting up off the couch whenever you wanted to change channels or adjust the volume, you had to periodically get up to adjust other things. Tuners drifted and you had to adjust the fine tuning, especially UHF tuners. Or the TV would lose sync and you had to adjust the horizontal or vertical hold. The Zenith had most of its controls hidden behind a little door that ran the width of the cabinet under the CRT. The door opened downward and you were presented with ten or so trimpot shafts of various colors sticking out through a panel. (Or not... you had to use a screwdriver to adjust some of the less commonly used ones, like the linearity controls.) They were all labeled on the inside of the little door.

The Zenith needed servicing once a year or so, which was not unusual back then. The first step was always to take the back off, pull all the tubes, and take then down to the drug store to use their tube tester. My Dad always let me go with him and operate the tube tester, which I thought was great fun. We'd identify the tube that was bad, and then we'd go get someone to unlock the cabinet under the tube tester where the new tubes were stored, and find a replacement. A couple of times the tube we needed was out of stock, and then we'd be off on a wild goose chase around town to find one.

If replacing a tube didn't fix it, it was time to call for service. The service man usually tried to work on the set in home first. I recall the first time I saw a TV service guy bring in his oscilloscope and hook it up. I thought the scope was the absolute coolest thing ever. All those knobs and buttons and lights, and cool drawings on the screen! I wanted to be a TV repair guy when I grew up, just so I could have one. They usually managed to fix the TV at the house, but I do recall it being hauled off to the shop once. It was gone for a week. Having no TV in the house for a while was not a huge deal back then; there were plenty of other things going on.

Like many people, we had a rooftop antenna with a rotator. But due to the ongoing UHF situation (the geography of this area is singularly unsuitable for UHF), cable started here very early. We had it by 1966, and then the UHF tuner was only used to pull in one area station that wasn't on the cable (for reasons that are still not clear to me). That made the rotator unnecessary, and my dad gave it to my mom's brother who installed it at my maternal grandmother's house.

We moved to another house in 1968, and my dad didn't put up an antenna at the new house; we just used the cable, which by now was populated with several out-of-town stations so we weren't missing any of the networks. The place where the Zenith went was in the basement rec room, along the wall where the fireplace hearth ran the length of the wall. The hearth wasn't quite wide enough for all four legs of the Zenith to stand on, so after pondering the situation for a while, my dad simply removed the legs and sat the cabinet directly on the hearth. We watched the Apollo 11 liftoff and moon landing on that set in 1969.

My first views of color came in 1968. At our new house, one of our neighbors had bought a teensy (11" or so) color set that they had in their basement. I recall nothing about it other than that it was color and it was small. However, my great-uncle purchased what must have been a top-of-the-line Admiral set at about this time. The first thing I remember watching on it was a college football game, and my great-uncle was enraptured by it. The set had some interesting quirks and features. In addition to the usual color intensity and tint controls, it had a white balance control. You could make it more sepia or more blue. I don't recall ever seeing another set in the pre-microprocessor era with that. Another thing I recall about the Admiral was that when you turned it off, instead of the CRT beam shrinking to a point and then fading out, it briefly made a very distinctive three-leaf color pattern as it faded away. My great-aunt still had the set when she died in 1997, but it was no longer working; the CRT had lost vacuum.

The Zenith finally went out in 1970, given to a family friend who installed it in his lake cabin. We got an instant-on RCA XL-100, our first color set. And they weren't kidding about "instant"; when you pressed the power switch (a big chromed bar that ran across the top of the control panel), BAM! it was on. The CRT voltage came on so abruptly that it produced an audible "snap" when you turned the set on. The UHF tuner on this one was a clunk-clunk tuner; each "clunk" selected a band of three channels. You had to set the band to the proper channel once (by turning and turning and turning the fine tune) and then it would remember that setting. This worked acceptably well since, by this time, the FCC had realized that they couldn't assign adjacent UHF channels and were keeping them all six channels apart. The secondary controls were mounted in a weird tilt-out panel which is hard to describe in words. Imagine a metal box which, when closed, has its front face flush with the front of the TV. It's hinged at the front bottom edge. When you pull on the front top edge, it tilts forwards and down, and the controls are mounted on the top of the box which is exposed. By this time horizontal and vertical sync circuits had improved to where they didn't usually need to be fooled with, but the color did require frequent adjustment.

And yes, they sucked electricity. With the RCA at least, it was more than just keeping the tube heaters lit; my understanding of that set was that all of the circuity was powered all the time, except for the CRT drive voltage and the audio output amp. After we'd had it for a few months, my dad started unplugging it at night. My dad had that set until it did in fact catch fire one day in 1976. I wasn't there at the time, but my dad was watching it when it happened. He told me that the fire didn't have anything to do with the instant-on feature per se; it was a problem with the power switch, which was under-spec'ed for the current it was handling. He hot-wired the set so it would always be on when plugged in, but shortly after he got rid of it.


Post# 555912 , Reply# 80   11/11/2011 at 11:29 (4,571 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

You know, when I was researching more stuff for this thread, I came across several adverts for televisions that could accept 83 channels, in 1951! The first UHF station went on the air in Portland, OR in 1952. I wonder why it took so long to get UHF factory installed? Chicago didn't get it's first UHF station until 1964 and a lot of people couldn't receive it for lack of a UHF tuner. But they sold set top UHF adapters which work like the modern ATSC converters of today.

The GE B&W set my mom won had a VHF tuner knob on the upper right of the control panel and on the bottom of the set there was a round plate that said "UHF Tuning". But there was no knob. This would have been in the 1961-62 time frame. So I assumed that if you wanted UHF the dealer installed a UHF tuner for you.

I remember when UHF started in Chicago as I noted in a previous post. What I didn't mention was the detent style UHF tuner didn't come till later. The ones in the 1960's were like tuning a radio by hand. And the stations were VERY narrow in terms of where you could tune it to get it right.

And finally yes, televisions of the 60's were not nearly as reliable as the sets of today. You periodically would see the television van in front of somebodies house on the street. We were fortunate, we never had to have any of our sets taken in. But we did have rectifier tubes replaced from time to time. And then the service guy went out to his truck and brought in a soldering iron and replaced something (I was too young to understand what he was doing) and no more blown rectifier tubes. I used to watch the guy work, ask a lot of questions and then I'd watch him run color bars and convergence patterns on the screen. Finally if the service guy would come, I'd get shooed out of the house so I wouldn't be a bother.
But usually the service guys would answer my questions with an explanation of how things worked.

And sadly recently I have come across a lot of stories on the internet about how some guy somewhere was an independent television repair shop and dealer and could no longer make enough money to keep going on. But most of the guys who came to the house back then were usually in their 40's or so. So I imagine they'd all be in their 80's or 90's by now, long retired. Does anyone anymore do in house television repairs?


Post# 555923 , Reply# 81   11/11/2011 at 12:05 (4,571 days old) by LordKenmore (The Laundry Room)        
Does anyone anymore do in house television repairs?

lordkenmore's profile picture
One of my neighbors does--or did. But it's limited. I think he only does warranty work. And I don't think he's a real TV repairman. The repairs are basically swap out a circuit board and pop in a new board.

A fast Google search turns up repair services that claim in home service. One service even apparently is ONLY in home, and claims lower prices due to lower overhead. (This could make sense, since the business could be located someplace cheap, and wouldn't have to be set up to be ready to receive customers.)

I wonder how well repair people do these days. So many people treat electronics as throw away items. Over the years I've seen several repair shops close down.


Post# 555926 , Reply# 82   11/11/2011 at 12:23 (4,571 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        
The first UHF station went on the air in Portland, OR in 195

rp2813's profile picture

Allen, might that have been KPTV, Channel 27?

 

This clock (in need of repairs and cleaning) sits atop my 1950 Admiral 10" set. 


Post# 555933 , Reply# 83   11/11/2011 at 13:20 (4,571 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Yes, Channel 27 in Portland started in 1952.

It was also the first television station in Portland, too. I wonder why they didn't get a VHF station earlier?



CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK


Post# 555949 , Reply# 84   11/11/2011 at 15:09 (4,571 days old) by MikeS ()        
UHF History

UHF has been around since television broadcasting became serious business in the USA after World War II. (In fact, CBS' ill-fated "spinning wheel" color system would have required broadcasters to use the UHF band.) By the early 1950's, most areas of the nation had VHF stations; though most television set makers offered UHF models for $20 to $30 more than VHF-only sets, few buyers sprung for UHF.
Ironically, FCC Chairman Newton Minnow--of "vast wasteland" fame--took matters into his own hands and changed the television landscape: Rather than allow the free market decide the future of UHF, he proposed that all new sets have both VHF and UHF capability as standard. With a push from the Kennedy White House (and a threat by Minnow to convert seven major cities to UHF broadcasts), Congress passed the All-Channel Receiver Act. By 1964, all new sets had built-in UHF tuners for channels 14 to 83.
The Receiver Act not only helped the growth of educational (public) television and independent (non-network) commercial stations, it was a boost to the third-ranked ABC Network. By 1970, thanks to UHF, ABC finally had affiliates in every major American city, paving the way for ABC's ratings success of the late 1970's.
Of course, with cable, satellite and digital broadcasting, the entire television landscape. Whether for better or worse, I'll leave that decision up to you.


Post# 555960 , Reply# 85   11/11/2011 at 15:41 (4,571 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

When I was a kid, I used to travel around with my parents quite a bit. I was always anxious to see what channels were available in the cities we visited. They were always 2 to 13. Until around 1964 I came across a channel 22. I was shocked. How could this be? How could they receive it? And then we got our own Channel 26, then a year or two later a channel 39.

I used to think of UHF as being those "strange" channels. All the good stuff to watch was on 2-13. But then I found out as you have stated that some cities had their major network affiliates on UHF. The "good stuff" on UHF? No way (as I used to think!).

How times have changed.


Post# 555966 , Reply# 86   11/11/2011 at 15:57 (4,571 days old) by petek (Ontari ari ari O )        

petek's profile picture
Somewhere back I read about the big gains in Japanese tv's was the obvious difference in their advertising. Companies such as RCA in particular heavily advertised their after sales service (a negative actually). The Japanese companies heavily advertised their reliability, aka little to no servicing ever required.

Post# 556045 , Reply# 87   11/11/2011 at 23:25 (4,571 days old) by mixfinder ()        
Monkey Wards

Our family's first television purchased in 1952 was an Airline from Montgomery Ward.  We had one UHF station, channel 29 that didn't come on until 10:00am.  Through out the years the TV had a knife under the tuner to hold it in adjustment, the back was off and almost monthly we pulled dead tubes and tested at the grocery store buying replacements from the drawers underneath.  If the problem was more than we could solve we called Harry Wattley from Harrie's TV.  He was a tall, rotund and irracisible charactor.  We were all shushed out the room for fear of offending him.  In 1964 our neighbor who was manager of the Wards catalog office convinced my mom to bring home a color TV to use over the Christmas break and we could return it afterwards, no questions asked.  It never went back.  Through out the years TVs have become less expensive, better quality and last much longer without attention.  Frankly I wouldn't have a clue if anyone even repairs TVs anymore.  My first TV was a Magnificent Magnavox, and so was the second.  After the divorce I bought a used Magnavox with we replaced with a Panasonic HD flat screen in 2006.  The Panasonic has stereo speakers and hits those rich base tones like a console stereo used to do.


Post# 556050 , Reply# 88   11/11/2011 at 23:46 (4,571 days old) by ptcruiser51 (Boynton Beach, FL)        
Wowser!

ptcruiser51's profile picture
I take one step away from this discussion and off it goes!

My mom was from Wilkes-Barre, PA, my dad from Scranton, PA. They migrated to NJ during WW2. We often went back to visit on vacation through the 1950s and 1960s. W-B/Scr is located in a big, elongated, hollowed-out valley. To this day, there are big microwave towers beaming TV/Radio transmissions down into it. I can remember TV's with that "extra" dial on the side that everyone used. 22=WCAU (CBS), 28=WBRE(NBC), I forget ABC (16???). Anyone help me out here? I don't recall any VHF stations at all.

Radio signals were equally spotty. Auto/home receivers were static-y and fading in and out. Forget FM, they might have been broadcasting from Mars.

What a treat to visit nowadays and have scores of stations to tune in!

Fading memories here, no offense at correction.


Post# 556057 , Reply# 89   11/12/2011 at 00:35 (4,571 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Everyone who bought a color tv in the 60's had a reason for choosing the brand that they did. Do you know the reason why you or your parents chose the brand they did?

My parents looked for quite some time at various stores and different brands. Everywhere from a small service shop down the road to a very large appliance store miles away. They finally narrowed it down to two sets:

Admiral & Zenith. Both sets had about the same picture quality and were about the same price. Both had the rectangular screen. So my Dad finally chose the Zenith as "with kids in the house I can see that Admiral pull out control panel being slammed in the set repeatedly and sooner than later it'll fail". BTW, Admiral offered that pull out control panel for 3 years, 1964-1967. When their sets got remote control the pull out panel went away.


Post# 556069 , Reply# 90   11/12/2011 at 02:18 (4,571 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc)        

UHF-for the broadcaster-its more expensive to use-You need more transmitter power to cover the same area.UHF broadcast is "line of sight" as UHF frequencies are.UHF TV broadcast antennas use both mechanical and electrical "Beam tilt" so listeners close to the broadcast station tower will get reception.TV broadcast antennas are made up of "bays" individual antenna elements made up into one unit.For the UHF ones-the lower bays are actually tilted out from the antenna mast-physical beam tilt.VHF doesn't have this problem.When I lived in Wash DC area-the lowest power UHF station was running 55Kw visual transmitter power.(one 55Kw klystron stage)this was the standard output power for that type of Klystron tube.Becuase of circuit losses-you have to run up to three times more input power to the stage-since it has to be linear-broadband-the tube is conducting all of the time.The largest UHF station in that area had a 220Kw 5 Klystron monster-the first Harris 220U they built.This thing pulled over a MEGAWATT at dark picture.Their cheif engineer(CH#20)described how all of the streetlights on River Road Bethesda would go out when they went dark picture.PEPCO put in a separate substation for them--69Kv to 13.8Kv and at Ch20's building they have a VERY large 13.8Kv to 480V transmformer.For VHF-esp low band-less transmitter power is needed-these run 25-35Kw and use conventional triode or tetrode transmitting tubes.These transmittrers are more efficient.Smaller size and less power.Hi band VHF runs 40-60Kw.the losses start going up here.But much less than UHF.And to top it off-VHF is easier for you to receive and tune.But today-----Low band VHF frequencies are to be auctiuoned off by the FCC to other services.Modern digital TV uses Hi Band VHF and UHF.Digital transmitters can be lower power than analog ones.But they still have to use the linear stages to pass the RF modulated by the digital pulse signals.22Kw serves us OK here in place of the 220Kw monster-to see these HUGE transmitters is quite something!Knew some folks that used to run Wash DC Ch20's transmitter.and most TV transmitters have a built in spectrum analyser for tuning their visual stages-its like an oscilloscope-but shows a bandwidth curve instead of an impression of an electrical waveform as an oscilloscope does.TV service techs-when they used to fix TV's used a spectrum analyser to tune the TV's video IF stages-just like tuning the RF stages in the TV transmitter.I have had to do these things-can be sort of fun if all goes well."Shape the curve" as its said-the ideal visual bandwidth curve is sort of like the shape of a loaf of bread!


Post# 556081 , Reply# 91   11/12/2011 at 08:27 (4,570 days old) by Ironrite ()        
Brand Reason

Growing up we had a Packard Bell B&W set. It seemed like it was always getting repaired. My parents had the same hesitation that color sets were not perfected. My oldest sister and her husband got a Zenith color portable console, with remote, in the mid 60s and it was fun to see color shows. Still the parents didn't think the picture was that great. My brother in law's sister bought the same model of TV. The BIL had fun taking his remote over to their house, hiding it and then kept changing channels and volume. Made his sister think something was wrong with their new set. My oldest nephew was a baby at the time, just learning to crawl around. The bells on his shoes would also cause the Zenith to change channels and volume.

Finally in 1967 my parents saw my aunt's Sylvania set. They liked the color and picture. It had a more natural look to the picture. My parents bought a Sylvania in the Fall of 1968. Cabinet was a consideration. My mom picked a French Provincial model, with remote, for the living room and my dad got a wood tone, metal cabinet portable for their bedroom. Though the picture was good, it seemed like the Sylvania was also being repaired a lot. First thing I recall watching on it was the presidental election.

Also, does anybody remember a commercial that was broadcast around 1966-67. It was for Wink soda. There was some buzz a couple of weeks before the commercial as the drink was so tasty (something along those lines) you would see color on your B&W TV. I remember watching it and the Canada Dry logo was flashing green and red on our old Packard Bell. It was only run once that I recall.


Post# 556095 , Reply# 92   11/12/2011 at 11:09 (4,570 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

I don't know how you could get color on a B&W set as there are no color phosphors on a B&W CRT. Maybe Tolivac could explain how that commercial worked.

There are still a few companies around that will repair/restore old color sets.

And yes, I do remember those self service tube testing machines in drug stores. I used them to test tubes for my short wave radio I had at the time. I think those were around until the late 70's when they all disappeared.

Around 1975 a guy down the street from us had a Zenith round screen color set that a relative had given him. It didn't work. He figured that there was a bad tube in it that was causing the problem. So he took out all the tubes and took them to the drug store to test them. Almost every tube was bad. So he spent a couple of hundred bucks on new tubes for it. After he installed them the set came on. But to his horror, the picture was not good. It was very green and very dim.
No adjustment would work to correct it. So after all that it was the picture tube that was bad. He said he needed to put a tube brightener on it. But he never did. That set sat in his garage for years and years. At least til I moved away. I'm willing to bet if he is still alive, that set is still sitting there.

And in the 70's a lot of manufacturers stopped using wood on their cabinetry and started to go to plastic! So if you see a set that looks like the cabinet is made of carved wood, chances are it would be molded plastic! Usually after a few years the finish on the plastic chipped or flaked off revealing the plastic underneath!


Post# 556101 , Reply# 93   11/12/2011 at 11:38 (4,570 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
early cable

I remember the tube testers in the drug stores! Never saw anyone use them, and my parents certainly didn't know how to pull apart a tv and test the tubes. That said, I don't remember any B&W set ever needing any service. We simply adjusting vertical and horizontal hold and usually got it to work. Adjusting the UHF dial was a bit of an art, though.

Grew up in San Diego with very hilly to mountainous topography. San Diego in the 1960s had local stations 8 (KFMB-CBS) and 10 (KOGO-NBC), with ABC aced out of the market by the two-channels-per-market FCC rule. ABCs solution was to broadcast from Tijuana, Mexico: Channel 6, XETV. They cranked up the power and it had the best reception of any station in San Diego, though studios were in Tijuana. The only other local station was Channel 15, an educational (later PBS) station with studios at San Diego State College.

Reception of Los Angeles stations (2-CBS, 4-NBC, 7-ABC, plus independent channels 5, 7, 9, and 11) were dependent on where one lived in San Diego. When I was between 2-5 years of age, we lived on an elevated mesa-type area known as Clairemont, and could pull the LA stations with ease using a rooftop antenna. When I was five, we moved closer to downtown, but on the bay side of a hill, with the hill being to the north and blocking signals from LA. The coastline of California is not straight, it's curved, so signals from LA go straight across the water to San Diego---unless a hill or mountain is blocking them, which was the case for us.

As a result, we had cable very early, maybe 1965. It carried all of the San Diego PLUS Los Angeles stations, crystal clear reception. Well worth the whopping $5 a month bill. A year later, my parents remodeled their living room, and one of the improvements was an audiophile stereo system (MacIntosh amp and tuner). To pull in the classical music stations they loved, the rooftop antenna was upgraded to a rotor antenna, with a 360 rotary control so you could maneuver the antenna just right to increase FM signal quality.

The rotor antenna was also run into the den where the color tv (won for free in a Lions Club raffle....) was hooked up to cable. We had an A/B switch so we could have either cable or antenna input into the tv, plus a second rotary control was placed on top of the tv.

The reason to extend the rotor antenna to the tv room was as follows: during prime time and sometimes on weekends, the SD and LA network channels ran the same programming. There was some big court case involving cable tv in which local advertisers sued a cable company for offering identical programs from two different markets: some of the viewers would watch the out-of-town channel and not see the local advertisers. The court held that local advertisers had a right to "force" viewers to see their ads, and the FCC allowed (or ordered) cable companies to BLOCK out-of-town channels when the local network affiliate ran the same program. I.e., when Bonanza was on NBC on Sunday night, you could watch it on San Diego's channel 10, but channel 4 from LA was blocked for the same time block.

The problem was that the cable company often forgot to UNBLOCK the distant channel after the identical programing ended. So say a network station in LA wanted to run a late night movie after prime time network programs were finished. You'd see the movie listed in the local newspaper and TV Guide listings, only to find "snow" when you turned to channel 2, 4 or 7. My guess is that the blocking had to be done manually and was not automated. With a rooftop rotor antenna, one could often rotate the antenna and pull in the LA station that was blocked on cable. Not always, and sometimes the picture quality lagged, but sometimes it was the only way to watch a movie when they forgot to unblock the LA stations. The independent stations 5, 7, 9, and 11 were not affected by the blocking issue.

I don't know when the blocking issue finally died, but it was still alive and well into the late 1980s. When I first moved to south Orange County, our cable company carried two channels from San Diego (we are half way between SD and LA), but as I understood it, there was a limit of TWO channels that could be imported from San Diego. People would watch them to get local San Diego news, etc. By that time, SD had all three networks (Ch 6 is still in Tijuana but is independent) plus PBS plus I believe two more independents on UHF....but we only received TWO of them, the NBC and CBS affiliates.


Post# 556111 , Reply# 94   11/12/2011 at 12:41 (4,570 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

I remember seeing some homes having antenna rotators on them. I think one neighbor that had one said he used it to receive blacked out sports games from other cities.

From what I remember, the first time I saw cable it was usually in mountainous areas. The first one I saw had the normal channels and then one channel just showed an analog clock. That's all it showed all day and all night long. Then I saw another cable system that had a Clock, Barometer & Temp gauge and I guess they were on a turntable of some kind because they would rotate around the lens of the camera.

I imagine that in cities with mountains, ghosting would be a big issue. Then cable may have been a god send for those markets.

One thing I noticed when people were upgrading to color television the sales person never mentioned that you would have to upgrade your antenna too. I wonder how many people found that out after the fact? After my Dad went back to complain about poor reception the salesperson sold him a tv top set of color rabbit ears. That was even worse than the antenna we used for B&W so he took it back. Later that year I spent my own money and put up a nice antenna made for color. That worked beautifully.



Post# 556112 , Reply# 95   11/12/2011 at 12:59 (4,570 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        
Tubes and Testers

rp2813's profile picture

We did some tube testing at the drug store and maybe even at a local grocery store (if memory serves me) when I was a kid, but we lived very close to United Radio and TV, which was an independent electronics supply store and had a whole bank of tube testers, so it made more sense as a one-stop shopping option.

 

While we were able to isolate the occasional bad or weak tube, most would test OK.  I still have a box of tubes in the garage that are presumably good, and likely were components of a 1951 Capehart 13", a 1962 Airline 21" (B/W) and its companion multiplex stereo/phono console, or various GE clock radios.

 

When I had all of the capacitors replaced on my 1950 Admiral 10" round CRT set, I brought that box of tubes with me to the repair guy.  He advised that tubes rarely ever go bad and he didn't touch a single tube on that chassis.  The TV works fine, presumably with the majority -- if not all -- of its original factory tubes.  There could be variations in values from one tube of the same type as another, and switching out, say, a good 5U4 with another known good 5U4 could be enough to improve or resolve a minor horizontal issue a given set might be experiencing.  

 

The bottom line is that most 50's TV sets, particularly the early 50's ones, were replaced because they had problems with capacitors, not tubes, and often weren't worth repairing due to cost and the fact that larger screen sets were desirable and affordable.  This is why sets like my Admiral deliver a fine picture with their original CRT's.  They were commonly replaced rather than repaired, long before the end of their CRT's useful life,  by a TV with a screen that was twice as big.


Post# 556132 , Reply# 96   11/12/2011 at 17:28 (4,570 days old) by cadman (Cedar Falls, IA)        

cadman's profile picture
For info on the B&W commercial that produced colors, look up the Fechner Effect. A lot of people saw this spot but I understand it was only shown in limited markets and only a couple times. -Cory


Post# 556165 , Reply# 97   11/12/2011 at 19:42 (4,570 days old) by chromacolor ()        

I worked in my Uncles TV Sales/repair shop in the late 70's and got to go on many house calls. On new sets of that era, the best picture was a Zenith Chromacolor. A close second was a Sylvania GT-matic, but their picture tubes were NOT long lasting. RCA's to me.. always had a so-so picture. Those GE's with the VIR were the biggest piece of crap to hit the market. GE was NEVER good quality in electronics. The "General" liked to design everything "on the cheap" The VIR system did win an Emmy, but like was stated in an earlier post.. not all stations used VIR. Also stations tended NOT to adhere to quality control, so if they were misadjusted, that's what the VIR system played back.
The biggest piece of junk.. that ALL repairmen hated... Motorola! (which always confused me because they were expensive, and an "engineers" set. built like tanks)
but ya.. they never had a color set with a decent picture, and they broke if you looked at one cross-eyed. Motorola sold out to Panasonic in 1974.


Post# 556168 , Reply# 98   11/12/2011 at 19:59 (4,570 days old) by cfz2882 (Belle Fourche,SD)        
Quasar

weren't the motorola sets branded"Quasar"after panasonic bought them?-still U.S.
made and still motorola models with a different name...?


Post# 556170 , Reply# 99   11/12/2011 at 20:16 (4,570 days old) by chromacolor ()        

Sort of....
On Motorola color sets, the Motorola branded tube sets were ALL junk. Then they got in the "solid-state" game early and those sets were branded "Quasar *by Motorola" The picture quality wasn't as bad as those on the Motorola tube chassis sets, but the Quasars used HUGE modules that were trouble-prone and expensive to replace. They called this "works in a drawer". We repairmen called it "junk in a drawer" after 74 they used up the stock and were mostly made in the US, but I think by 1976 they were rebadged Panasonics.

Curtis Mathes sets were never that good and mostly were rebadged NEC sets. They had a great gimmick tho. They had the longest warranty and in advertising used the slogan "expensive and darn well worth it". In reality they were expensive because you paid out the ass for that warranty.

Since I'm a TV nerd, another brand that was expensive and pure junk during that time-frame was Magnavox. Magnavox purchases were usually made by the lady of the house, because they had the most beautiful cabinets on a console set. Expensive cabinets and the junkiest "innards" in electronics.
There are exceptions to every brand out there. I'm sure a few of those troublesome sets ran for years, and some of the top ones probably cranked out some lemons, but for the most part, for reliability, you always went with Zenith or RCA.


Post# 556173 , Reply# 100   11/12/2011 at 20:45 (4,570 days old) by bwoods ()        

On Jamie's comments on the GE VIR. If the station had the VIR misadjusted, you just touched the VIR button and turned the ssystem off, The set then behaved like any other set with the up front user adjustable controls.

My 26 year old GE Stereo Color TV, part of their "Command Performace Series" is still my daily driver, and has never had a repair, attests to the fact of the ability of GE engineers. It also speaks highly of those on the General Electric assembly line in Portsmouth, Virginia. Recall that Zenith used to have the most reliable TV's, per consumer surveys, (which Zenith proudly proclaimed in the ads touting "hand wiring" over printed circuit boards (before they changed). In the late 70's GE's reliability went to Number 1 and even surpassed Zenith's.

Here are some neat photos from my 1965 General Electric Color TV/STereo sales brochure.

I apologize for the quality. I don't have a scanner and just took some flash shots.


Post# 556174 , Reply# 101   11/12/2011 at 20:47 (4,570 days old) by bwoods ()        

and another...

Post# 556175 , Reply# 102   11/12/2011 at 20:48 (4,570 days old) by cfz2882 (Belle Fourche,SD)        

that timeline sounds about right-the 19"quasar solid state color i was given was
made in '75 and had the same copperish plating on the chassis panels and framework
as period motorola sets.
Speaking of plug in modules,a 1976 RCA solid state color i had in the mid-'80s
had a vertical steel chassis frame that modules plugged into,it was kinda ill-
designed in some ways as RCA had placed some elecrolytic capacitors,transistors
and other heat-affected parts right above hot running large resistors and power
transistors!This TV could have used a cooling fan LOL.TV was still had a power
transformer and was very heavy for a plastic cabinet 19".Performance and stability
were not all that great,but set was 9yrs old when i got it-Ex motel set with an
am/fm radio built in.


Post# 556176 , Reply# 103   11/12/2011 at 20:49 (4,570 days old) by bwoods ()        

and some info....

Post# 556177 , Reply# 104   11/12/2011 at 20:53 (4,570 days old) by bwoods ()        
Roundies

Am I the only one, or do any of you miss the roundies?

Maybe it was a matter of pride. Back in the early sixites, everyone knew you had a color TV, just because of the round picture tube. I think the round tube had sort of a charisma, or maybe better an "ambience", of its own,

I really missed my family's roundie Sylvania purchased in 1964, when it got replaced with a 1966 Sylvania rectangular.


Post# 556184 , Reply# 105   11/12/2011 at 22:33 (4,570 days old) by Supersuds (Knoxville, Tenn.)        
Quasar II?

supersuds's profile picture
Does anyone remember something called "Quasar II" by Motorola? We had one that was new about 1973 (after the color Heathkit my dad had put together in 1967 was stolen, to our relief -- it was always shorting out).

The Quasar II did NOT have works in a drawer. I remember being disappointed by that, as I'd seen the ads. As it turned out, it ran until 1986 with the only repair being a new tube. It was solid state except for one large tube (don't know what it did) that stayed on all the time so you'd get a picture as soon as you turned it on. It may have needed replacement more than once. Oh, and I think the channel knob stripped, but most of them did back then.


Post# 556187 , Reply# 106   11/12/2011 at 22:47 (4,570 days old) by norgeway (mocksville n c )        
Motorola!

In my opinion, Motorola was as good as it got! Especially the three channel stereos!

Post# 556190 , Reply# 107   11/12/2011 at 22:56 (4,570 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        

rp2813's profile picture

How appropriate for those GE ads have the image of the weekly "GE College Bowl" quiz show on their sets.  I think that's supposed to be Allan "Here's the toss-up" Ludden pictured, but the show did have another host at one time or another IIRC.


Post# 556233 , Reply# 108   11/13/2011 at 04:23 (4,570 days old) by 112561 (River Park, in Port St. Lucie, Florida)        

112561's profile picture
Bwoods, I wish I could have gotten the GE books from our dealer, I hate to think of where they went! I have three GE color sets, one is a three inch, one a thirteen, and the other is a fifteen or thereabouts. I also have a nineteen inch black and white stereo combo, The Custom Decorator. I love GE anything, regardless of whatever their quality practices were.

I also notice the painting in the one television picture is by Dick Van Dyke! The stereo console has the GE Tonal 1 "wrist action" floating pickup. Fantastic! I had a tube GE console with that changer. Idiot I am, I got rid of it.




This post was last edited 11/13/2011 at 06:26
Post# 556238 , Reply# 109   11/13/2011 at 05:40 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

A friend of mine had that same GE tape deck that was in that GE console pictured above as a stand alone unit. It actually sounded pretty good.

When I was in HS (65-69) when visiting friends houses I always looked in their living room to see if a round screen was in there. I was interested in television even more than washing machines! Sometimes the set was turned on. Most of the time the picture was adjusted for over saturation of color, or contrast turned way too high. I wondered why people couldn't adjust their color sets properly. You could tell that a lot of the time the picture was adjusted by looking at the grass during a football game which resulted in too green a picture. But get too close to the set and you'd be told "don't touch that thing, my husband has it set just the way he likes it.".

I definitely didn't like the round screens. It always seemed to me that the picture was somewhat cut off. We went from the rectangular Olympic B&W console set to the Zenith rectangular set so thought that's the way it was supposed to be. I do remember my parents holding out for the square screen.

Then my mom had a friend that had a 63' Zenith (roundie). One time we visited and I saw a new Admiral 19" portable set sitting on top of the Zenith set (around 1965). I asked the woman why she has a B&W set on top of a color set? She replied that she watches "her stories" while ironing and house cleaning and she bought that B&W set to watch those since her stories were B&W. She said she didn't want to "use up all the color" on the color set when she was watching shows broadcast in B&W. At the time I was taking a electronics course in HS and we covered basic television technology. I really wanted to laugh, but I bit my tongue and kept quiet.

And how many times around that era were you watching TV with a group (like the rest of your family) and someone say "That picture is too red" then immediately someone says "No, it's too green!" You usually heard that when shows with "Color by DeLuxe" were showing.

The neighbors we knew that had a Motorola had a 1966 set. This was before "works in the drawer". It was one of the more BOL models. Square screen small wood case and spindle legs. It looked like it got a good picture. The guy there told my dad he bought it because of Motorola's long history with electronics. I never knew what happened to that set after 1969 since I went off to college and those people moved while I was away.
By the mid 70's the Quasar sets were "Assembled in the U.S. from parts made in Japan". The link tells the rest of the story. They were the first to release a solid state set in 1967.

I never knew anyone with a Sylvania set. But when we moved to Houston a lot of people I talked to down here said that Sylvania had a good reputation. But when I was ready to buy another set I looked for places that sold them. I couldn't find even one. I didn't see my first Sony until 1975 or so.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK


Post# 556242 , Reply# 110   11/13/2011 at 06:44 (4,569 days old) by chromacolor ()        

I remember the "Quasar II". It was a bit odd because the first generation Quasars were solid state, and then the Quasar II came out which had some tubes. They did still have some modules in the drawer, but were a vast improvement for reliability than the first generation sets. What Motorola/Quasar did was not uncommon because the other big players came out with all solid state models around 1970, then went to "hybrid" sets which contained some tubes till around 1974, with most major manufactures going all solid state around 1975.
Those solid state sets on a vertical chassis could be troublesome with bad connections, but were designed for in home servicing. We repairmen usually had to lug those HEAVY old consoles into the shop if it wasn't a tube issue, hence the manufactures new designs.
Almost all US manufactures were dead and gone by the late 80's, and appeared in name only.
RCA sold to GE in the late 80's, which then sold off to Thomson Electronics (a french company) which Thomson contined to own until recently and now sold to a Chinese company.
Zenith went bankrupt and was taken over by Goldstar (now known as LG)
On a sad note, LG wanted to kill the Zenith name, so in the 90's they put out sets with known defective picture tubes (lasting no longer than 3 years) and killed of the Zenith name after that.
Sylvania was originally owned by GTE (the phone company) then went thru a ton of mergers before being absorbed by Phillips which had also taken over Magnavox early in the game.
Curtis Mathes never designed their own sets by the mid 70's and were outsourced.
Japanese sets continued to kick our ass in quality and which led to most all US manufactures being done by the late 80's.
On a sad note, even Sony went down the tubes by the late 90's. They couldn't afford to continue manufature in Japan, and killed off the ONE thing they had going for them which was the Trinitron tube. (when the patent ran out)

Electronics did the same thing as the appliance manufactures.. as the years went on, they existed in mame only with all the mergers, so a consumer never really knew that the RCA they bought in 72 was NOT the same RCA they bought in 86. etc etc.....

I have a soft spot for the "roundies" and still own 3!

On a side note... Motorola did put out some impressive stereos, but the manufaturer that wins the top prize for the most expensive, best stereos of that era would have to go to Magnavox.


Post# 556271 , Reply# 111   11/13/2011 at 10:16 (4,569 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
roundies

A wealthy great-uncle who lived in West Los Angeles had a roundie RCA or Zenith, but I never saw it work. Either the set wasn't working, or else there was no color programming on the day we happened to visit. The first time I actually SAW live color television was in a hotel lobby tv in c. 1962 (Huckleberry Hound Show). Later the same year, our Y Indian Guides tribe met at the home of a wealthy banker member, and when the meeting adjourned to refreshments time, a few of us wandered over into the den where his mom and sister were watching "The Virginian", my second live color tv viewing experience. These sets must have been roundies since they were in the early 1960s.

The parents of my friend around the corner had a roundie Zenith in their bedroom, complete with four function Space Command remote control. They could control hue and saturation with the control, as well as volume and channels. I'm guessing they bought it in 63 or 64. What I remember about it even then was that I didn't like the way the corners were cut off in terms of viewable picture. Our sets at home were still black and white, but I appreciated being able to see what was happening in the corners. We entered the color era during the winter of 67-68 with a 19" table top GE rectangular tube model, won in a Lions Club raffle.


Post# 556272 , Reply# 112   11/13/2011 at 10:41 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Motorola was also big in the stereo and auto audio segment in the 60's. I remember a lot of friends having Motorola AM/FM radios in their cars, some even with a reverb unit which made the sound seem like it was on springs.They were huge in the CB radio market. But you know, I have even seen a Motorola 8-Track radio/8-track player that was quadrophonic!

They also made (or marketed) transistor radios that were quite popular. So they had a huge name in the electronics market.

I think that Japanese televisions really took over the market around 83-84. That seems when a lot of american television companies folded, or were taken over. There even was a lawsuit over the fact that Japanese companies were "dumping" color televisions over here to get market share. Dumping is a term used for selling something in another country with a price below what it is being sold for in their own country.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK


Post# 556275 , Reply# 113   11/13/2011 at 11:00 (4,569 days old) by bwoods ()        

We can thank Jack "Neutron" Welch for getting rud of General Electronics. He wanted a larger market for GE X-Ray and sold/traded the rights to stick GE and RCA logos onto Thomson Consumer electronics manufactured products, in order to get Thomson's share of the world X-Ray market.

As I am a GE sharehlder, I get their annual reports and their Consumer Electronics business was making a nice profit, even with high U.S. labor cost, in 1985 and 1986 when Welch pulled the plug.

The Portsmouth Virginia plant was cranking out console and portable TVs with a passion. Unfortunately, even by this time, the GE phones, portable radios, cassettes, etc. were being made overseas, though.

That left Zenith, on its own, as the only U.S. manufactured set. And, as Jamie told you, that didn't last long.

He did the same thing, in 1983, with GE HVAC, which had the largest U.S. market in heating and cooling and set the industry standards with the Weathertron line. Why did he sell it. In his own words, he said "I didn't like HVAC." Trane was THRILLED to get GE's HVAC business and snap[ed it right up from Welch. Dropped thier design for heat pumps, which was inferior to GE's, and started sticking their logo on GE Weathertrons.

Some say that Welch sold GE HVAC, to get enough money to buy RCA. Of course, once he bought RCA he split up its divisions and sold them. Two world superpowers in consumer electronics, GE and RCA, down the drain. It ended the circle that began when GE, in a deal with the U.S. Government started RCA (about 1919).

I could on and on about how the egomaniac Neutron Jack destroyed GE, as well as RCA, but my blood pressure is getting up thinking about it, so I'll save that for another posting, hehe.



Post# 556276 , Reply# 114   11/13/2011 at 11:06 (4,569 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        

Japan has a larger presence before 83-84 in the black and white portable market. They made a SONY B&W portable with a 5" inch screen by the early 60s. The family who own the Zenith also owned a Sony portable. They had a weekend home/ranch in the eastern San Diego County mountains. They would bring the TV along mainly to keep in contact should there be an emergency or something. The only channel was Channel 6 (ABC) from Mexico. I think they were able to pull in Channel 6 using the single rabbit ear antenna.

The model below appears to be later than the early 60s, but the basic size and layout of controls was the same. They later made a color model which I remember seeing in the dorm room of a (very wealthy) classmate in college late 1970s.

Sony built an assembly plant in San Diego in the late 1970s and that seemed to ramp up their sales. The first tv we bought , as opposed to winning in a Lions Club raffle, was a 19" Hitachi table top, 1972. That model died 1979 and was replaced by an MGA (Mitsubishi) 19" table top, which soldiered on into the mid-1990s, when it was replaced by a 26" Magnavox. That set began making strange noises earlier this year and has been replaced by a 32" Vizio HD with WiFi---they love watching Netflix now!


Post# 556282 , Reply# 115   11/13/2011 at 11:38 (4,569 days old) by bwoods ()        

GE 1965 Price List

Loo at the prices for GE's 1965 "Ultra Color" tv sets in the lower right corner. This price list was dated July 22, 1964.

I don't know what the inflation factor is for conversion of 1964 dollars to 2011, but lets say is was as low as a factor of 5 (probably actually higher than that even). That means their top-of-the-line set, at a suggest retail of $825, would take the equivalent earning power of over $4000 today! Even the net price to the right on the chart, for the dealers, was $636.

I believe my parents paid $600+ for their first Sylvania Color set in November 1964. I was with my dad and remember him trying to talk the salesman down in price. It was the top-of-the-line Sylvania console. I do remember the salesman telling my dad not to move the set around and don't run the vacuum cleaner underneath it because it would "magnetize" the picture tube. That must have been in the days before automataic degaussing.


Post# 556292 , Reply# 116   11/13/2011 at 12:18 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

I think automatic degaussing came around 1965 or so. And even with that the when the service guy came to the house he'd always degauss the screen as the last thing he'd do before leaving.

Yes, I heard a lot of people talk about not letting the vacuum cleaner get too close to their color TV. My cousin used to hold a magnet up to the color CRT and watch all the color being drawn to where the magnet was. I thought, ah ha! You could bend the electron beams with a magnet. Fortunately, the set had automatic degaussing on it.

Most of the sets we saw for most brands in 1964 sold for $500-$650 or so. The lower price was for a set in a wood box with simple legs, the $650 figure was for a full fledged console with a speaker on each side of the screen, plus tone controls.

When my parents bought the color TV they also bought a Zenith console stereo. It had external inputs and outputs even a headphone jack. So I could listen to records while the rest of the family watched TV. That was the reason they bought separates rather than a all in one console. I had seen those huge consoles in stores, but only knew one friend of the family that had one. It was also a Zenith.
But from what I was told, those went for about $1200-$1400 back then. I think my parents paid $650 for the television set and $449.00 for the stereo.

One relative had bought a nice GE stereo console in 1966. It sounded pretty good but cheaply made. Everything was plastic, including the knobs on the radio/amp. After just a few years all the silver trim paint started to flake off.

The 80's was the era of corporate raiders. Buy a company that may be in trouble cheap, sell off it's divisions for a tidy profit and then kill the name. Or keep the name but use only very cheaply built products under that name. I think this was where "Reaganomics" started and greed became rampant as it is today.

But when companies start to sell their owned assets they don't realize that when they do this the company is worth less. Then if they try to get financing for something it's much more difficult to get a loan. Then eventually they'll sell off all their assets and become a "paper only" company that's virtually worthless.
American Airlines is headed in this direction now.

And with all this talk of the trade deficit, we are hearing that the U.S. has to stop consuming so much because so much is imported. They forgot that if products were made here like they used to, we wouldn't have such a trade deficit. And the job situation wouldn't be as bad as it is today.


Post# 556322 , Reply# 117   11/13/2011 at 15:05 (4,569 days old) by chromacolor ()        
The Demise of RCA

RCA was always a large,greedy company that ruled with an iron fist. CBS developed a color TV system first. (early 50's) However, it broadcast at a different refresh rate, and was a spinning wheel system. RCA had so much money invested in B&W that they spent vast sums of money and tied up the courts and won with their color system. Most manufactures got out of the color game when the big guns at RCA entered with color TV. The ones that remained had to pay licensing fees to RCA for years, and their sets were nothing more than RCA "clones". Zenith and Motorola were a few that spent years developing their own systems.
What did in RCA? The CED Videodisc system. They spent years and millions to bring that to the market. By the time that format hit, it was a joke. VHS had a stronghold on the market. The videodiscs were large, used a stylys, and of course, you could not record with them. They were a husk of a company when GE took them over, to sell off and tear them apart.
Whirlcool.. you are correct that he 80's were the death knoll for corporations. However.. consumers are so conditioned to buy new and cheap, that most products are now considered disposible. I have a handfull of TV's that range from the late 40's thru the 70's that still work. They were made to be repaired and had company pride.


Post# 556328 , Reply# 118   11/13/2011 at 15:31 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

You are right about new and cheap. Instead of individual parts, most things are made out of "assemblies". This means that if a part goes bad it's not unit repairable. You have to replace the entire module that it was connected to. Then it's no longer economical to repair the product, it may be cheaper to just toss it and buy a new cheap one again.

You could tell back in the 60's the smaller appliance shops that carried color TV were proud of what they sold. You could tell the enthusiasm in their sales pitch.

I was talking with my sister today and asked her if she ever knew of anyone with a Philco or GE color set. She said her husband's parents had a Philco color set as their first one. The original GE Porta-Color sets are highly collectable.

I remember those videodisc systems by RCA & Pioneer. The first time it died most people say it was because there weren't enough titles on the market, the second time there was a bunch of titles, but everyone was VHS oriented by that time. From what I remember the RCA system used a stylus of sorts where the Pioneer system used a laser reader on the disk.

The 70's televison repairmans case.... (On Ebay now, there are more photos of what's inside this case on the link.)


CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK on eBay


Post# 556329 , Reply# 119   11/13/2011 at 15:33 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        
Common Repairs

And Chromacolor, what were the most common television repairs you encountered?

Post# 556335 , Reply# 120   11/13/2011 at 16:01 (4,569 days old) by drewz (Alexandria, Virginia)        

drewz's profile picture
My 1968 New Vista Home Entertainment Center still works well, everything original.

Weird that the stereo was ss and the tv was tube and worked as two independant systems just sharing the speaker system, stereo has it's own cord and electric system and just plugged into the tv so you can't work both at one time.

New Vista Color, (all tube) has the matted (frosted) non-glare glass classic color.

Trans Vista cost more and was half ss and tube?

And to think the very next year 1969 you could purchase a RCA 2000 set that looked space age in design and no moving parts.

I have hundreds of spec sheets for all models in my RCA binders, just need to get a scanner to post them.


Post# 556336 , Reply# 121   11/13/2011 at 16:01 (4,569 days old) by bwoods ()        

HeHe..Corporate greed existed long before "Reaganomics." Probably back to the first corporation that ever was. :-) We all have our pet theories, but (I think) one of the major problems with technical companies/corporations is the disturbing trend for the CEO to no longer be an engineer, but an MBA or other business major.

It seems like the beginning of most technical companies were engineers/scientist/inventors who loved their ideas and products, with a passion, and wanted to create a company to produce and distribute these. And if they made money in the process, which they hoped to, this was great.

It seems now days the CEO's main goal is to please the shareholds (and make mney for themself with bonuses) and if they manage to make a saleable product, that's OK. As long as its good enought to last through the warranty period.

Long lost is the love of research and betterment of mankind through product develop that Edison and George Westinghouse, et. al., had. Profit was desireable, but a secondary result of producing their prouducts.

It seems, starting in the late fifties early sixties, profit became the main goal and product secondary.

In the case of Neutron Jack Welch, he was a chemical engineer, forced into engineering by his dad. He didn't like it and was not good at it. Even in his biography, he tells (in a rare moment of self depreciation) of how he caused a major explosion at one of the polymer generating facilities when he was engineer at GE Plastics. He should have been fired. GE would be a different company today.

However, GE liked Welsh because he was ambitious and with his ego, he did not take "no" for an answer, they saw a managerial future for him. (If you read his bio and also read the book about GE called "Profit at Any Cost" you will be able to get a picture of the man who destroyed GE.)

Anyone who even remotely disagreed with him was verbally, and beligerantly, badgered into submission. He is described as losing his temper at the mere hint of disagreement. He would get red in the face, pound his fist on the table and verbally badger someone until he started stuttering so badly, he could barely talk.

He had a stuttering problem when he was a kid and was often teased by other kids, when he was in school, not only because of the stuttering, but because he was physically short as well. So he learned to "protect" himself by verbal abuse of others and carried this habit into the professional world. It is how he got his way with the GE board of directors. Almost everyone who was interviewed, who worked under him, hated him and few ever dared to speak up as they would be verbally abused and embarrased in front of everyone. He would then find a resourceful way to demoted, transfer or relieve that person of their duties. You did not cross "neutron" Jack and survive.

He built his ego by buying and selling companies and being a major player in the corporate world. Sold off first was HVAC, small household appliances next and then consumer electronics. His major goal, according to him, was to get GE out of manufacturing and make it into a service company. It was he who built GE Financial from almost nothing. That is why he had the Board agree to change the name of the company from, General Electric Company to GE as he did not want the company to be associated with electrical prooducts.

The one thing he didn't get by with, was changing the GE logo from the late 1800's cursive GE in a circle symbol to block letters GE (like you see on the GE Building in Corporate Headquaraters in New York. Remember the year (late 1980's) he had the block letter put on GE appliances in place of the worldwide famous logo?

There was such an outroar, from the public, that it was just about the only time Welch ever back down on anything. His ego was so strong he wanted the company to have a new logo, created by him, instead of their historic one.

It was also about this time he had the words "general electric" slowly being phased off most products. All you saw was the GE logo, usually in a corner. He said he was trying to educate the public that GE was not an electrical manufacturing company.

His goal was to transform a company, doing what it had been doing for nearly one hundred years, and phase in new finacial, insurance and service arms while phasing out many (but ot all) the electrical manufacturing arms.


Post# 556343 , Reply# 122   11/13/2011 at 16:12 (4,569 days old) by drewz (Alexandria, Virginia)        

drewz's profile picture
1986 A VERY SAD YEAR FOR RCA,

Don't know how true this rumor was but many said at the time GE got their hands caught in the cookie jar with regards to defense and other government contracts, and were banned from doing business with the government for a period.

RCA was not doing well at the time and who else had alot of government contracts...R-C-A!

So guess what, GE was back in the business again, then they decided what they wanted and sold off what they did not want.



Post# 556346 , Reply# 123   11/13/2011 at 16:19 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

..with technical companies/corporations is the disturbing trend for the CEO to no longer be an engineer, but an MBA or other business major.

Yup, bottom dollar and no excuses. When this started happening these new CEO's made sure their bonuses were tied to the stock price. Want to boost it up a little? Close a factory and lay off employees. Guaranteed increase in stock price. Repeat until you have no more factories and then pull your golden parachute.

These CEO's could really care less about the products they were making, no compassion for an excellent product.

Anytime you hear a speech from a CEO and hear the words "We have a duty to make a profit for our stockholders" and you work for that company, something bad is about to happen to your job or your benefits.

Several years back the CEO of American Airlines pleaded with all the employees for pay cuts. He said the company won't be able to continue without these cuts.
A month of so later after he got the cuts from the employees he rewarded himself with a $5 million dollar bonus for getting the cuts and more bonuses for people on the BOD. The employees found out about this and almost rioted. They did an employee slow down that Thanksgiving weekend to demonstrate their unhappiness. Lots of late flights, missed connections, etc. The media took notice and eventually the CEO responsible for this was forced out of a job. Good for them.


Post# 556353 , Reply# 124   11/13/2011 at 16:28 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        
Wow, Drewz

That is one mint looking set. Smart "Danish Modern" design. In the early to late 70's our living room was decked out in this style. In 1969 they changed to plain traditional. You are only missing the avocado carpeting to put the set on.

For you TV guys out there. A guy I knew in HS parent's had bought one of the early RCA color sets, I think around 1958 or so. I noticed that when you changed the channel to an empty one, the static on the screen was even in color. But by the time we got a color set, the static was only black & white. Did the manufacturers put a color killer circuit in the sets to mute the color if not receiving a signal?

Then later on television sets won't even go to a blank channel. Our Sony set just says "Channel Not Found" and stays on the current channel.


Post# 556355 , Reply# 125   11/13/2011 at 16:40 (4,569 days old) by chromacolor ()        
Common Repairs

Whirlcool.. when I was in repairs it was the late 70's, there were many of the earlier tube color sets on the repair route. Solid State stuff was still fairly new, so didn't see alot. Also remember that color TV was EXPENSIVE at that time and most people had 1 set, that got the hell used out of it. They literally "baked" to death.
Most repairs at that time were mainly tube related. The death knoll for a set was either a bad picture tube or a flyback failure. NOT that they couldn't be repaired, but those were the most expensive parts. Many people moved on up to a solid state set if the old set had that failure. Also.. tubes were becoming more and more expensive. Here were a few common problems by brand:
RCA - They ate up flybacks and the later tube chassis used a ton of 6GH8 tubes that were always bad. Drews.. I love your set btw.. but that was the worse chassis for flyback issues, so you're lucky mo issues. You've either got a CTC-31 or a CTC-38 chassis in that one. Trans Vista would have been the FIRST solid state RCA chassis (CTC-40)
Zenith: usually built like tanks and NEVER broke, but if they did, a pain in the ass to fix. It seemed like they would pop up with some intermittant impossible to diagnose issue.
Magnavox -- bad picture tubes, and a pain to service. Also bad flyback design
Motorola --- built by engineers. Built like tanks, but lousy picture tubes,color reproduction, and by 1980, hard to get parts for
Sylvania -- if it was a GTE set, hard to get parts for. If it was a NAP set,tricky to work on, but usually had a good picture.
ANY early Japanese color set --- HORRID HORRID HORRID. Impossible to get parts for.

We were in the Midwest --- at that time you simply bought American. The people that bought a Sears, Wards,Gambles,Western Auto usually bought them because of a charge card. Not everyone of those sets were bad. It depended who they farmed out to. So you never knew what brand you were going to be working on until you took the back off on one of those. If it wasn't a tube or some generic part, you were screwed because those retailers made it impossible for a repairman to get parts. Ya.. you could order them,wait forever, and pay thru the nose.
What kept an old set going was the lady of the house. If she loved the cabinet, hubby had to shell out the $$$ to keep that going.
Other memories.... there were a few times that we would get a complaint of a dim picture. Windex helped that if they were heavy smokers. Some people never cleaned the screen!
I also remember if a set had a poor funtioning high-voltage or color circuit, the opening credits of "The Mary Tyle Moore" would set it off, and it would overload the circuit and "bloom". Sounds nuts.. but you could have a set in the shop, have it hooked to a color generator, run the hell out of it and think you had it repaired, and a call would come in a week later, and we would get that complaint. RCA sets were the most trouble prone.


Post# 556358 , Reply# 126   11/13/2011 at 16:42 (4,569 days old) by cadman (Cedar Falls, IA)        

cadman's profile picture
Regarding the CBS color system, it wasn't so much bullying and outspending that put RCA into first place in the color war, it was that their system would prove to be technically superior. Remember that the FCC actually chose the CBS system as the color standard as work on electronic systems at that time weren't quite ready for prime time (groan). As field trials progressed and improvements were made it was obvious a mechanical system was not the right choice- the signals were completely incompatible with B&W broadcasts, picture brightness suffered due to brightness loss of the filters (this was pre-aluminized CRTs), size was limited to approx 10" tubes and once you went larger, the rotating color wheel grew to ridiculous proportions.

Interestingly, RCA and NBC had a bit of a chicken and egg scenario going. How could you justify the expense of color programming with a limited number of sets, and who would buy a color TV with limited programming? Knowing this, RCA worked with other manufacturers to spur development of competitors' sets, even supplying engineering sample CRTs for development. Westinghouse, Philco, Admiral, Motorola, Sylvania and the other bug guys developed their own sets using the 15” RCA tube with their own circuit designs and some of these 1954 sets exist today (big bucks and VERY rare).

But they learned what RCA did. Nobody was ready to drop a grand on a TV without a proven record and without programming. For the next 5 years, RCA stuck it out and they were really the only game in town until the technology became affordable and buyer interest began to rise. Zenith finally came on board with their own design, with others following. -Cory


Post# 556362 , Reply# 127   11/13/2011 at 16:50 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

I just found this most interesting excerpt from a book named "Cases in Corporate Strategy". It details how the different television companies introduced and marketed their color television sets. It's right in line with the title of this thread, market share between the brands. Very interesting.

It seemed that in 63-66 the supply of color CRT's was a major problem. Several of the companies just bought their CRT's from other companies, usually RCA. But others held out for their R&D sections to develop their own. And it seemed that getting the rectangular screens was rather problematic too.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO whirlcool's LINK


Post# 556368 , Reply# 128   11/13/2011 at 17:12 (4,569 days old) by chromacolor ()        
CBS

Yep.. you nailed it Cory.
I did get to see a CBS set in operation tho. I was surprised on how fantastic the picture was, but ya.. the system RCA came up with did prove to be better for the whole industry, and RCA must have been right as it's still basically in use today. Well.. not since analog went away, but still reproduction wise.
And boy, weren't those 15" color picture tubes dogs? The color reproduction is fantastic, but the whole keeping it under vacuum issue.....
RCA came to market with that design to get a color set on the market, but many remained unsold, and usually went to RCA staff or sold at a deep discount.
Didn't RCA come out with the 21" jug a year later?
In my opinion, the best "roundie" chassis design RCA ever did was the CTC-16.
The worst one that went to market and sold in droves was the CTC-38.


Post# 556369 , Reply# 129   11/13/2011 at 17:16 (4,569 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

The final run down.

According to that article, in 1966 (which was the first year that the networks had full time color telecasting here is what each companies market share was:

Brand Color Share

RCA 33%
Zenith 22%
Motorola 10%
Admiral 9%
Sears (!!) 7% Shocking!
Magnavox 6%
Sylvania 5%
Philco-Ford 3%

Interestingly enough, Zenith was the leader for B&W sets that year.
RCA was the leader in color sales 1965-69 without a doubt. And I was quite surprised that Sears Silvertone sets had that amount of share. And that Admiral made the Airline color sets that Montgomery Ward sold. Interesting to say the least.



Post# 556378 , Reply# 130   11/13/2011 at 18:30 (4,569 days old) by bwoods ()        

For those who haven't read it..I recommend "Tube" by David and Marshall Fisher (Counterpoint Publishers, 1996)

It's the best book I havae read on the development of the tv set, to date. Not only does it talk about the technological development of b&w and color tv, but gives a fascinating background about the inventors themself.

Lot of neat trivia.

For example, the world's first televised drama, was present by General Electric, The Queen's Messenger, in 1928. The cameras used the Nipkow disk system and were so large neither the cameras or actors moved during the production. There was one actor and one actress at a table. One camera was fixed to the actors face and the other to the actress's. A third was on a "double" who did hands holding small props.

They used a receiver as a monitor and actually had devloped a fade control to fade from one camera to another.

The only problem, no one owned a tv set back then. :-) However, reporters and journalist were invited to a building next door to the GE lab where they had a 3 inch GE receiver designed to capture the broadcast signal.

That Sept. 12, the play was aired from GE's Schenectady laboratory in New York by sending it by wire to the WGY radio station transmitter.

The New York Times first review of a televised program was not too good. Saying, "the pictures were sometimes blurred and confused."




Post# 556398 , Reply# 131   11/13/2011 at 21:26 (4,569 days old) by cornutt (Huntsville, AL USA)        
CBS color system

That started out as sort of a CBS inside joke, something they did just to tweak RCA's nose. The television networks were all anxious to begin color broadcasting, and everyone knew that RCA had a system that they were working on, but RCA didn't seem to be in any hurry to submit it to the FCC. CBS's Peter Goldmark had a system that he had invented for industrial television systems that used the spinning color wheel. It worked well with the small 3-5" monitors that were used in that application. (Decades later, the early-version Space Shuttle video cameras used the same basic system.)

So CBS submitted their system to the FCC as a proposed standard, just to try to get a rise out of RCA. Much to their surprise, the FCC took their proposal seriously, and then that got CBS thinking that they might actually have a chance of getting their system adopted. And the dollar signs started dancing in their heads, even though (as Admiral was quick to point out) a 21" set would require a 6-foot diameter wheel and a 10-amp motor to spin it, not to mention the slot that the consumer would have to cut in their living-room floor for clearance. (It would be bad if your floor joists ran the other way...) CBS got Sears to twist the arms of its two OEMs at the time to endorse their system, and it came perilously close to being adopted before everyone came to their senses. Unfortunately CBS had by this time gotten way too emotionally invested in what had started as a joke, and they went off in a huff and had nothing further to do with color broadcasting until the mid-'60s.


Post# 556401 , Reply# 132   11/13/2011 at 22:06 (4,569 days old) by LordKenmore (The Laundry Room)        

lordkenmore's profile picture
"I remember those videodisc systems by RCA & Pioneer. The first time it died most people say it was because there weren't enough titles on the market, the second time there was a bunch of titles, but everyone was VHS oriented by that time."

LaserDisc (Pioneer) was probably killed off by DVD, actually. LaserDisc remained in production--both players and discs--until the DVD era sometime. It was very much of a niche format--most people went with VHS--but LaserDisc was preferred by people into high performance.

Years back, I did business with a small audio dealer. A specialist, one shop operation. The primary focus of the store was stereo, but he also was selling surround sound. (This was before home theater had become so hot.) His demonstrations ALWAYS used LaserDisc. He did not have VCR in the store--not even a store owned unit to use to demonstrate surround sound.


Post# 556409 , Reply# 133   11/13/2011 at 23:15 (4,569 days old) by PhilR (Quebec Canada)        

philr's profile picture
My first color TV was a 1974 GTE Sylvania GT Matic 26" solid state with "instant on" feature. I got it from my parents when they got a new RCA Colortrack in the mid eighties. It replaced my black and white RCA "Townsman Series" tube set which my aunt gave me when I was 6-7 years old. The Sylvania lasted quite a few years. I had it repaired once in the late eighties and the technician just replaced chips until he found the wrong one I remember I paid 85$ for that (I was 11 or 12 years old then!). In 1992, the colors began separating but the picture was still ok if you turned the color control to have a black and white image. I had to throw it away a few years ago as I was lacking space to keep it but I wish I'd still have it!
The oldest color TV in my family was my grandfather's 1966 JVC. He gave it to my uncle when he got a Sony Trinitron in the late seventies. My uncle still used the JVC in the late eighties. Another uncle had a Quazar Motorola set from the early seventies which wasn't solid state. I also watched a lot of TV and played video games with my cousin on this one. My parents and many friends had solid state Zenith Chromacolor TVs from the late seventies/early eighties and I didn't like the picture on them. I still have one from 1984 and it has the same strange colors as the other sets I remember from my childhood. My parents also had a Zenith TV with the "Space Phone" (pulse type, hands free phone which used remote control to dial or answer the phone) from around 1983 until a few years ago. I really liked the look of this TV and it had a stronger tuner than their RCA (we had no cable TV and both sets were connected to the same external antenna) but I preferred the picture on the RCA. You had to open the speaker doors to access the controls.

This picture shows me and my parent's 1974 Sylvania in 1979.




This post was last edited 11/13/2011 at 23:41
Post# 556413 , Reply# 134   11/13/2011 at 23:44 (4,569 days old) by Mikes ()        
On CBS And RCA

CBS' ill-fated color television experiment was no joke--especially when it came to the bottom line. CBS' spinning wheel/UHF only color system died for two reasons. 1. No one was willing to chuck recently purchased incompatible B&W sets for CBS color, and NO major TV set maker (certainly not RCA) was willing to build sets using the CBS format.
2. Faced with that fact, CBS purchased what was considered a second-rate electronics maker called Hytron, and essentially slapped the CBS-Columbia name on Hytron TV's and other products. It didn't hide the fact Hytron products were mediocre; and since no one was willing to back CBS color, Hytron turned into a major money loser for the company--which was then reliant on revenues from its radio and television networks, along with Columbia Records.
As for RCA, the company's then-Chairman Thorton Bradshaw--who turned around the company by shedding it of non-electronic acquisitions (including Banquet frozen foods and Hertz rental cars), and installing the team of Grant Tinker and Brandon Tartikoff at NBC--realized by the mid-1980's, RCA without NBC could not survive because of strong competition from Japanese and Korean electronics makers, and RCA's reliance on defense contracts. He knew the only way to keep RCA intact was sell the company to another firm--which is where Jack Welsh and GE came in. Welsh wanted RCA for NBC--which became a profit machine by 1985--and had every intention of selling off other parts of RCA, including its TV manufacturing operations.
And that's exactly what happened.


Post# 556442 , Reply# 135   11/14/2011 at 05:04 (4,569 days old) by tolivac (greenville nc)        

Color on the BW set-not going to happen-you need the three color phospors in the CRT to make that happen and the color signal demodulation circuits in the set-sent by the chroma signal from the transmitter.And---early RCA TV transmitters-esp the Low band ones-could not pass the chroma signals.so these could broadcast monochrome only-with that most of these early transmitters went to the scrap yard.Sad-they were beautiful peices of engineering-I saw one of thewse RCA transmitters at Ch#2 in Baltimore.The unit was in emaculate condition.worked beautifully-but a monchrome signal.the power tubes used in the visual driver,PA and aural PA were an unuasual RCA water cooled internal anode glass envelope design.These haven't been made by RCA for many,many years.the station hoarded what they could get-and wanted to sell that TX for $30,000 at that time--late 70's.Now its worthless today-but good for a museam.They were so cool to see operating-all of that HOT GLASS seen through the "peek-a-boo" windows!And---RCA had a power tube divison located in Pennsylvania-forget the city-now its under the name Burl Electronics-they make power tubes still and other electronic components.and to run that old RCA transmitter-need a 208-230V 3Ph supply to run it.And places for the blowers,water pumps and heat exchangers.All of RCA's TV transmitters used high level grid modulation of a driver stage.this meant amplifying the video signal to several hundred volts.Many tube stages involved-and these need adjustment.Harris-GE transmitters used very low level modulation-the video modulator was in a low level satge-then amplified by several linear RF power amplifiers-these were inefficient-but easier to deal with.The archillees heal in GE-Harris TV tx were the screen supplies for the visual driver and PA stages-these used the 7-8Kv main HV supply and stepped it down to 1200-1800V with a bank of voltage dropping resistors and a 4CX-250 power tube acting as a series regulator.And 807 tube and OA3 tube served as the grid reference for the 4CX-250-if you had a fault in the Visual stage-like a shorted tube or screen socket cap-that regulator blew up and was a pain to rebuild.RCA transmitters used a separate 3Ph fed supplies for the screen voltage fed thru a Sola 3ph reg transformer-these were easier to fix.Mostly caps or rectifier diodes.Same thing with the RCA grid supplies.The GE's had a separate grid supply.

Post# 556480 , Reply# 136   11/14/2011 at 10:44 (4,568 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
NBC-CBS feud

Some of it was politics, but some of it was compatibility with B&W television. By the time they were ready to roll out color tv, B&W had significant market penetration, but these sets were new (most less than five years old) and had cost a lot of money to consumers. A system that was not compatible with existing tv's was doomed to failure. The government was not going to approve a system that was incompatible with millions of sets that were acquired at great sacrifice by middle class Americans.

On the other hand, adoption of the RCA system meant that the US was stuck on a 525 line system (or whatever the resolution was) until the 2000s. On my first visit to Europe (1973, exchange student), my untrained eye immediately noted that color tv was superior in Europe, with a sharper picture. What I didn't realize was that Europe's system had over 600 lines, having been adopted in c. 1967.

Another issue was cost and lack of color programming. Color programs cost more to produce and to broadcast than B&W. An entirely separate broadcasting system devoted to the CBS color system was simply not feasible, since there was so little color programming available. At the inception, color was limited to specials like the Rose Parade or Peter Pan or the famous Ford 50th Anniversary Show (Mary Martin/Ethel Merman, etc.). The latter can be seen (in portions) on YouTube. The recording is in B&W but I understand the original was broadcast live in color (could be wrong about this).

Regular (non-specials) network prime time shows did not begin to switch to color until c. 1960. The Virginian and Bonanza were among the first to go to color. Regular network sitcoms and dramas were not all-color until 1965-67, with ABC being the last to switch. What is really illuminating is the fact that the second and third seasons of the Lucy Show (63-64 and 64-65) were filmed in color, but were broadcast (per CBS protocol) in black and white. The original viewers who saw the Lucy Show 1963-65 in prime time saw it in B&W, while the syndicated reruns were presented in color. Desilu understood that the existence of color prints of the series would boost its future value. Only the first season (62-63) remains in B&W on reruns or boxed sets.

The recent transition to all-digital broadcast tv in the USA caused much less consternation and fewer transition issues than a CBS color system would have generated. First, most cable systems convert to analog anyway, so existing analog sets work with most cable companies, either line-in or with a cable box. The only people really affected were those with rooftop or rabbit ear antennas, and a $100 digital-converter box solved problems for those who wished to continue with analog sets. $100 in 2009 terms was much less money than $200-300 spent in the early 1950s for a relatively new B&W that was about to be rendered obsolete by CBS color.


Post# 556488 , Reply# 137   11/14/2011 at 11:11 (4,568 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
1960s color tv prices

Thank you bwoods for posting the GE price list. I seem to remember that the Porta Color was the first color tv sold for $200, so I wonder how the price list---apparently for 23" models---shows tv's priced as low as $200.

Our first color set was a 19" table top model that came with a cart, won in a Lions Club raffle when my father bought the tickets he failed to sell to others. He promptly forgot about the tickets, but one night when he and I returned from a hockey game, my mother told us she'd gotten a call from the tv retailer to "come and pick up the tv that you won" and in her station wagon tailgate sat the new set.

I remember checking prices of the set we won at that time and it seemed to go for $350 at most retailers. That was like $2500 today.


Post# 556492 , Reply# 138   11/14/2011 at 11:29 (4,568 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        
Admiral made the Airline color sets that Montgomery Ward sol

rp2813's profile picture

Allen, thanks for the run-down on who made what for who.

 

I thought that Admiral color set in post #89 bore a remarkable resemblance to our 1962 Airline black & white, shown in the picture below, taken from the product literature for the set.  I'm thinking Wards may not have yet offered color sets in 1962. I suppose that by 1962, Admiral was as close to the inferiority of Norge as Wards could get for their TV vendor.

 

This particular Airline was too early for the tilt-out controls, but they were located in the same area.  The top right "drawer" on the cabinet actually slid down to reveal the controls.

 

Leave it to Wards to use something as awful (and yet colorful) as the image of a clown to show off their B&W televisions.

 


Post# 556518 , Reply# 139   11/14/2011 at 14:23 (4,568 days old) by cadman (Cedar Falls, IA)        

cadman's profile picture
Tolivac, actually you can have color on a B&W set, in fact an entire system was devised to do so using both b&w cameras and receivers. No chroma. No tri-color tubes. Check this out! www.earlytelevision.org/butterfie...


Also, see my post halfway up about that commercial. It relied on the same Fechner effect but of course everyone sees the colors differently. -Cory


Post# 556519 , Reply# 140   11/14/2011 at 14:33 (4,568 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

The question is whose television sets did Wards sell?

It's kind of screwy. Cortron Industries was a company that made Wards television sets for them. Admiral bought Cortron. Were the sets then supplied by Cortron designs, or did Admiral dump those designs and provide Wards with their Admiral designs?

And then in 1970 Admiral became a spec builder of TV's for the Emerson & Dumont brands. So this made Admiral one of the largest of the private label manufacturers.

It seems after Admiral left the consumer electronics market, Montgomery wards bought their sets from different manufacturers such as RCA, Sony, JVC, etc.

At the time Admiral was bought out by Rockwell International. They saw the imports from Asia already eating into the American market and got out of the appliance and television markets quickly, selling them off to somebody else.





This post was last edited 11/14/2011 at 14:54
Post# 556525 , Reply# 141   11/14/2011 at 14:57 (4,568 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

And the largest supplier of Color CRTs was:

Name Number
RCA .... 2,300 (in thousands of units)
Sylvania/GTE ..... 1,150
Zenith ..... 1,100

So I take it that a lot of different brand sets had Sylvania picture tubes in them?


Post# 556542 , Reply# 142   11/14/2011 at 15:44 (4,568 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        

rp2813's profile picture

The guy that fixed my 1950 Admiral advised that in the early days of TV, Admiral was right up there with RCA for quality and market share. 

 

If we rely on the messed-with-for-TV version of Admiral history per "Mad Men," in the early 60's the brand was slipping and the suggestion from the advertising agency was to target the demographic that was buying their products, which was the segment of the population that fell somewhere below the middle class.

 

This would agree with Ward's marketing of lower quality appliances, electronics and power tools that cost less than the better quality items that Sears was known for.


Post# 556552 , Reply# 143   11/14/2011 at 16:32 (4,568 days old) by paulg (My sweet home... Chicago)        
Wards = Hoffman/Cortron, Wells-Gardner, Admiral

paulg's profile picture
In short, the 1960's Montgomery Ward color TVs were often Hoffman -
But there were many Montgomery Ward televisions made by Wells-Gardner too. Look for models beginning with WGEC or WG for Wells Gardner Electronics Corp.
That Wards Airline "5235" was likely the "WG5235" which would make it a Wells-Gardner set.
Wells-Gardner still operates in Chicago. Warwick, Wells-Gardner and Admiral were the three big OEMs in Chicago. Boy, with Zenith and Motorola too - Chicago seemed like THE place for television manufacturing.
I recall that after about 1970, Admiral chassis seemed to drift in their design style. I suspect they were using some Hoffman designs although i cannot prove that. (And why not? They owned them.) Rockwell International didn't come into play until about 1974.
In the 1970s, Admiral's designs became more refined under Rockwell International. I remember that Admiral and Wards TVs then became largely identical.
Admiral seemed to make some iffy decisions near the end. Their 1965-1970 picture-tube manufacturing plant opened when rectangular picture tubes were in short supply - ran into issues when the industry became over-supplied. Their water system was allegedly sabotaged and the tube quality dropped. I believe the phosphors wouldn't stick.
Admiral bought Hoffman/Cortron, a fading color-tv manufacturer in about 1970, just as the Japanese sets were taking hold.
Admiral supplied CARTRIVISION sets under Wards, Admiral and Emerson brands but that recording system went bust very quickly. This was about 1972. By 1974 Admiral was sunk.
Losers, losers, losers so it seemed.
I found Admiral an interesting company. I worked with quite of few ex-employees of that company. They seemed to do a good job of remaining marketable but went about it in somewhat screwy ways.
Did you know Admiral made their own microwave ovens in the 1970s? That seemed like a smart decision as Magic Chef continued to do so after purchasing Admiral in 1979. Wards used SHARP to make the microwaves through the 1970s and essentially through to the end.
Unrelated clarification: When CBS decided to enter the TV manufacturing business they bought AIR-KING, a small TV manufacturer. Air-King brand went away and was replaced by the CBS brand.
The tubes used in the sets were CBS-HYTRON


Post# 556559 , Reply# 144   11/14/2011 at 16:58 (4,568 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

Hey Paul, thanks for the enlightenment.
While researching this, I found that Cortron was already making Hoffman electronics when Admiral bought them. I remember the big Admiral sign, not too far away from the big Motorola sign on I-294 around Franklin Park, just before you got to the ORD exit. I mean these were big Las Vegas style boards with animation on them.

Yes, I did notice that lots of color tv manufacturing was done in the midwest and especially in Chicago. Admiral also had a plant in Quincy, IL. And later on built their televisions in Taiwan with a division called Admiral Overseas Manufacturing Company.

Admiral had quite a few fans 1964-1968 or so. I knew quite a number of people with them. But search Ebay or other places where vintage console type of televisions are sold and you don't see many Admirals or Magnavoxes or even Sylvania's or GE's. Usually it's either RCA or Zenith still available. Sure other brands are available, but the models available today are Japanese models sold under the old brand name.

I was surprised that Admiral went out of business so quickly. All of the stores we shopped that carried RCA or Zenith also carried Admiral. It was when you got to your small repair shop that also sold new TV's is where you'd find only one brand or maybe two. It's either a Zenith shop or and RCA shop.


Post# 556570 , Reply# 145   11/14/2011 at 17:19 (4,568 days old) by goatfarmer (South Bend, home of Champions)        

goatfarmer's profile picture

Man, that's one scary looking clown! Looks like a J W Gacy pic!

 

I remember that Admiral sign, along I 294. We saw it on our way to Wisconsin for a vacation. That thing was there for years it seems.


Post# 556579 , Reply# 146   11/14/2011 at 18:07 (4,568 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        
I think

that this thread is getting too long, especially for people who have slower connections. Please make any new responses to Color TV brand popularity - 1960's Part 2.

Post# 556585 , Reply# 147   11/14/2011 at 18:31 (4,568 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        
Admiral

rp2813's profile picture

I didn't find a new thread, so am posting here.

 

I was going to mention Admiral's bigger-than-Vegas animated display smack in the middle of Times Square.  You can't miss it in most of the vintage TS film footage.  Only a company that was riding high could afford what was arguably the ultimate in prime advertising space for the entire free world.


Post# 556628 , Reply# 148   11/14/2011 at 21:20 (4,568 days old) by whirlcool (Just North Of Houston, Texas)        

In fact if you look closely, the Admiral sign in Times Square is right above the Braniff sign!

Post# 556637 , Reply# 149   11/14/2011 at 22:23 (4,568 days old) by Spankomatic (Ukiah,CA)        

spankomatic's profile picture

We had one like this (1964 Magnavox) when I was growing up.


Post# 556638 , Reply# 150   11/14/2011 at 22:24 (4,568 days old) by Spankomatic (Ukiah,CA)        

spankomatic's profile picture

Oh! Can't forget the remote!


Post# 556684 , Reply# 151   11/15/2011 at 01:56 (4,568 days old) by Launderess (Quiet Please, There´s a Lady on Stage)        
You Boys And Your Toys (Electronics)

launderess's profile picture
*LOL*

I could sit here all day listening to y'all go back and forth with this interesting conversation, but there are a few things I should be rinsing out. *LOL*

My color television story? Boring and simple. We had a B/W set (Emerson) until one day Mother Dear redecorated the living room and then we had a nice new Zenith color television with wood cabinet.

That wood cabinet was about as close as one got to the thing (when polishing as part of one's household chores), as the old B/W set was banished downstairs to the rumpus room for we children to watch. The living-room and thus color set were strictly off limits for us, though we were allowed in when one or both parents were watching something. *LOL*



Post# 556687 , Reply# 152   11/15/2011 at 02:11 (4,568 days old) by rp2813 (Sannazay)        
Magnavox Remote

rp2813's profile picture

Oh yeah Jim, I remember friends had a portable with that same remote.  Miles of button travel and at the end of it, resistance, a thunk and then it went "Psssshhhhh."

 

Apologies for adding to this thread.

 

Now everybody click over to part two!


Post# 556761 , Reply# 153   11/15/2011 at 10:19 (4,567 days old) by PassatDoc (Orange County, California)        
Zenith Space Command remote hijacked by a dog

We had relatives in San Bernardino with a Zenith color tv perched in a built-in custom closet occupying a full wall (opposite the bed) of the master bedroom. They had a miniature (not toy) poodle with an ID tag and license tag on his collar. These medals would jingle as the dog walked around, and sometimes he'd hit the right frequency and turn the tv on or off by accident. I remember watching the tv, the dog would walk in and either the channel would change or the tv would turn itself off.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

The Discuss-o-Mat has stopped, buzzer is sounding!!!
If you would like to reply to this thread please log-in...

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy