Thread Number: 483
recommendations for a new top loader |
[Down to Last] | ![]() |
Post# 49064 , Reply# 4   11/12/2004 at 07:45 (6,966 days old) by kenmore1978 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Did she say WHY she wouldn't consider a FL machine? Have all the advantages been pointed out to her? |
Post# 49070 , Reply# 5   11/12/2004 at 10:57 (6,966 days old) by Launderess ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 49074 , Reply# 6   11/12/2004 at 14:25 (6,966 days old) by christd1 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
If she is anything like my wife, her husband is on these sites learning about product (too much!!) and she is against any suggestion he has. |
Post# 49085 , Reply# 7   11/12/2004 at 18:17 (6,966 days old) by Launderess ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
She who has to use it, get's to choose it! Any husband who strays from this theme, does so at his own peril. For if the suggested appliance does not work he is in for countless lectures that begin with "well if you just had listened to me........ but NO, you wouldn't listen". Marriage,much like raising children is about choosing your battles wisely. In some matters it's best to concede territory rather than face an attack on your flank! *LOL* Launderess |
Post# 49102 , Reply# 10   11/12/2004 at 22:15 (6,966 days old) by laundramatt (Youngstown, Ohio)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Maybe she wants her laundry done in a couple of hours or less. With a frontloader, it could take her all day. (Long cycle times) |
Post# 49109 , Reply# 11   11/13/2004 at 00:51 (6,966 days old) by medrivewild ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Cycle times are not that much longer. If she refuses to accept society then have her buy the Fisher & Paykel. To buy any other top loader is a waste of money. |
Post# 49110 , Reply# 12   11/13/2004 at 01:55 (6,966 days old) by Launderess ![]() |
  | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |